CoD gets slaughtered for not evolving, but is Battlefield all that different?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GTAV2012
GTAV2012

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 GTAV2012
Member since 2011 • 94 Posts

[QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="wis3boi"] shall i list every cod and the $45 in DLC each one gets every year?glez13

DLC = stand-alone titles now? Wow, the damage control is insane. Sure, list all CoD games but not the DLC. It's not a game.

Since when are expansion packs that need the original game to run counts as a stand-alone title?

Also you have to notice that some of those titles are only for PC and others are only for consoles so you can't mix all of them together like that . For example on PC fans had to wait 2 year for a new Battlefield at certain point, something similar for console gamers.

So? DLC = optional. Nobody forces you to buy it.
Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts

Not including expansion packs and F2P games.

Call of Duty - 2003

Call of Duty: United Offensive - 2004

Call of Duty: Finest Hour - 2004

Call of Duty 2 - 2005

Call of Duty: Big Red One - 2005

Call of Duty 3 - 2006

Call of Duty: Road to Victory - 2007

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare - 2007

Call of Duty: World at War - 2008

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - 2009

Call of Duty: Black Ops - 2010

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - 2011

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Battlefield 1942 - 2002

Battlefield Vietnam - 2004

Battlefield 2 - 2005

Battlefield 2: Modern Comabat - 2005

Battlefield 2142 - 2006

Battlefield: Bad Company - 2008

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - 2010

Battlefield 3 - 2011

el3m2tigre
Why not include F2P games? They take precious development time, which could go into making the game better.
Avatar image for Ironbash
Ironbash

1132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Ironbash
Member since 2011 • 1132 Posts
[QUOTE="Blueresident87"]

[QUOTE="GTAV2012"] OK, look kid. I'm not going to be rude, but here's the deal: Battlefield, is a nobody. What do I mean by nobody? I mean, it plays in the leagues of, say Resistance, Haze and Rage. Nobodies. Call of Duty 4 is the single most influential entertainment property of this generation. That is something entirely different. If you enjoyed the old BF games more than CoD4, fine. But CoD4 still gathered the biggest fanbase, sold the most, inspired the most developers, created a global phenomenon and is nowadays regarded as one of the finest FPS titles in history. No BF game has ever, or will ever top that, kid.GTAV2012

Why you calling him kid?

And the Halo franchise did far more for the gaming industry than COD. You sound like a pure fanboy.

Halo: CE only.

Uhhh yeah and then Forge came along, and then firefight which was copied by half the industry and then a Theatre mode which Black ops blatantly took off reach.
Avatar image for GTAV2012
GTAV2012

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 GTAV2012
Member since 2011 • 94 Posts

[QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]Here's why - Battlefield 1942, and certainly BF2, play way way better in online multiplay than CoD has EVER achieved. It hit it's peak in 2007 with CoD4 - it's been on a decline since then - and CoD4 was just a well balanced and designed, run-and-gun shooter with lots of tight corners to guaruntee some easy kills. It never even came close to being as deep as the oldest Battlefield game, it's always been on a different concept level.ermacness

OK, look kid. I'm not going to be rude, but here's the deal: Battlefield, is a nobody. What do I mean by nobody? I mean, it plays in the leagues of, say Resistance, Haze and Rage. Nobodies. Call of Duty 4 is the single most influential entertainment property of this generation. That is something entirely different. If you enjoyed the old BF games more than CoD4, fine. But CoD4 still gathered the biggest fanbase, sold the most, inspired the most developers, created a global phenomenon and is nowadays regarded as one of the finest FPS titles in history. No BF game has ever, or will ever top that, kid.

CoD might have the fanbase, but in tactical gameplay and technicalities, CoD can't even dream in the same league of BF, especially the BC series, and now BF3. Why do you think that BF have less of a fanbase than CoD? because of the sheer FACT that CoD holds your hand with overpowered killstreaks that would make a basically average player seem godly in the KDR department, while BF,. you have to EARN that great KDR. Each time you kill someone in BF, YOU DO IT, not some random AI controlled KS that you obtained by getting a certain amount of kills in one session w/o dying. CoD have the fanbase, but BF takes the cake in tactical gameplay by light years "KID".;)

Yes, BF is more of a tactical game than CoD. But when did tactical games > other games in terms of quality, just because they involve more tactics?
Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

Not including expansion packs and F2P games.

Call of Duty - 2003

Call of Duty: United Offensive - 2004

Call of Duty: Finest Hour - 2004

Call of Duty 2 - 2005

Call of Duty: Big Red One - 2005

Call of Duty 3 - 2006

Call of Duty: Road to Victory - 2007

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare - 2007

Call of Duty: World at War - 2008

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - 2009

Call of Duty: Black Ops - 2010

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - 2011

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Battlefield 1942 - 2002

Battlefield Vietnam - 2004

Battlefield 2 - 2005

Battlefield 2: Modern Comabat - 2005

Battlefield 2142 - 2006

Battlefield: Bad Company - 2008

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - 2010

Battlefield 3 - 2011

GTAV2012

The only reason there are more CoD games, is that there are two different developers producing CoD titles.

I know, Activision has 2 teams prepped up for max milkage, but of course, it's what you guys want isn't it?:lol:

Avatar image for GTAV2012
GTAV2012

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 GTAV2012
Member since 2011 • 94 Posts
[QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="Blueresident87"]

Why you calling him kid?

And the Halo franchise did far more for the gaming industry than COD. You sound like a pure fanboy.

Ironbash
Halo: CE only.

Uhhh yeah and then Forge came along, and then firefight which was copied by half the industry and then a Theatre mode which Black ops blatantly took off reach.

OK, Forge and Theatre were two great things by H3. But still, the game as a whole didn't push the genre as COD4 did (and Halo 1 had done prior to them). So Halo, lately, hasn't been nearly as revolutionary as it once was.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

Oh, please, TC.

Every game have introduced a new mechanic and/or a new setting.

The exception is the expansions and the Vietnam-DLC, but the expansions are incredibly cheap (and half of them free), and the Vietnam-DLC introduced a new setting, the first flamethrower, new maps, the radio, etc, at a fair price.

Can anyone here show me a BF-game (not an expansion) that didn't introduce something new?

(Also, where is Wasdie?)

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#58 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
The beta of BF3 is what I've played and tbh it feels like BC2 with the ability to now go prone. Maybe there is some subtle tweaks but for the most part it was an underwhelming experience. COD has IMO been on the decline after COD4 launched, which is my personal FPS of this gen.
Avatar image for GTAV2012
GTAV2012

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 GTAV2012
Member since 2011 • 94 Posts

[QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

Not including expansion packs and F2P games.

Call of Duty - 2003

Call of Duty: United Offensive - 2004

Call of Duty: Finest Hour - 2004

Call of Duty 2 - 2005

Call of Duty: Big Red One - 2005

Call of Duty 3 - 2006

Call of Duty: Road to Victory - 2007

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare - 2007

Call of Duty: World at War - 2008

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - 2009

Call of Duty: Black Ops - 2010

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - 2011

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Battlefield 1942 - 2002

Battlefield Vietnam - 2004

Battlefield 2 - 2005

Battlefield 2: Modern Comabat - 2005

Battlefield 2142 - 2006

Battlefield: Bad Company - 2008

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - 2010

Battlefield 3 - 2011

el3m2tigre

The only reason there are more CoD games, is that there are two different developers producing CoD titles.

I know, Activision has 2 teams prepped up for max milkage, but of course, it's what you guys want isn't it?:lol:

Nobody forces me to buy the games, though. If I found a CoD game uninteresting, I'll pass. So where is the problem?
Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts

Oh, please, TC.

Every game have introduced a new mechanic and/or a new setting.

The exception is the expansions and the Vietnam-DLC, but the expansions are incredibly cheap (and half of them free), and the Vietnam-DLC introduced a new setting, the first flamethrower, new maps, the radio, etc, at a fair price.

Can anyone here show me a BF-game (not an expansion) that didn't introduce something new?

(Also, where is Wasdie?)

Am_Confucius
But COD does the same.
Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#61 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

Honestly I stopped caring a few months ago. When trailers first were coming out for BF3 I got caught up in the hype of it being the "Call of Duty Killer," and I wanted to see Activision get slapped around a bit, then EA started getting high on their own butt fumes and I realized that they just want to be Activision. They are using BF3 as a vehicle of online passes and forced Origin installs, and on top of that the game doesn't live up to the hype. It's got a weak single player campaign and no split screen multiplayer options, which in a lot of ways puts it behind Call of Duty.

Call of Duty may not have evolved since the original Modern Warfare, but at least Activision is giving people exactly what they expect from the series, while EA keeps trying to bend their customers over to short change them. Activision keeps milking their products by releasing them over and over with minimal changes, while EA tries to make improvements but they always come with strings attached. I have little interest in buying any brown and gray military FPS at this point, and lately I find that a nice RPG is much more my pot of tea.

Avatar image for Ironbash
Ironbash

1132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Ironbash
Member since 2011 • 1132 Posts
[QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="Ironbash"][QUOTE="GTAV2012"] Halo: CE only.

Uhhh yeah and then Forge came along, and then firefight which was copied by half the industry and then a Theatre mode which Black ops blatantly took off reach.

OK, Forge and Theatre were two great things by H3. But still, the game as a whole didn't push the genre as COD4 did (and Halo 1 had done prior to them). So Halo, lately, hasn't been nearly as revolutionary as it once was.

COD 4 was a great game sure, but it didn't push the boundaries of gameplay or visual representation that's for sure. (Gameplay was solidified in CoD 2-3 and the Visual representation stagnated with the use of ID tech 3 - RAGE uses an engine 2 generations ahead of MW3)
Avatar image for GTAV2012
GTAV2012

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 GTAV2012
Member since 2011 • 94 Posts
[QUOTE="Ironbash"][QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="Ironbash"] Uhhh yeah and then Forge came along, and then firefight which was copied by half the industry and then a Theatre mode which Black ops blatantly took off reach.

OK, Forge and Theatre were two great things by H3. But still, the game as a whole didn't push the genre as COD4 did (and Halo 1 had done prior to them). So Halo, lately, hasn't been nearly as revolutionary as it once was.

COD 4 was a great game sure, but it didn't push the boundaries of gameplay or visual representation that's for sure. (Gameplay was solidified in CoD 2-3 and the Visual representation stagnated with the use of ID tech 3 - RAGE uses an engine 2 generations ahead of MW3)

Call of Duty 4 still rewrote the book of how to make a modern FPS game.
Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

Not including expansion packs and F2P games.

Call of Duty - 2003

Call of Duty: United Offensive - 2004

Call of Duty: Finest Hour - 2004

Call of Duty 2 - 2005

Call of Duty: Big Red One - 2005

Call of Duty 3 - 2006

Call of Duty: Road to Victory - 2007

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare - 2007

Call of Duty: World at War - 2008

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - 2009

Call of Duty: Black Ops - 2010

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - 2011

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Battlefield 1942 - 2002

Battlefield Vietnam - 2004

Battlefield 2 - 2005

Battlefield 2: Modern Comabat - 2005

Battlefield 2142 - 2006

Battlefield: Bad Company - 2008

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - 2010

Battlefield 3 - 2011

Loegi

Why not include F2P games? They take precious development time, which could go into making the game better.

It doesn't make any difference really. Yes it takes up development time, but it's free. The developers gain nothing from them. The point of that list is to show off the milkage.

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
[QUOTE="Ironbash"][QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="Ironbash"] Uhhh yeah and then Forge came along, and then firefight which was copied by half the industry and then a Theatre mode which Black ops blatantly took off reach.

OK, Forge and Theatre were two great things by H3. But still, the game as a whole didn't push the genre as COD4 did (and Halo 1 had done prior to them). So Halo, lately, hasn't been nearly as revolutionary as it once was.

COD 4 was a great game sure, but it didn't push the boundaries of gameplay or visual representation that's for sure. (Gameplay was solidified in CoD 2-3 and the Visual representation stagnated with the use of ID tech 3 - RAGE uses an engine 2 generations ahead of MW3)

I think the perk system was pretty important, it was even introduced in Battlefield.
Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#66 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
[QUOTE="GTAV2012"][QUOTE="Ironbash"][QUOTE="GTAV2012"] OK, Forge and Theatre were two great things by H3. But still, the game as a whole didn't push the genre as COD4 did (and Halo 1 had done prior to them). So Halo, lately, hasn't been nearly as revolutionary as it once was.

COD 4 was a great game sure, but it didn't push the boundaries of gameplay or visual representation that's for sure. (Gameplay was solidified in CoD 2-3 and the Visual representation stagnated with the use of ID tech 3 - RAGE uses an engine 2 generations ahead of MW3)

Call of Duty 4 still rewrote the book of how to make a modern FPS game.

COD4 was epic. MW2 not so much.
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="GTAV2012"] OK, look kid. I'm not going to be rude, but here's the deal: Battlefield, is a nobody. What do I mean by nobody? I mean, it plays in the leagues of, say Resistance, Haze and Rage. Nobodies. Call of Duty 4 is the single most influential entertainment property of this generation. That is something entirely different. If you enjoyed the old BF games more than CoD4, fine. But CoD4 still gathered the biggest fanbase, sold the most, inspired the most developers, created a global phenomenon and is nowadays regarded as one of the finest FPS titles in history. No BF game has ever, or will ever top that, kid.GTAV2012

CoD might have the fanbase, but in tactical gameplay and technicalities, CoD can't even dream in the same league of BF, especially the BC series, and now BF3. Why do you think that BF have less of a fanbase than CoD? because of the sheer FACT that CoD holds your hand with overpowered killstreaks that would make a basically average player seem godly in the KDR department, while BF,. you have to EARN that great KDR. Each time you kill someone in BF, YOU DO IT, not some random AI controlled KS that you obtained by getting a certain amount of kills in one session w/o dying. CoD have the fanbase, but BF takes the cake in tactical gameplay by light years "KID".;)

Yes, BF is more of a tactical game than CoD. But when did tactical games > other games in terms of quality, just because they involve more tactics?

When did state that it did? All I stated was that while CoD have a bigger fanbase, in which was the "emphasis" of your post, BF advantage over CoD is the fact that it's more tactical, and since Activision refers to CoD as a "arcade tactical shooter", BF besting CoD in thatl area says something great about BF. How about I reverse the question on you: When does a bigger fanbase > other games in terms of quality?

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38935 Posts
maybe if there wasn't a new cod every 6 weeks people wouldn't rip on it so much
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

[QUOTE="Ironbash"][QUOTE="GTAV2012"] OK, Forge and Theatre were two great things by H3. But still, the game as a whole didn't push the genre as COD4 did (and Halo 1 had done prior to them). So Halo, lately, hasn't been nearly as revolutionary as it once was.GTAV2012
COD 4 was a great game sure, but it didn't push the boundaries of gameplay or visual representation that's for sure. (Gameplay was solidified in CoD 2-3 and the Visual representation stagnated with the use of ID tech 3 - RAGE uses an engine 2 generations ahead of MW3)

Call of Duty 4 still rewrote the book of how to make a modern FPS game.

and i can name a game that took very little to nothing from CoD4, and is very successful: Battlefield 3

Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
CS1.6 + mods>>>>>All other FPS.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#71 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
BF doesnt come out every yearmems_1224
It pretty much does now...
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts
[QUOTE="Am_Confucius"]

Oh, please, TC.

Every game have introduced a new mechanic and/or a new setting.

The exception is the expansions and the Vietnam-DLC, but the expansions are incredibly cheap (and half of them free), and the Vietnam-DLC introduced a new setting, the first flamethrower, new maps, the radio, etc, at a fair price.

Can anyone here show me a BF-game (not an expansion) that didn't introduce something new?

(Also, where is Wasdie?)

Loegi
But COD does the same.

No it doesn't. They add new weapons, reskin the game, and add some perks. That kind of content-adding with no new mechanics is usully sold as DLC or expansion, not as a 60$-game. (My humble opinion)
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

CS1.6 + mods>>>>>All other FPS. Killfox
How about staying on topic?

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

Battlefield is the same game over and over. Dont believe the fanboys who are making battlefield 3 a huge game, its not. Its a utter flop. COD evolves, it adds more games modes and it adds more maps and more guns. BF3 feels like BC2 with different maps. Note to say, Battlefield always gets yearly releases.

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
maybe if there wasn't a new cod every 6 weeks people wouldn't rip on it so muchcomp_atkins
In the years 2002 to 2011 COD released as much games as Battlefield.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts
[QUOTE="Loegi"] I think the perk system was pretty important, it was even introduced in Battlefield.

Uh...what perk-system?
Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#77 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
[QUOTE="Loegi"]I agree, I don't really see the difference between BF3 and BF2 besides graphics.SaltyMeatballs
It has jets, which oh wait previous BF games had. It's more like BC2 with jets, or BF2 with BC2 destruction.

Yeah it reminds me of a blend of those 2 games, that's not a bad thing it's good fun.
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts

[QUOTE="Killfox"]CS1.6 + mods>>>>>All other FPS. ermacness

How about staying on topic?

Oh sorry I forgot to add the words COD and BF to my post. Here I fix it for you. CS1.6 + mods>>>>>BF3/MW2/BO/MW3.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts
[QUOTE="Loegi"][QUOTE="Am_Confucius"]

Oh, please, TC.

Every game have introduced a new mechanic and/or a new setting.

The exception is the expansions and the Vietnam-DLC, but the expansions are incredibly cheap (and half of them free), and the Vietnam-DLC introduced a new setting, the first flamethrower, new maps, the radio, etc, at a fair price.

Can anyone here show me a BF-game (not an expansion) that didn't introduce something new?

(Also, where is Wasdie?)

Am_Confucius
But COD does the same.

No it doesn't. They add new weapons, reskin the game, and add some perks. That kind of content-adding with no new mechanics is usully sold as DLC or expansion, not as a 60$-game. (My humble opinion)

Thats wrong. Black ops did more than reskinning Mw2. They removed many perks like one many army, they added wager matches, killstreaks cant stack, more customization, more attachments like flamethrower, new gameplay feature which is dolphin dive and so on. Its not a remake. I can say that Bf3 feels like BC2 with different maps.
Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
[QUOTE="Loegi"][QUOTE="Am_Confucius"]

Oh, please, TC.

Every game have introduced a new mechanic and/or a new setting.

The exception is the expansions and the Vietnam-DLC, but the expansions are incredibly cheap (and half of them free), and the Vietnam-DLC introduced a new setting, the first flamethrower, new maps, the radio, etc, at a fair price.

Can anyone here show me a BF-game (not an expansion) that didn't introduce something new?

(Also, where is Wasdie?)

Am_Confucius
But COD does the same.

No it doesn't. They add new weapons, reskin the game, and add some perks. That kind of content-adding with no new mechanics is usully sold as DLC or expansion, not as a 60$-game. (My humble opinion)

MW2 added kill streaks, Blops added CP points, MW3 adds weapon proficiencies, WaW added co-op. Pretty new mechanics in my opininion.
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]BF doesnt come out every yearvashkey
It pretty much does now...

but the difference is that it, in most cases, doesn't come out on every platform. The only ones that did this gen was 1943, BC2, and BF3, and last gen, it was BF2.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Battlefield certainly hasn't evolved, but it has changed substantially enough to warrent a sequel

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Not that I have seen there are refinements but battlefield has not evolved bf3 plays exactly like bad company 1 and 2.

Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

Battlefield is the same game over and over. Dont believe the fanboys who are making battlefield 3 a huge game, its not. Its a utter flop. COD evolves, it adds more games modes and it adds more maps and more guns. BF3 feels like BC2 with different maps. Note to say, Battlefield always gets yearly releases.

shahilsyed

Now you are just being silly. Saying that Battlefield isn't constantly evolving is like saying that coffee-cups are mostly used as hats.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#85 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38935 Posts

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]maybe if there wasn't a new cod every 6 weeks people wouldn't rip on it so muchLoegi
In the years 2002 to 2011 COD released as much games as Battlefield.

but cod is way more recent in their releases.. like 6 games in the past 4 years.. so it skews the perception... they found a formula that works so they're gonna pump out as many titles as they can before it gets old... anyway it doesn't matter. they're both fun

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

Battlefield is the same game over and over. Dont believe the fanboys who are making battlefield 3 a huge game, its not. Its a utter flop. COD evolves, it adds more games modes and it adds more maps and more guns. BF3 feels like BC2 with different maps. Note to say, Battlefield always gets yearly releases.

