call of duty 5 new pics

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="dd2005nian"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Nasty...

I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...

Taiko88

since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D

You can post bad pics all you want MGS4 is handsdown the best looking game on consoles nothing else is even close.

Uhhh, no. Good art direction, and camera angles go a long way. MGS4 has amazing models, but that's abou it. Textures are terrible, in any pic. Hell if you look at KZ2 pics/vids, the textures and non-aa really show.

Um it depends actually some of the textures are outstanding. Yes some are inconsistent but as you are actually playing the game( it is a 3rd person title) most of the textures look great. It also has amazing lighting, motion blur and particle effects but judgeing by your comments you havent even played the game your just looking at pics.

[QUOTE="Taiko88"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="dd2005nian"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Nasty...

I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...

Polaris_choice

since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D

You can post bad pics all you want MGS4 is handsdown the best looking game on consoles nothing else is even close.

Uhhh, no. Good art direction, and camera angles go a long way. MGS4 has amazing models, but that's abou it. Textures are terrible, in any pic. Hell if you look at KZ2 pics/vids, the textures and non-aa really show.

Um it depends actually some of the textures are outstanding. Yes some are inconsistent but as you are actually playing the game( it is a 3rd person title) most of the textures look great. It also has amazing lighting, motion blur and particle effects but judgeing by your comments you havent even played the game your just looking at pics.

What the hell does MGS4 have to do with COD5???!!!

God, can't we go through one thread without talking about MGS4?

Take it they are screenshots from the 360 version and not the PS3 version cos they look awful

a katana on cod5?

looks like they ran out of ideas

Kirlok

Or maybe its because the japanese soliders actually used katanas in battle. Im pretty sure that officers would be issued one but like i said, im not sure....

And while its annoying that they are going back to world war 2, the jungle fighting of the pacific might change it up enough to make it a decent game.

Back to world war 2?! :cry: Nooooo!dracula_16

Exactly my thought. Going to pass on this one, probably.

Im going to give them a secound chance COD3 wasn't the worst game I've played, hopefully they'll get it right.

Take it they are screenshots from the 360 version and not the PS3 version cos they look awful

PS_John

And you were asking me how I can call you a troll :lol:

[QUOTE="dd2005nian"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Nasty...

I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...

club-sandwich

since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D

the LATEST cow excuse. i thought you all desperately convince everyone with uncharted graphics then we point out that your most hyped game of the millenia has average at best graphics and all you can say is "it's all about the gameplay :|"? :lol:

There still hasn't been a single well done Pacific WWII game, it's pretty much untouched.

In terms of carnage, the Pacific is where it was at. That was a pure bloodbath. Nobody surrendered, the battles went on untill every single person died clawing at their enemy.

Shoot, anyone ever hear of that New York Taxi driver that killed like 40+ Japanese single-handedly? It was a real freaking bloodbath.

ViolentPressure

This is the exact reason I'm looking forward to it, I'm so sick of everyone complaining "OMG it's WW2 again whaaa whaaa!!" urrm I'm sorry unless you're living in some magical universe then last time I checked there have been what like 2 major games set in WW2 and one was Rising Sun which sucked. Just quit complaining, this has flamethrowers and maybe swords online therefore it's awesome already.

[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Nasty...

I really need to be blunt here, these look terrible...

dd2005nian

since when mgs fans have rights to blame cod graphics.:D

It's quite obvious your a lemming as you flamed mgs when it was never mentioned....

Also...

Good job going and looking for the worst mgs4 pic, here's some pics, check out the backgrounds also in these...

Am I the only one who is glad it's going back to WW2? Modern Warfare was good but if they carried on making modern games it would be the same story over and over. Communists are killing innocents and middle eastern militias are blowing stuff up, atleast with WW2 games your playing a part of history and not some poorly written story. And why do people have no respect for Treyarch? COD3 might not have been better than 2 in terms of gameplay, but it was alot more immersive and had a much greater wow factor, now if they're using the COD4 engine then I believe this game could possibly be better than COD4, well that's my opinion anyway.ONLYDOD

This is actually a great point, the best thing about WORLD war 2 is that it took place all over the WORLD, and so instead of just Modern Warfare fighting in the desert cities, (which after 1 more game if they made another everyone would start going "OMG no more Iraq War games please!!!!") they can spread their wings and do what they are doing here, having it in Japan and other places. Plus I also agree with your Treyarch comment, I quite enjoyed COD3, it was a by the books WW2 shooter but the online was amazing and as I said in my posts, the ability to use Katana's and Flamethrowers online just makes it so much better.

Back to world war 2?! :cry: Nooooo!dracula_16

it will be considerably more violent.

Plus why is everyone against WWII...? They are not doing germans anymore, its the japanese. Thats what pumps me up for the game.

[QUOTE="ONLYDOD"] Am I the only one who is glad it's going back to WW2? Modern Warfare was good but if they carried on making modern games it would be the same story over and over. Communists are killing innocents and middle eastern militias are blowing stuff up, atleast with WW2 games your playing a part of history and not some poorly written story. And why do people have no respect for Treyarch? COD3 might not have been better than 2 in terms of gameplay, but it was alot more immersive and had a much greater wow factor, now if they're using the COD4 engine then I believe this game could possibly be better than COD4, well that's my opinion anyway.bobbetybob

This is actually a great point, the best thing about WORLD war 2 is that it took place all over the WORLD, and so instead of just Modern Warfare fighting in the desert cities, (which after 1 more game if they made another everyone would start going "OMG no more Iraq War games please!!!!") they can spread their wings and do what they are doing here, having it in Japan and other places. Plus I also agree with your Treyarch comment, I quite enjoyed COD3, it was a by the books WW2 shooter but the online was amazing and as I said in my posts, the ability to use Katana's and Flamethrowers online just makes it so much better.

I agree, people should stop complaining. about it going back to WW2.

Meh...graphics are pretty ugly imo. I doubt if I pick this one up...sick of WWII settings of every war game and it's Treyarch. I heard CoD3 was okay,but I didn't take the risk.killab2oo5

cod3 wasnt ok, it was an awesome game, the only reason people hate it is coz its not made by infinity war and anything made by treyarch is an autocrap -_-

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]Meh...graphics are pretty ugly imo. I doubt if I pick this one up...sick of WWII settings of every war game and it's Treyarch. I heard CoD3 was okay,but I didn't take the risk.mingo123

cod3 wasnt ok, it was an awesome game, the only reason people hate it is coz its not made by infinity war and anything made by treyarch is an autocrap -_-

wtf is that again...??

Enough with WW2 already... pff.. Wont be failure , but not what CoD4 was imo...

wtf is that again...??

Enough with WW2 already... pff.. Wont be failure , but not what CoD4 was imo...

AzatiS

pfft enough with the modern day settings too, they aren't excactly original anymore either

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]Meh...graphics are pretty ugly imo. I doubt if I pick this one up...sick of WWII settings of every war game and it's Treyarch. I heard CoD3 was okay,but I didn't take the risk.mingo123

cod3 wasnt ok, it was an awesome game, the only reason people hate it is coz its not made by infinity war and anything made by treyarch is an autocrap -_-

COD3 wasent nearly as good as the Iwards offerings... Its alot to ask though, even Iward cant beat their own COD1... Which still stands to be better than the lot.

Ok that third screen is just bloom abuse.

No Infinity Ward, and back to bloody WW2 (a great period for games to be set in...before there were several hundred of them set on the same god damn beach, enough Saving Private Ryan imitations). Even if it seems be in the Pacific this time, it's ridiculous to go back to WW2 after being in the modern day. And it's Treyarch again, whoopdedo. I was a fan of series, but I'll most likely be giving this one a miss, as I did CoD3.

[QUOTE="dracula_16"]Back to world war 2?! :cry: Nooooo!rgame1

it will be considerably more violent.

Plus why is everyone against WWII...? They are not doing germans anymore, its the japanese. Thats what pumps me up for the game.

Actually there will be a little part in this game that you will fight germans.

a katana on cod5?

looks like they ran out of ideas

Kirlok

I'm looking forward to the robots.

Infinity Ward is way better. This looks like crap.Rikusaki

Nice to see a return to World War 2. I love my WW2 games. Shame about the lack of any British in the game, though (We played a big role in CoD4 so I guess we can have a break :P)Doom_HellKnight

How do you know Burma/Singapore won't feature, now that would be an untouched part of WW2.

But I really want a Winter War game.

Finland vs Russia For. The. Win.