Can Consoles do Crysis ???

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]I think they would be able to athigh-some mediumat 640p. The game runs pretty smooth even at 24fps (I ran it at 30fps,demo maxed),majority of gamers on consoles wouldn't notice.True_Gamer_

Crysis level sizes, phhysics, and interactibity - combined with increadably complex a.i - its a no go.

Just nope.

The Cell does not compensate for such small memory.

Maxed settings??? :lol:

What is this a joke????

720p? and AA was 0 as was AF....

Is this MAXXED? Did you see the deph field? It was pathetic...as were the textures and jaggies all over the place...

[QUOTE="PBSnipes"]Absolutely. Not on very high settings, but on medium for sure and possibly high (I've only played it on Medium myself). Far Cry 2 is coming to the 360 and PS3 and it seems like it will have much steeper system requirements, so there is no doubt in my mind that Crysis could be ported to consoles.Ramadear

Well the difference is that the Far Cry 2 devs are making it for the 360 and PS3 as well, which means they were already designing the game around consoles as well. Crysis however was designed solely around the PC. Put it this way, the Geforce 8800 series struggles to run the game at respectable settings. So imagine a console? Which is essentially a entry level PC. I'm not saying "A Crysis" isn't possible. But the Crysis you see on PC is not. And Crysis is know for its graphics not gameplay. So if a console can't render the graphics then its no point in it coming to consoles.

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

WuTangG

and neither of those games have ever even been shown on the 360...

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

WuTangG

Ever seen a 360 running them? :|

PC can't even render Crysis at max... so no...

If you are talking about putting everything at meium at 640X480, then the Wii can render it.

[QUOTE="WuTangG"]

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

dgsag

Ever seen a 360 running them? :|

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

WuTangG

Ever seen a 360 running them? :|

What makes you so certain they'll look on par or remotely close to the PC version then?

Look at how the 360 ports of Supreme Commander and World in Conflict are turning out... :lol:

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

dgsag

Ever seen a 360 running them? :|

What makes you so certain they'll look on par or remotely close to the PC version then?

Look at how the 360 ports of Supreme Commander and World in Conflict are turning out... :lol:

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

WuTangG

Ever seen a 360 running them? :|

What makes you so certain they'll look on par or remotely close to the PC version then?

Look at how the 360 ports of Supreme Commander and World in Conflict are turning out... :lol:

Ok, what about Command and Conquer?

If the 360 ran that game this badly, I can't understand how you guys can even be hoping to get a close version of Far Cry 2 and Alan Wake.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

They can do these

Alan Wake

and

Far Cry 2

Nuff said:)

WuTangG

Ever seen a 360 running them? :|

What makes you so certain they'll look on par or remotely close to the PC version then?

Look at how the 360 ports of Supreme Commander and World in Conflict are turning out... :lol:

THe same can be said for alan wake and far cry 2.

If the 360 ran that game this badly, I can't understand how you guys can even be hoping to get a close version of Far Cry 2 and Alan Wake.

dgsag

Must suck that your $5000 cant run that nicely, see ignorance is bliss:lol:

Must suck that your $5000 cant run that nicely, see ignorance is bliss:lol:

WuTangG

$1500 in 2006, and I beat the game on High settings at quite smooth frame rates. :)

Here's a video, which I recorded off my computer while the game was running, hence slightly lower frame rates.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/156142.html

[QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Must suck that your $5000 cant run that nicely, see ignorance is bliss:lol:

dgsag

$1500 in 2006, and I beat the game on High settings at quite smooth frame rates. :)

Here's a video, which I recorded off my computer while the game was running, hence slightly lower frame rates.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/156142.html

Consoles can do crysis on ULTRA HIGH!!111!!!!

but hopefully sometime in the future lol.

Right now they can run it but it will have to be a watered down version.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Must suck that your $5000 cant run that nicely, see ignorance is bliss:lol:

WuTangG

$1500 in 2006, and I beat the game on High settings at quite smooth frame rates. :)

Here's a video, which I recorded off my computer while the game was running, hence slightly lower frame rates.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/156142.html

*Shrugs* Actually, there are several great configuration files made by fans which run the game even smoother than that and preserve a High level of eye candy with some very high tweaks added in. Just search around on some fan sites.

It's something you have to see to believe. Frankly, I'm amazed the game doesn't run slower. Its just that people's expectations have been set too low after the recent flurry of linear, console ports.

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Must suck that your $5000 cant run that nicely, see ignorance is bliss:lol:

dgsag

$1500 in 2006, and I beat the game on High settings at quite smooth frame rates. :)

Here's a video, which I recorded off my computer while the game was running, hence slightly lower frame rates.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/156142.html

*Shrugs* Actually, there are several great configuration files made by fans which run the game even smoother than that and preserve a High level of eye candy with some very high tweaks added in. Just search around on some fan sites.

It's something you have to see to believe. Frankly, I'm amazed the game doesn't run slower. Its just that people's expectations have been set too low after the recent flurry of linear, console ports.

Crysis could run on consoles at 720p withall of the effects turned down. It'd be bad. That game scales horribly even on the PC.

Bgrngod

You obviously don't know what scaling means, if the game weren't optimised, it wouldn't run on any hardware right now. The reason for Crysis' performance are the physical limitations of hardware, the game is extremely optimised, and scales fairly well, i get very good frame rates with everything on high and medium for shaders and shadows, in my CRAPPY 8500gt (20-35 FPS)

Considering that Crysis has Ram usage tops at over 1500 mb I think thegame would have too be waterd down beyond recognition.

Not too mention other graphical aspects that no computer can handle at a good framerate.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Must suck that your $5000 cant run that nicely, see ignorance is bliss:lol:

WuTangG

$1500 in 2006, and I beat the game on High settings at quite smooth frame rates. :)

Here's a video, which I recorded off my computer while the game was running, hence slightly lower frame rates.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/156142.html

*Shrugs* Actually, there are several great configuration files made by fans which run the game even smoother than that and preserve a High level of eye candy with some very high tweaks added in. Just search around on some fan sites.

It's something you have to see to believe. Frankly, I'm amazed the game doesn't run slower. Its just that people's expectations have been set too low after the recent flurry of linear, console ports.

So if they simply removed some of the graphics options from your version of the game you would be happy?

Wow, that sounds amazingly stupid.

Short answer: No

Long answer: Consoles lack the amount of ram needed to really drive this game. I can't see consoles running the same quality of graphics, same quality of physics, same AI, same draw distance and level design all at once. Consoles are cheap (relative to a high end gaming PC) for a reason, you get what you pay for.

karasill

Here is a video i took everything is maxed except 3 options are on high 1 being Shadows.

X2AA now look at how far the draw distance is and tell me wich game on Xbox360 or PS3 has an area and draw distance like Crysis ?? Also just look at the graphixs can this be done on consoles???

http://media.putfile.com/Crysis-Vid

any thoughts???

Dualityeq

Crackdown on 360? Assassins creed?

Edit: not the graphics but the draw distance can be...umm graphics can get pretty good tho, look at war hound, ff13 if those are real shot and project offset....not as good but good looking. ot as many plant animations that take up ram tho...thats why crysis can't be down on consoles, the lil things like birds, critters, plant animations all take up ram....if they took those out it could prolly be on consoles.

Not enough RAM sarg'

lol at 512 mb and 2x256

I was talking recommended...surely the 360 and PS3 version are higher than minimum,and I was using Oblivion as an example that console games can run PC games that require much higher requirements than a consoles specifications due to easier optimization because everyone PS3 and 360 is the same hardware wise.killab2oo5

The 360 and PS3 Oblivion look knowhere as good as the PC version on a gaming PC nowdays, nor scratch the framerate.

Optimisation isnt a magical cure. A game can only be optimised so much to such low end hardware, and when it still doesnt run properly the game itself must be gutted.

And Oblivion is a poor comparison anyway. The game was developed as a multiplat since the beginning, and its incomparable to a complex game.

[QUOTE="Taalon"][QUOTE="Ramadear"]

[QUOTE="PBSnipes"]Absolutely. Not on very high settings, but on medium for sure and possibly high (I've only played it on Medium myself). Far Cry 2 is coming to the 360 and PS3 and it seems like it will have much steeper system requirements, so there is no doubt in my mind that Crysis could be ported to consoles.Ramadear

Well the difference is that the Far Cry 2 devs are making it for the 360 and PS3 as well, which means they were already designing the game around consoles as well. Crysis however was designed solely around the PC. Put it this way, the Geforce 8800 series struggles to run the game at respectable settings. So imagine a console? Which is essentially a entry level PC. I'm not saying "A Crysis" isn't possible. But the Crysis you see on PC is not. And Crysis is know for its graphics not gameplay. So if a console can't render the graphics then its no point in it coming to consoles.

Probably at a very low resolution and everyone knows that Very High kills the fps. You probably could hit 35fps if you are looking at the ocean or a wall. But saying 35fps average on Very High, I would call you a liar. With heavy fighting scenes you will probably go below 20fps. Every hermit knows that the 8800 series(single gpu) doesn't run the game well. Even tri sli barely dishes out 60fps at 1920 x 1080.

of course console can do Crysis. their specs already exceed the required specs by Crytek albeit for the RAM.

these games look just as good as crysis on good settings and before hermits attack me for posting the far cry screens its already been confirmrd to look great on all platforms, and actually has some physics that crysis can't do. also draw distance is confirmed

lol at the poster above for thinking those look as good as Crysis...especially the first one :lol:

its obvious that Farcry 2 wont look even close to the PC on the consoles...I cant believe anyone actually thinks it is since over the past year, every multiplat has looked better on the PC, ran better as well....

of course console can do Crysis. their specs already exceed the required specs by Crytek albeit for the RAM.

these games look just as good as crysis on good settings and before hermits attack me for posting the far cry screens its already been confirmrd to look great on all platforms, and actually has some physics that crysis can't do. also draw distance is confirmed

Nameless-Hero

You are posting screens of two unrealeased games that look knowhere as good as Crysis, and never will, everyone already knows BF:BC looks like tripe (compared to its initial screens, and 'in engine' trailer'), and has limited destructible objects - and crap draw distance - from proper recent screens, and that KZ2 forcuses on small linear levels.

And Far Cry 2 is still in PC development, and we dont even know any information of how the console ports will be done.

What a poor attempt at trying to prove people wrong - as you are enforcing how right PC gamers actually are

/fail

[QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

of course console can do Crysis. their specs already exceed the required specs by Crytek albeit for the RAM.

these games look just as good as crysis on good settings and before hermits attack me for posting the far cry screens its already been confirmrd to look great on all platforms, and actually has some physics that crysis can't do. also draw distance is confirmed

skrat_01

You are posting screens of two unrealeased games that look knowhere as good as Crysis, and never will, everyone already knows BF:BC looks like tripe (compared to its initial screens, and 'in engine' trailer'), and has limited destructible objects - and crap draw distance - from proper recent screens, and that KZ2 forcuses on small linear levels.

And Far Cry 2 is still in PC development, and we dont even know any information of how the console ports will be done.

What a poor attempt at trying to prove people wrong - as you are enforcing how right PC gamers actually are

/fail

desperate hermits grasping for straws there is no way you can say the games i posted look like utter crap compared to crysis because they dont. the fact that console games are comparable to the almight Crysis is a laugh and a testament to how well made the 360 and PS3 are. use your eyes for once and not stupid tech numbers

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

of course console can do Crysis. their specs already exceed the required specs by Crytek albeit for the RAM.

these games look just as good as crysis on good settings and before hermits attack me for posting the far cry screens its already been confirmrd to look great on all platforms, and actually has some physics that crysis can't do. also draw distance is confirmed

Nameless-Hero

You are posting screens of two unrealeased games that look knowhere as good as Crysis, and never will, everyone already knows BF:BC looks like tripe (compared to its initial screens, and 'in engine' trailer'), and has limited destructible objects - and crap draw distance - from proper recent screens, and that KZ2 forcuses on small linear levels.

And Far Cry 2 is still in PC development, and we dont even know any information of how the console ports will be done.

What a poor attempt at trying to prove people wrong - as you are enforcing how right PC gamers actually are

/fail

desperate hermits grasping for straws there is no way you can say the games i posted look like utter crap compared to crysis because they dont. the fact that console games are comparable to the almight Crysis is a laugh and a testament to how well made the 360 and PS3 are. use your eyes for once and not stupid tech numbers

Will you hide when these games run at 640p?

Yes. and No

They can run it but at what cost? No pretty graphics, due to the gpu restrictions and ram restrictions. if an 8800gtx struggles at at max settings past 12x10 what could the r600 or 7800 that the ps3 and xbox360 run it at?

Absolutely. Not on very high settings, but on medium for sure and possibly high (I've only played it on Medium myself). Far Cry 2 is coming to the 360 and PS3 and it seems like it will have much steeper system requirements, so there is no doubt in my mind that Crysis could be ported to consoles.PBSnipes

Amen

it is possible and consoles would really be capable of running it on medium too, I explain to much now, all I am gonna say now is farcry 2 is comming to consoles so /thread.amorbis1001

1. No it isnt possible, there is too many technical limitations of low end console hardware

2. We dont even know how the Far Cry 2 console verison will be compared to the PC one. Its only been announced. For all we know it could be Far Cry instincts all over again.

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

of course console can do Crysis. their specs already exceed the required specs by Crytek albeit for the RAM.

these games look just as good as crysis on good settings and before hermits attack me for posting the far cry screens its already been confirmrd to look great on all platforms, and actually has some physics that crysis can't do. also draw distance is confirmed

Nameless-Hero

You are posting screens of two unrealeased games that look knowhere as good as Crysis, and never will, everyone already knows BF:BC looks like tripe (compared to its initial screens, and 'in engine' trailer'), and has limited destructible objects - and crap draw distance - from proper recent screens, and that KZ2 forcuses on small linear levels.

