By the time PS3 hit's it's prime the new Xbox will be out.....

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 3verlastingHero
3verlastingHero

747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 3verlastingHero
Member since 2008 • 747 Posts

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"][QUOTE="Flamestos"]So the next X-box is coming out next year since thats when the PS3 will be in it's prime with it's biggest exclusives (GT5, FFXIII, GOW III)?bobbetybob

Gee 09, it only took what 3 years? :roll:

360 only got so many good games early because it came out early, there are hardly any games for them to be looking forward to next year.

Alot of people will dissagree with you, I have even heard people say 08 will be the best year for 360.

EDIT: Wait you said NEXT year, I guess your right, I don't know what games are coming in 09 for 360.

Avatar image for pro-nathan-07
pro-nathan-07

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 pro-nathan-07
Member since 2007 • 1591 Posts
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"][QUOTE="Flamestos"]So the next X-box is coming out next year since thats when the PS3 will be in it's prime with it's biggest exclusives (GT5, FFXIII, GOW III)?3verlastingHero

Gee 09, it only took what 3 years? :roll:

360 only got so many good games early because it came out early, there are hardly any games for them to be looking forward to next year.

Alot of people will dissagree with you, I have even heard people say 08 will be the best year for 360.

EDIT: Wait you said NEXT year, I guess your right, I don't know what games are coming in 09 for 360.

yup alot of rpg's for the 360 this year, which is perfect for me :D
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts
cows... dont attempt to apply the Wii logic of existnace, create a cheap console that the masses will buy, the issue at hand here is that Sony forced people into $500 and $600 consoles by included first to market technology that was not needed at the time. MS can release a new console in 2010 for $400 and it will be lightyears ahead of the PS3 graphically.. while including bluray or a mega huge hard drive for fully installed games. The technology will be so much cheaper there... they are in a far greater tactical position to make all kinds of next gen moves, while sony still hasnt delivered on the PS3 yet.. sonys living in the past clearly.
Avatar image for signore
signore

2122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#54 signore
Member since 2007 • 2122 Posts

after all the disapppointments with PS3, i think ill buy the next xbox,, assuming it doesnt have hardware probs (thats the reason i got a ps3)

When i had a ps2, i always knew i had the best system out there. I get the feeling this generation that i have a great system, but its being treated like a 3rd rate console by sony and third party publishers

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#56 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts
[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]Iv'e had my PS3 since Nov. 17, 2006 and the ONLY game that is truly worth $60 IMO is Uncharted, now thats sad.3verlastingHero

Your Opinion does not equal General Opinion. War Hawk, Resistance: Fall of Man, Ratchet & Clank, Motor Storm, & Ninja Gaiden Sigm (regardless that it's a remake) all seemed like quality games.

OK lets say every one of those games are truly worth the price of admission (which they aren't) thats what? 5 games in the span of almost 2 years? Well 6 including Uncharted, 360 had more AAA games than that in the first COUPLE MONTHS after launch.

Those along with multiplats are more than enough to satisfy the average gamer.
Avatar image for jessie5788
jessie5788

972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 jessie5788
Member since 2007 • 972 Posts
microsoft isn't going into the next gen until nintendo and sony does. we all know nintendo doing a good job with the wii and sony starting to glow so there not going anywhere.. ms isn't making a new console for a couple of years. here why. people are still buying the 360 even today. know there sales aren't the best the only region there doing good in is the us but they still have a big fanbase. plus it would be suicide for them. you would have the blind idiots following ms. but some will be pissed off at ms. they drop 400 on the 360 just to see its going to be replaced. plus starting over is hard ms will lose a hell of a lot of fanbase plus having devs start all over with new hardware. i wouldn't be surprised if most of them will go to sony or nintendo. .
Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
Well that's pretty doubtful seeing as the PS3 is coming into its prime within the next year. And even in this year it seems to be far ahead the competition in terms of software releases. It will be another 3-4 years before we see another new console... unless Nintendo decides to drop something new early to compete in the hi-def era (maybe just an updated Wii or something).
Avatar image for megaton3k
megaton3k

515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 megaton3k
Member since 2007 • 515 Posts

I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.3verlastingHero

Try not to do that again on your next post please.....

