BioWare: "calling the next game Mass Effect 4 is a disservice"

  • 126 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
It doesn't have to be called Mass Effect at all. Give it a new name.blackace
wide affliction
Avatar image for Cellpwn
Cellpwn

1052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Cellpwn
Member since 2007 • 1052 Posts

Throw back in the RPG elements and ship combat, and I'll forget about that whole "Mass Effect 3" thing that happened.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#54 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]That's what I'm talinbout - also included should be well done, player controlled, surface, air and space vehicles. :D

SecretPolice

:o that might be a bit of a huge undertaking if you include air vehicles!

Eh, perhaps I'm just spoiled by Bungie dev'ed Halo Reach that included all that and it's just a FPS. :o C'mon Bio, you can do it. :P

Actual space exploration and combat, ala Frontier: Elite or Evochron Mercenary, would be beyond epic! We could build our own ship and get parts for it...oh boy!!!

Unfortunatly, it wont happen :P

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45531 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] :o that might be a bit of a huge undertaking if you include air vehicles!PAL360

Eh, perhaps I'm just spoiled by Bungie dev'ed Halo Reach that included all that and it's just a FPS. :o C'mon Bio, you can do it. :P

Actual space exploration and combat, ala Frontier: Elite or Evochron Mercenary, would be beyond epic! We could build our own ship and get parts for it...oh boy!!!

Unfortunatly, it wont happen :P

But I want it all. :cry:

Tis the art of negotiation, ask for way more than what you'l actually settle for. :P

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] :o that might be a bit of a huge undertaking if you include air vehicles!PAL360

Eh, perhaps I'm just spoiled by Bungie dev'ed Halo Reach that included all that and it's just a FPS. :o C'mon Bio, you can do it. :P

Actual space exploration and combat, ala Frontier: Elite or Evochron Mercenary, would be beyond epic! We could build our own ship and get parts for it...oh boy!!!

Unfortunatly, it wont happen :P

i'd literally crap my pants if it had ship to ship combat.
Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#57 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts

[QUOTE="drinkerofjuice"]Whatever the story may be, I want it to be years before the Commander Shep saga. They have near endless possibilities with the universe to the extent where the trilogy can be easily dwarfed.blue_hazy_basic
I'd be excited by either. There are so many rich opportunities in the pre-shep universe to set a story, but at the same time the shattered pieces of whats left after 3 is so intriguing ....

They really can only place a prequel between the 26 year gap of the first contact wars and the beginning of Mass Effect. The reason for this is mostly marketing, not having any humans in which people can identify with in the game would be grievous. I'd be all for a game in the universe with no Humans, but they just wouldn't do that. 

It would have to be an even shorter time scale because the first contact war setting would be extremely boring. It would just be humans vs everything else.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Eh, perhaps I'm just spoiled by Bungie dev'ed Halo Reach that included all that and it's just a FPS. :o C'mon Bio, you can do it. :P

blue_hazy_basic

Actual space exploration and combat, ala Frontier: Elite or Evochron Mercenary, would be beyond epic! We could build our own ship and get parts for it...oh boy!!!

Unfortunatly, it wont happen :P

i'd literally crap my pants if it had ship to ship combat.

  And we would have two conclusions to that.. A) SWTOR in which people were b!tching how lame and linear the space combat was, when it was suppose to be a mini game.. B) Spore a game that promised everything.. And it did do that, at the depth of a teaspoon the entire way..  

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#59 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

But I want it all. :cry:

Tis the art of negotiation, ask for way more than what you'l actually settle for. :P

SecretPolice

i'd literally crap my pants if it had ship to ship combat.

blue_hazy_basic

It would be soo good!

To be honest, when Mass Effect 1 was announced with a huge explorable world, this and that, i thought we would have that kind of real time freedom! They failed at that, but thankfully surpassed the hype in everything else!

Avatar image for deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8

22399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
Member since 2007 • 22399 Posts
I thought the disservice started 10 minutes before the credits?
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Actual space exploration and combat, ala Frontier: Elite or Evochron Mercenary, would be beyond epic! We could build our own ship and get parts for it...oh boy!!!

