Review of World in Conflict: "Everything about this game is top-notch..."
I disagree; I find the game to be boring, simple and repetitive.
Is that a simple enough explanation of how a review is an opinion?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Review of World in Conflict: "Everything about this game is top-notch..."
I disagree; I find the game to be boring, simple and repetitive.
Is that a simple enough explanation of how a review is an opinion?
i was in another thread just reading
and im sick of poeple saying
"it doesnt matter if X game got X score its their opinion"
please show me a review in gamespot state an opinion,
.....
the reviewers never say
I
my
i think
ect
which means they are stating facts, are you going to read a news paper for opinions, NO your reading it for facts and reviews are the SAME way,
Riki101
Read my blog.
http://www.gametrailers.com/game/3206.html
http://uk.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/kanelynchdeadmen/index.html?tag=result;title;0
so you say reviews are facts, but i dont understand, that means these two sites having different scores is impossible. TIME PARADOXXXXXXXX
ROFLMAO! Has SW really become this dumb? Are some people really thinking that reviewers are now the word of God?Bigboi500
if God reviewed games we wouldnt have this problem.
or would his reviews just be opinions as well :shock:
[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"][QUOTE="Riki101"]
the reviewers never say
I
my
i think
Riki101
Of course they do. :?
It's a formal way not to say like that but it's still an opinion.
which means they are stating facts
Riki101
That's where your thread falls apart. If they were facts, how could reviews vary? Either its fact or its not. It can't be a fact here and not over there or a fact there and not ever here. Get it? It makes no sense at all.
hm, maybe i guese you guys are right, but to me, i like to look at it as facts, as i dont care about someone elles opinion,That's like...even more stupid. You now agree that reviews are opinions, but you like to think of them as fact (despite being opinions) because you don't care about people's opinions/reviews? That makes so little sense I could give birth to a baby elephant.
anyway
speaking about opinions
i think system wars would be so much better if people use facts instead of opinions, to me, reading someone elles opinion in system wars is useless, as it doesnt do any good for anyone, keep your opinions to yourselfs and talk about things with facts, not opinions in system wars.... please.Riki101
Jesus christ... Yes, ban opinions from discussion, that'll make them much more interesting.
"Hey, did you play Game X for the PS3?"
"Indeed I did."
"So what did you think of it?"
"It's a sci-fi FPS that has 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"What did eveyone else think?"
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
Oh boy what fun!
[QUOTE="metroidfood"]This thread is wrong. *FACT*Riki101
I agree with your points and feel you truly expressed your argument with logical facts. Thank you.
/sarcasm.
i mean i was just stating my opinion in crysis, and yet this person looks at is as if it were a fact, or is not a fact at all its a LIE
he doesnt look at it as if it were an OPINION, and what i said about crysis was AN OPINION
Joke character officially confirmed. Blurting out "IMO" obviously doesn't give you some sort of immunity from criticism when making retarded claims contradicting a commonly held perception without anything to back it up. It's called trolling/flamebaiting and you will of course get shat on for it.
And it's not particularly uncommon for people to disagree with each others' opinions. That guy obviously did not take your claims as fact (if he did then how come he disagrees with them? it's quite difficult to disagree with facts you know.), he disagreed with them as they went against all common sense. In case you still don't understand, which is likely, here's an example.
"IMO Half-Life 2 is a piece of crap garbage game."
"I agree with your points and feel you truly expressed your argument with logical facts. Thank you./sarcasm."
"See, this guy agrees reviews are fact."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment