CoD: Elite on PS3, very complex dev challenge says Activision...

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gamedude234
gamedude234

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 gamedude234
Member since 2009 • 2558 Posts

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#52 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Why all of a sudden do they do this now? They didn't have any issues in the past, but all of a sudden it's now? Naughty Dog, Konami, and most Multiplat Devs don't have problems like this. So why all ofa sudden?

Of course both systems have different abiltiles but the differences in 90% of multiplats are so small and insignificant that they are unoticable. My guess is that Activision is just being lazy or got another deal with MS not to release it yet. I mean there have been ALOT of betas on PSN like AC Brotherhood, Uncharted 3 ect... and AC Revelations is having a Beta on PSN pretty soon too at the same time as their AC Revelations beta on Xbox Live, and they don't seem to be having any issues.

lawlessx

Did you read the article at all? your talking as if Elite is a game

Yes, Elite is an option that you can pay for to get some bonus stuff...Still doesn't change the fact that there isn't really any reason to complain about this in 2011.

Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

gamedude234

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#54 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

Promised_Trini

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

Exactly...the PS3 has been out on the market for a long time now and most Devs have no problem whatsoever in developing for it. And 90% of themultiplats have insgignificant and near invisible differences that they are basically the same, no one sees any difference in the first place unless they go to fanboy sites like lens of truth where they nitpick the number of leaves on a tree :lol:

Avatar image for gamedude234
gamedude234

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#55 gamedude234
Member since 2009 • 2558 Posts

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

Promised_Trini

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

then explain why devs are still saying that the PS3 is harder to work on.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#56 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

gamedude234

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

then explain why devs are still saying that the PS3 is harder to work on.

Most devs arn't saying that anymore, besides that Peter Molonoux from LionHead studios and about 2 others most devs don't have a problem with it anymore. I know people like to pretend multiplats are "vastly" different from each other on the PS3 and 360 but that's just fanboy talk. 90% of the time you can't tell the difference at all, unless you go to fanboy sites like lens of truth where they nitpick insiginifcant differences. Otherwise no one really noitices or cares.

Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

gamedude234

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

then explain why devs are still saying that the PS3 is harder to work on.

Plain and simple...People don't like change in tech...

Avatar image for gamedude234
gamedude234

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 gamedude234
Member since 2009 • 2558 Posts

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

ShadowMoses900

then explain why devs are still saying that the PS3 is harder to work on.

Most devs arn't saying that anymore, besides that Peter Molonoux from LionHead studios and about 2 others most devs don't have a problem with it anymore. I know people like to pretend multiplats are "vastly" different from each other on the PS3 and 360 but that's just fanboy talk. 90% of the time you can't tell the difference at all, unless you go to fanboy sites like lens of truth where they nitpick insiginifcant differences. Otherwise no one really noitices or cares.

why are you constantly mentioning multiplats? we all know that for a few exceptions(like black ops), there isn't a major difference, all its saying is that the 360 is more developer friendly. Nothing less, nothing more. No need to get worked up about it.

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

Like someone said, this isn't the first time we've heard something like this. The PS3 is a harder platform to develope for, simple as that. Not buying COD elite anyway, as Halo and other games have had things like that for years, and for free, but whatever i guess. Activison will probabaly market it well enough to convince people to dish out money for something as dumb as this....

gamedude234

It's not 2006-2007 no more...Dev's should understand the PS3 tech by now...It's pitifully excuse if you ask me now...To hear dev's are is still complaining about the PS3 and its what 2011 now...

then explain why devs are still saying that the PS3 is harder to work on.

laziness? i mean like he said it: it's been years since ps3 released, im pretty sure they know there way around teh cell

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#60 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

then explain why devs are still saying that the PS3 is harder to work on.

gamedude234

Most devs arn't saying that anymore, besides that Peter Molonoux from LionHead studios and about 2 others most devs don't have a problem with it anymore. I know people like to pretend multiplats are "vastly" different from each other on the PS3 and 360 but that's just fanboy talk. 90% of the time you can't tell the difference at all, unless you go to fanboy sites like lens of truth where they nitpick insiginifcant differences. Otherwise no one really noitices or cares.

why are you constantly mentioning multiplats? we all know that for a few exceptions(like black ops), there isn't a major difference, all its saying is that the 360 is more developer friendly. Nothing less, nothing more. No need to get worked up about it.

Because people that mention it being hard to develop for use multiplat differences to try and justify it, and what's wrong with PS3 Black Ops exactly? It did have a few issues with getting dropped from parties at launch but they updated and fixed it like 3 days after launch.

But by this point in time there is no excuse to use the "PS3 being hard to develop for" anymore. Naughty Dog doesn't complain about it, Konami doesn't complain about,majority of devs don't complain about it anymore, and Infinity Ward didn't complain about iteither until now.It was only considered hard to develop for at around launch, but around a year or 2 after that devs started to understand it better.

And why do you assume I'm angry?

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#61 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Acti can only do copy and paste, now they have to actually do some work they are struggling... What a joke, i bet the price just went up because Activision had to do some brain work.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

Why all of a sudden do they do this now? They didn't have any issues in the past, but all of a sudden it's now? Naughty Dog, Konami, and most Multiplat Devs don't have problems like this. So why all ofa sudden?

Of course both systems have different abiltiles but the differences in 90% of multiplats are so small and insignificant that they are unoticable. My guess is that Activision is just being lazy or got another deal with MS not to release it yet. I mean there have been ALOT of betas on PSN like AC Brotherhood, Uncharted 3 ect... and AC Revelations is having a Beta on PSN pretty soon too at the same time as their AC Revelations beta on Xbox Live, and they don't seem to be having any issues.

ShadowMoses900
it's not a difference in abilities, it's a difference in how the online is structured, PSN is an awesome free service but XBL is better structured, more efficient and more streamlined, i am sure they will have all the problems sorted out, it will just takr longer with PSN than it will with XBL.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Lets see.

Xbox live superior to psn. Microsoft far more progressive in implimentation of API's for their own Online stats, and website access services for xbox live and 3rd party API's for their own use.
Sony has no concept of online stats, trophy support for API use by 3rd parties most have to ghetto it and refresh and view the Sony website and such.

so what amounts to a completely connected profile, stats intensive system it wouldn't be surprising its hard to impliment on Psn or Connecting with playstation.us

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
Acti can only do copy and paste, now they have to actually do some work they are struggling... What a joke, i bet the price just went up because Activision had to do some brain work.JohnF111
just what I was thinking
Avatar image for dipsetboy17
dipsetboy17

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 dipsetboy17
Member since 2009 • 647 Posts

lol oh wow activision.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

Acti can only do copy and paste, now they have to actually do some work they are struggling... What a joke, i bet the price just went up because Activision had to do some brain work.JohnF111

Get out of my head:cry:

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Elite on PS3, very complex dev challenge to suck more money from their trillion of fans says activision. I think this is just a stupid and useless idea.
Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

Heard it before.

Lazy devs.

Blame the casuals

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

This isn't news, every way to access this "service" will feel like a sloppy port, since the very nature of Activision swill development doesn't allow for quality.

Avatar image for gamedude234
gamedude234

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#70 gamedude234
Member since 2009 • 2558 Posts

[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Most devs arn't saying that anymore, besides that Peter Molonoux from LionHead studios and about 2 others most devs don't have a problem with it anymore. I know people like to pretend multiplats are "vastly" different from each other on the PS3 and 360 but that's just fanboy talk. 90% of the time you can't tell the difference at all, unless you go to fanboy sites like lens of truth where they nitpick insiginifcant differences. Otherwise no one really noitices or cares.

ShadowMoses900

why are you constantly mentioning multiplats? we all know that for a few exceptions(like black ops), there isn't a major difference, all its saying is that the 360 is more developer friendly. Nothing less, nothing more. No need to get worked up about it.

Because people that mention it being hard to develop for use multiplat differences to try and justify it, and what's wrong with PS3 Black Ops exactly? It did have a few issues with getting dropped from parties at launch but they updated and fixed it like 3 days after launch.

