I hope you haven't seen
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Nasty...
I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...
NAPK1NS
since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D
[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]Nasty...
I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...
dd2005nian
since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D
I'm will never buy another CoD unless: 1. Made by Infinity Ward 2. PC Exclusive
Number 2 is never going to happen, so looks like I'm going to be missing out.
I'm will never buy another CoD unless: 1. Made by Infinity Ward 2. PC Exclusive
Number 2 is never going to happen, so looks like I'm going to be missing out.
Sir_BIGnuts
[QUOTE="Sir_BIGnuts"]I'm will never buy another CoD unless: 1. Made by Infinity Ward 2. PC Exclusive
Number 2 is never going to happen, so looks like I'm going to be missing out.
strudel420
Has nothing to do with that, it's just that as soon as the franchise hit consoles it went down the drain. Obviously the original console version (I don't remember the title) was crap, but CoD2 and everything after that was dumbed down from the original once it hit consoles.
[QUOTE="strudel420"][QUOTE="Sir_BIGnuts"]I'm will never buy another CoD unless: 1. Made by Infinity Ward 2. PC Exclusive
Number 2 is never going to happen, so looks like I'm going to be missing out.
Sir_BIGnuts
Has nothing to do with that, it's just that as soon as the franchise hit consoles it went down the drain. Obviously the original console version (I don't remember the title) was crap, but CoD2 and everything after that was dumbed down from the original once it hit consoles.
There still hasn't been a single well done Pacific WWII game, it's pretty much untouched.
In terms of carnage, the Pacific is where it was at. That was a pure bloodbath. Nobody surrendered, the battles went on untill every single person died clawing at their enemy.
Shoot, anyone ever hear of that New York Taxi driver that killed like 40+ Japanese single-handedly? It was a real freaking bloodbath.
I'm will never buy another CoD unless: 1. Made by Infinity Ward 2. PC Exclusive
Number 2 is never going to happen, so looks like I'm going to be missing out.
Sir_BIGnuts
Pretty much the same way. Even at that, unless they do something radically different, COD4 was a decent game, but certainly not 90+ worthy, it's call of duty with skins, a game released in 2003.
I'm being honest, I'm extremely pissed off that they're going back to WWII. COD4 took us in a fantastic new direction for the series and then Treyarch just had to bring us back to 2005... Screw COD5, I'm sticking to COD4 and waiting for the next Infinity Ward made COD. Treyarch pisses me off so much.
whats the matter console gamers, Treyarch not good enough for you after you tasted what PC FPS were like with CoD2+4?
CoD3 was great for a console shooter, so i dont know what everyones complaining about.
and why is everyone acting like Treyarch wants this game to be WW2? did anyone every stop to think that maybe its activisions decision, since you know, they own the franchise?
That third pic is downright fugly.PBSnipes
I'm sorry that's the wrong answer.... and the correct answer is... all of those pictures are friggin ugly! I know its early and stuff... but how much detail can u put into a jungle??
At least the flamethrower looks exciting... U guys r right it looks pacific, i just hopes it has a half decent story!
[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]Nasty...
I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...
dd2005nian
since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D
You can post bad pics all you want MGS4 is handsdown the best looking game on consoles nothing else is even close.
[QUOTE="dd2005nian"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]Nasty...
I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...
Polaris_choice
since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D
You can post bad pics all you want MGS4 is handsdown the best looking game on consoles nothing else is even close.
Uhhh, no. Good art direction, and camera angles go a long way. MGS4 has amazing models, but that's abou it. Textures are terrible, in any pic. Hell if you look at KZ2 pics/vids, the textures and non-aa really show.
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="dd2005nian"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]Nasty...
I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...
Taiko88
since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D
You can post bad pics all you want MGS4 is handsdown the best looking game on consoles nothing else is even close.
Uhhh, no. Good art direction, and camera angles go a long way. MGS4 has amazing models, but that's abou it. Textures are terrible, in any pic. Hell if you look at KZ2 pics/vids, the textures and non-aa really show.
no thats just a bad pic.
Read the review, he says the textures are amazing, he also says thgat the game is the most visually impressive on any console game to date.
That pic has been used loads but play the game before bashing its graphics.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment