Call of Duty: Ghosts will feature Collapsing Skycrapers

  • 100 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Cloud_Insurance
Cloud_Insurance

3279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Cloud_Insurance
Member since 2008 • 3279 Posts

so for a single downloadable level the gameplay is going to change.

 

seems like a good idea. 

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts
Uh, wow. Activision must have the dumbest userbase. What's next? Grass moves?
Avatar image for heeweesRus
heeweesRus

5492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 heeweesRus
Member since 2012 • 5492 Posts

Will buy on PS4/PS3 Day 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

Activision are funny

BF4 skyscraper falling
1z2qsu.gif

CoD: Ghost skyscraper falling
portable%20toilet%20knock%20push%20fall%

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
BF4 looks like the same scripted destruction as BF3, but this time they make a sky scraper collapse.
Avatar image for SuperFlakeman
SuperFlakeman

7411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 SuperFlakeman
Member since 2011 • 7411 Posts

I like the idea of dynamic maps, but it's always scripted so the outcome is 100% predictable.

For it to be an interesting mechanic, they'd need to consult the L4D guys, because those guys came up with a sweet formula that includes variables.

The BF4 counterpart may be impressive in its scope and technical capability, but in terms of gameplay it's not ground-breaking. I don't get why BF is appealing in the first place anyway, the size of the maps means slower pace and you have to run alot just to reach a choke point. It makes gameplay more boring. 

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#57 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Another COD feature that could be really good but will end up mediocre.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#58 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

I like the idea of dynamic maps, but it's always scripted so the outcome is 100% predictable.

For it to be an interesting mechanic, they'd need to consult the L4D guys, because those guys came up with a sweet formula for variables.

The BF4 counterpart may be impressive in its scope and technical capability, but in terms of gameplay it's not ground-breaking. I don't get why BF is appealing in the first place anyway, the size of the maps means slower pace and you have to run alot just to reach a choke point. It makes gameplay more boring. 

SuperFlakeman
You have to run about 20 seconds max if the round has started, because you can create spawns or spawn at squad or spawn at points about to be taken.
Avatar image for Michael0134567
Michael0134567

28651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#60 Michael0134567
Member since 2008 • 28651 Posts

Call of Duty innovating like nothing else. Thank you Infinity Ward.

Avatar image for ShadowofSonic
ShadowofSonic

24616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#61 ShadowofSonic
Member since 2009 • 24616 Posts
Am I supposed to be impressed?
Avatar image for deactivated-5fc147aeeb0aa
deactivated-5fc147aeeb0aa

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-5fc147aeeb0aa
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

I like the idea of dynamic maps, but it's always scripted so the outcome is 100% predictable.

For it to be an interesting mechanic, they'd need to consult the L4D guys, because those guys came up with a sweet formula that includes variables.

The BF4 counterpart may be impressive in its scope and technical capability, but in terms of gameplay it's not ground-breaking. I don't get why BF is appealing in the first place anyway, the size of the maps means slower pace and you have to run alot just to reach a choke point. It makes gameplay more boring. 

SuperFlakeman

Warfare is supposed to be slow paced. That is what I hate most about CoD. The maps are so fvcking small there is no room to manuever.

Avatar image for applefan1991
applefan1991

3397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 applefan1991  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 3397 Posts
I think that it sounds pretty cool. I can't stand the way BF4 plays so I'm excited that this is happening with COD
Avatar image for Big_Pecks
Big_Pecks

5973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#64 Big_Pecks
Member since 2010 • 5973 Posts

So dynamic maps are newsworthy? SSB was doing this in the 90s.

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperFlakeman"]

I like the idea of dynamic maps, but it's always scripted so the outcome is 100% predictable.

For it to be an interesting mechanic, they'd need to consult the L4D guys, because those guys came up with a sweet formula that includes variables.

The BF4 counterpart may be impressive in its scope and technical capability, but in terms of gameplay it's not ground-breaking. I don't get why BF is appealing in the first place anyway, the size of the maps means slower pace and you have to run alot just to reach a choke point. It makes gameplay more boring. 

sherman-tank1

Warfare is supposed to be slow paced. That is what I hate most about CoD. The maps are so fvcking small there is no room to manuever.

Supposed to be slow paced? Maybe when we had muskets and horses But now that we have machine guns,missiles,airplanes and tanks its a lot faster paced.
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#66 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts

So they copied Battlefield and turned it into a pre-order DLC.

Is this some kind of a joke?

