Bungie quiet on PS3 development

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#101 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I don't know if Bungie could get away with a multiplat game on the PS3 and 360. I could more easily see a PC/360 game, perhaps even a PC exclusive game, but I can't really see Bungie doing a multiplat on the PS3.

ohthemanatee
I used to think the same thing about Bioware

yeah, but they can't put a halo game on the Ps3, MS owns the halo IP lock, stock and barrel, MS sold the IP for mass effect to EA, big difference
Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts

Halo never really interested me but i'd love to see it go to the ps3 just to see the s**t storm that would ensue :lol:

comments would include:

"LOL REACH NOT EXCLUSIVE!!1!! PWNZORZ LOLOLOL LEMMINGS AM CRY"

and hardcore lemmings will either say :

a. their version will be superior

b. they didn't care that much about halo

c. they boycott reach (but end up getting it anyway)

and then everyone else will be rejoicing that more people get to enjoy the game

swamplord666

Halo is still MS exclusive. A word to the wise though, I've notice somelemmings only like Halo as argument fodder and nothing more. In reality, some don't know crap about Halo.

Avatar image for Ninja-Bear
Ninja-Bear

1028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Ninja-Bear
Member since 2010 • 1028 Posts
Very unlikely. People forget that Microsoft still owns a stake in the company and has first publishing rights.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#104 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]

He's talking about the devs. They make Halo games over and over. Sony Santa Monica is responsible for another lil gem called Twisted Metal, among other things. Not saying I agree with him about Bungie, but the GoW cheap shot was unnecessary.Hahadouken

no it isn't


And how was that a cheap shot? it's exactly the same logic

My bad, that's David Jaffe developing both, I forgot that Incognito was the tie between Warhawk and Twisted Metal and not Twisted Metal and God of War.

Point conceded.

we all make mistakes :)

Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="ZIMdoom"]

Hard to say. Honestly, I would be surprised if it did come out for PS3. But at the same time, I can't understand why they would go through the trouble of buying their freedom back from MS's ownership if they didn't want to develop for other consoles. I mean, if they were just going to be exclusive MS developers anyway, why breaking from them?

angelkimne

It's not just about platforms, it's about creative freedom...

And besides that, MS still own a share in Bungie; I can't see them making any games on Ps3 right now. PC's a certain possibility though.

Why wouldn't they have creative freedom at MS? They've developed their single biggest game and possibly one of the biggest games ever. Why wouldn't they have creative freedom? That makes no sense.

As for MS owning a share in Bungie, that doesn't mean much unless it is a controlling share. Anything less and they are just looking for the company to make as much money as possible. Plus Sony owns a share in Square/Enix and they are developing games in other consoles.

Avatar image for killzonexbox
killzonexbox

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 killzonexbox
Member since 2010 • 3019 Posts

Bungie's new IP close to having a publisher

Bungie is finally leaving the Halo franchise after Halo Reach. They have been committed to the series for many years now and ODST sort of blew up into something bigger than they ever expected if you take their word for it. So what's next from the studio that saved the Xbox and when will it get here? No one knows, but evidently the new IP is close to having a publsiher.

The game, which isnt' tied to any platform, has been in development for a while now, but very little is known about it. Speaking with Eurogame about the game having a publisher Lars Bakken of Bungie said, "I think internally we'll know sometime soon. I don't handle these things, but I'd imagine we're going to know way before we make the public announcement of who's handling that! But sure, I think those talks are, I guess, close."

That's some real firm confirmation there, huh? Talks to get a publisher may, kind of, be on the way at some point. I find it hard to believe that Bungie will have any trouble finding a publisher unless this new game is actually macaroni artwork, and even then I'm pretty sure someone would produce it as long as they could say "From the developers of Halo" on the box.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="swamplord666"]

Halo never really interested me but i'd love to see it go to the ps3 just to see the s**t storm that would ensue :lol:

comments would include:

"LOL REACH NOT EXCLUSIVE!!1!! PWNZORZ LOLOLOL LEMMINGS AM CRY"

and hardcore lemmings will either say :

a. their version will be superior

b. they didn't care that much about halo

c. they boycott reach (but end up getting it anyway)

and then everyone else will be rejoicing that more people get to enjoy the game

SpiritOfFire117

Halo is still MS exclusive. A word to the wise though, I've notice somelemmings only like Halo as argument fodder and nothing more. In reality, some don't know crap about Halo.

to be honest i am not that big fan of the halo games, they are fantastic top notch games,i am into the universe more, but reach is the first halo game i am really stoked for, it has the gritty atmosphere that i find lacking in the other halo games, and it's sandbox, i love sandbox games
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#108 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
I'd buy Macaroni Artwork if Bungie made it. I'd probably pre-order it, too.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts
I'd buy Macaroni Artwork if Bungie made it. I'd probably pre-order it, too.musicalmac
would you buy the renaissance edition or the Mac and cheese edition?
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#110 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"] Have no fears, I'm being facetious. Chances are it would be a top title, though. Bungie's track record is pretty impressive. I don't think anyone can really determine what is the absolute best game on any given platform. :P

Yeah that's what I figured, but I didn't realize Ty was poking fun, too. Confuzzlement ensued. Bungie is an extremely talented dev, I'm sure they would produce great games, whichever plat they work on. I like that they are buddy-buddy with the Naughty Dog boys, it keeps fanboys guessin'. :P
Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"]

[QUOTE="swamplord666"]

Halo never really interested me but i'd love to see it go to the ps3 just to see the s**t storm that would ensue :lol:

comments would include:

"LOL REACH NOT EXCLUSIVE!!1!! PWNZORZ LOLOLOL LEMMINGS AM CRY"

and hardcore lemmings will either say :

a. their version will be superior

b. they didn't care that much about halo

c. they boycott reach (but end up getting it anyway)

and then everyone else will be rejoicing that more people get to enjoy the game

delta3074

Halo is still MS exclusive. A word to the wise though, I've notice somelemmings only like Halo as argument fodder and nothing more. In reality, some don't know crap about Halo.

to be honest i am not that big fan of the halo games, they are fantastic top notch games,i am into the universe more, but reach is the first halo game i am really stoked for, it has the gritty atmosphere that i find lacking in the other halo games, and it's sandbox, i love sandbox games

Then it's apperent the series is moving in a good direction.

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#112 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

So in other words they are making a PS3 game. Whenever developers/publishers don't outright deny something, it's usually a sign.

Insomniac were said to be making a multiplat horror game some time ago- how interesting it would be if both were confirmed at E3.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

2.Bungie is allowed to make stuff for another systems now but as has been said they are giving microsoft first pick allways.

nervmeister

I doubt that "arrangement" is permanent. For all we know. the reason Bungie hasn't made new IP's yet is because they're waiting for that stipulation to expire.

lol proof please? and sorry no the arrangement isn't a bad thing since bungie games released on 360...sell...and make bungie money.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#114 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I don't know if Bungie could get away with a multiplat game on the PS3 and 360. I could more easily see a PC/360 game, perhaps even a PC exclusive game, but I can't really see Bungie doing a multiplat on the PS3.

delta3074
I used to think the same thing about Bioware

yeah, but they can't put a halo game on the Ps3, MS owns the halo IP lock, stock and barrel, MS sold the IP for mass effect to EA, big difference

Bingo... and MS would never part with Halo. It's the same reason Rare can't touch any of their really popular franchises, unless Microsoft buys the rights from Nintendo.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45609 Posts

I'd buy Macaroni Artwork if Bungie made it. I'd probably pre-order it, too.musicalmac
Yup....

Wait, I Hmm, I hear there is a discount for mult quantities - what ya think ? j/k :P

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="ohthemanatee"] I used to think the same thing about Bioware

yeah, but they can't put a halo game on the Ps3, MS owns the halo IP lock, stock and barrel, MS sold the IP for mass effect to EA, big difference

Bingo... and MS would never part with Halo. It's the same reason Rare can't touch any of their really popular franchises, unless Microsoft buys the rights from Nintendo.

ironically nintendo already refused to sell them to MS, they originally planned to put goldeneye on XBLA, they even offered to code a wii version for nintendo to put out , but nintendo actually refused, annoying as hell, but nintendo is one tuff nut to crack,lol
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#117 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
So in other words they are making a PS3 game. Whenever developers/publishers don't outright deny something, it's usually a sign.Floppy_Jim
I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#118 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"]I'd buy Macaroni Artwork if Bungie made it. I'd probably pre-order it, too.ohthemanatee
would you buy the renaissance edition or the Mac and cheese edition?

Depends on the extras. ;)
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#119 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="delta3074"]yeah, but they can't put a halo game on the Ps3, MS owns the halo IP lock, stock and barrel, MS sold the IP for mass effect to EA, big differencedelta3074
Bingo... and MS would never part with Halo. It's the same reason Rare can't touch any of their really popular franchises, unless Microsoft buys the rights from Nintendo.

ironically nintendo already refused to sell them to MS, they originally planned to put goldeneye on XBLA, they even offered to code a wii version for nintendo to put out , but nintendo actually refused, annoying as hell, but nintendo is one tuff nut to crack,lol

Yeah Nintendo doesn't seem like the type to play ball. Reggie seems like a gorilla in a suit, happy to roll around in his money stacks all day. They probably figure they are doing fine without Rare and even leaving those franchises sit on the back-burner just as an extra Eff You. :P
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45609 Posts

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]So in other words they are making a PS3 game. Whenever developers/publishers don't outright deny something, it's usually a sign.Hahadouken
I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".

Are both of ya hyped on buying a Bungie made PS3 game knowing MS refused it for the 360 ?

Avatar image for Ninja-Bear
Ninja-Bear

1028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Ninja-Bear
Member since 2010 • 1028 Posts
Would bungie even be capable of making a PS3 game? They're a premier developer for sure, but after making games on the Xbox for like a decade, surely their studio and their tools are all centered around PC/360 development? Starting up on the PS3 would be a whole different world for them.
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#122 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]So in other words they are making a PS3 game. Whenever developers/publishers don't outright deny something, it's usually a sign.Hahadouken
I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".

And even in cases where ports have been outright denied they still happen- FF13, for example. Watch it happen to FF14, Splinter Cell, Mass Effect, etc later this year- so downright predictable :P
Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#123 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

I don't see why any cows would care. I thought pretty much all Halo/Bungie fans owned a 360 by now

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#124 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]So in other words they are making a PS3 game. Whenever developers/publishers don't outright deny something, it's usually a sign.SecretPolice

I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".

Are both of ya hyped on buying a Bungie made PS3 game knowing MS refused it for the 360 ?

I'd buy the game on the 360 anyway (unless it's a PS3 exclusive :shock: ). Is this right of refusal anything more than a rumour?

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Either way it dosent matter to me, i own both consoles. I would love it on the other hand just to watch the comments from the Lems, they would be devastated and there world ruined. Damage control in full effect if it happens for months.
Avatar image for n00bkid
n00bkid

4163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 n00bkid
Member since 2006 • 4163 Posts
If Halo goes to PS3, all the Lems will sell there 360.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#127 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]So in other words they are making a PS3 game. Whenever developers/publishers don't outright deny something, it's usually a sign.SecretPolice

I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".

Are both of ya hyped on buying a Bungie made PS3 game knowing MS refused it for the 360 ?




First of all, I own a 360 and a PC, so it's highly unlikely that I'm going to miss a Bungie game because I don't own the platform it's on.

Second, I seriously doubt that Bungie signed a contract to give Microsoft right of refusal on ALL FUTURE PROJECTS, whether or not they have anything to do with publishing them. Until I hear actual confirmation I'm going to assume it's a good-faith agreement after Reach. Unless they have a binding contract to this effect, it seems naive to assume they would just keep making exclusives because they are all good pals. Squenix and Sony were good pals too and look how that turned out.

Third, would I be interested in buying a game that MS refused to publish? Absolutely. I'm sure there are a bunch of games they passed on that went on to be great games. They may not have thought them fiscally sensible. I don't make money on them so I don't care if they make money on them.

Fourth, what do you think it means when a developer won't directly deny allegations like this? BioWare is doing it now regarding Mass Effect 2.

Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts

If Halo goes to PS3, all the Lems will sell there 360.n00bkid

Halo is MS exclusive and most lems don't know crap about Halo.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

Hard to say. Honestly, I would be surprised if it did come out for PS3. But at the same time, I can't understand why they would go through the trouble of buying their freedom back from MS's ownership if they didn't want to develop for other consoles. I mean, if they were just going to be exclusive MS developers anyway, why breaking from them?

ZIMdoom
They broke away to gain creative freedom. Anyway Microsoft gets first dibs on their next project. If Microsoft go no, we don't want to publish that game then theres a chance it could appear on the PS3. But otherwise, no.
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#130 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

I'm absolutely certain it is not in development for PS3 & find the sheer thought of it insane. That said I'm also not the slightest bit excited about the game myself.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#131 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
They might be working on the PS3, but whichever game they make we know it will be on the 360 at least.
Avatar image for N7Sovereign
N7Sovereign

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 N7Sovereign
Member since 2010 • 52 Posts

[QUOTE="swamplord666"]

Halo never really interested me but i'd love to see it go to the ps3 just to see the s**t storm that would ensue :lol:

comments would include:

"LOL REACH NOT EXCLUSIVE!!1!! PWNZORZ LOLOLOL LEMMINGS AM CRY"

and hardcore lemmings will either say :

a. their version will be superior

b. they didn't care that much about halo

c. they boycott reach (but end up getting it anyway)

and then everyone else will be rejoicing that more people get to enjoy the game

SpiritOfFire117

Halo is still MS exclusive. A word to the wise though, I've notice somelemmings only like Halo as argument fodder and nothing more. In reality,most don't know crap about Halo.

Had to fix that.

But yes, fanboys only hype up games because of this stupid console war. It's funny seeing kids list games like Gears of War 3, Resistance 3 and other exclusives, but then watching them posts in other topics how the series is overrated garbage.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"] I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".Hahadouken

Are both of ya hyped on buying a Bungie made PS3 game knowing MS refused it for the 360 ?




First of all, I own a 360 and a PC, so it's highly unlikely that I'm going to miss a Bungie game because I don't own the platform it's on.

Second, I seriously doubt that Bungie signed a contract to give Microsoft right of refusal on ALL FUTURE PROJECTS, whether or not they have anything to do with publishing them. Until I hear actual confirmation I'm going to assume it's a good-faith agreement after Reach. Unless they have a binding contract to this effect, it seems naive to assume they would just keep making exclusives because they are all good pals. Squenix and Sony were good pals too and look how that turned out.

Third, would I be interested in buying a game that MS refused to publish? Absolutely. I'm sure there are a bunch of games they passed on that went on to be great games. They may not have thought them fiscally sensible. I don't make money on them so I don't care if they make money on them.

Fourth, what do you think it means when a developer won't directly deny allegations like this? BioWare is doing it now regarding Mass Effect 2, and I would bet my Gamespot account, against anyone else's, that it won't remain a PC/360 game.

But then look at Insomniac and Sony, they've been Playstation exclusive for years. I don't think its that ridiculous for Microsoft and Bungie to have that system in place.

Avatar image for ImageChef
ImageChef

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 ImageChef
Member since 2010 • 163 Posts
[QUOTE="N7Sovereign"]

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"]

[QUOTE="swamplord666"]

Halo never really interested me but i'd love to see it go to the ps3 just to see the s**t storm that would ensue :lol:

comments would include:

"LOL REACH NOT EXCLUSIVE!!1!! PWNZORZ LOLOLOL LEMMINGS AM CRY"

and hardcore lemmings will either say :

a. their version will be superior

b. they didn't care that much about halo

c. they boycott reach (but end up getting it anyway)

and then everyone else will be rejoicing that more people get to enjoy the game

Halo is still MS exclusive. A word to the wise though, I've notice somelemmings only like Halo as argument fodder and nothing more. In reality,most don't know crap about Halo.

Had to fix that.

But yes, fanboys only hype up games because of this stupid console war. It's funny seeing kids list games like Gears of War 3, Resistance 3 and other exclusives, but then watching them posts in other topics how the series is overrated garbage.

