I'm considering buying Bad co. for 20 bucks after playing alot of 1943 lately. How does this game stand up to the likes of CoD4 as far as modern FPS's go?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm considering buying Bad co. for 20 bucks after playing alot of 1943 lately. How does this game stand up to the likes of CoD4 as far as modern FPS's go?
[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Bad Company is a very fun game. I found its multiplayer to be much better than COD.rockguy92Agreed. count me in. i fully agreed.
Bad company represents all that is wrong with FPS single player campaigns. the multiplayer is decent thoughAndrovinusi thought the SP was pretty decent also. Some humors that are hit and miss. overall, not bad at all. Downside is the graphic from the is washed up, doesnt look that good. But hey, im not playing the game for its graphic.
BF:bc is alot of fun and since the next modern warfare will be out in a few month I would say go for battlefield. If you like 1943 you'll love bad company. 1943 is kinda like a stripped down version of bad company.It hasmore vehicles, weapons, class customization and maps.
You can't vote like that. For your input on the matter to be considered valid, you must have had experience with both subjects in question to form a legitimate stance on the argument.I only played COD 4, so I guess COD 4.. Not going to buy BF: Bad Company to see.
Yandere
Bad company represents all that is wrong with FPS single player campaigns. the multiplayer is decent thoughAndrovinusbesides a few bugs i liked it better then cod4. its has a story and a backbone to it. you can also do more damage to stuff which made me enjoy bc better then cod4.
i enjoyed cod4 better.. but battlefield 2 destroys them all, Bad company is like a downgraded version of it... either way they are both very goodI'm considering buying Bad co. for 20 bucks after playing alot of 1943 lately. How does this game stand up to the likes of CoD4 as far as modern FPS's go?
Utensilman
[QUOTE="Yandere"]You can't vote like that. For your input on the matter to be considered valid, you must have had experience with both subjects in question to form a legitimate stance on the argument.i didnt expect your mac to run games lolI only played COD 4, so I guess COD 4.. Not going to buy BF: Bad Company to see.
DonPerian
call of duty 4 over bad company anyday.
battlefield bad company damn man that game sucked the destruction was so crappy you couldnt destroy the whole building so predetermined
lol the you couldnt shoot the tree's into chunks once they've fallen like crysis spoiled me on that.
the tree's branches just clip though the ground dont even bend has no collision detection with the ground
they took out prone crawl, the gaphics were grainy, the game lacked physics.
it the sucked ****
call of duty 4 might not have destruction but you can shoot through walls.
and atleast they didnt half ass attempt something like digital illusions.
frostbite engine sucks ass and red faction guerilla dev's get mad props for doing destruction halfway right.
BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL
BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL
killzowned24
they didnt half ass attempt destruction either, battlefield you cant shoot through walls
or cars so there u go
you can lean around corners in call of duty 4 on the pc i dunno about console version why would you even play call of duty on a console?
you can also prone crawl in call of duty 4.
the gameplay is overall better in call of duty 4.
cod4 supports more gameplay modes call of duty 4 all the way.
Seriously screw bad company that game sucked.
no prone crawl WTF are they thinkin, prone crawl helps you take cover behind really short objects you couldnt take cover behind with a normal crouch.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]
BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL
videogamesdead8
they didnt half ass attempt destruction either, battlefield you cant shoot through walls
or cars so there u go
you can shoot through light stuff in BFBC not much of difference most buildings are concrete ,besides in BC you can destroy walls. owned[QUOTE="videogamesdead8"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]
BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL
killzowned24
they didnt half ass attempt destruction either, battlefield you cant shoot through walls
or cars so there u go
you can shoot through light stuff in BFBC not much of difference most buildings are concrete ,besides in BC you can destroy walls. ownedyou can only shoot blow up pretermined walls and they break the sameway.
you cant shoot through the buildings frame
owned
you cant lean or prone crawl no free for all deathmatch game sucks
whats your point that its not real? The destruction changes the gameplay and makes it far better. who cares about prone but a hermit sniper? I think having tanks,boats,helis,hummers, beat that easy:) killzowned24
you cant take cover from snipers without prone crawl sometimes
you dont know much about fps it seems.
the destruction the buildings break apart the sameway everytime it doesnt change crap everyone knows which wall is gonna be blown up the game is crap
buy red faction guerilla if you want some decent destruction.
Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.aero250dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots
[QUOTE="aero250"]Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.killzowned24dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone in Battlefield.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="aero250"]Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.aero250dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone. BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="aero250"] Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone.aero250BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo. Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play. wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone.
Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play. wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone. Ive never found the game intense apart from hiding from the Tanks which dominate everything.[QUOTE="aero250"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo.killzowned24
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone. Ive never found the game intense apart from hiding from the Tanks which dominate everything. why hide when you can run up and place a c4 charge on it, thats intense:)[QUOTE="aero250"] Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play.aero250
[QUOTE="aero250"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone.Ive never found the game intense apart from hiding from the Tanks which dominate everything. why hide when you can run up and place a c4 charge on it, thats intense:)killzowned24
Now thats intense :D
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment