Console Gamers are Consistently getting Better Performance in Games then PC. PC Master Disgrace!!!!!!

This is 100% TRUE!!!!!!

Console gamers are getting a high-end experience on PS5/Series X with most games hitting 60FPS or hovering near that with a smooth experience and the games are looking really good with a mix of med to high settings.

Whereas on PC you literally need a 4090/5090 to hit max and 60+ at max settings but you need to sell a $kidney to achieve this and you'll still need to use DLSS & FSR. What's the point of spending crazy money every few years for an ultra expensive GPU and you'll still need to use DLSS or FSR to hit the FPS numbers and detail level you want?

What's even worse even with the best PC setup you still see hermits complaining all the time about some of the latest graphics engines like UE5 running like dog shit on PC and buggy? Also if you have like a 3070/4070 GPU that's only like a few years old good luck hitting decent number with newer games on those you're barely getting 1440p with high settings and again you'll need to heavily rely on DLSS & FSR to get anything decent.

None of this adds up to making any common sense. You midas well just buy the new high-end console every 5 years and get a great 4k HDR 120hz TV and call it a day becuase you're going to get a great experience with less bugs and smooth gameplay and great looking graphics.

Both Stalker 2 & KCD2 run like butter in performance mode on console yet you hear hermits saying they will wait blah blah blah for bugs and updates becuase they can't get the performance they want.

Even Avowed has been bumped to 60FPS on the X so PC is just a waste of time literally.

My 4080S pushes higher settings, up to 120hz (LG C4/C3). What does the Series X do?

Hells yeah! Preach brother!!

Nonsense aside, the inevitable return to mostly 30 fps on consoles hasn't happened which is a big win.

Somewhat ironically the best thing about PC for me is the performance benefit on older games (prior to PS5/SX )

Why not run med-high on PC for a more accurate comparison?

Max settings are usually overkill and often unoptimized.

I say that as someone who owns a 4090 and plays at max settings. If I cant run at max 60, I will start sacrificing settings to maintain 60-120fps

Is OP constantly drunk?

@rzing: Troll alt account. Most people kinda humour him cos SW is shit nowadays.

@lundy86_4: it's shit because people humour the trolls though which drives away better discussions.

Modding team need to grow a set.

@rzing: Nah, place went to shit quickly after the redesign. Used to have a lot more users worth their salt.

Oh no he's turned his sights on pc now....😩

Oh dear @xbox7204life what an epic fail lol.

Not in Stalker 2 and KCD2 and likely not Cyberpunk.

At ultra or max settings NO maybe close if you're using 100% DLSS but then it's not gonna look as good as full on natural with the horsepower of the GPU.

Hermits need to bring honesty to the table

What does the series X do?

Something something was said in OP.

Roughly 60 in those games and many others with nice graphic settings for pennies on the dollar.

"Roughly 60... with nice graphic settings..."

Well this thread went entirely as expected. 😂

Yeah but can you play Factorio?

Didn't think so. Sit yo ass down, son.

I'm playing KCD2 at native 1440p at 80+ FPS high settings. I'm good.

Performance can be good on a console but what I care about is the appliance like approach where there's a focus on convenience and a consistent plug and play experience.

Everyone knows that's my job, and everyone knows (you especially) I do a damn good job at it.

@last_lap: well wrangle up TC here because he's trying to steal your thunder.

Bad optimization sucks. The Monster Hunter Wilds beta looks and runs much worse than Monster Hunter World.

Hopefully they fix that on launch.

After being spoiled with 100+ FPS in many games, I refuse to acknowledge 60 FPS as being some sort of gold standard or magic number.

In 2025 ideally, we should be playing with 100+ FPS, even if it means lower resolution / settings.

Lol, even if that where true the main reason for PC gaming isn't even power. It's the game library.

Consoles created a new graphical settings category. “Lower than lowest on PC” makes me laugh every time I see it in those Digital Foundry videos

@lundy86_4 said:

@xbox7204life said:

Roughly 60 in those games and many others with nice graphic settings for pennies on the dollar.

"Roughly 60... with nice graphic settings..."

Meanwhile you're using a so called top end GPU from just a few years ago but are already having to use trickery and frame apps to get decent performance and settings and paying an arm and a leg to do so.

What's wrong you can't brute force it with that $2000 GPU? My point exactly.

Right? Consoles will put a couple of settings (like textures) on high so it'll take a good screenshot, then go potato mode on everything else to keep it from looking like a slideshow in action

1440p LMFAO!!!!!! What's wrong why not 4k or will you be chugging at closer to 30-40 frames on your mighty PC?

If it's at 60 on console then it looks and plays fine. Not to mention better optimization 99.9% of the time.

One positive doesn't make the other a negative, all hardware has its benefits and drawbacks regardless how one feels about them. Take a step back and you'll notice an obsession, getting far too attached with a chunk of plastic..

That's the problem with fanbois to begin with. Both P.C. loyalists and Console purists are full of retards.

Just enjoy your ****ing games.

You're gloating about 60 FPS while using a mediocre upscaling method from 1080p, and super low settings. While I play the same games at 90-144 fps while using a significantly better looking upscaling method and higher settings and higher starting resolution. And I don't even have my 5090 yet, in which It will be 144-240 FPS.

This thread is pathetic. Your experience is FAR worse for 99.9% of video games.

My current PC will likely run that at 120 FPS with far better visuals than X. My new one will likely run it at 180+. 60 looks choppy, and your sad Xbox upscaler from 1080p is blurry compared to DLSS4. And god knows how many settings they sacrificed beyond the resolution/upscaling method.

Worlds apart.

Homie...

The standard PS5 and Xbox Series X offer two modes: a 30 frames per second fidelity mode that renders at 1440p, and also a 60fps performance mode that renders at 1080p

Not even fixed 60fps... Ouch.

@TheEroica: Looking through this thread and seeing him getting his butt handed to him should ensure that he leaves it to the expert (me) in future.

He should stick the doom & gloom Sony threads.

Lmao. Console scrub rekt. He also missed the part where I put NATIVE. No PISSER/FSR or any upscaling. If I use DLSS I can easily hit 4k 80 FPS at high settings.

This thread has been tough for OP. Being a troll is hard, but get your arse blown out whilst trying to troll must take its toll.

Stupid thread but... and funny enough, I've been seeing more and more of the so-called "PC master race" embracing the Steamdecks, the Rog Allys and Legion GOs and completely leaving their $3000 towers gathering dust...

Suddenly their precious 120fps @ 8k resolutions arent that important anymore.... XD

Just a personal note