Blu-Ray was not worth it for Sony.

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for beachbob1
beachbob1

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 beachbob1
Member since 2007 • 518 Posts

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.Albanian_Killa

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

I am already downloading HD(1080p) movies on the 360 and with TW Cable so in 4 to 5 years I would think it would be pretty standard. Which could translate into huge losses for Blu Ray and anyone cuaght behind the times like Blockbuster was.(they will still make money but I dont see the windfall like VHS and DVD)

Avatar image for RyuHayabusaX
RyuHayabusaX

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 RyuHayabusaX
Member since 2005 • 7838 Posts
Movies wise, MS is doing great b/c they aren't losing money on some blu-ray drive. The Marketplace is definitely great, and of course Sony has it as well, and with increased speed in the future, downloading our games will be used more often.
Avatar image for virtuas
virtuas

1312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 virtuas
Member since 2007 • 1312 Posts
[QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.beachbob1

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

I am already downloading HD(1080p) movies on the 360 and with TW Cable so in 4 to 5 years I would think it would be pretty standard. Which could translate into huge losses for Blu Ray and anyone cuaght behind the times like Blockbuster was.(they will still make money but I dont see the windfall like VHS and DVD)

arent you egotistical. you're only thinking of your situation. how about the rest of the world?

Avatar image for RyuHayabusaX
RyuHayabusaX

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 RyuHayabusaX
Member since 2005 • 7838 Posts
[QUOTE="beachbob1"][QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.virtuas

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

I am already downloading HD(1080p) movies on the 360 and with TW Cable so in 4 to 5 years I would think it would be pretty standard. Which could translate into huge losses for Blu Ray and anyone cuaght behind the times like Blockbuster was.(they will still make money but I dont see the windfall like VHS and DVD)

arent you egotistical. you're only thinking of your situation. how about the rest of the world?

In the future it'll definitely become more common.
Avatar image for beachbob1
beachbob1

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 beachbob1
Member since 2007 • 518 Posts
[QUOTE="virtuas"][QUOTE="beachbob1"][QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.RyuHayabusaX

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

I am already downloading HD(1080p) movies on the 360 and with TW Cable so in 4 to 5 years I would think it would be pretty standard. Which could translate into huge losses for Blu Ray and anyone cuaght behind the times like Blockbuster was.(they will still make money but I dont see the windfall like VHS and DVD)

arent you egotistical. you're only thinking of your situation. how about the rest of the world?

In the future it'll definitely become more common.

You could of said I was egotistical when I had cable TV and you where using rabbit ears too. But look what happened.

Avatar image for virtuas
virtuas

1312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 virtuas
Member since 2007 • 1312 Posts
[QUOTE="RyuHayabusaX"][QUOTE="virtuas"][QUOTE="beachbob1"][QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.beachbob1

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

I am already downloading HD(1080p) movies on the 360 and with TW Cable so in 4 to 5 years I would think it would be pretty standard. Which could translate into huge losses for Blu Ray and anyone cuaght behind the times like Blockbuster was.(they will still make money but I dont see the windfall like VHS and DVD)

arent you egotistical. you're only thinking of your situation. how about the rest of the world?

In the future it'll definitely become more common.

You could of said I was egotistical when I had cable TV and you where using rabbit ears too. But look what happened.

4 to 5 years is enough to make that big of a jump. some part of of the u.s. still subscribe to dial up.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#57 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts
[QUOTE="RyuHayabusaX"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Adonymous"]

Xbox wasn't worth it for MS....they lost $5billion, and are still in the red on their games division.

SolidTy

It was a LONG TERM investment, like Blu-Ray is for Sony.

Blu-Ray might have been nice if Sony released it later on on PS4 maybe. Blu-Ray hasn't pulled them ahead of Microsoft yet and it hasn't saved them. Now it might still later but it wasn't necessary for PS3 to have success.

But don't you see, BLU-RAY beat HDDVD! You see, SONY was thinking LONGTERM. You are only looking at the PS3. Sony is also looking at Electronic devices, movie formats, and more.

Sure, they want the PS3 to be successful, but they wanted BLU-RAY to be a standard, which it is NOW.

If Microsoft is using Blu-Ray for the Xbox 720, then SONY won. See how that works, it's envisioning the future. IS it a gamble?

Sure.

But that business for you.

Uhh...Blu Ray is not that important NOW.

MS took the smart route by cancelling hd-dvd and just waiting till games demand a TON of space, which is going to happen in the future.

Avatar image for RyuHayabusaX
RyuHayabusaX

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#58 RyuHayabusaX
Member since 2005 • 7838 Posts
Don't see why I'm worrying about all this lol, I have college in a year and probably won't be buying an Xbox 3 when Med School comes around. Personally I'm just glad that we'll have these consoles around for 4-5 more years because a new console isn't necessary. Any game can be made like Gears of War and MGS 4, but it's about how much effort the developer puts in. So if every game can be made like Gears of War, we don't need better graphics next gen, we need what we've been waiting for, VR and 3-D!
Avatar image for beachbob1
beachbob1

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 beachbob1
Member since 2007 • 518 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="RyuHayabusaX"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Adonymous"]

Xbox wasn't worth it for MS....they lost $5billion, and are still in the red on their games division.

taj7575

It was a LONG TERM investment, like Blu-Ray is for Sony.

Blu-Ray might have been nice if Sony released it later on on PS4 maybe. Blu-Ray hasn't pulled them ahead of Microsoft yet and it hasn't saved them. Now it might still later but it wasn't necessary for PS3 to have success.

But don't you see, BLU-RAY beat HDDVD! You see, SONY was thinking LONGTERM. You are only looking at the PS3. Sony is also looking at Electronic devices, movie formats, and more.

Sure, they want the PS3 to be successful, but they wanted BLU-RAY to be a standard, which it is NOW.

If Microsoft is using Blu-Ray for the Xbox 720, then SONY won. See how that works, it's envisioning the future. IS it a gamble?

Sure.

But that business for you.

Uhh...Blu Ray is not that important NOW.

MS took the smart route by cancelling hd-dvd and just waiting till games demand a TON of space, which is going to happen in the future.

It was really smart becuase now by dropping the 360 to $199 they are gonna bleed Sony dry. Sony is gonna be losing big money to stay in this war. Sony's best case this Gen is a tie which means they lost significant market share.

Avatar image for 1xcalibur1
1xcalibur1

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 1xcalibur1
Member since 2008 • 442 Posts

Bluray came up ontop of the HD war.

MGS4 is the first ever game to weigh in 33gb.

Developers complain one DVD9 is hardly enough for their work.

Xbox is starting to get 2 disc games.

I'll say Bluray was right on spot.

Avatar image for 1xcalibur1
1xcalibur1

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 1xcalibur1
Member since 2008 • 442 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="RyuHayabusaX"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Adonymous"]

Xbox wasn't worth it for MS....they lost $5billion, and are still in the red on their games division.

taj7575

It was a LONG TERM investment, like Blu-Ray is for Sony.

Blu-Ray might have been nice if Sony released it later on on PS4 maybe. Blu-Ray hasn't pulled them ahead of Microsoft yet and it hasn't saved them. Now it might still later but it wasn't necessary for PS3 to have success.

But don't you see, BLU-RAY beat HDDVD! You see, SONY was thinking LONGTERM. You are only looking at the PS3. Sony is also looking at Electronic devices, movie formats, and more.

Sure, they want the PS3 to be successful, but they wanted BLU-RAY to be a standard, which it is NOW.

If Microsoft is using Blu-Ray for the Xbox 720, then SONY won. See how that works, it's envisioning the future. IS it a gamble?

Sure.

But that business for you.

Uhh...Blu Ray is not that important NOW.

MS took the smart route by cancelling hd-dvd and just waiting till games demand a TON of space, which is going to happen in the future.

Rage is already on 2 compressed dvd9.

Avatar image for sdu_1111
sdu_1111

474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 sdu_1111
Member since 2007 • 474 Posts

lol .. was this worth it for the 360?

it doesn't run games even at all

its totally dead now

Avatar image for 1xcalibur1
1xcalibur1

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 1xcalibur1
Member since 2008 • 442 Posts

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.Albanian_Killa

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

Correction, Sony has already started streaming it's movie studios on ps3 in the US.

Works flawlessly as far as I heard.

Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts
[QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]

[QUOTE="beachbob1"]I disagree with the argument that Sony was thinking long tern and won the format war. It's tuff to see that far in the future. The next Gen for movies may not see the sales DVD and VHS did. Haven't you noticed Blockbuster Video's ever shrinking bussiness model. The future for Movies is already here. DL Netflix/360 The next gen consoles will be powerhouses and you wil be surfing the net and downloading most of your games and movies imo. MP3 is still in its infancy and look what it has done to the music industry already.beachbob1

Downloading? :lol: If Sony took the downloading route now, no one would buy it. With bandwidth restrictions so messed up, I don't think DLC is the best method. Sure, 10 years from now, of course, but so far, no. First of all, Netflix streaming from what I hear is not HD. If someone can tell me if I'm right or wrong that would be great. Streaming eats up bandwidth too because data isn't coming in by magic here now. Netflix is easy in terms of you can watch any movie in a click, but I prefer hard copy. So far, content on the PSN Store and XBL Marketplace is in 720p from what I'm hearing. 1080p is better than 720p, which is why Blu-Ray is the future. I don't want DLC to be the future. Businesses will go bankrupt, and this world will become fatter than ever with everyone staying at home and not going outside. I know what you're thinking, wtf am I doing bringing this here. All I'm saying is that if the future is DLC, things are going to have to change a lot.

I am already downloading HD(1080p) movies on the 360 and with TW Cable so in 4 to 5 years I would think it would be pretty standard. Which could translate into huge losses for Blu Ray and anyone cuaght behind the times like Blockbuster was.(they will still make money but I dont see the windfall like VHS and DVD)

there will always be a demand for physicaly media, if there wasnt then devs would just release games exclusively to programs like steam for the pc, some people would rather have the physical media so that they can just pick it up and go over to a friends, no flash drive required

Avatar image for AdmiralDan
AdmiralDan

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#65 AdmiralDan
Member since 2003 • 1231 Posts
Don't you guys realize how bad Sony fell behind this gen? The last 2 gens Sony BLEW the competition out of the water. They Quadrupled the next 2 consoles' total sales with the PS2 and bankrupted another console! The PS1 destroyed the N64. Now they're fighting for sloppy seconds with the 2nd gen Microsoft system while the Wii pulls a last gen Sony on them.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#66 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts

Disc movie formats is a much, much bigger market than games though.

And Ps3 made them win it.

angelkimne
Lie. Games have generated more income than cd's,dvd's, and theatre trips in the last 2 years. This industry is becoming the most lucrative in entertainment.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#67 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts

lol .. was this worth it for the 360?

it doesn't run games even at all

its totally dead now

sdu_1111
Hey I got one for 50 bucks and there are nearly 200 titles for $15 or less. If it's out on HD-DVD I'd buy it before the price of BLU. Not producing anymore doesn't mean they don't work.
Avatar image for jharv
jharv

1774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 jharv
Member since 2007 • 1774 Posts

lol .. was this worth it for the 360?

it doesn't run games even at all

its totally dead now

sdu_1111

I bought one for $50. It's a hell of a dvd up-scaler.

Avatar image for Iceman2911
Iceman2911

2669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Iceman2911
Member since 2006 • 2669 Posts
p
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

lol .. was this worth it for the 360?

it doesn't run games even at all

its totally dead now

sdu_1111
LOL didnt buy it. i did buy a dvd player back in the day because I could rent ten movies and not need a truck (vhs) to move then and then not having to rewind stuff was good too. My freinds all got a dvd player too as we all had tvs that could take advantage of it. Everyone did! I have now a 720p HDTV so I cannot take full advantage of BR or HD-DVD. Lots and lots of people are the same way. Actually many many people cannot take advantage of 5.1 DD right now let alone Uncompressed HD sound. Mabey if 1080p was what everybody had normally right now then I see BR as Taking off but oh well!
Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts

At this point, the PS3 does not need any saving, nor does Sony. Their line-up is just as good as the 360 and I can see LBP being a system seller kind of. Neither MS nor Sony need saving. Sony is doing a good job at introducing gamers(Which is a large community) into the world of what we will soon know as Blu Ray: The dominate format. By the time it is 2012, they might release the new consoles, but imagine this:

While Blu Ray being the dominate format, the PS3 will most likely be very cheap compared to the price tag it has on it now. Many people will prefer buying the PS3 because of it's Blu Ray and the games many haven't gotten to get their hands on yet.

Both Sony and Microsoft know what they are doing. But you can tell that Sony planned for the future, and I believe they are on track.

Avatar image for deathtoallgods
deathtoallgods

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 deathtoallgods
Member since 2007 • 577 Posts

*FACEPALM*

Sony may have lost $2-3b...but now that Blu-Ray is dominant next-gen medium in a few years who'll be making $$$?

