CoD4 vs BF: Bad Company (poll)

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Utensilman
Utensilman

1571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Utensilman
Member since 2006 • 1571 Posts

I'm considering buying Bad co. for 20 bucks after playing alot of 1943 lately. How does this game stand up to the likes of CoD4 as far as modern FPS's go?

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts
Bad Company is a very fun game. I found its multiplayer to be much better than COD.
Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts
Bad Company is a very fun game. I found its multiplayer to be much better than COD.II-FBIsniper-II
Agreed.
Avatar image for Ross_the_B0SS
Ross_the_B0SS

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Ross_the_B0SS
Member since 2008 • 1210 Posts

Bad Company. I like sniping and it's more enjoyable in Bad Company.

Avatar image for strudel420
strudel420

3687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 strudel420
Member since 2006 • 3687 Posts

Overall I preferred COD4, but enjoyed Bad Company quite a bit.

Avatar image for OPuniverse
OPuniverse

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 OPuniverse
Member since 2009 • 1943 Posts
[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Bad Company is a very fun game. I found its multiplayer to be much better than COD.rockguy92
Agreed.

count me in. i fully agreed.
Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#7 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts
Bad company represents all that is wrong with FPS single player campaigns. the multiplayer is decent though
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

The multiplayer alone of Bad Company is more than worth that price. Some of the most atmospheric firefights I've ever witnessed.

Avatar image for TSNAKE617
TSNAKE617

5494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TSNAKE617
Member since 2008 • 5494 Posts

BF: BC feels very realistic. Very large maps, desructible environments, taking damage from falls, etc. ( I haven't played CoD, but BF: BC is my favorite multiplayer so far.)

Avatar image for OPuniverse
OPuniverse

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 OPuniverse
Member since 2009 • 1943 Posts
Bad company represents all that is wrong with FPS single player campaigns. the multiplayer is decent thoughAndrovinus
i thought the SP was pretty decent also. Some humors that are hit and miss. overall, not bad at all. Downside is the graphic from the is washed up, doesnt look that good. But hey, im not playing the game for its graphic.
Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

I only played COD 4, so I guess COD 4.. Not going to buy BF: Bad Company to see.

Avatar image for PS3Fanboy7
PS3Fanboy7

353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 PS3Fanboy7
Member since 2009 • 353 Posts
BF is awesome and Bad Company is awesome, one of the best. COD isnt that good.
Avatar image for smokingsbad
smokingsbad

38455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 smokingsbad
Member since 2004 • 38455 Posts
I only played Bad Company ONCE:( I only have Cod4, so i can't really tell you which is better But during that one time playing BC it was fun lulz
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
battlefield COULDVE been a fun game. most of the time i felt like i was fighting a war with two seemingly childish partners. all they do is a very poor attempt at comedy throughout the games SP wich gets old VERY quickly and sometimes the mission objectives arent too clear......imo. i really didnt like the game so i wound up returning it not long after i bought it. i exchanged it for God of War 2. i may pick it up again later when the price goes down even more but for now...the only saving grace for that game to me was the multiplayer wich was truthfully better than COD but i just didnt find it as addictive...
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
Frankly id rather play a game with a GREAT SP and GREAT MP than a game with an absolutely Horrid SP but with an OUTSTANDING MP
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
I think BC is a far better game. Single and Multiplayer wise.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#17 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts
Both are practically equal to me, but I enjoyed Cod4's multiplayer far more. The singleplayer for Bad Company was a BLAST though. Aside it being fun as hell, it was frickin hilarious as well. :D
Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

BF:bc is alot of fun and since the next modern warfare will be out in a few month I would say go for battlefield. If you like 1943 you'll love bad company. 1943 is kinda like a stripped down version of bad company.It hasmore vehicles, weapons, class customization and maps.

Avatar image for lm2f
lm2f

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 lm2f
Member since 2007 • 1272 Posts
Frankly id rather play a game with a GREAT SP and GREAT MP than a game with an absolutely Horrid SP but with an OUTSTANDING MPslvrraven9
Neither of them have good SP, cod4 puts you in very linear levels and repeatedly shooting everything.
Avatar image for Syferonik
Syferonik

3060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Syferonik
Member since 2006 • 3060 Posts

Between CoD4 and BF:BC i say BF:BC is better and BF:1943 is even better (1943 has M1 Garand and that weapon is just never getting old head shotting ppl with)

Avatar image for DonPerian
DonPerian

3773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 DonPerian
Member since 2005 • 3773 Posts

I only played COD 4, so I guess COD 4.. Not going to buy BF: Bad Company to see.

Yandere
You can't vote like that. For your input on the matter to be considered valid, you must have had experience with both subjects in question to form a legitimate stance on the argument.
Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts
Bad company represents all that is wrong with FPS single player campaigns. the multiplayer is decent thoughAndrovinus
besides a few bugs i liked it better then cod4. its has a story and a backbone to it. you can also do more damage to stuff which made me enjoy bc better then cod4.
Avatar image for ReaperV7
ReaperV7

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ReaperV7
Member since 2008 • 6756 Posts
bad company is fun.
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts

I'm considering buying Bad co. for 20 bucks after playing alot of 1943 lately. How does this game stand up to the likes of CoD4 as far as modern FPS's go?

Utensilman
i enjoyed cod4 better.. but battlefield 2 destroys them all, Bad company is like a downgraded version of it... either way they are both very good
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts
[QUOTE="Yandere"]

I only played COD 4, so I guess COD 4.. Not going to buy BF: Bad Company to see.

DonPerian
You can't vote like that. For your input on the matter to be considered valid, you must have had experience with both subjects in question to form a legitimate stance on the argument.

i didnt expect your mac to run games lol
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#26 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Bad Company by far. Its the best multiplayer game this gen imo

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

bad company sucks i was pissed they took out prone crawl

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

battlefield 2 modern combat on 360 pwns bad company

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

call of duty 4 over bad company anyday.

battlefield bad company damn man that game sucked the destruction was so crappy you couldnt destroy the whole building so predetermined

lol the you couldnt shoot the tree's into chunks once they've fallen like crysis spoiled me on that.

the tree's branches just clip though the ground dont even bend has no collision detection with the ground

they took out prone crawl, the gaphics were grainy, the game lacked physics.

it the sucked ****

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

call of duty 4 might not have destruction but you can shoot through walls.

and atleast they didnt half ass attempt something like digital illusions.

frostbite engine sucks ass and red faction guerilla dev's get mad props for doing destruction halfway right.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL

killzowned24

they didnt half ass attempt destruction either, battlefield you cant shoot through walls

or cars so there u go

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

you can lean around corners in call of duty 4 on the pc i dunno about console version why would you even play call of duty on a console?

you can also prone crawl in call of duty 4.

the gameplay is overall better in call of duty 4.

Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

cod4 supports more gameplay modes call of duty 4 all the way.

Seriously screw bad company that game sucked.

no prone crawl WTF are they thinkin, prone crawl helps you take cover behind really short objects you couldnt take cover behind with a normal crouch.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL

videogamesdead8

they didnt half ass attempt destruction either, battlefield you cant shoot through walls

or cars so there u go

you can shoot through light stuff in BFBC not much of difference most buildings are concrete ,besides in BC you can destroy walls. owned
Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

[QUOTE="videogamesdead8"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

BFBC destroys cod4 in gameplay and graphics, its a must have shooter. ^ so your complaining about destruction when cod4 has none, and trees being messed up yet cod trees dont even move AT ALL!!! ...LOL

killzowned24

they didnt half ass attempt destruction either, battlefield you cant shoot through walls

or cars so there u go

you can shoot through light stuff in BFBC not much of difference most buildings are concrete ,besides in BC you can destroy walls. owned

you can only shoot blow up pretermined walls and they break the sameway.

you cant shoot through the buildings frame

owned

you cant lean or prone crawl no free for all deathmatch game sucks

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
whats your point that its not real? The destruction changes the gameplay and makes it far better. who cares about prone but a hermit sniper? I think having tanks,boats,helis,hummers, beat that easy:)
Avatar image for videogamesdead8
videogamesdead8

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 videogamesdead8
Member since 2009 • 200 Posts

whats your point that its not real? The destruction changes the gameplay and makes it far better. who cares about prone but a hermit sniper? I think having tanks,boats,helis,hummers, beat that easy:) killzowned24

you cant take cover from snipers without prone crawl sometimes

you dont know much about fps it seems.

the destruction the buildings break apart the sameway everytime it doesnt change crap everyone knows which wall is gonna be blown up the game is crap

buy red faction guerilla if you want some decent destruction.

Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts
Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.
Avatar image for MerisYaki
MerisYaki

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 MerisYaki
Member since 2008 • 967 Posts

You seem to be okay with generic shooters, so I'm sure either one will blow you away.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.aero250
dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots
Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts

[QUOTE="aero250"]Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.killzowned24
dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots

Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone in Battlefield.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="aero250"]Bad company is good but Call of duty 4 is far better online.aero250
dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots

Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone.

BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo.
Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="aero250"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] dont see how. BFBC- far bigger maps destruction better weapons medics huge artillery guns-also other manned weapons like anti air craft and grenade launchers looks better- 720p, grass and foliage actually moves!! vehicles- helis,boats,hummers,tanks,buggy can take in game screenshots

Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone.

BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo.

Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play.
Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="aero250"] Call of duty 4 is far more enjoyable to play i hate the amount of bullets you have to shoot to kill someone.aero250
BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo.

Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play.

wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone.

Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts

[QUOTE="aero250"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] BFBC is far better, cod is basically the same thing over and over with no destruction or vehicles.It doesnt take a lot of bullets unless your using the support class but that holds like triple the ammo so its fair imo.killzowned24

Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play.

wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone.

Ive never found the game intense apart from hiding from the Tanks which dominate everything.
Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="aero250"] Battlefield is enjoyable online but the maps are far too big, So it's never intense to play.aero250

wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone.

Ive never found the game intense apart from hiding from the Tanks which dominate everything.

why hide when you can run up and place a c4 charge on it, thats intense:)
Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts

[QUOTE="aero250"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] wut? going after the gold can be very intense or trying to hold a zone.

killzowned24

Ive never found the game intense apart from hiding from the Tanks which dominate everything.

why hide when you can run up and place a c4 charge on it, thats intense:)

Now thats intense :D