Well, can it really happen?? Please discuss. (In terms of graphics)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
1. Halo 3 looks better then Resitance.
2. You used an early shot, back when it was called i-8. The final game DOES NOT look that good.Â
NAPK1NS
what you on about? the first n third shot is from Resistance themselves, and middle shot is from I-8. Get your facts right. Yes, Halo 3 will graphically blow Resistance. Unreal on the other hand blows both, and Crysis just kills all competition :P
They are very different art styles. In fact, too different to even have a fair comparison -- Resistance aims for attention to detail and subtle realism, much like Half-Life 2. Halo 3 on the other hand aims to look clean, pin-sharp and easy on the eyes. Grittiness and cleanliness don't go hand in hand.
Â
2. You used an early shot, back when it was called i-8. The final game DOES NOT look that good.NAPK1NS
It actually looks better. Course you haven't played the game and this knowledge is common sense to anyone who has.Â
[QUOTE="MegaPigeon"]You used a shot from e305.... :|
And yes, it most definately will. Even more likely to look better.
Whats e305?? I just copy & paste from google. That is all.
GatoFeo
The electronic entertainment expo of 2005 :) You usually get the same treatment as witchcraft for doing posting shots form then :)
That was the infamous time when Sony used CGI and passed it off as gameplay. The character models (or at least in my opinion) are more detailed than the mid-shot of the Chimera thingy in the beta. There's still a few more months until Halo 3's release, and Bungie have hardly ever made a bad looking game, so I'd expect it to look way better than the Beta and maybe even the announcement trailer :)
From what I've seen of Halo 2.5 I don't think so.iunderstand
its actually called halo 3.i guess you cant see or read.
You should have used Haze for a better example.
It's running on PS3, has high-rez textures, HDR, particle effects= Better example.
You should have used Haze for a better example.
It's running on PS3, has high-rez textures, HDR, particle effects= Better example.
miss_kitt3n
It's also multiplatform :|Â
[QUOTE="iunderstand"]From what I've seen of Halo 2.5 I don't think so.marklarmer
its actually called halo 3.i guess you cant see or read.
Oh sorry, I never actually read the title of the game. I just assumed from the visuals I saw of the actual game that the game was only going to be half a step up from Halo 2... My bad sorry.Â
[QUOTE="marklarmer"][QUOTE="iunderstand"]From what I've seen of Halo 2.5 I don't think so.iunderstand
its actually called halo 3.i guess you cant see or read.
Oh sorry, I never actually read the title of the game. I just assumed from the visuals I saw of the actual game that the game was only going to be half a step up from Halo 2... My bad sorry.Â
nice comeback...but a guess you must have that one wrote down ready for when people react to your blatant arrogance.
[QUOTE="iunderstand"][QUOTE="marklarmer"][QUOTE="iunderstand"]From what I've seen of Halo 2.5 I don't think so.marklarmer
its actually called halo 3.i guess you cant see or read.
Oh sorry, I never actually read the title of the game. I just assumed from the visuals I saw of the actual game that the game was only going to be half a step up from Halo 2... My bad sorry.
nice comeback...but a guess you must have that one wrote down ready for when people react to your blatant arrogance.
I post from cue cards.Â
People.. seriously, STFU about Halo3's art style. There is nothing in its art style that says it has to use low polygon environments/characters/evertying with plain textures and simple geometry and very few shaders. Seriously shut the hell up about that copout ****. You wanna see Halo's art style? Look at the recently released concept drawings that sport all sort of detail and coloring and 'Halo' art style yet look ten times better than the actual game. Fact is there is no reason Halo3 shouldn't look twice as good as Resistance considering its pushing a hell of alot less stuff on screen but yet here we are with tons of people having a hard time distinguishing it from a last gen game (Halo 2). Either Bungie is pulling a fast one on everyone or they are phoning this one in, cause Halo3 is a technical embarrassment at this point.pooonu
Well the reason why I wanna know is because can it really pull off it's graphics. Due to my Hd tv, I don't want it to look all shiny and plain when Halo 3 finally comes out.
Well, can it really happen?? Please discuss. (In terms of graphics)
GatoFeo
The Inside of Lost resort looks way better than the inside of that place right there from the looks of it. Ill wait for single player gameplay before I say for sure though.Â
Well, can it really happen?? Please discuss. (In terms of graphics)
GatoFeo
This is not part of the game I played. E305 confirmed!
Halo 3 can indeed top Resistance.
Resistance has some horrible textures, but all the geometry on screen is nice. Since Halo 3 already has better textures than Resistance I have to say yes, it will surpass this game in graphics.Pro_wrestler
Umm, no. You clearly haven't played Resistance--it has awesome textures. Â
[QUOTE="MegaPigeon"]You used a shot from e305.... :|
And yes, it most definately will. Even more likely to look better.Â
GatoFeo
Whats e305?? I just copy & paste from google. That is all.
Basically, e3 05 shots from sony are all cgi trailers with no actual resemblence to the final game's graphics.
[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]2. You used an early shot, back when it was called i-8. The final game DOES NOT look that good.Ultra-Alue
It actually looks better. Course you haven't played the game and this knowledge is common sense to anyone who has.
It actually doesn't and i've played the game. Halo 3 has great character models and enviornments whereas resistance has good looking character models and bland textures on the environment and the lighting is not as good as Halo 3's.Â
Man I love RFOM and still to me is a very underrated game graphically and gameplay wise, but I think halo 3 in its final stage will look better in every way then RFOM. But even if it does look better then RFOM I still doubt it will come close to touching gears of war or mass effect, crysis, uncharted drake's fortune, and unreal tournament 3 in the graphics department, but the gameplay will rock and it will sell like hot cakes no matter how it looks.squallff8_fan
Halo 3 already looks better than resistance but it doesn't match Gears which is the only game i can comment since its the only one out that you mentioned. Â Â
These are all in game, but its a launch title and looks great but I still think halo 3 will look better in the final version, alot better.
[QUOTE="Ultra-Alue"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]2. You used an early shot, back when it was called i-8. The final game DOES NOT look that good.sirk1264
It actually looks better. Course you haven't played the game and this knowledge is common sense to anyone who has.
It actually doesn't and i've played the game. Halo 3 has great character models and enviornments whereas resistance has good looking character models and bland textures on the environment and the lighting is not as good as Halo 3's.
Yeah was sorta thinking the same thing. The ground textures on varies spots seem to be very low res and don't match the visual fidelity of the Models.Â
No doubt squall resistance looked great for a launch game and is still fun to this day. But from playing the Halo 3 beta, i know that Halo 3 will look better than Resistance.sirk1264Even though the beta's graphics suck?
[QUOTE="sirk1264"]No doubt squall resistance looked great for a launch game and is still fun to this day. But from playing the Halo 3 beta, i know that Halo 3 will look better than Resistance.Pariah_001
Even though the beta's graphics suck?
The beta graphics are quite good, especially a lot of the special effects.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment