BO2 is looking like the best FPS in a really long time (gamescom coverage) and Halo 4 is looking more like... Halo 3 with different maps. Wouldnt you agree?
Halo's last great innovation was adding sprint lol.
Eddie-Vedder
I miss not being able to sprint in Halo 3, it gave the game a uniqueness to it. Now its just trying to be like COD. Halo is playing catch up to COD while COD keeps being one step ahead of it.
I really enjoy the formula of Halo. I hope it doesn't change much. Halo is like Tetris in the sense that the formula is timeless. You can play it and have fun anytime.
And so COD is "evolving". lol You'll agree to anything if it means taking a small swipe at anything Halo or 360-related. have u not seen what they have changed in blops 2? :| its pretty much nothing like the past cods outside of the actual gunplay
Sigh... where's the gamespot glitch when we need it :(.
Second_Hokage
Translation: im butt hurt over what he said and he should be banned forevaz! :| Ok, i'm not butthurt a slight bit, but your ability to create thread must be taken away forever.
After Halo 3 they really didn't have anywhere to go other than graphical increases and frivolous content. But CoD has a long way to go before they match the simple balance of H3.
And so COD is "evolving". lol You'll agree to anything if it means taking a small swipe at anything Halo or 360-related. have u not seen what they have changed in blops 2? :| its pretty much nothing like the past cods outside of the actual gunplay
Yet no one in this thread has even given an example of such a difference. Go figure.
And so COD is "evolving". lol You'll agree to anything if it means taking a small swipe at anything Halo or 360-related. have u not seen what they have changed in blops 2? :| its pretty much nothing like the past cods outside of the actual gunplay
Using that same logic, Halo 4 has also evolved. Just not through your brand of lenses. Again, you'll agree to anything.
But really I'm done. I'm breaking one of my rules already by posting in a Hokage thread.
I really wish halo 4 was "halo 3 with different maps" or even better halo 2 with different maps but it isn't. It's looking way better than reach and I love the art style more than reach so hopefully it will be as good as halo 3.
It doesn't matter what CoD does, it will always be labeled as "just the same old CoD rehash" by these stupid elitists. Just simply ignroe these elitists.
Yet no one in this thread has even given an example of such a difference. Go figure.Kickinurass
-All the social/e-sport features -perks no longer affect weapons (which is a fundamental difference) -The setting has changed to futuristic -Strike force missions , campaign is much more open now..there are choices and they can affect the campaign -instead of the traditional pick primary weapon , secondary etc... they have revamped it to a 10 item slot system. -killstreaks are now earned by points instead gaining them with kills, which will hamper campers significantly and im sure im missing heaps more
Using that same logic, Halo 4 has also evolved. FireSpirit117
I like the changes coming to Black Ops II, but Halo 4 will do me justice in the long-run. I find Halo to be more fun, but I'll play BLOPS II at a friends house since I like the addition of Multi-Team.
niether are evolved. both are generic trash Metro Last Light will be better than both combine by far. but recieve less score cuz its not mainstream game unlike cod and halo which always praise by corrupt mainstream media. its sad state of industrySNIPER4321
What does "generic trash" even mean?
Using a game formula that is proven to be fun and millions of people enjoy? I don't other industries where people say "this is too popular so it's trash". Generally people want more of what they like.
[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]niether are evolved. both are generic trash Metro Last Light will be better than both combine by far. but recieve less score cuz its not mainstream game unlike cod and halo which always praise by corrupt mainstream media. its sad state of industrySNIPER4321
What does "generic trash" even mean?
Using a game formula that is proven to be fun and millions of people enjoy? I don't other industries where people say "this is too popular so it's trash". Generally people want more of what they like.
6 hour linear pew pew pew with MP focus. they both are. they receive critical acclaim because they are popular. nothing special I prefer stuff like Stalker and metro. metro is linear. sure but is story driven FPS with atmosphere.
So you're jumping on the internet hipster crap where you hate it because it's popular and believe that game reviewers have 0 credibility and just rate stuff on the basis that it's popular?
[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]niether are evolved. both are generic trash Metro Last Light will be better than both combine by far. but recieve less score cuz its not mainstream game unlike cod and halo which always praise by corrupt mainstream media. its sad state of industry Metro reminded me of doom so ya most shooters are generic in one way or another. I consider metro mainstream its pubished by thq and got 20 E3 award nominations by the so called corrupt mainstream media. Sales your right it probably won't sell as much but I think that is because its a slow paced suspense thriller when I prefer fast paced action.
Using a game formula that is proven to be fun and millions of people enjoy? I don't other industries where people say "this is too popular so it's trash". Generally people want more of what they like.
Wasdie
6 hour linear pew pew pew with MP focus. they both are. they receive critical acclaim because they are popular. nothing special I prefer stuff like Stalker and metro. metro is linear. sure but is story driven FPS with atmosphere.
So you're jumping on the internet hipster crap where you hate it because it's popular and believe that game reviewers have 0 credibility and just rate stuff on the basis that it's popular?
You do realize how dumb that sounds right?
this applies to anyone on sw....no one seems to like any games except for ones that came out 7 years ago
[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"] 6 hour linear pew pew pew with MP focus. they both are. they receive critical acclaim because they are popular. nothing special I prefer stuff like Stalker and metro. metro is linear. sure but is story driven FPS with atmosphere.SNIPER4321
So you're jumping on the internet hipster crap where you hate it because it's popular and believe that game reviewers have 0 credibility and just rate stuff on the basis that it's popular?
You do realize how dumb that sounds right?
its ture. most of mainstream popular games are bad. even zelda oot. most of best games recieve 8 here. but cod games are same since cod4 which was decent game. halo gameplay dont suit me because gunplay is like water gun and its colorfull Sorry you feel that way but it does sounds pretty crazy. If a game is popular its because a lot of people like it so obviously its not a bad game just cause you disagree.
.
Log in to comment