But by this point in time there is no excuse to use the "PS3 being hard to develop for" anymore. Naughty Dog doesn't complain about it, Konami doesn't complain about,majority of devs don't complain about it anymore, and Infinity Ward didn't complain about iteither until now.It was only considered hard to develop for at around launch, but around a year or 2 after that devs started to understand it better.

And why do you assume I'm angry?

the PS3 version of black ops is quite inferior to the 360 version. Framerate drops, more lag, that sort of thing.

Again, multiple devs have said in the past year or so how its harder to develop for the PS3. I think Bioware said something similar as well. Is this a bad thing? is it limiting devs or is it forcing them to work harder to make better games? Either way, the PS3 is harder to work on, in some cases noticbly, in other cases no. Fact.

Avatar image for Khoo1992
Khoo1992

2472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#71 Khoo1992
Member since 2005 • 2472 Posts

Erm... I have a question for Activision...

Why Valve can make Steamworks available to PS3 and said it's impossible to do it on Xbox?

Avatar image for LustForSoul
LustForSoul

6404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LustForSoul
Member since 2011 • 6404 Posts
Wouldn't the first time the PS3's dev kit sucks.
Avatar image for tommyas
tommyas

2594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 tommyas
Member since 2007 • 2594 Posts
Stats tracking service? Really now... How could that be a problem?
Avatar image for tommyas
tommyas

2594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 tommyas
Member since 2007 • 2594 Posts

I've been noticing a pattern with activision and microsoft from sometime now. Looking back they announced a Exclusive deal stating that DLC for cod would be a timed exclusive on the 360,But i don't think that was the only agreement made. Was I the only one that found abit odd that after this deal is made the PC/ps3 versions of BO are released buggy and in some cases unplayble due to terrible stuttering and framerate issues while the 360 version ran fine? I mean it's not like this was an small isolated issue..it was wide spread and it took days to even get an official statement and weeks to start getting some patches done.

lawlessx
Exactly. As far as I remember, MW2 ran perfectly on PS3, silky smooth. BO was TERRIBLE on ps3 first few weeks and even now, after countless patches, it doesnt run as smooth as it should.
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Bungie did it fine, years ago. Perhaps Acitvision should ask them?

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

Where do you get the idea that they're kissing MS's butt from that article?

Promised_Trini

All of a sudden its problem to bring elite over to PS3?.

do you really care about this 'feature' i much prefer if it wasnt included at all
Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts

Lets see.

Xbox live superior to psn. Microsoft far more progressive in implimentation of API's for their own Online stats, and website access services for xbox live and 3rd party API's for their own use.
Sony has no concept of online stats, trophy support for API use by 3rd parties most have to ghetto it and refresh and view the Sony website and such.

so what amounts to a completely connected profile, stats intensive system it wouldn't be surprising its hard to impliment on Psn or Connecting with playstation.us

WilliamRLBaker

Your posts are laughable...

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

Bungie did it fine, years ago. Perhaps Acitvision should ask them?

-Snooze-

Huh? Bungie didn't start working for PS3 until recently...

Avatar image for RoOodriGowW
RoOodriGowW

3309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 RoOodriGowW
Member since 2008 • 3309 Posts

I don't think people got the message quite right here , including TC , the complex dev challenge is that this time they need to work solely on the ps3 (and 360 for that matter , which ain't a problem since it's always been the lead platform) for the elite part , while in the other games a simple port would do.

Avatar image for ZoomZoom2490
ZoomZoom2490

3943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 ZoomZoom2490
Member since 2008 • 3943 Posts

activision is using ten year old tools, so im not suprsised.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

Good. Makes the dev work harder.

Avatar image for Gotham-Calls
Gotham-Calls

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Gotham-Calls
Member since 2011 • 335 Posts

i'm calling it now. cod elite will not launch until after a month mw3 is released on ps3. quote it right now.

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

i'm calling it now. cod elite will not launch until after a month mw3 is released on ps3. quote it right now.

Gotham-Calls

i felt the same. It will beat black ops for the buggy as hell game/add on activision has ever made :o