buh buh OPINION

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Thompsonwhore
Thompsonwhore

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Thompsonwhore
Member since 2003 • 2059 Posts

Review of World in Conflict: "Everything about this game is top-notch..."

I disagree; I find the game to be boring, simple and repetitive.

Is that a simple enough explanation of how a review is an opinion?

Avatar image for bcrich959
bcrich959

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 bcrich959
Member since 2004 • 242 Posts
If reviews are "Fact's", then why is it that for example I have seen one site praise the controls on a Wii game for being fun and responsive while another site say's they actually don't add to the fun or are not responsive enough for the same game? I'm not going to dig these reviews up and of course they may not be word for word, but I have seen many conflicting reviews on Wii games and the controls used between sites.
Avatar image for Click_Clock
Click_Clock

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Click_Clock
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts
This is by far the dumbest thread in System Wars' history. Gamespot's editors are giving their opinion of a game, their opinion is no better than yours or any other reviewer.
Avatar image for Insane00
Insane00

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 Insane00
Member since 2003 • 1267 Posts

i was in another thread just reading

and im sick of poeple saying

"it doesnt matter if X game got X score its their opinion"

please show me a review in gamespot state an opinion,

.....

the reviewers never say

I
my
i think
ect

which means they are stating facts, are you going to read a news paper for opinions, NO your reading it for facts and reviews are the SAME way,
Riki101

Read my blog.

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts

http://www.gametrailers.com/game/3206.html

http://uk.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/kanelynchdeadmen/index.html?tag=result;title;0

so you say reviews are facts, but i dont understand, that means these two sites having different scores is impossible. TIME PARADOXXXXXXXX

Avatar image for wii4panta
wii4panta

2886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 wii4panta
Member since 2007 • 2886 Posts

ROFLMAO! Has SW really become this dumb? Are some people really thinking that reviewers are now the word of God?Bigboi500

:lol:...it seems like it...

Avatar image for samusarmada
samusarmada

5816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#57 samusarmada
Member since 2005 • 5816 Posts

ROFLMAO! Has SW really become this dumb? Are some people really thinking that reviewers are now the word of God?Bigboi500

if God reviewed games we wouldnt have this problem.

or would his reviews just be opinions as well :shock:

Avatar image for Supafly1
Supafly1

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Supafly1
Member since 2003 • 4441 Posts
[QUOTE="Tsug_Ze_Wind"]

[QUOTE="Riki101"]
the reviewers never say

I
my
i think
Riki101

Of course they do. :?


show me a review, i mean a professional review, in gamespot that stated an opinion,

they arent opinions they are facts

i really never have read a review that said,

I HATED THIS GAME
or
i didnt like this gameplay machanic

It's a formal way not to say like that but it's still an opinion.

Avatar image for sam280992
sam280992

3754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 sam280992
Member since 2007 • 3754 Posts
The Ignorance...
Avatar image for The_Crucible
The_Crucible

3305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 The_Crucible
Member since 2007 • 3305 Posts


which means they are stating facts
Riki101

That's where your thread falls apart. If they were facts, how could reviews vary? Either its fact or its not. It can't be a fact here and not over there or a fact there and not ever here. Get it? It makes no sense at all.

Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#61 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

hm, maybe i guese you guys are right, but to me, i like to look at it as facts, as i dont care about someone elles opinion,

That's like...even more stupid. You now agree that reviews are opinions, but you like to think of them as fact (despite being opinions) because you don't care about people's opinions/reviews? That makes so little sense I could give birth to a baby elephant.

anyway

speaking about opinions

i think system wars would be so much better if people use facts instead of opinions, to me, reading someone elles opinion in system wars is useless, as it doesnt do any good for anyone, keep your opinions to yourselfs and talk about things with facts, not opinions in system wars.... please.Riki101

Jesus christ... Yes, ban opinions from discussion, that'll make them much more interesting.

"Hey, did you play Game X for the PS3?"
"Indeed I did."
"So what did you think of it?"
"It's a sci-fi FPS that has 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"What did eveyone else think?"
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."
"It's a sci-fi FPS with 14 levels, 24 weapons, 8 vehicles and 7 multiplayer maps for up to 16 players."

Oh boy what fun!

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]This thread is wrong. *FACT*Riki101

you think so?

check this out
http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26201048&msg_id=298255298#298255298

the first reply is

I agree with your points and feel you truly expressed your argument with logical facts. Thank you.

/sarcasm.

i mean i was just stating my opinion in crysis, and yet this person looks at is as if it were a fact, or is not a fact at all its a LIE

he doesnt look at it as if it were an OPINION, and what i said about crysis was AN OPINION

Joke character officially confirmed. Blurting out "IMO" obviously doesn't give you some sort of immunity from criticism when making retarded claims contradicting a commonly held perception without anything to back it up. It's called trolling/flamebaiting and you will of course get shat on for it.

And it's not particularly uncommon for people to disagree with each others' opinions. That guy obviously did not take your claims as fact (if he did then how come he disagrees with them? it's quite difficult to disagree with facts you know.), he disagreed with them as they went against all common sense. In case you still don't understand, which is likely, here's an example.

"IMO Half-Life 2 is a piece of crap garbage game."
"I agree with your points and feel you truly expressed your argument with logical facts. Thank you./sarcasm."
"See, this guy agrees reviews are fact."