Bungie sure are stupid...

  • 107 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Rob-Belmont
Rob-Belmont

1350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Rob-Belmont
Member since 2009 • 1350 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Avatar image for awuilfj
awuilfj

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 awuilfj
Member since 2009 • 409 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont
They are stupid if they didn't profit. Did they profit?
Avatar image for Arbiterisl33t69
Arbiterisl33t69

2542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 Arbiterisl33t69
Member since 2009 • 2542 Posts
You're about 4 months late, pal/
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

Wut?

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
The only problem I have with ODST was that it was priced and advertised as a full Halo game when it was clearly a spin off. I don't think it was rushed though, it was fantastic for what it was.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#6 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50081 Posts

Yep, damn Bungie for giving us a great game. Damn them! :x

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

yep.. Bungie sure *ARE* stupid..

EDIT: for those who don't catch on, I'm pointing out his grammatical error

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

Yeah they only made millions and millions of dollars of a game that didn't take nearly as much work as a true halo sequel. What Idiots!!!

Avatar image for MC3887
MC3887

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MC3887
Member since 2009 • 1507 Posts

yep.. bungie sure *ARE* stupid..

Sword-Demon
Lol because bungie isn't plural, good one.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont
you haven't played ODST then i take it,you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off, if you are happy with your purchase you havn't been ripped off, it's wether it's worth the price to YOU that matters, not wether everyone else thinks it's worth it or not
Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

I ain't a die hard halo fan, and i thought that ODST was great?

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

ODST has sold in the 4M+ range. There is absolutely no way that 4M is mostly "hardcore Halo fans".

Avatar image for MC3887
MC3887

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MC3887
Member since 2009 • 1507 Posts

ODST has sold in the 4M+ range. There is absolutely no way that 4M is mostly "hardcore Halo fans".

Teufelhuhn
Have you seen the MLG/gamebattles/bungie forums/ other halo websites.
Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts
A little late aren't we? ;) Plus I doubt you even played the game to begin with.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

They are stupid for making a good game and a ton of money? If this is the definition of stupid then all that time I've secretly been called "rich" and "high quality". Okay, that's awesome.

Avatar image for bc1391
bc1391

11906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 bc1391
Member since 2004 • 11906 Posts

*snickers at title*

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

I got ODST for free (and a couple other games) with the deal from walmart. So Booyah!

Avatar image for mirriorman
mirriorman

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 mirriorman
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts

ODST has sold in the 4M+ range. There is absolutely no way that 4M is mostly "hardcore Halo fans".

Teufelhuhn

didnt you hear?

bungie have an army of fans now 6million in size!:P

i liked odst and i didnt have the map packs before so its all good

Avatar image for Vadamee
Vadamee

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Vadamee
Member since 2009 • 1195 Posts
Halo is a billion dollar franchise = Bungie/MSFT stupidity.
Avatar image for MC3887
MC3887

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MC3887
Member since 2009 • 1507 Posts

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

fueled-system
Halo wars at GS
Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont

Wait, what is your argument? For the first half you say Microsoft is ripping off people with a spin off/expansion pack and then you reckon the game is worth its money. Also isn't making profit what companies do? I'm sure Microsoft main objective is to make money.

Avatar image for ThePRAssassin
ThePRAssassin

1344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ThePRAssassin
Member since 2009 • 1344 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont

Only people who buy Halo are "diehard fans"

There is no medium when it comes to Halo. It's Halo Fanboy or Halo Hater, there's only two groups.

Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:
Avatar image for kejigoto
kejigoto

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#25 kejigoto
Member since 2004 • 2735 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont

1.) Your title should read "Bungie sure is stupid..."

2.) They included all of Halo 3's multiplayer because they wanted to free up space on people's hard drives and get all the map packs onto a disc. Plus this would be a great way to get new comers in as well as the older Halo 3 crowd. They didn't want to rework the multiplayer because they are introducing a new multiplayer component with Halo: Reach.

3.) The main draw here is the single player campaign and the new Fire Fight mode, both of which are rather good.

4.) You also forget that they included a brand new map pack that I still believe isn't out on Xbox Live yet for Halo 3 owners.

5.) How can they be stupid if the game scored well, was recieved well, sold well, and most importantly brought them a profit?

Halo 3: ODST was the first Halo game I was truly interested in since Master Chief didn't really appeal to me. I bought Halo 3 for the multiplayer but could have cared less beyond that. ODST I'm actually enjoying the single player mode, fire fight is an absolute blast, and having Halo 3's multiplayer component tossed in is just a nice bonus since it freed up about 2 gigs on my hard drive.

Also aren't you a few months late on attempting to make a point on this? This is like the guy I saw earlier complaining because Gamespot gave Gears of War Game of the Year in 2006 over Twilight Princess. Did I stumble into a time warp today or something?

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

SpiritOfFire117

It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:

And yet it would

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#27 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Saves me Time and Money when I get a Xbox 360.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

I just got into the multiplayer months before ODST (I hadn't played some since my college days with Halo 2), thus it was great for me. It just so happens that the campaign was well worth the price of entry.

Avatar image for SpiritOfFire117
SpiritOfFire117

8537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 SpiritOfFire117
Member since 2009 • 8537 Posts

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

fueled-system

It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:

And yet it would

Whatever. You. Say. Bro.

It's still ridiculous to say a game sells due to having a name associated with angels. Where is the logic in that?

Avatar image for ThePRAssassin
ThePRAssassin

1344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ThePRAssassin
Member since 2009 • 1344 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

SpiritOfFire117

It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:

Isn't it?

People actually bought MGS, SOCOM, Resistance, etc on PSP simply because it said the name on it. I love how Halo only gets singled out though. Name recognition is everywhere, not just with Halo. People bought PS3 simply because it said PlayStation on it. People bought 360 because it says Xbox on it. People buy Jordans because it says Jordan on it. Ed Hardy sells because guess what? It's Ed Hardy.

The fact that Halo gets singled out and is apparently the only thing that sells off of it's name shows how great of a game it is, and just how many jealous haters there are.

It's great how the only things people can say about Halo is "it's for 12 years old who like gay Power Rangers" like Hakoom said in his "My 100 platinums" video or "Halo sucks and only sells because it's Halo"

Avatar image for MC3887
MC3887

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MC3887
Member since 2009 • 1507 Posts

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

ThePRAssassin

It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:

Isn't it?

People actually bought MGS, SOCOM, Resistance, etc on PSP simply because it said the name on it. I love how Halo only gets singled out though. Name recognition is everywhere, not just with Halo. People bought PS3 simply because it said PlayStation on it. People bought 360 because it says Xbox on it. People buy Jordans because it says Jordan on it. Ed Hardy sells because guess what? It's Ed Hardy.

The fact that Halo gets singled out and is apparently the only thing that sells off of it's name shows how great of a game it is, and just how many jealous haters there are.

It's great how the only things people can say about Halo is "it's for 12 years old who like gay Power Rangers" like Hakoom said in his "My 100 platinums" video or "Halo sucks and only sells because it's Halo"

The funny thing is sony even said they would win the gen because of name recognition. Cows also went with it, it is true though, if they didn't have it they would have been crushed.
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

I'm sorry but I refuse to argue with this until you need to learn proper grammar.

Avatar image for MGS4_GOAT
MGS4_GOAT

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 MGS4_GOAT
Member since 2010 • 59 Posts
Sorry to inform you that they sold nealry 4 million copies by now.
Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts

ODST has sold in the 4M+ range. There is absolutely no way that 4M is mostly "hardcore Halo fans".

Teufelhuhn
I'm sure the majority of those people just bought it because it had 'Halo' in the title.
Avatar image for MGS4_GOAT
MGS4_GOAT

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 MGS4_GOAT
Member since 2010 • 59 Posts

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]

They are not stupid at all.. it makes them money.

They could realease a halo cooking mama and it would still probably sell a million copies and get 8.5+ review scores simply because it has the name halo in it.

ThePRAssassin

It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:

Isn't it?

People actually bought MGS, SOCOM, Resistance, etc on PSP simply because it said the name on it. I love how Halo only gets singled out though. Name recognition is everywhere, not just with Halo. People bought PS3 simply because it said PlayStation on it. People bought 360 because it says Xbox on it. People buy Jordans because it says Jordan on it. Ed Hardy sells because guess what? It's Ed Hardy.

The fact that Halo gets singled out and is apparently the only thing that sells off of it's name shows how great of a game it is, and just how many jealous haters there are.

It's great how the only things people can say about Halo is "it's for 12 years old who like gay Power Rangers" like Hakoom said in his "My 100 platinums" video or "Halo sucks and only sells because it's Halo"

People buy MGS games because their made by one of the finest developers in the industry. And MGS4 sold well because it was a masterpiece. Can't say the same for Halo.
Avatar image for dragonfly110
dragonfly110

27955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#36 dragonfly110
Member since 2008 • 27955 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont

have you ever evenplayed ODST? YOur acting like the maps were the entire package, the single player AND firefight were both amazing and made it easily worth the price for me. I mean obviously its not as big of a game as say Metal Gear Solid 4, or Geow 2, but its still a solid game in its own respect.

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts

Yep, damn Bungie for giving us a great game. Damn them! :x

Stevo_the_gamer
ODST being great is debatable.
Avatar image for Gundamforce
Gundamforce

1222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Gundamforce
Member since 2005 • 1222 Posts

Bungie sure are stupid...

Rob-Belmont

In a business standpoint, they got their profits, so they would be anything but stupid. Personally i got my copy on a discount and the game was awesome, but it was short compared to most FPS and it lacked matchmaking for firefight. Hopefully they'll have matchmaking firefight for Reach.

Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]

[QUOTE="SpiritOfFire117"] It's funny how some people say a game sells based on angelic symbolism. :roll:MGS4_GOAT

Isn't it?

People actually bought MGS, SOCOM, Resistance, etc on PSP simply because it said the name on it. I love how Halo only gets singled out though. Name recognition is everywhere, not just with Halo. People bought PS3 simply because it said PlayStation on it. People bought 360 because it says Xbox on it. People buy Jordans because it says Jordan on it. Ed Hardy sells because guess what? It's Ed Hardy.

The fact that Halo gets singled out and is apparently the only thing that sells off of it's name shows how great of a game it is, and just how many jealous haters there are.

It's great how the only things people can say about Halo is "it's for 12 years old who like gay Power Rangers" like Hakoom said in his "My 100 platinums" video or "Halo sucks and only sells because it's Halo"

People buy MGS games because their made by one of the finest developers in the industry. And MGS4 sold well because it was a masterpiece. Can't say the same for Halo.

Why not? Halo has won several awards, recieved huge critical success and has numerous fans playing it every day. You can say you don't like the game due to its design - but to say its not a great series is irrational fanboyism.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
How long was Heavenly Sword? How long was the 1st Uncharted? did either of them have Multiplayer? I know my copies didn't. One of my biggest gripes with gamers in this day and age, is that they are always so concerned with the length of the game, almost more than the quality of it. Another annoyance greater than the former is how all these little kids think the game needs multiplayer/co-op in order to be "worth it", or deem the title "terrible" because of a lack of multiplayer.
Avatar image for MadVybz
MadVybz

2797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#41 MadVybz
Member since 2009 • 2797 Posts

#1. There's a difference between 'spin-off' and 'expansion pack'. ODST is no way a spin off if it has Halo 3 in the title and includes its multiplayer.

#2. I could bet money that there are many people who didn't have the map packs or Halo 3 altogether and got ODST.

#3. It's not stupid if you make a profit. Did Bungie make a profit? More than likely.

#4. It's 'Bungie sure is stupid'.

Avatar image for masterpinky2000
masterpinky2000

1955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 95

User Lists: 0

#42 masterpinky2000
Member since 2004 • 1955 Posts
Probably should have been $40, yeah. But considering that some single-player only games with campaigns of 10 hours or less now sell for $60 as new titles, why can't ODST sneak in there?
Avatar image for MadVybz
MadVybz

2797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#43 MadVybz
Member since 2009 • 2797 Posts

How long was Heavenly Sword? How long was the 1st Uncharted? did either of them have Multiplayer? I know my copies didn't. One of my biggest gripes with gamers in this day and age, is that they are always so concerned with the length of the game, almost more than the quality of it. Another annoyance greater than the former is how all these little kids think the game needs multiplayer/co-op in order to be "worth it", or deem the title "terrible" because of a lack of multiplayer.moistsandwich

Those same gamers probably hate Portal to death.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#44 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

I think it's safe to say that the majority of the people buying ODST, a SPIN OFF of the main Halo series, would be the most diehard Halo fans. Sure there will be others getting it, but the majority of them will be big Halo fans, fans who would have already bought all the map packs and stuff. So why did Bungie think it was a good idea to include all the maps and stuff in the game, the target audience already has them. A new single player + one new multi player mode is hardly worth the asking price, for those guys anyway. Personally I think that overall the game is good value.

I bet Microsoft put Bungie up to it in order to have something to sell in Q4 2009, we all know that Microsoft never hesitate to rush things if it means extra profit, screw the loyal customer!

Rob-Belmont
A lot of assumptions.
Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

Yep, damn Bungie for giving us a great game. Damn them! :x

II-FBIsniper-II

ODST being great is debatable.

Hey, aren't you the Halo negative nancy who bashes the latest Halo games when they're mentioned in a positive manner? It's really ironic that you claim to be a Halo fan when you're constantly negative.

Anyways, if Bungie IS stupid, then I guess Sony's Game division is just brain dead (You know what I mean).

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

lol they are stupid for creating games that outscore and outsell most others...and are outplayed all others.

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#47 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

Yep, damn Bungie for giving us a great game. Damn them! :x

gmc2u_64

ODST being great is debatable.

Hey, aren't you the Halo negative nancy who bashes the latest Halo games when they're mentioned in a positive manner? It's really ironic that you claim to be a Halo fan when you're constantly negative.

Anyways, if Bungie IS stupid, then I guess Sony's Game division is just brain dead (You know what I mean).

Try again.
Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"] ODST being great is debatable.II-FBIsniper-II

Hey, aren't you the Halo negative nancy who bashes the latest Halo games when they're mentioned in a positive manner? It's really ironic that you claim to be a Halo fan when you're constantly negative.

Anyways, if Bungie IS stupid, then I guess Sony's Game division is just brain dead (You know what I mean).

Try again.

Buddy, I know that you have all of the Halo games, but that's not the point.

Whenever someone mentions the latest Halo games positively, you come in randomly and act like a negative nancy, which is rather ironic.

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts
[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]Buddy, I know that you have all of the Halo games, but that's not the point. Whenever someone mentions the latest Halo games positively, you come in randomly and act like a negative nancy, which is rather ironic.

It's ironic that a Halo fan is disappointed with the quality of the latest Halo games?
Avatar image for TheGrat1
TheGrat1

4330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 TheGrat1
Member since 2008 • 4330 Posts

They are stupid for making a good game and a ton of money? If this is the definition of stupid then all that time I've secretly been called "rich" and "high quality". Okay, that's awesome.

ActicEdge
Lets hope George W. Bush never finds this thread.