Nintendo

Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

Don't you guys realize how bad Sony fell behind this gen? The last 2 gens Sony BLEW the competition out of the water. They Quadrupled the next 2 consoles' total sales with the PS2 and bankrupted another console! The PS1 destroyed the N64. Now they're fighting for sloppy seconds with the 2nd gen Microsoft system while the Wii pulls a last gen Sony on them.AdmiralDan

And I'm sure Sony's movie department is laughing at the fact that they don't care how bad there gaming section is doing because they pull in so much money from being part of the Blu-ray association and one of the largest movie publishers out there frontiering a new disc format.

I'm sure Sony is crying over the fact they made Blu-Ray win the format war. Crying All the way to the Bank! BAZING!

Avatar image for ceruxx
ceruxx

1292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 ceruxx
Member since 2007 • 1292 Posts

What you're forgetting is that SONY is a Japanese company and in the end they're going to think of Japan first, and hope that the PS3 does well enough in America. XBOX is desperately trying to secure some footing in Japan, which apparently it is doing, but the PS3 is still Japan's next gen console of choice (wii is pretty much old gen with motion controls).

So SONY isn't in so much trouble in Japan as it is in North America.

SONY probably isn't as hurt as everyone else is making it out to be. Also, remember that Final Fantasy XIII is still PS3 exclusive in Japan which will probably be a major blow to XBOX360 in Japan.

The west is doing poor in the east and the east is doing poor in the west. And then theres the wii and you can pretend to be at a bowling alley and wave your arms and **** ._.;

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

All I know if I didn't have an HDTV and if it wasn't for blu ray becoming the standard HD format, I don't think I would've gotten a PS3 early. Also it was a 20 gig for $300 bucks brand new back then, so I couldn't resist. Anyway if it wasn't for those reasons, I would've gotten a PS3 sometime in 2009. But yeah, I haven't bought a blu ray movie in awhile now, I mostly rent instead of buying these blu ray movies.

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#76 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Adonymous"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Adonymous"]

Xbox wasn't worth it for MS....they lost $5billion, and are still in the red on their games division.

RyuHayabusaX

It was a LONG TERM investment, like Blu-Ray is for Sony.

exactly.

I knew where you were going, but the TC didn't even know the Xbox was a failure.

of course I know but MS didn't put themselves into another $2-3 billion debt by going with HD-DVD, which might have reduced sales because the price of the 360 would be a lot higher than $280 right now. They stayed with DVD and still found a way to compete with Sony without losing money on a drive that didn't matter too much. Sure developers wouldn't have minded to have games like Oblivion on a 30 GB HD-DVD, which would give them breathing room, but in the end the 360 is still very much alive and developers are finding ways around the 9 GB DVD.

You do understand that you dont have a point at all do you?

Avatar image for filiwian
filiwian

2232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#77 filiwian
Member since 2007 • 2232 Posts
You do know that MS has lost more money than Sony right?
Avatar image for crispytheone88
crispytheone88

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 crispytheone88
Member since 2006 • 901 Posts

I have a PS3 (BLU-RAY) anda stand alone Hd-DVD player and a 360

Most people I show the Hd movies to, could care less, regular DVD look great, and they see it for themselves

Blu-Ray may be the Standard HD format, but it still has to beat DVD, which does not have the same problems VHS had when DVD beat it as the standard format, People have to Care enough to WANT to upgrade, and from most of the people I talk to, they Don't, Hell we still buy almost all of our movies on regular DVD because there is not enough of a diffrence when sitting across the room, and some movies on Blu-Ray cost twice as much, I'm not a rich man

Blu-Ray may not be worth it, Sony has spent alot of money to finally win a format war, only time will tell if its worth it, will people really replace all those car DVD players, portable DVD players, DVD players in the kids room, its super cheap, and still looks fantastic

Avatar image for diped
diped

2005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 diped
Member since 2008 • 2005 Posts
well bluray is basically the only reason to be an early adopter of the ps3. It was a cheap bluray player.

its still one of the very, very few reasons to buy a ps3.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Uh yeah it was worth it, in the long run so it seems.

Their format is the new hd disk format.

I think they are relatively pleased that the competition format was strangled to death.

Avatar image for trasherhead
trasherhead

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#81 trasherhead
Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts
They lost 200$ in the start, but now they are breaking even.
And the fact that the 360 is forced to have games on 2 or more discs now (rage) just proves that BD is needed. 1-2 years time and devs will realy have a hard time puting their games on the 360 without several discs or simply cut back at the details.
And the more discs devs need to use the less profit the devs will make because MS makes them pay pr disc they use.
Avatar image for fluxorator
fluxorator

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 fluxorator
Member since 2008 • 887 Posts

When will most of the idiots on this planet realise that Sony is more than just the PS3?

I mean DVD was 'a pointless upgrade over CD' when the PS2 came out.

CD's were considered useless when the PS1 first came out.

After a while people realised the true potential.
It's called future-proofing something. Sure the PS3 isn't future proof, but a hell of a more resistant than the other consoles.

Back to my examples of DVD and CD

What do they both have in common apart from being Optical Media?

Well Sony helped create both of them, putting them into their consoles was more in part an effort to help bring in profits to other sections of the Sony Corporation rather then SCE.

Same with BluRay. BluRay beat HD-DVD, largely thanks to the PS3, and so Sony's goal was acheived

The PS3 being left with what could be said as a 'superior' media is a by-product.

Avatar image for Zoso-8
Zoso-8

2047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Zoso-8
Member since 2008 • 2047 Posts
I love when ignorant fanboys like to comment about a companies successes/losses when the console is still only 2 years old. You really don't think Sony knew they were going into this with a high probability of losses? These companies are planning in the long term. Remember, the PS2 is 8 years old and still going strong.
Avatar image for Virus214
Virus214

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Virus214
Member since 2007 • 2052 Posts

Guess you did not see all the posts about the RAGE downgrades for the 360 due to dvd limitations. This is just the beginning.

howell1972

oohh yeaaa

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#85 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts

When will most of the idiots on this planet realise that Sony is more than just the PS3?

I mean DVD was 'a pointless upgrade over CD' when the PS2 came out.

CD's were considered useless when the PS1 first came out.

After a while people realised the true potential.
It's called future-proofing something. Sure the PS3 isn't future proof, but a hell of a more resistant than the other consoles.

Back to my examples of DVD and CD

What do they both have in common apart from being Optical Media?

Well Sony helped create both of them, putting them into their consoles was more in part an effort to help bring in profits to other sections of the Sony Corporation rather then SCE.

Same with BluRay. BluRay beat HD-DVD, largely thanks to the PS3, and so Sony's goal was acheived

The PS3 being left with what could be said as a 'superior' media is a by-product.

fluxorator

Just to help your argument. Early PS2 games were on CDs, and not on DVDs, this measure was soon changed due to space needs.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

47640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 SolidGame_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 47640 Posts
You're not worth it.
Avatar image for ONLYDOD
ONLYDOD

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#87 ONLYDOD
Member since 2006 • 6026 Posts
Okay Mr. Buisness man why don't you go and tell Sony, if your so correct with what you say im sure they'll employ you.
Avatar image for agentzero23
agentzero23

921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 agentzero23
Member since 2008 • 921 Posts
[QUOTE="RyuHayabusaX"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Adonymous"]

Xbox wasn't worth it for MS....they lost $5billion, and are still in the red on their games division.

SolidTy

It was a LONG TERM investment, like Blu-Ray is for Sony.

Blu-Ray might have been nice if Sony released it later on on PS4 maybe. Blu-Ray hasn't pulled them ahead of Microsoft yet and it hasn't saved them. Now it might still later but it wasn't necessary for PS3 to have success.

But don't you see, BLU-RAY beat HDDVD! You see, SONY was thinking LONGTERM. You are only looking at the PS3. Sony is also looking at Electronic devices, movie formats, and more.

Sure, they want the PS3 to be successful, but they wanted BLU-RAY to be a standard, which it is NOW.

If Microsoft is using Blu-Ray for the Xbox 720, then SONY won. See how that works, it's envisioning the future. IS it a gamble?

Sure.

But that business for you.

Sony has electronics like hdtvs and such that would benefit from the blu ray victory and a purpose to buy hd

Avatar image for Burnsmiesta
Burnsmiesta

1672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Burnsmiesta
Member since 2004 • 1672 Posts
I reckon the PS3 would have destroyed the 360 if it launched without Blu-Ray. No delay of launch needed (I believe there was a shortage of Blu-Ray lasers?), lower price point, MS's headstart advantage destroyed.
Avatar image for PvtGump8
PvtGump8

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 PvtGump8
Member since 2005 • 739 Posts
Well my Magic 8 ball says once PCs make the switch to Blue-Ray games and the price of BR discs fall the Xbox will be left in the dust....