Unfortunatly, it wont happen :P

sSubZerOo

i'd literally crap my pants if it had GOOD* ship to ship combat.

  And we would have two conclusions to that.. A) SWTOR in which people were b!tching how lame and linear the space combat was, when it was suppose to be a mini game.. B) Spore a game that promised everything.. And it did do that, at the depth of a teaspoon the entire way..  

Fixed* :P Spore was my biggest disappointment this gen, u made me sad ... And I realise that adding space combat to an RPG like ME would be an improbable use of Bioware's resources, but a man can dream dammit! A man can dream!
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

But I want it all. :cry:

Tis the art of negotiation, ask for way more than what you'l actually settle for. :P

PAL360

i'd literally crap my pants if it had ship to ship combat.

blue_hazy_basic

It would be soo good!

To be honest, when Mass Effect 1 was announced with a huge explorable world, this and that, i thought we would have that kind of real time freedom! They failed at that, but thankfully surpassed the hype in everything else!

Someone here got it early and I remember talking to them about the worlds, thinking we could explore them all a bit like KOTOR and being extremely disappointed in how they turned out. Loved ME1 to pieces though!
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
I've loved all the games, so I'm ok with whatever they are doing.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#64 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Shepard's story is done. I'm cool with that, I just want to get back into that universe with a new story arc.

Hopefully by the time the new game comes out someone can mention the series without some dumbass whining about the ending.

Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

To be honest, you can create any game genre from the Mass Effect Universe, an MMO, an FPS, Open World, Card games, RTS, Even racer lol. Seriously the Mass Effect Universe is that rich enough to house that much because its an entire universe in its own right. The thing that could help Bioware is if they employ alot more creative minds that can help them create unique game genres in the Mass Effect Universe worth caring about

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

I think it is time for this industry to start hiring new writers, no one can make a new game anymore? I mean how many more sequels are we going to see with these games. Its getting ridiculous.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

I think it is time for this industry to start hiring new writers, no one can make a new game anymore? I mean how many more sequels are we going to see how these games. Its getting ridiculous.

xscrapzx
It would be a new game though, just set in the same universe. I love the idea of having a game with a rich background and lore, like the elder scrolls.
Avatar image for FastEddie2121
FastEddie2121

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 FastEddie2121
Member since 2009 • 3081 Posts
Looks like they are distancing themselves from ME3. Not a bad move on their part, but too little too late, as the saying goes.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#69 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts

I cannot comprehend how anyone can say ME1 is better than ME2. And after I saw people defending ME1's DLC, I just gave up any effort to. 

padaporra
Yeah...ME1 is pretty much overrated by the fanbase. Nevermind Pinnacle Station is terrible. Pretending to be an action game but featuring hit or miss dice rolls is a frusterating no no. ME1 has by far the worst character development in the series, so bad that they had more development in between ME1 and ME2 than in ME1 itself. Wrex is the only character in ME1 to get real character development. Tali gets abssolutely no development at all. Hell, I forgot she was on the ship. ME1's plot was also pretty contrived, more so than ME3. Its quite funny how the idiot fanbase accuses ME3 of reliance on contrivance when ME1 is way worse. With Vigil actually being a Deus Ex Machina played staright. ME3 is actually strongest of the series...it has both a focused plotline than ME2 lacked, while having major character development that ME1 lacked. its that fans are too stupid to realize this while complaining about the already fixed ending they don't get.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="padaporra"]

I cannot comprehend how anyone can say ME1 is better than ME2. And after I saw people defending ME1's DLC, I just gave up any effort to. 

texasgoldrush
Yeah...ME1 is pretty much overrated by the fanbase. Nevermind Pinnacle Station is terrible. Pretending to be an action game but featuring hit or miss dice rolls is a frusterating no no. ME1 has by far the worst character development in the series, so bad that they had more development in between ME1 and ME2 than in ME1 itself. Wrex is the only character in ME1 to get real character development. Tali gets abssolutely no development at all. Hell, I forgot she was on the ship. ME1's plot was also pretty contrived, more so than ME3. Its quite funny how the idiot fanbase accuses ME3 of reliance on contrivance when ME1 is way worse. With Vigil actually being a Deus Ex Machina played staright. ME3 is actually strongest of the series...it has both a focused plotline than ME2 lacked, while having major character development that ME1 lacked. its that fans are too stupid to realize this while complaining about the already fixed ending they don't get.