Halo is by far the most played game on the 360, and the most played game (statistically) for 2007,2008, and 2009. Halo 2 was for 2004,2005, and 2006 (yes, more played than gears of war/ the whole next-gen) It's apparent that people do care about the game.
Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts

[QUOTE="N7Sovereign"]

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"]

Halo is still MS exclusive. A word to the wise though, I've notice somelemmings only like Halo as argument fodder and nothing more. In reality,most don't know crap about Halo.

ImageChef

Had to fix that.

But yes, fanboys only hype up games because of this stupid console war. It's funny seeing kids list games like Gears of War 3, Resistance 3 and other exclusives, but then watching them posts in other topics how the series is overrated garbage.

Halo is by far the most played game on the 360, and the most played game (statistically) for 2007,2008, and 2009. Halo 2 was for 2004,2005, and 2006 (yes, more played than gears of war/ the whole next-gen) It's apparent that people do care about the game.

People yes. Fanboys are a different story.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45609 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"] I have to agree. If devs say that something is "a blah blah/yadda yadda game", don't say "there are currently no plans for a", or outright deny it, they are probably hiding something. I dunno about the Bungie deal in particular, but this is historically true of developers. Kojima never said anything ambiguous, he just said that MGS4 was a PS3 exclusive, period. Other devs have avoided flat-out denying things because of the backlash from fans when they turn out to be "liars".Hahadouken

Are both of ya hyped on buying a Bungie made PS3 game knowing MS refused it for the 360 ?




First of all, I own a 360 and a PC, so it's highly unlikely that I'm going to miss a Bungie game because I don't own the platform it's on.

Second, I seriously doubt that Bungie signed a contract to give Microsoft right of refusal on ALL FUTURE PROJECTS, whether or not they have anything to do with publishing them. Until I hear actual confirmation I'm going to assume it's a good-faith agreement after Reach. Unless they have a binding contract to this effect, it seems naive to assume they would just keep making exclusives because they are all good pals. Squenix and Sony were good pals too and look how that turned out.

Third, would I be interested in buying a game that MS refused to publish? Absolutely. I'm sure there are a bunch of games they passed on that went on to be great games. They may not have thought them fiscally sensible. I don't make money on them so I don't care if they make money on them.

Fourth, what do you think it means when a developer won't directly deny allegations like this? BioWare is doing it now regarding Mass Effect 2.

Ohh so much here and so little time to post. :P Let me just say yes indeed, MS retained the rights ( you look it up, me too busy ) and it truly says so much you would want a Bungie made game sooo bad on PS3 knowing that dopey MS passed it up for use as an Exc. on 360. :lol:

Ya sounded serious there for a minute but I must say I caught myself...after digesting what you said I must conclude no, no you not serious... Amrite ?

Avatar image for masterpinky2000
masterpinky2000

1955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 95

User Lists: 0

#137 masterpinky2000
Member since 2004 • 1955 Posts
Why not multiplat? They didn't become crack developers on the 360's architecture just to go make games on the PS3.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#138 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

Ohh so much here and so little time to post. :P Let me just say yes indeed, MS retained the rights ( you look it up, me too busy ) and it truly says so much you would want a Bungie made game sooo bad on PS3 knowing that dopey MS passed it up for use as an Exc. on 360. :lol:

Ya sounded serious there for a minute but I must say I caught myself...after digesting what you said I must conclude no, no you not serious... Amrite ?

SecretPolice



Okay, I understand you were pressed for time, but that whole post was barely coherent to me. NOT saying this to attack you, I just truly don't understand the flow there, I don't get what you are trying to say. You also seem like you are trying to take shots at me with all the "u cant b srs can u" stuff, which I don't understand at all, because I didn't do it to you.

I'll give it a go though.

"Let me just say yes indeed, MS retained the rights ( you look it up, me too busy)"

Bzzzzzzt. Sorry, that's not going to cut it. I looked all over the place for official word, and the closest I found was an interview with a Bungie employee that did NOT explicitly deny working on a PS3 game. I'm not saying you are full of it, but I reserve the right to believe you until I see actual hard evidence.

"... and it truly says so much you would want a Bungie made game sooo bad on PS3 knowing that dopey MS passed it up for use as an Exc. on 360. :lol: "

What exactly does it say? I have an X360, why would I be so desperate for a Bungie game to be released on PS3? Please explain how it says "a lot" and what exactly it says. "Dopey MS"? Now you're putting words in my mouth. I have a 360 and I game on a Windows PC, I'm not a huge fan of MS corporate BS, but I don't let my dislike of certain aspects of their company prevent me from enjoying aspects I do like.