Avatar image for jessie5788
jessie5788

972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 jessie5788
Member since 2007 • 972 Posts

cows... dont attempt to apply the Wii logic of existnace, create a cheap console that the masses will buy, the issue at hand here is that Sony forced people into $500 and $600 consoles by included first to market technology that was not needed at the time. MS can release a new console in 2010 for $400 and it will be lightyears ahead of the PS3 graphically.. while including bluray or a mega huge hard drive for fully installed games. The technology will be so much cheaper there... they are in a far greater tactical position to make all kinds of next gen moves, while sony still hasnt delivered on the PS3 yet.. sonys living in the past clearly.Bdking57

first of all sony never forced anyone to do anything. did you expect the ps3 to be a ps2.5 no. when you make something you want it to be future proof. that why all the technology was in there now its benefiting sony for having all the useless technology that people bashed them for. so when the next xbox sony can say we already had that. by the way you just described theps3. so basically you want the next xbox to match the ps3. ms isn't the type of company that makes products cheap. in reality they are junk but money wise no. don't expect all the technology you listed to be cheap that crap cost money a lot and ms loves to overcharge.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.3verlastingHero

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just someone else view of the game. Whats worst, no quote" AAA games" or a bad image.

http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/684760/Xbox_360_Causes_House_To_Burn.html?utm_source=g4tv&utm_medium=rssfeeds&utm_campaign=TheFeed

With all the hardware failures and another Xbox product burning a house down, its already a bad start for the next Xbox.

Avatar image for 3verlastingHero
3verlastingHero

747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 3verlastingHero
Member since 2008 • 747 Posts

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.megaton3k

Try not to do that again on your next post please.....

Well im sorry for speaking freely, excuse me, next time i will make sure to get your permission before I think.
Avatar image for black_awpN1
black_awpN1

7863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 black_awpN1
Member since 2004 • 7863 Posts
And teh PS3 would beat the new XBOX in sales if that happens. Newer consoles always sell worse than older ones.
Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts
Just a point, this can be spun as both an advantage and a disadvantage. I mean, technology hasn't exactly jumped leaps and bounds since the start of the generation. Really, this gen should last until there's some serious jump in technology, I mean a serious Crysis beater graphically.
Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]Iv'e had my PS3 since Nov. 17, 2006 and the ONLY game that is truly worth $60 IMO is Uncharted, now thats sad.3verlastingHero

Your Opinion does not equal General Opinion. War Hawk, Resistance: Fall of Man, Ratchet & Clank, Motor Storm, & Ninja Gaiden Sigm (regardless that it's a remake) all seemed like quality games.

OK lets say every one of those games are truly worth the price of admission (which they aren't) thats what? 5 games in the span of almost 2 years? Well 6 including Uncharted, 360 had more AAA games than that in the first COUPLE MONTHS after launch.

Lol, please list the AAA exclusives of the 360 around launch. I think that we have all come to agree that many of the games were overated in hindsight. But regardless of that issue...

All of those games listed were in the span of 1 year. In the span of 2 years the PS3 has Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, Resistance, Motorstorm, MLB The Show 07 & 08, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, UT3, The Agency, Infamous, Motorstorm 2, Haze, Metal Gear Solid 4, Resistance 2, Little Big Planet, GT Prologue, Wipeout HD, Killzone 2, and possibly White Knight Chronicles. With the exception of The Agency, we can rest assured that those all ARE worth the price of admission. And is significantly a notch ahead of the 360's exclusive line up at the two year mark.

It's all a matter of they kind of games you like. The only games I still play from time to time on the 360 are Bioshock and Mass Effect. And after two years on the market they still do not have anything to rival the experience of Warhawk, Ratchet & Clank, and Heavenly Sword. Not saying that they can't (not trying to turn this into some sort of technology war), simply that they don't. Those three games + Uncharted & MGS4 are enough reason to own a PS3 all buy themselves. The PS3 simply has some amazing gaming experiences that are not available anywhere else right now besides the PS3, that simple.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
So after MGS4 what else is good on the PS3 that didn't have a dud first game? As in that isnt a sequel to a crappy game that had a bad rating...? Yeah, PS3 is oging to have one or two good games, but xbox already has more than that out. How can you even compare ps3 to xbox greatness!
Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.CubanBlunt

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just some else view of the game.