Avatar image for WiiMan21
WiiMan21

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#67 WiiMan21
Member since 2007 • 8191 Posts

It's probably heavily scripted.  Unless CoD is adding destructive enviroments then cool.

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23838 Posts

Not only is it being touted as an innovation, but they are selling it as pre-order DLC.  foxhound_fox

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#69 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

This thread is about Call of Duty, the shooter.

So why is everybody talking about Cod and fish? I mean yeah cod is pretty tasty with butter but u guise, it's off topic.

Avatar image for DarthRamms
DarthRamms

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 DarthRamms
Member since 2013 • 1128 Posts
COD same shit every year oh wait now we can play dogs and why didn't they talk about this during their video but mention fish ai likes its something new instead
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

It's like it's realistic or somethin.

Avatar image for Shottayouth13-
Shottayouth13-

7018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Shottayouth13-
Member since 2009 • 7018 Posts
Dat next gen powa!
Avatar image for deactivated-5fc147aeeb0aa
deactivated-5fc147aeeb0aa

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-5fc147aeeb0aa
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

[QUOTE="SuperFlakeman"]

I like the idea of dynamic maps, but it's always scripted so the outcome is 100% predictable.

For it to be an interesting mechanic, they'd need to consult the L4D guys, because those guys came up with a sweet formula that includes variables.

The BF4 counterpart may be impressive in its scope and technical capability, but in terms of gameplay it's not ground-breaking. I don't get why BF is appealing in the first place anyway, the size of the maps means slower pace and you have to run alot just to reach a choke point. It makes gameplay more boring. 

p4s2p0

Warfare is supposed to be slow paced. That is what I hate most about CoD. The maps are so fvcking small there is no room to manuever.

Supposed to be slow paced? Maybe when we had muskets and horses But now that we have machine guns,missiles,airplanes and tanks its a lot faster paced.

Quite frankly no. In real life a squad can be pinned down by a sniper for hours. Having better weapons doesn't make people want to get in the way of danger more.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
couldnt bother reading it, just answer me this SW, mp or sp ?
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
lolQuake2Engine.
Avatar image for Wiimotefan
Wiimotefan

4151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Wiimotefan
Member since 2010 • 4151 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Not only is it being touted as an innovation, but they are selling it as pre-order DLC.  ConanTheStoner

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

It will probably look the same as when someone loses at Jenga

Jenga.gif

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23838 Posts

It will probably look the same as when someone loses at Jenga

Jenga.gif

BPoole96

lol you're probably right.

Avatar image for Trail_Mix
Trail_Mix

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Trail_Mix
Member since 2011 • 2579 Posts

Cool. CoD giving me even less of a reason to play the BF series.

Avatar image for SDC_4_LIFE
SDC_4_LIFE

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 SDC_4_LIFE
Member since 2013 • 164 Posts

[QUOTE="ConanTheStoner"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Not only is it being touted as an innovation, but they are selling it as pre-order DLC.  Wiimotefan

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

It will probably look the same as when someone loses at Jenga

Jenga.gif

ConanTheStoner

lol you're probably right.

You're both wrong, physics is something that isn't known to CoD. You can explode RED barrels, cars (which are essentially red barrels) and break windows=Call of Duty 2013 physics.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52551 Posts
This is gonna kick the shit out of Battlefield. Again.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="ConanTheStoner"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

It will probably look the same as when someone loses at Jenga

Jenga.gif

silversix_

lol you're probably right.

You're both wrong, physics is something that isn't known to CoD. You can explode RED barrels, cars (which are essentially red barrels) and break windows=Call of Duty 2013 physics.

I wonder if they will let players open doors all by themselves this time. Dem door swinging physics are nuts
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#84 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Not only is it being touted as an innovation, but they are selling it as pre-order DLC. http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intel/2012/09/26/26-mitt-romney-laughing.o.jpg/a_560x375.jpg" alt=" " />

^
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#85 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45460 Posts
I must say, if one were to even claim Activision is copying EA's E3 multiplayer demo of Battlefield 4, even if that's true it's quite impressive they could put this in multiplayer so quickly. Though I doubt that's the case, given from the look of the game design it seems pretty fitting that such a feature exists.
Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]

[QUOTE="ConanTheStoner"]

lol you're probably right.

BPoole96

You're both wrong, physics is something that isn't known to CoD. You can explode RED barrels, cars (which are essentially red barrels) and break windows=Call of Duty 2013 physics.