Am_Confucius

Now you are just being silly. Saying that Battlefield isn't constantly evolving is like saying that coffee-cups are mostly used as hats.

Battlefield 3 is exactly like Bad company 2. There are no differences between Bad company 2 and battlefield 3. Battlefield gets yearly release but why does COD get bashed so much even though they get yearly release too?
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts
[QUOTE="Loegi"] MW2 added kill streaks, Blops added CP points, MW3 adds weapon proficiencies, WaW added co-op. Pretty new mechanics in my opininion.

Lol wut? There are kill-streaks in MW, I'm pretty sure..?
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

Battlefield is the same game over and over. Dont believe the fanboys who are making battlefield 3 a huge game, its not. Its a utter flop. COD evolves, it adds more games modes and it adds more maps and more guns. BF3 feels like BC2 with different maps. Note to say, Battlefield always gets yearly releases.

shahilsyed

The only reason why people who "NEVER" played either BC2, or BF3 says this is because this is the 1st time that destruction had made it into a BF game outside of BC.:lol:

Anyone, who's basically everyone who have "thoroughly" played both can easily tell you that BC2, and BF3 in terms of gameplay is completely 2 different games.

BTW, :lol: @ CoD evolves. The only thing that CoD manages to do is fix problems that the previous CoD had, and add new ones.:lol:

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#89 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]BF doesnt come out every yearermacness

It pretty much does now...

but the difference is that it, in most cases, doesn't come out on every platform. The only ones that did this gen was 1943, BC2, and BF3, and last gen, it was BF2.

Why does it matter? Who cares? They're both milked games. Neither of them reinvent themselves on a regular basis. Arguing over which one is milked more is just absurd. Pots calling kettles black. This whole CoD vs BF **** flinging is just pathetic.
Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
[QUOTE="Am_Confucius"][QUOTE="Loegi"] MW2 added kill streaks, Blops added CP points, MW3 adds weapon proficiencies, WaW added co-op. Pretty new mechanics in my opininion.

Lol wut? There are kill-streaks in MW, I'm pretty sure..?

Woops sorry, responded too quick I guess. MW2 added customizable kill streaks as well as pro versions of perks.
Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#91 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
I love how people are saying "Stop counting teh DLC's but put BF's expansions in anyway!"
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

Not that I have seen there are refinements but battlefield has not evolved bf3 plays exactly like bad company 1 and 2.

WilliamRLBaker

:lol: I see why no one takes you seriously here. BF3 plays VERY different to BC2. There are similarities, but in gameplay, BF3 plays so much diffeently than BC2.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"] It pretty much does now...vashkey

but the difference is that it, in most cases, doesn't come out on every platform. The only ones that did this gen was 1943, BC2, and BF3, and last gen, it was BF2.

Why does it matter? Who cares? They're both milked games. Neither of them reinvent themselves on a regular basis. Arguing over which one is milked more is just absurd. Pots calling kettles black. This whole CoD vs BF **** flinging is just pathetic.

because if you're not a multiplatform owner, you don't see a BF game every year. That is what matters in this particular debate.

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
I love how people are saying "Stop counting teh DLC's but put BF's expansions in anyway!"kris9031998

[QUOTE="Loegi"]From Wikipedia:

2002 Battlefield 1942

2003 Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome

2003 Battlefield 1942: Secret Weapons of WWII

2004 Battlefield Vietnam

2005 Battlefield 2

2005 Battlefield 2: Special Forces

2005 Battlefield 2: Modern Combat

2006 Battlefield 2: Euro Forces

2006 Battlefield 2: Armored Fury

2006 Battlefield 2142

2007 Battlefield 2142: Northern Strike

2008 Battlefield: Bad Company

2009 Battlefield Heroes

2009 Battlefield 1943

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2: Vietnam

2011 Battlefield Play4Free

2011 Battlefield 3

Seems like it released every year.wis3boi

rofl @ those in red. If you're gonna include those, then I'm going to count the CoD map packs

There are no expansion packs in this list, yet it has the same amount of games as CoD. EDIT: I meant, these can be considered full games.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

COD Black ops evolved alot than Mw2. BF3 did not evolve from BC2. Easy equation here. BTW BF3 is a huge flop.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#96 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

[QUOTE="kris9031998"] [QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="Loegi"]From Wikipedia:

2002 Battlefield 1942

2003 Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome

2003 Battlefield 1942: Secret Weapons of WWII

2004 Battlefield Vietnam

2005 Battlefield 2

2005 Battlefield 2: Special Forces

2005 Battlefield 2: Modern Combat

2006 Battlefield 2: Euro Forces

2006 Battlefield 2: Armored Fury

2006 Battlefield 2142

2007 Battlefield 2142: Northern Strike

2008 Battlefield: Bad Company

2009 Battlefield Heroes

2009 Battlefield 1943

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2: Vietnam

2011 Battlefield Play4Free

2011 Battlefield 3

Seems like it released every year.Loegi

rofl @ those in red. If you're gonna include those, then I'm going to count the CoD map packs

There are no expansion packs in this list, yet it has the same amount of games as CoD.

Road to rome, Secret weapons, Special Forces, Euro Forces, Armored Fury, Northern strike, Vietnam.... Wow, just wow. You arent even trying.

EDIT: And BF has been around a while longer than CoD has if i am not mistaken.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#97 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ermacness"]but the difference is that it, in most cases, doesn't come out on every platform. The only ones that did this gen was 1943, BC2, and BF3, and last gen, it was BF2.

ermacness

Why does it matter? Who cares? They're both milked games. Neither of them reinvent themselves on a regular basis. Arguing over which one is milked more is just absurd. Pots calling kettles black. This whole CoD vs BF **** flinging is just pathetic.

because if you're not a multiplatform owner, you don't see a BF game every year. That is what matters in this particular debate.

When did the definition of milking become purely based on how many platforms a game is on? Seriously, with the amount of games and explansion released in the battlfield series in it's life time how can it not be milked? Both series are milked to heaven and back.

At this point it's silly to even argue over which is more milked. The fans just come off as elitists and tools. It's a game for crying out loud.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#98 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]BF doesnt come out every yearLoegi
From Wikipedia:

2002 Battlefield 1942

2003 Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome

2003 Battlefield 1942: Secret Weapons of WWII

2004 Battlefield Vietnam

2005Battlefield 2

2005 Battlefield 2: Special Forces

2005 Battlefield 2: Modern Combat

2006 Battlefield 2: Euro Forces

2006 Battlefield 2: Armored Fury

2006 Battlefield 2142

2007 Battlefield 2142: Northern Strike

2008 Battlefield: Bad Company

2009 Battlefield Heroes

2009 Battlefield 1943

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2: Vietnam

2010 Battlefield Online

2011 Battlefield Play4Free

2011 Battlefield 3 Seems like it released every year. EDIT: forgot the quote -_-'

Major ownage lol, good to see a few hermits trying to damage control :D.

In the end Both CoD and BF are the same except a few twists/upgrades each game that comes out, are they both good at what they do? yes, I'll be buying both (already have BF3).

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
[QUOTE="kris9031998"] Road to rome, Secret weapons, Special Forces, Euro Forces, Armored Fury, Northern strike, Vietnam.... Wow, just wow. You arent even trying.

Well, I though it was obvious that you had to ignore the red ones.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts

Batlefield has evolved, and it isn't an annual franchise.

[QUOTE="kris9031998"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="Loegi"]From Wikipedia:

2002 Battlefield 1942

2003 Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome

2003 Battlefield 1942: Secret Weapons of WWII

2004 Battlefield Vietnam

2005 Battlefield 2

2005 Battlefield 2: Special Forces

2005 Battlefield 2: Modern Combat

2006 Battlefield 2: Euro Forces

2006 Battlefield 2: Armored Fury

2006 Battlefield 2142

2007 Battlefield 2142: Northern Strike

2008 Battlefield: Bad Company

2009 Battlefield Heroes

2009 Battlefield 1943

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010 Battlefield: Bad Company 2: Vietnam

2011 Battlefield Play4Free

2011 Battlefield 3

Seems like it released every year.Loegi

rofl @ those in red. If you're gonna include those, then I'm going to count the CoD map packs

There are no expansion packs in this list, yet it has the same amount of games as CoD.

EDIT: I meant, these can be considered full games.

But they aren't full games. They are exapansion packs, they just add a few maps, vehicles, weapons etc.