Console contract options are GOOD for the industry (intelligent discussion only)

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#51 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

Console contracts were a CRITICAL necessity to maintain powerful systems and innovation. Now hear me out first.

The simple truth is, manufacturers have always done a horrible business practice, selling their consoles at a loss (mostly with the exception of Nintendo, they are smart). This business method puts the manufacturers deep in the red. Microsoft and Sony lost millions and millions doing this. The business model has to change. They can no longer take huge losses. They all want to be profitable day one, its the only way to survive. Nintendo has mostly always been profitable day one, they demonstrate how to run a business for profits.

So, the only way to be profitable nowadays, it to keep costs low. This will result in a far stripped down hardware console, lossing substantial potential power to remain profitable. The powerhouse consoles we all waited to hear and be announced and drool over specs, will all be long gone with this business model. Innovation and leaps forward, will be killed.

OR

They can have both powerful hardware and profits, IF the manufacturers adapt to the current industry, rather than stick to archaic business modeling.This new way of allowing powerful hardware, and remaining profitable, is contracts. Offer a powerful console with a cheap investment year by year contract. In the end, you pay a little more than you would have if you saved up.

What people need to realize is, this is an OPTION. A necessary one in fact. The masses will surely love it, but some hardcore gamers wont. The thing is, you don't have to get into the contract. There will surely be a separate console without a contract for $400-$500 separately, but many families wont be able to afford it.Please realize the good things in this model. It will allow a leap forward in tech, while remaining profitable. We would have barely better than current gen tech if someone didn't come up with this plan.

Its a great, and necessary option for the industry to offer powerful consoles and not take huge losses. You don't have to be in a contract, you can still buy an expensive separate product. There is an option for both hardcores and casual. It is not a bad thing, but a necessity for the industry to adapt and survive in the current environment, the old powerful hardware/huge losses model is heavily outdated, and no company will ever use it again.

reach3

This is what nintendo does... make consoles with old tech keep cost down but games suffer power.ya real smart. TWO they attemp to sell 3ds but had take a loss because cost to high for what cussumor gets. This is where selling games come in. For every game sold on a system the maker of that system gets a cut. This is why console makers really dont care about selling the hardware at a cut

Avatar image for Lupin497
Lupin497

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Lupin497
Member since 2012 • 282 Posts

>reach thread

>intelligent discussion

freedomfreak
Why are you typing like that? Is it supposed to mean something? And what's with the picture?
Avatar image for Boddicker
Boddicker

4458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 Boddicker
Member since 2012 • 4458 Posts

I wholeheartedly agree with the OP. I probably will just pay for a next gen console upfront, but there are certainly people that will find the contract option easier to handle. Like it or not it looks like contracts are here to stay.

Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

>reach thread

>intelligent discussion

Lupin497

Why are you typing like that? Is it supposed to mean something? And what's with the picture?

Sigh...

You really are new to all of this,aren't you?

What he wrote means you can have either a reach thread,or a intelligent discussion,since these two don't go together(reach is known as a forum troll)...

As for the picture,it's there for lolz,what else?

Ever heard of funny GIFs?

Avatar image for Lupin497
Lupin497

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Lupin497
Member since 2012 • 282 Posts

[QUOTE="Lupin497"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

>reach thread

>intelligent discussion

Rocker6

Why are you typing like that? Is it supposed to mean something? And what's with the picture?

Sigh...

You really are new to all of this,aren't you?

What he wrote means you can have either a reach thread,or a intelligent discussion,since these two don't go together(reach is known as a forum troll)...

As for the picture,it's there for lolz,what else?

Ever heard of funny GIFs?

No I haven't. I guess this is all new to me. I'm not a regular internet user. I should probably get back into my hiding spot. Maybe the ultra internet geeks will give me a hard time for not knowing that; similar to the situation I had here the other night.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="Lupin497"] Why are you typing like that? Is it supposed to mean something? And what's with the picture? Lupin497

Sigh...

You really are new to all of this,aren't you?

What he wrote means you can have either a reach thread,or a intelligent discussion,since these two don't go together(reach is known as a forum troll)...

As for the picture,it's there for lolz,what else?

Ever heard of funny GIFs?

No I haven't. I guess this is all new to me. I'm not a regular internet user. I should probably get back into my hiding spot. Maybe the ultra internet geeks will give me a hard time for not knowing that; similar to the situation I had here the other night.

Yup,sounds like a good idea.Though if you want a more "friendlier" gaming forum enviroment,go to PGD...

SW,it's here only for fun,trolls,and ownages...

Avatar image for Lupin497
Lupin497

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Lupin497
Member since 2012 • 282 Posts

[QUOTE="Lupin497"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Sigh...

You really are new to all of this,aren't you?

What he wrote means you can have either a reach thread,or a intelligent discussion,since these two don't go together(reach is known as a forum troll)...

As for the picture,it's there for lolz,what else?

Ever heard of funny GIFs?

Rocker6

No I haven't. I guess this is all new to me. I'm not a regular internet user. I should probably get back into my hiding spot. Maybe the ultra internet geeks will give me a hard time for not knowing that; similar to the situation I had here the other night.

Yup,sounds like a good idea.Though if you want a more "friendlier" gaming forum enviroment,go to PGD...

SW,it's here only for fun,trolls,and ownages...

I should probably check that out. And I'll agree to disagree on your claim. This place is ABSOLUTELY NO place for fun.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="Lupin497"] No I haven't. I guess this is all new to me. I'm not a regular internet user. I should probably get back into my hiding spot. Maybe the ultra internet geeks will give me a hard time for not knowing that; similar to the situation I had here the other night.Lupin497

Yup,sounds like a good idea.Though if you want a more "friendlier" gaming forum enviroment,go to PGD...

SW,it's here only for fun,trolls,and ownages...

I should probably check that out. And I'll agree to disagree on your claim. This place is ABSOLUTELY NO place for fun.

Yet you have returned :cool:

Avatar image for Lupin497
Lupin497

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Lupin497
Member since 2012 • 282 Posts

[QUOTE="Lupin497"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Yup,sounds like a good idea.Though if you want a more "friendlier" gaming forum enviroment,go to PGD...

SW,it's here only for fun,trolls,and ownages...

BPoole96

I should probably check that out. And I'll agree to disagree on your claim. This place is ABSOLUTELY NO place for fun.

Yet you have returned :cool:

Yes, I have. What's it to you? Why do you care?
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="Lupin497"] No I haven't. I guess this is all new to me. I'm not a regular internet user. I should probably get back into my hiding spot. Maybe the ultra internet geeks will give me a hard time for not knowing that; similar to the situation I had here the other night.Lupin497

Yup,sounds like a good idea.Though if you want a more "friendlier" gaming forum enviroment,go to PGD...

SW,it's here only for fun,trolls,and ownages...

I should probably check that out. And I'll agree to disagree on your claim. This place is ABSOLUTELY NO place for fun.

Hehe,that entirely depends on your personal definition of fun :twisted:

Avatar image for Lupin497
Lupin497

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Lupin497
Member since 2012 • 282 Posts

[QUOTE="Lupin497"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Yup,sounds like a good idea.Though if you want a more "friendlier" gaming forum enviroment,go to PGD...

SW,it's here only for fun,trolls,and ownages...

Rocker6

I should probably check that out. And I'll agree to disagree on your claim. This place is ABSOLUTELY NO place for fun.

Hehe,that entirely depends on your personal definition of fun :twisted:

You are acting really strange.