I wonder if they will let players open doors all by themselves this time. Dem door swinging physics are nuts

holy shit i can tell you right now this would be a revolution! But seriously, anyone who's playing CoD not bothered by the none existent physics? I mean games on N64 had better ones wtf. But they find time to make it so fish moves out the way. I swear its the same team who is making CoD Ghost that is in charge of Xbone marketing, mega fail in both sides.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

CoD still playing catch up in the tech department

seanmcloughlin

 

They will probably never catch up. Their new engine is already more dated than Frostbite.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

CoD still playing catch up in the tech department

_Matt_

 

They will probably never catch up. Their new engine is already more dated than Frostbite.

the secret sauce is, their fanbase don't even know what Frsotbite is so yeaaaah

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#89 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

CoD still playing catch up in the tech department

silversix_

 

They will probably never catch up. Their new engine is already more dated than Frostbite.

the secret sauce is, their fanbase don't even know what Frsotbite is so yeaaaah

The actual secret sauce is that they don't care! Nobody who still plays Battlefield 3 daily is doing so because it looks nice.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

Gee, why don't you copy Battlefield more, Call of Duty?

If it's true, I can't wait to see how glitchy it is. 

SuperNecro
How else is everyone going to experience destructible environments? Nobody buys BF games. Lol

That's good, it keeps the idiots out of Battlefield; stick them in Call of Duty where they belong.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
I think that it sounds pretty cool. I can't stand the way BF4 plays so I'm excited that this is happening with CODWadeFan
>Can't stand the way BF4 plays >BF4 isn't even out. Wut?
Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#92 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
[QUOTE="WadeFan"]I think that it sounds pretty cool. I can't stand the way BF4 plays so I'm excited that this is happening with CODDragonfireXZ95
>Can't stand the way BF4 plays >BF4 isn't even out. Wut?

...do you really expect it to play differently to BF3?
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="WadeFan"]I think that it sounds pretty cool. I can't stand the way BF4 plays so I'm excited that this is happening with CODbobbetybob
>Can't stand the way BF4 plays >BF4 isn't even out. Wut?

...do you really expect it to play differently to BF3?

It may or may not. I know perks are changed along with new weapons, counter-knifing, different vehicles are added, commanders are in again, also, skyscrapers collapsing?

How is this not different, again?

People said the same shit about Bad Company 2 to Battlefield 4. Usually people who said that were completely ignorant.

I'll admit the bold doesn't change much, but compare that to Call of Duty. How much shit changes from game to game in the Call of Duty series?

Avatar image for Guy_Brohski
Guy_Brohski

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#94 Guy_Brohski
Member since 2013 • 2221 Posts

COD's specialty is scripted events. Now when they can show me real time destruction along the lines of BF: BC or even Red Faction then I might consider buying another COD game. Maybe next next gen Activision will finally be up to last gen's standards. But I doubt it LOL.

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

BOL135JCQAECKLV.jpg:large

lul

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#97 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] >Can't stand the way BF4 plays >BF4 isn't even out. Wut?DragonfireXZ95

...do you really expect it to play differently to BF3?

It may or may not. I know perks are changed along with new weapons, counter-knifing, different vehicles are added, commanders are in again, also, skyscrapers collapsing?

How is this not different, again?

People said the same shit about Bad Company 2 to Battlefield 4. Usually people who said that were completely ignorant.

I'll admit the bold doesn't change much, but compare that to Call of Duty. How much shit changes from game to game in the Call of Duty series?

Was I defending CoD? You asked him how he knew what BF4 plays like, and at it's core I doubt the gameplay will have changed. Yes commander mode should hopefully add a bit more strategy to the game, but if you don't like the gunplay or using vehicles then it still won't be for you. I wasn't bashing the game I don't expect every game to suddenly change the entire way it plays every game, I was just pointing out why he probably felt that way
Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts

CoD still playing catch up in the tech department

seanmcloughlin
Yep. Although in their eyes they're set to "raise the bar again" from that press release, first few sentences :lol: COD has never raised any bar aside from amount of online mp popularity.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
I look forward to seeing them use those collapsing buildings in completely scripted setpieces.
Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

BOL135JCQAECKLV.jpg:large

lul

RR360DD

Its funny because its 1000% true. This is all brogamers that play CoD think and i know 2 personally (one of them plays CoD only and doesn't touch other games at all) and all they do is blame LAG/HOST/CAMPERS/TEAM/UAV/STUN AND FLASH NADES/NOOBTUBE all f*cking day since MW2. From 09-2013 same excuses... like stop playing the fking game if CoD lags that much but nooooo every next CoD comes out they gotta buy it hoping everything will suddenly change