It seems they fixed the biggest issue the first game had atleast, and that Bravely Second's second half won't be absolute trash.
Lame how they force you to side with s*** characters for the sake of getting a new job though. (maybe you can get the job later in the game without having to deal with that nonsense?)
As long as more than half the game isn't repeating the same section several times over and gameplay and story and presentation are on par with the last then I"ll be happy.
Blab is so salty how much the 3DS is better than the Vita, that he has to create a hype troll thread. Even though the game wasn't even hyped to begin with. The Vita is beyond dead bro. Deal.
It appears the one problem with the first game is corrected, so I'm happy, cause that a was drag.
@Legend002: To be fair, this whole subseries had no right even existing beyond a single game what with the first one being a massive pile of sh*t. I'm just surprised people needed a second game to notice this.
It's so bizarre to me how someone can get enjoyment out of a game "flopping" and also creating a thread about it to bait people who might like it. Strange world... strange people.
@Legend002: It teaches Square-Enix the lesson that they actually have to put effort into their FF knock off products. Or that the first game's praise and "success" was pure luck (it was).
Regardless I'm content, as a poor outing will kill the series and force the company to put the money into something else. Preferably something that doesn't suck.
@Legend002: News to me; I was under the impression Bravely Second was the second entry. Unless you're referring to the million FF sequels/knock offs. Those will never go away, but there's always the tiniest hope the next one won't suck.
You're just mad that this series clowns your beloved, yet tired FF franchise.
..."beloved"?
Pro tip, friend: do your research before you make blatantly incorrect claims.
I'm relatively sure about 90% of your posts involve some discussion about FF. Out of what? 18 or so games in the franchise only a small number of them have been good games.
I'm relatively sure about 90% of your posts involve some discussion about FF. Out of what? 18 or so games in the franchise only a small number of them have been good games.
I'd say the number is closer to 40% of my posts since I returned a couple months ago. And that high percentage relates to the fact that FF15 is on the horizon and I'm discussing how bad it's likely to turn out on release.
Like I said, you want to make a claim, research that claim first. You're making a fool of yourself right now.
It teaches Square-Enix the lesson that they actually have to put effort into their FF knock off products. Or that the first game's praise and "success" was pure luck (it was).
Regardless I'm content, as a poor outing will kill the series and force the company to put the money into something else. Preferably something that doesn't suck.
Uh no the first games praise wasn't pure luck, the characters were far more likeable than anything in recent FF games and the combat was actually fun.
It teaches Square-Enix the lesson that they actually have to put effort into their FF knock off products. Or that the first game's praise and "success" was pure luck (it was).
Regardless I'm content, as a poor outing will kill the series and force the company to put the money into something else. Preferably something that doesn't suck.
Uh no the first games praise wasn't pure luck, the characters were far more likeable than anything in recent FF games and the combat was actually fun.
And the second game has a metacritic score over 80. He should read the positive points from GS review as well for a much clearer picture than the false one in his head.
Uh no the first games praise wasn't pure luck, the characters were far more likeable than anything in recent FF games and the combat was actually fun.
Yeah, the bland Tiz, cardboard cutout that was Agnes, painfully pointless Ringabel; Edea was the only character worth a darn, and that's only because she had history with the villains. She wasn't enough to save the story, though.
As for the combat, it wore thin when the second half of the game was nothing but the first half rehashed a few more times. Now if you found that enjoyable, more power to you.
Uh no the first games praise wasn't pure luck, the characters were far more likeable than anything in recent FF games and the combat was actually fun.
Yeah, the bland Tiz, cardboard cutout that was Agnes, painfully pointless Ringabel; Edea was the only character worth a darn, and that's only because she had history with the villains. She wasn't enough to save the story, though.
As for the combat, it wore thin when the second half of the game was nothing but the first half rehashed a few more times. Now if you found that enjoyable, more power to you.
If you thought Ringabel was pointless then oooooooooooooh boy.
It teaches Square-Enix the lesson that they actually have to put effort into their FF knock off products. Or that the first game's praise and "success" was pure luck (it was).
Regardless I'm content, as a poor outing will kill the series and force the company to put the money into something else. Preferably something that doesn't suck.
Uh no the first games praise wasn't pure luck, the characters were far more likeable than anything in recent FF games and the combat was actually fun.
And the second game has a metacritic score over 80. He should read the positive points from GS review as well for a much clearer picture than the false one in his head.
On Metacritic, the second game only got 4 points lower (81) than the first game (85). That's not a "flop" at all.
If you thought Ringabel was pointless then oooooooooooooh boy.
Having a reason for existing at the end of the plot doesn't redeem an entire game's worth of terrible dialogue and character interaction.
@Zen_Light said:
And the second game has a metacritic score over 80. He should read the positive points from GS review as well for a much clearer picture than the false one in his head.
What does the metacritic average has to do with anything? And for your information, I did read the review and all the positive points. Doesn't make the game any better for me and it certainly doesn't sway my stance on it.
But if you want to buy it, go ahead. I'm not stopping you. I'm just contributing to the discussion. ;)
Log in to comment