That's precisely the issue. The whole thing of "AAA" titles is realy an elitist fanboy thing. Most of my favorite games on the PS2 were rated b/w 7-8 on GS. So should I let GS's reviews deter me from playing them? Of course not. And GS is literally the only site to review PS3 games so harshly. 1UP has always been pretty critical of the PS3, and even they are more admitting to some of the brilliant games to come out on the platform. I enjoy Warhawk and Uncharted more than I do Halo 3 or Gears... but they both received lower scores... which is fine, I don't care about the scores themselves & at the end of the day I appreciate all four games. This thread is pretty bogus to me.

Avatar image for black_awpN1
black_awpN1

7863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 black_awpN1
Member since 2004 • 7863 Posts

So after MGS4 what else is good on the PS3 that didn't have a dud first game? As in that isnt a sequel to a crappy game that had a bad rating...? Yeah, PS3 is oging to have one or two good games, but xbox already has more than that out. How can you even compare ps3 to xbox greatness!Phazevariance

360 has like three good games this year that are guranteed to be good. PS3 has about 4 or 5.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

:wink: then it looks like buying an xbox360 now isn't a very good investment is it...

Better off getting a PS3 now then and waiting for the xbox720 to go down in price over the next couple of years since xbox360 will be dead.

killadread

Pretty much.

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts
[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.haze_blaze

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just some else view of the game.

That's precisely the issue. The whole thing of "AAA" titles is realy an elitist fanboy thing. Most of my favorite games on the PS2 were rated b/w 7-8 on GS. So should I let GS's reviews deter me from playing them? Of course not. And GS is literally the only site to review PS3 games so harshly. 1UP has always been pretty critical of the PS3, and even they are more admitting to some of the brilliant games to come out on the platform. I enjoy Warhawk and Uncharted more than I do Halo 3 or Gears... but they both received lower scores... which is fine, I don't care about the scores themselves & at the end of the day I appreciate all four games. This thread is pretty bogus to me.

My favourite game for the PS2 was Timesplitters :D And Jak 3

And medal of honour: rising sun, only realised that game was 6.4 recently. How!? It was awesome :D

Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts

So after MGS4 what else is good on the PS3 that didn't have a dud first game? As in that isnt a sequel to a crappy game that had a bad rating...? Yeah, PS3 is oging to have one or two good games, but xbox already has more than that out. How can you even compare ps3 to xbox greatness!Phazevariance

Regardless of what the 360 already has out... it hardly has anything this year to compete with the PS3 line-up, face it. I think Alan Wake will be good. Other than that I'll probably only buy NG2 & maybe Gears 2... but even w/ Gears 2 it'll depend on my budget after buying KZ2 & Resistance 2.

I think the other factor is... the 360 really doesn't have that many great games that aren't also on the PS3. Once you throw into account the fact that quite a few PS3'ers just buy the 360 games they like on pc... the PS3 really does come out ahead. Personally it is my favorite of the two systems. I'm not sure that the PS3 is really that much greater graphically (although Uncharted truly is the best looking game out still), but the PS3 does definitely have a better list of exclusives... even if it does have fewer games overall.

Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="haze_blaze"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.thrones

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just some else view of the game.

That's precisely the issue. The whole thing of "AAA" titles is realy an elitist fanboy thing. Most of my favorite games on the PS2 were rated b/w 7-8 on GS. So should I let GS's reviews deter me from playing them? Of course not. And GS is literally the only site to review PS3 games so harshly. 1UP has always been pretty critical of the PS3, and even they are more admitting to some of the brilliant games to come out on the platform. I enjoy Warhawk and Uncharted more than I do Halo 3 or Gears... but they both received lower scores... which is fine, I don't care about the scores themselves & at the end of the day I appreciate all four games. This thread is pretty bogus to me.

My favourite game for the PS2 was Timesplitters :D And Jak 3

My favorites were Disgaea 2, the Xenosaga series, And pretty much most of the Atlus catalog (which had a bunch of games range from 7's to 9's).

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.haze_blaze

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just some else view of the game.

That's precisely the issue. The whole thing of "AAA" titles is realy an elitist fanboy thing. Most of my favorite games on the PS2 were rated b/w 7-8 on GS. So should I let GS's reviews deter me from playing them? Of course not. And GS is literally the only site to review PS3 games so harshly. 1UP has always been pretty critical of the PS3, and even they are more admitting to some of the brilliant games to come out on the platform. I enjoy Warhawk and Uncharted more than I do Halo 3 or Gears... but they both received lower scores... which is fine, I don't care about the scores themselves & at the end of the day I appreciate all four games. This thread is pretty bogus to me.

Army of Two is better then a 6.5, Prologue should atlease be a 8.5, the graphics are a 10 by themself and when your inside a turn inside the car, it feels like your in the car with the car fighting the turn. GS gave it a 7.5 because it's not enough content, what did they expect from the came.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="thrones"][QUOTE="haze_blaze"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.haze_blaze

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just some else view of the game.

That's precisely the issue. The whole thing of "AAA" titles is realy an elitist fanboy thing. Most of my favorite games on the PS2 were rated b/w 7-8 on GS. So should I let GS's reviews deter me from playing them? Of course not. And GS is literally the only site to review PS3 games so harshly. 1UP has always been pretty critical of the PS3, and even they are more admitting to some of the brilliant games to come out on the platform. I enjoy Warhawk and Uncharted more than I do Halo 3 or Gears... but they both received lower scores... which is fine, I don't care about the scores themselves & at the end of the day I appreciate all four games. This thread is pretty bogus to me.

My favourite game for the PS2 was Timesplitters :D And Jak 3

My favorites were Disgaea 2, the Xenosaga series, And pretty much most of the Atlus catalog (which had a bunch of games range from 7's to 9's).

My brother liked Xenosaga, I liked Fear Effect. The thing I hate about reviews is that they basically make you buy a game with the scoures. What ever happend to takin a chance on a game?

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
microsoft isn't going into the next gen until nintendo and sony does. we all know nintendo doing a good job with the wii and sony starting to glow so there not going anywhere.. ms isn't making a new console for a couple of years. here why. people are still buying the 360 even today. know there sales aren't the best the only region there doing good in is the us but they still have a big fanbase. plus it would be suicide for them. you would have the blind idiots following ms. but some will be pissed off at ms. they drop 400 on the 360 just to see its going to be replaced. plus starting over is hard ms will lose a hell of a lot of fanbase plus having devs start all over with new hardware. i wouldn't be surprised if most of them will go to sony or nintendo. .jessie5788
Everybody is running under the assumption that a new machine means the 360 will be killed off since the first xbox was. The first xbox couldn't be profitable due to some hardware decisions, so MS had to kill it or continue pouring money down the drain(nvidia deal). This time the 360 can be the budget console(remember 80% of a consoles userbase typically comes at 200 bucks and below) and the new machine would be the top dog for the hardcore early adopters. The 360 would continue making them money while the userbase and library of the new machine build up and then those same people that didn't jump to this gen can enjoy the 360's for a few years until the new machine gets cheap(a few years into the next gen)and then they move on. MS can follow sony's route with the PS1/PS2 and PS2/PS3 relationship this time around. Look for the next xbox in fall of 2010, IMO.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

So the new Xbox is coming out next year?

Lionheart08
:| It's been moved up a year?I thought the PS3's prime was this year??
Avatar image for ikwal
ikwal

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 ikwal
Member since 2004 • 1600 Posts
what's all this bashing on the PS3, it's not like xbox360 has ANY good exlusive game. GoW is on PC and so is Mass Effect soon and Halo sucks.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

I actually think XBOX would release a new console just to keep up with the PS3 once it hits it's prime.

PS3 is going to have a long life cycle.

Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts

I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.3verlastingHero
REALLY? Thanks for talking me out of getting a 360. I will just wait for their next console and see if I want it. :roll:

Real response. Sony works at Sony's pace, not Microsofts pace.

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#81 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.l-_-l

REALLY? Thanks for talking me out of getting a 360. I will just wait for their next console and see if I want it. :roll:

Real response. Sony works at Sony's pace, not Microsofts pace.

Wow, and you say that like it's a good thing..

Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts

I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.3verlastingHero

I don't think the problem is Sony being slow, here. On the contrary, Microsoft is effin' rushing their console. How much better would the 360 have been if only Microsoft had taken their time ? I do hope they won't be stupid enough to attempt that again next gen.

Avatar image for killadread
killadread

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 killadread
Member since 2008 • 498 Posts
[QUOTE="haze_blaze"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.CubanBlunt

AAA, AA, A it dont matter, all 3 systems has good games. AAA is just some else view of the game.

That's precisely the issue. The whole thing of "AAA" titles is realy an elitist fanboy thing. Most of my favorite games on the PS2 were rated b/w 7-8 on GS. So should I let GS's reviews deter me from playing them? Of course not. And GS is literally the only site to review PS3 games so harshly. 1UP has always been pretty critical of the PS3, and even they are more admitting to some of the brilliant games to come out on the platform. I enjoy Warhawk and Uncharted more than I do Halo 3 or Gears... but they both received lower scores... which is fine, I don't care about the scores themselves & at the end of the day I appreciate all four games. This thread is pretty bogus to me.

Army of Two is better then a 6.5, Prologue should atlease be a 8.5, the graphics are a 10 by themself and when your inside a turn inside the car, it feels like your in the car with the car fighting the turn. GS gave it a 7.5 because it's not enough content, what did they expect from the game.

to be released on the xbox360.

Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
[QUOTE="l-_-l"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.xsubtownerx

REALLY? Thanks for talking me out of getting a 360. I will just wait for their next console and see if I want it. :roll:

Real response. Sony works at Sony's pace, not Microsofts pace.

Wow, and you say that like it's a good thing..

Yes it is a good thing. I don't want rushed crap. You rush a AAA game and you get a AA game. 360 has been out a year longer than the PS3, but lemmings for some unknown reason can't seem to keep that bit of info from leaking from their brains.
Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#85 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="l-_-l"]

[QUOTE="3verlastingHero"]I was thinking about this the other day, it seems like the PS3 is lagging WAY behind, and by the time it finally surpasses the 360 in terms of AAA games, Microsoft will have moved on to Xbox 540 or whatever, why is Sony so slow to get on the ball? I mean HOME is pretty much never coming out and it was supposta counter xbox live.l-_-l

REALLY? Thanks for talking me out of getting a 360. I will just wait for their next console and see if I want it. :roll:

Real response. Sony works at Sony's pace, not Microsofts pace.

Wow, and you say that like it's a good thing..

Yes it is a good thing. I don't want rushed crap. You rush a AAA game and you get a AA game. 360 has been out a year longer than the PS3, but lemmings for some unknown reason can't seem to keep that bit of info from leaking from their brains.

How many AAA games did the 360 have it's first year? You calling them rushed and trash? get out of here.

Avatar image for Pennockk
Pennockk

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Pennockk
Member since 2008 • 91 Posts

So the next X-box is coming out next year since thats when the PS3 will be in it's prime with it's biggest exclusives (GT5, FFXIII, GOW III)?Flamestos

wow you have 3 overated games comin out next year i better sell my 360!

Avatar image for jeffdoomsday
jeffdoomsday

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 jeffdoomsday
Member since 2008 • 1023 Posts

[QUOTE="Flamestos"]So the next X-box is coming out next year since thats when the PS3 will be in it's prime with it's biggest exclusives (GT5, FFXIII, GOW III)?Pennockk

wow you have 3 overated games comin out next year i better sell my 360!

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
Are you saying that's a good thing for Xbox? Releasing during the prime of the previous generation is a huge mistake. Especially if the next Xbox is a very marginal graphical improvement. Then you'd just have Xbox720/PS3 multiplats.