Next, the lol faces at me and the "you must be joking amirite" garbage is straight-up trolling. There is no other purpose to it than to try and get a rise out of me.

Last, you didn't address anything from my post except my request for proof, which you responded to with NO PROOF.

What was the point of that whole post? I'm pretty sure I have you confused with another user, because I didn't expect this from you. Now I will.

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

No...

Bungie if your reading this you need to stay on 360 and I"ll tell you why. First your games are really good, Halo 2 online still is my favorite online game of all time, I think it was set and done better than anything at the time and has been a example for other online FPS's. Part of the reason why Halo sells so well is because it is exclusive to 360 and people did buy it just because of that. There are lots of 360 fans that are loyal to the devs that develop exclusively for the system and they"ll buy any game they dev because of that.

The sony guys, they dont care about bungie. Sure some will buy the game and like it, but they ill never have the loyalty like they will towards naughty dog. You guys will waste money putting the resources in to dev for the ps3, and it return the 360 will take a hit in its quality because you have to take time away from it to learn the ps3. Don"t mess with what you have a goldmine on. HALO FANS WILL BUY ANYTHINING YOU GUYS MAKE.

Avatar image for Lab392
Lab392

6217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Lab392
Member since 2006 • 6217 Posts

Lord I hope not. They can keep their dirty, talentless, uncreative, unimaginitive, cheap, has-been hands away from my system.

Master_ShakeXXX

Yes, because Halo: CE didn't practically invent the modern console FPS control scheme.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45609 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Ohh so much here and so little time to post. :P Let me just say yes indeed, MS retained the rights ( you look it up, me too busy ) and it truly says so much you would want a Bungie made game sooo bad on PS3 knowing that dopey MS passed it up for use as an Exc. on 360. :lol:

Ya sounded serious there for a minute but I must say I caught myself...after digesting what you said I must conclude no, no you not serious... Amrite ?

Hahadouken



Okay, I understand you were pressed for time, but that whole post was barely coherent to me. NOT saying this to attack you, I just truly don't understand the flow there, I don't get what you are trying to say. You also seem like you are trying to take shots at me with all the "u cant b srs can u" stuff, which I don't understand at all, because I didn't do it to you.

I'll give it a go though.

"Let me just say yes indeed, MS retained the rights ( you look it up, me too busy)"

Bzzzzzzt. Sorry, that's not going to cut it. I looked all over the place for official word, and the closest I found was an interview with a Bungie employee that did NOT explicitly deny working on a PS3 game. I'm not saying you are full of it, but I reserve the right to believe you until I see actual hard evidence.

"... and it truly says so much you would want a Bungie made game sooo bad on PS3 knowing that dopey MS passed it up for use as an Exc. on 360. :lol: "

What exactly does it say? I have an X360, why would I be so desperate for a Bungie game to be released on PS3? Please explain how it says "a lot" and what exactly it says. "Dopey MS"? Now you're putting words in my mouth. I have a 360 and I game on a Windows PC, I'm not a huge fan of MS corporate BS, but I don't let my dislike of certain aspects of their company prevent me from enjoying aspects I do like.

Next, the lol faces at me and the "you must be joking amirite" garbage is straight-up trolling. There is no other purpose to it than to try and get a rise out of me.

Last, you didn't address anything from my post except my request for proof, which you responded to with NO PROOF.

What was the point of that whole post? I'm pretty sure I have you confused with another user, because I didn't expect this from you. Now I will.

Hmm, I guess I'll start by saying no offence meant as it appears from your post you were offended though I dunno why since in your own words, you couldn't even comprehend what I was saying.. :?

K, K thers that now... to just wrap it up tightly in as few of word needed ( the more words used is least impressive to me ) lets just say for matter of argument, the best proof that can be offered and I subjest you agree is past experience.. Bungie and MS partnered, recently seperated, Halo on MS Xbox made Bungie millions and it continues, never have Bungie made a PS game, never has Bungie planned and announced a PS game, No concrete news what so ever on Bungie dev'ing a PS game etc. etc. etc.