My brian joost gat damiged.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#71 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="padaporra"]

I cannot comprehend how anyone can say ME1 is better than ME2. And after I saw people defending ME1's DLC, I just gave up any effort to. 

blue_hazy_basic
Yeah...ME1 is pretty much overrated by the fanbase. Nevermind Pinnacle Station is terrible. Pretending to be an action game but featuring hit or miss dice rolls is a frusterating no no. ME1 has by far the worst character development in the series, so bad that they had more development in between ME1 and ME2 than in ME1 itself. Wrex is the only character in ME1 to get real character development. Tali gets abssolutely no development at all. Hell, I forgot she was on the ship. ME1's plot was also pretty contrived, more so than ME3. Its quite funny how the idiot fanbase accuses ME3 of reliance on contrivance when ME1 is way worse. With Vigil actually being a Deus Ex Machina played staright. ME3 is actually strongest of the series...it has both a focused plotline than ME2 lacked, while having major character development that ME1 lacked. its that fans are too stupid to realize this while complaining about the already fixed ending they don't get.

My brian joost gat damiged.

Please....sorry, ME1 isn't as good as you remember. Hell, Joker only gets one conversation tree and absolutely NO development in ME1...look at the development he gets in ME2 and ME3. Or Tali's entrance to the series also being a Deus Ex Machina to get evidence on Saren.... Sorry, but fans have nostalgia glasses on.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#72 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts
It doesn't have to be called Mass Effect at all. Give it a new name.blackace
Mass Shift would work.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="blackace"]It doesn't have to be called Mass Effect at all. Give it a new name.texasgoldrush
Mass Shift would work.

What about a Thorian based game called Moss Effect? :P
Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#74 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

if they wanted to make a ME4 they should have chosen a less apocalyptic ending in ME3

SecretPolice

Halo was their inspiration so perhaps an umm, ODST of sorts. :o

It wouldn't surprise me :P
Avatar image for deactivated-57d307c5efcda
deactivated-57d307c5efcda

1302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 deactivated-57d307c5efcda
Member since 2009 • 1302 Posts

[QUOTE="padaporra"]

I cannot comprehend how anyone can say ME1 is better than ME2. And after I saw people defending ME1's DLC, I just gave up any effort to.

PAL360

I loved both, but overall i prefer ME1.

ME1 - better story, better soundtrack (imo), better RPG elements and better exploration (loved exploring uncharted worlds with mako).

ME2 - better graphics, better gameplay and loved some characters.

This ^ right here. This says it all.

I'm glad i'm not the only person who enjoyed the mako exploration sequences. 

Avatar image for Fossil-
Fossil-

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Fossil-
Member since 2006 • 351 Posts
Them still existing is a disservice to the videogaming world.Salt_The_Fries
Lol this
Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#77 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

So basically it's new game/storyline in the Mass Effect universe

EPaul

Maybe it's a reboot with a Hipster!Shepard.

Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

I want a war for control of the galaxy between all of Commander Shepard's bastard children.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

Making Mass Effect 4 is a disservice.

Let it die before you ruin it completely.

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts
The universe is not destroyed because of the events in ME3. The only difference is no mass relays, a lot more destroyed cities, and no geth. The next story would just not allow jumping around the galaxy like the other ones because of the mass relays.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#81 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="padaporra"]

I cannot comprehend how anyone can say ME1 is better than ME2. And after I saw people defending ME1's DLC, I just gave up any effort to.

ryangcnx-2

I loved both, but overall i prefer ME1.

ME1 - better story, better soundtrack (imo), better RPG elements and better exploration (loved exploring uncharted worlds with mako).

ME2 - better graphics, better gameplay and loved some characters.

This ^ right here. This says it all.

I'm glad i'm not the only person who enjoyed the mako exploration sequences.

I'm sure we are not alone on this, buddy. Exploration solutions in ME2 and 3 were terrible!