And Far Cry 2 is still in PC development, and we dont even know any information of how the console ports will be done.

What a poor attempt at trying to prove people wrong - as you are enforcing how right PC gamers actually are

/fail

desperate hermits grasping for straws there is no way you can say the games i posted look like utter crap compared to crysis because they dont. the fact that console games are comparable to the almight Crysis is a laugh and a testament to how well made the 360 and PS3 are. use your eyes for once and not stupid tech numbers

No game compares to Crysis on a technical scale. It is a generation ahead, and pushes even the most power video cards, that completely dwarf the technology before it, to their limits.

Those games dont look like utter crap (well BF2 BC first person screens look damn average), but they look knowhere as good as Crysis, and do not offer anywhere near the scale, or interactivity of Crysis.

The 360 and PS3 are low end speced systems nowdays. Get with the times, technology is progressing at a rapid rate and consoles fall behind every generation. It just happens that there has been a MASSIVE leap fowards this gen with the 8800 series and Crysis. Consoles this gen have begun lagging behind even earlier than usual.

And I use my eyes and tech numbers - more imporatntly common sense, and a realistic view. I am a studying visual designer - more specifically - for games.

Wow. Way to just totally overlook the Cell's benchmark genius.

Seriously, you are acting like a bitter and defensive fanatic. Might I suggest you take your midol?

Pariah_001

you still believe that a processor is magically going to make more ram? Oh and the Far Cry 2 screens have all been PC only.

[QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

Wow. Way to just totally overlook the Cell's benchmark genius.

Seriously, you are acting like a bitter and defensive fanatic. Might I suggest you take your midol?

_Pedro_

you still believe that a processor is magically going to make more ram? Oh and the Far Cry 2 screens have all been PC only.

Where did I say that Cell would create another 2 gigs of RAM?

I specifically said, "If they had enough RAM--."

You guys are so wired on the 'consoles can't do Crysis' knee-jerks that you forego actually reading posts of opposition and just shout, "It doesn't have the RAM! Shut your mouths!"

Please to note that I am not talking about RAM.

if ur telling me that crytek can't do a legitimate 360 port that looks reasonably close to what is essentially first generation dx10 game (seeing as how its one of like 3 that even have any notable improvements running in dx10), then they should leave the gaming business cuz that means they don't know how to code. :|

[QUOTE="_Pedro_"][QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

Wow. Way to just totally overlook the Cell's benchmark genius.

Seriously, you are acting like a bitter and defensive fanatic. Might I suggest you take your midol?

Pariah_001

you still believe that a processor is magically going to make more ram? Oh and the Far Cry 2 screens have all been PC only.

Where did I say that Cell would create another 2 gigs of RAM?

I specifically said, "If they had enough RAM--."

You guys are so wired on the 'consoles can't do Crysis' knee-jerks that you forego actually reading posts of opposition and just shout, "It doesn't have the RAM! Shut your mouths!"

Please to note that I am not talking about RAM.

Then why make an asumption about it? We all know how great the Cell is, it's being used in a lot of modern Supercomputers. If the PS3 only had more ram it would definetly look close to the PC on High. I believe the cell can also take a lot of strain off the GPU.

The 360 is completely different. We have very little information about the Processor, but the GPU is said to be on par with the X1950XT. Which means the 360 can't hope to achieve the PC level even if it had enough ram.

btw: There is probably going to be a Crysis port, but it's definetly not going to contain such vast levels as the PC.

if ur telling me that crytek can't do a legitimate 360 port that looks reasonably close to what is essentially first generation dx10 game (seeing as how its one of like 3 that even have any notable improvements running in dx10), then they should leave the gaming business cuz that means they don't know how to code. :|

Big_T-Mac

Its quite easy:

Butcher the textures quality

Diminish the damage moddeling

Eradicate any AI...

Constraint any field deph

Diminish the poly count

ANd there you have Crysis 0.1....

Absolutely. Not on very high settings, but on medium for sure and possibly high (I've only played it on Medium myself). Far Cry 2 is coming to the 360 and PS3 and it seems like it will have much steeper system requirements, so there is no doubt in my mind that Crysis could be ported to consoles.PBSnipes

on low on dx9, it runs playably on hardware of the equivelant level of ps3/360. High dx10? no way!

Absolutely. Not on very high settings, but on medium for sure and possibly high (I've only played it on Medium myself). Far Cry 2 is coming to the 360 and PS3 and it seems like it will have much steeper system requirements, so there is no doubt in my mind that Crysis could be ported to consoles.PBSnipes

could run medium if you made the levels all liner and then you just have nothing but your typical shooter