If I had more time ( maybe someone here will do it ) I woild nab the Official statement when the MS, Bungie split happened that quoted MS/Bungie argeeing on first refusal right for MS on the Bungie made games after the split.

Oh and sorry again if your offended by some friendly :) banter though that goes on in SW and what makes it a bit more fun then some other places.

Again, Hope .. no harm, no foul and all is well.

Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

The reason Bungie left Microsoft is because Microsoft is pretty lousy when it comes to nurturing and fostering creative and artistic talent.

Bungie figured this out only after being with Microsoft for a few years and nearly getting their own culture irrepairably damaged beyond all return.

Now that Bungie has bought their freedom, why would it be surprising to anyone that they'd want to develop for as many platforms as possible....that's what most developers do anyways.

Avatar image for KittenWishes
KittenWishes

1165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 KittenWishes
Member since 2010 • 1165 Posts
Microsoft have first right of refusal for anything Bungie develops. Nothing is from them will be on any Playstation platform for a long, long time.
Avatar image for Modern_Unit
Modern_Unit

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Modern_Unit
Member since 2010 • 1511 Posts

Naughty Dog quiet on 360 development....OMG ND is developing for 360

COWS = OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45609 Posts

Naughty Dog quiet on 360 development....OMG ND is developing for 360

COWS = OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Modern_Unit

Indeed as I have looked and found nothing in terms of making it a Fact - ND won't someday make a game for MS - UC3 on Xbox 720 confimed. :P

Avatar image for kejigoto
kejigoto

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#146 kejigoto
Member since 2004 • 2735 Posts

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Microsoft own a stake in Bungie still?

In fact Bungie is actually named Bungie LLC (Limited Liability Company)

According to Wiki that means:

A Limited Liability Company or a company with limited liability (abbreviated L.L.C. or LLC or W.L.L) is a flexible form of business enterprise that blends elements of partnership and corporate structures. It is a legal form of business company, in the law of the vast majority of United States jurisdictions, that provides limited liability to its owners. Often incorrectly called a "limited liability corporation" (instead of company), it is a hybrid business entity having certain characteristics of both a corporation and a partnership or sole proprietorship (depending on how many owners there are). An LLC, although a business entity, is a type of unincorporated association and is not a corporation. The primary characteristic an LLC shares with a corporation is limited liability, and the primary characteristic it shares with a partnership is the availability of pass-throughincome taxation. It is often more flexible than a corporation and it is well-suited for companies with a single owner.

Something tells me that Microsoft isn't about to let Bungie start developing for any platform but the 360 and maybe the PC....

Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

Naughty Dog quiet on 360 development....OMG ND is developing for 360

COWS = OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Modern_Unit

Fundamental and huge difference,

Naughty Dog is owned by Sony. Bungie is owned by no one.

In fact, Bungie couldn't wait to get away from Microsoft. Obviously, they were unhappy.

All of the 21 or so developers seem quite happy with Sony, on the other hand.

See, Sony is good with nurturing their artists and have many years of practice with this. Remember, Sony has dozens of music Artists and TV and movie studio's and personnel. In other words, Sony's creates artistry.....Microsoft destroys artistry.

Microsoft destroyed FASA

Avatar image for CakeBalls
CakeBalls

848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 CakeBalls
Member since 2009 • 848 Posts

Naughty Dog quiet on 360 development....OMG ND is developing for 360

COWS = OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Modern_Unit
bad example as ND is a in-house Sony dev where as Bungie isn't. Better comparison would've been Insomniac ;) Anyway, Bungie developin' for Genesis confirmed.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#149 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

Microsoft gets first dibs, so unless one of their projects looks so bad microsoft won't take it, then theres no way there will be a Bungie game on PS3.

Avatar image for yoshi_64
yoshi_64

25261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#150 yoshi_64
Member since 2003 • 25261 Posts
Being free form MS means they very well could make a game that's multi platform and appears on PS3 or PC (or even Macs :P ) Will we see one soon? Probably not, I don't think their next game will be on the PS3 ...yet. I think it may go on the MS system because their fanbase is primarily there.