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#82 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

The universe is not destroyed because of the events in ME3. The only difference is no mass relays, a lot more destroyed cities, and no geth. The next story would just not allow jumping around the galaxy like the other ones because of the mass relays.CanYouDiglt
Actually in the extended cut they end up putting the relays back together, which is really lame. Like they wanted that major point in the end, that galactic interconnection is dismantled. Then when everyone rightfully thought it was stupid and poorly handled, they said "na j/k everyone knows how they work and it will be cake to reassemble."

I figured after the dreadful original ending a cool pseudo sequel would be trying to keep the stranded aliens from killing eachother on earth, or maybe a game where you explore the solar system for a way to fix the relay, and only then would they reconnect with the galaxy. But na they pretty much ruined the complexity of any story taking place right after ME3 by putting everything back together in the end.

And no, I don't care about spoilers, it's a ME4 thread and it's been a year.

Avatar image for EpicGame
EpicGame

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 EpicGame
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
Meh, New IP would be much better.
Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#85 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

Well I hope they do something with the Rachni wars.

Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#86 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts

i can kind of see where he is coming from, but i don't think the WWI and II analogy works. there weren't really any soldiers in WWI that had the impact that shepard did in the ME trilogy. i mean, shepard stops the universe from being destroyed at least 3 times in the main games, probably more in the DLC, and then some of the ME3 ending options would alter everything about the universe. anything set after that time frame would need to do more than gloss over what he/she did.

as for what to do with the series, i think it needs a new technology. the big conceit of the universe, that not only made the fiction possible but also drew me in initially, was the mass effect and all it's potential uses. another mass effect-scale technology would freshen things up again.

that said, i'm wary of bioware management after they caved in to fanboys in ME3. i might wait to see how they handle the inevitable next controversy they run into before i bite on another bioware game.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#87 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts
Oh, so the next title in the series will be called Days+Of+Our+Lives.jpg
Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts

I just hope the next Xbox gets it as an exclusive or timed exclusive.  Would be great for 720 owners.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#89 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts

i can kind of see where he is coming from, but i don't think the WWI and II analogy works. there weren't really any soldiers in WWI that had the impact that shepard did in the ME trilogy. i mean, shepard stops the universe from being destroyed at least 3 times in the main games, probably more in the DLC, and then some of the ME3 ending options would alter everything about the universe. anything set after that time frame would need to do more than gloss over what he/she did.

as for what to do with the series, i think it needs a new technology. the big conceit of the universe, that not only made the fiction possible but also drew me in initially, was the mass effect and all it's potential uses. another mass effect-scale technology would freshen things up again.

that said, i'm wary of bioware management after they caved in to fanboys in ME3. i might wait to see how they handle the inevitable next controversy they run into before i bite on another bioware game.

LoG-Sacrament
No, they did not cave in to fanboys, except for a couple things. In fact, when many wanted the ending CHANGED, they said no. Also take into account that the writers said that they did not want fans to see the ending as apocolyptic and thats not what they were trying to portray, so the writers also had an effect. They did what CD Projeckt did with The Witcher 2, expand and flesh out the sudden and rushed ending, while giving an epilogue slide show based on your choices. In fact, I wouldn't doubt that Bioware looked at CD Projeckts fix for TW2 when making their fix for ME3.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#90 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts

[QUOTE="ryangcnx-2"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I loved both, but overall i prefer ME1.

ME1 - better story, better soundtrack (imo), better RPG elements and better exploration (loved exploring uncharted worlds with mako).

ME2 - better graphics, better gameplay and loved some characters.

PAL360

This ^ right here. This says it all.

I'm glad i'm not the only person who enjoyed the mako exploration sequences.

I'm sure we are not alone on this, buddy. Exploration solutions in ME2 and 3 were terrible!

However, the series and the narrative doesn't really allow for too much exploration. The mako exploration sequences are a bore, plain and simple, with dead lifeless planets (except for their skylines), with the same copy paste buildings. Bioware doesn't really do RPGs where you explore, thats not their MO.
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#91 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
[QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"]

i can kind of see where he is coming from, but i don't think the WWI and II analogy works. there weren't really any soldiers in WWI that had the impact that shepard did in the ME trilogy. i mean, shepard stops the universe from being destroyed at least 3 times in the main games, probably more in the DLC, and then some of the ME3 ending options would alter everything about the universe. anything set after that time frame would need to do more than gloss over what he/she did.

as for what to do with the series, i think it needs a new technology. the big conceit of the universe, that not only made the fiction possible but also drew me in initially, was the mass effect and all it's potential uses. another mass effect-scale technology would freshen things up again.

that said, i'm wary of bioware management after they caved in to fanboys in ME3. i might wait to see how they handle the inevitable next controversy they run into before i bite on another bioware game.

texasgoldrush
No, they did not cave in to fanboys, except for a couple things. In fact, when many wanted the ending CHANGED, they said no. Also take into account that the writers said that they did not want fans to see the ending as apocolyptic and thats not what they were trying to portray, so the writers also had an effect. They did what CD Projeckt did with The Witcher 2, expand and flesh out the sudden and rushed ending, while giving an epilogue slide show based on your choices. In fact, I wouldn't doubt that Bioware looked at CD Projeckts fix for TW2 when making their fix for ME3.

they felt they needed to explain the ending to more people and they did so by altering the game. i wouldn't have a problem if they had a discussion such as "this is how we interpret the ending," but i don't like the idea of going into the ending and adding more cut-scenes to appease consumers. no matter what the end result in the game is, it makes it feel cheap.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]Oh, so the next title in the series will be called Days+Of+Our+Lives.jpg

I lol'd and lol'd.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#93 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"]

i can kind of see where he is coming from, but i don't think the WWI and II analogy works. there weren't really any soldiers in WWI that had the impact that shepard did in the ME trilogy. i mean, shepard stops the universe from being destroyed at least 3 times in the main games, probably more in the DLC, and then some of the ME3 ending options would alter everything about the universe. anything set after that time frame would need to do more than gloss over what he/she did.

as for what to do with the series, i think it needs a new technology. the big conceit of the universe, that not only made the fiction possible but also drew me in initially, was the mass effect and all it's potential uses. another mass effect-scale technology would freshen things up again.

that said, i'm wary of bioware management after they caved in to fanboys in ME3. i might wait to see how they handle the inevitable next controversy they run into before i bite on another bioware game.

LoG-Sacrament
Except for one thing (the relays, which they restored back to their original idea for them), they altered nothing. No, they did not cave in to fanboys, except for a couple things. In fact, when many wanted the ending CHANGED, they said no. Also take into account that the writers said that they did not want fans to see the ending as apocolyptic and thats not what they were trying to portray, so the writers also had an effect. They did what CD Projeckt did with The Witcher 2, expand and flesh out the sudden and rushed ending, while giving an epilogue slide show based on your choices. In fact, I wouldn't doubt that Bioware looked at CD Projeckts fix for TW2 when making their fix for ME3.

they felt they needed to explain the ending to more people and they did so by altering the game. i wouldn't have a problem if they had a discussion such as "this is how we interpret the ending," but i don't like the idea of going into the ending and adding more cut-scenes to appease consumers. no matter what the end result in the game is, it makes it feel cheap.

However, the writers felt that they also did not communicate the ending well and did not want fans to interpit it in ways that had no intention for fans to interpet. And really, they didn't appease everyone, many wanted a happy ending...they didn't get it. And really, the memorial wall sequence was a thematic keystone for ME3. They made a compromise here. And it was fair. And Bioware absolutely needed to flesh out the Catalyst. THIS had to be done. No ifs ands or buts.
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#94 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] No, they did not cave in to fanboys, except for a couple things. In fact, when many wanted the ending CHANGED, they said no. Also take into account that the writers said that they did not want fans to see the ending as apocolyptic and thats not what they were trying to portray, so the writers also had an effect. They did what CD Projeckt did with The Witcher 2, expand and flesh out the sudden and rushed ending, while giving an epilogue slide show based on your choices. In fact, I wouldn't doubt that Bioware looked at CD Projeckts fix for TW2 when making their fix for ME3.

they felt they needed to explain the ending to more people and they did so by altering the game. i wouldn't have a problem if they had a discussion such as "this is how we interpret the ending," but i don't like the idea of going into the ending and adding more cut-scenes to appease consumers. no matter what the end result in the game is, it makes it feel cheap.

However, the writers felt that they also did not communicate the ending well and did not want fans to interpit it in ways that had no intention for fans to interpet. And really, they didn't appease everyone, many wanted a happy ending...they didn't get it. And really, the memorial wall sequence was a thematic keystone for ME3. They made a compromise here. And it was fair. And Bioware absolutely needed to flesh out the Catalyst. THIS had to be done. No ifs ands or buts.

if that's how they interpret the ending then so be it. bioware was talking about how great the ending was before release and then like bad salesmen they can suddenly feel they didn't communicate it well? it was for appeasement.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Them still existing is a disservice to the videogaming world.Salt_The_Fries
Avatar image for GreekGameManiac
GreekGameManiac

6439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#96 GreekGameManiac
Member since 2010 • 6439 Posts

Whatever it is,i'm certainly interested.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#97 texasgoldrush  Online
Member since 2003 • 15245 Posts
[QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"] they felt they needed to explain the ending to more people and they did so by altering the game. i wouldn't have a problem if they had a discussion such as "this is how we interpret the ending," but i don't like the idea of going into the ending and adding more cut-scenes to appease consumers. no matter what the end result in the game is, it makes it feel cheap.

However, the writers felt that they also did not communicate the ending well and did not want fans to interpit it in ways that had no intention for fans to interpet. And really, they didn't appease everyone, many wanted a happy ending...they didn't get it. And really, the memorial wall sequence was a thematic keystone for ME3. They made a compromise here. And it was fair. And Bioware absolutely needed to flesh out the Catalyst. THIS had to be done. No ifs ands or buts.

if that's how they interpret the ending then so be it. bioware was talking about how great the ending was before release and then like bad salesmen they can suddenly feel they didn't communicate it well? it was for appeasement.

No they weren't....in fact, they admitted that it would divide fans and that some would hate it. And yet, once again, they didn't try to appease everyone. They stuck with their guns. Really most ending haters wanted the Catalyst gone and removed entirely, however, Bioware EXPANDED his role. Nevermind the "Refuse" ending was kind of a middle finger to many of the whiners as well.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#98 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
I expect something like Chrono Trigger and Chrono Cross or Xenogears and Xenosaga.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#99 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

Please, use its full title: Mass Effect 4 Kidz.

Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#100 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] However, the writers felt that they also did not communicate the ending well and did not want fans to interpit it in ways that had no intention for fans to interpet. And really, they didn't appease everyone, many wanted a happy ending...they didn't get it. And really, the memorial wall sequence was a thematic keystone for ME3. They made a compromise here. And it was fair. And Bioware absolutely needed to flesh out the Catalyst. THIS had to be done. No ifs ands or buts.

if that's how they interpret the ending then so be it. bioware was talking about how great the ending was before release and then like bad salesmen they can suddenly feel they didn't communicate it well? it was for appeasement.

No they weren't....in fact, they admitted that it would divide fans and that some would hate it. And yet, once again, they didn't try to appease everyone. They stuck with their guns. Really most ending haters wanted the Catalyst gone and removed entirely, however, Bioware EXPANDED his role. Nevermind the "Refuse" ending was kind of a middle finger to many of the whiners as well.

here is casey hudson hyping the ending as "amazing" and "very definitive." here he comes off as very proud of it as well.

if they really wanted to stick with their guns, they would have left it as it was. some people would have liked it and some wouldn't have, but that would have been fine. some people like the new ending and that's fine too. but honestly, i don't like the idea of going back and changing (or "expanding") a major part of the game because fans complained. and let's say for second that bioware did make changes just to tell off a few people. that's cutting off the nose to spite the face.

i'm actually one of gamers that didn't like the game (not for the ending, but it's a long story. ask if you care). however, i wouldn't want bioware to go back and start throwing stuff in until i shut up. it's because i don't want to order a game. i want to try one. gaming is much more exciting when i could potentially play something that's so good i never knew i wanted it.