Console gamers gladly buy DLC, PC Gamers think they're entitled to it for free

  • 100 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EvanTheGamer
EvanTheGamer

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 EvanTheGamer
Member since 2009 • 1550 Posts

This is why so few game companies take PC as a serious platform anymore.

Just in case you're wonderin'

Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

this is why publishers think they can milk console gamers for theirmoney on anything in case your wondering

Avatar image for falconclan
falconclan

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#3 falconclan
Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

This is why so few game companies take PC as a serious platform anymore.

Just in case you're wonderin'

EvanTheGamer

This is why they get the content free almost every time DLC is available. Honestly, I hate bending over for the companies on consoles. I can understand paying for something sometimes, but DLC comes out seemingly daily for some games, and they are tiny tweaks that you pay $10 for... Other times you get DLC the same month or so that the game was released, and that just pisses me off.

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#5 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

PC gamers can create their own content. Console gamers can't.

Avatar image for hoplayletsplay
hoplayletsplay

983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 hoplayletsplay
Member since 2005 • 983 Posts
I, as a console gamer, DO NOT like the idea of download contents at all! It is obviously ruining the industry. Games should get cheaper not more expensive.
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts
pc gamers feell entitled to it for free, because their the ones who make a majority of the "dlc"
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Or so many console gamers willingly buy stuff that should be free. Are willingly milked.
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48993 Posts

I like Valve's way of looking at DLC. It's free because:
-It keeps people playing your game
-It attracts new people to the game : more sales

Avatar image for falconclan
falconclan

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#10 falconclan
Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

I, as a console gamer, DO NOT like the idea of download contents at all! It is obviously ruining the industry. Games should get cheaper not more expensive.hoplayletsplay
How old are you? I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US. Games have gotten cheaper recently, and development costs are high.

I can't say I blame them for trying to profit, but I think they should be more honest in pricing. Seriously, I want value.

Avatar image for Valiant_Rebel
Valiant_Rebel

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Valiant_Rebel
Member since 2009 • 4197 Posts

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

washd123

Basically this. Of course no one forces anyone to buy DLC, and even then, some of the DLC can be overpriced. As long as people buy overpriced DLC, it will stay overpriced (not trying to flame anyone).

Avatar image for falconclan
falconclan

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#12 falconclan
Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="washd123"]

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

Valiant_Rebel

Basically this. Of course no one forces anyone to buy DLC, and even then, some of the DLC can be overpriced. As long as people buy overpriced DLC, it will stay overpriced (not trying to flame anyone).

You can't exactly tell if its over priced or not. For some things its harder, take for example, the oblivion DLC, there is no real way to base how long it will take to beat it or how much you'll replay it.

If its a gears map pack sure, you can make the call. 3 maps for $10, probably not a great deal, 19 maps and a deleted scene, great deal.

Avatar image for steve17989
steve17989

1020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 steve17989
Member since 2006 • 1020 Posts

DLC is the only way for console gamers to prolong their games (some exceptions), so developers and publishers exploit this by selling lots of overpriced DLC. PC gamers have had free user created content for years, so they obviously don't feel the need to slap down money whenever their game starts to feel tired. To PC gamers paying for DLC is devolutionary.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

I like Valve's way of looking at DLC. It's free because:
-It keeps people playing your game
-It attracts new people to the game : more sales

R4gn4r0k

Indeed, its the basic principles of downloadable content.

Dating back to the start of online gaming in the 90s, developers would release updates with new maps, keeping a strong user base and encouraging more people to play, or come back to it.

Nowadays developers milk customers who already bought the product, diving the player base rather than growing it, and making it stronger.

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it...

... while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

washd123

How many times have PC gamers had the chance to get ripped off by DLC?

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts
I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US.falconclan
You got jipped.
Avatar image for hoplayletsplay
hoplayletsplay

983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 hoplayletsplay
Member since 2005 • 983 Posts

[QUOTE="hoplayletsplay"]I, as a console gamer, DO NOT like the idea of download contents at all! It is obviously ruining the industry. Games should get cheaper not more expensive.falconclan

How old are you? I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US. Games have gotten cheaper recently, and development costs are high.

I can't say I blame them for trying to profit, but I think they should be more honest in pricing. Seriously, I want value.

I'm on my last years of high school now if that's really what you want to know. And I agree with you about how the companies are doing it wrong when they charge you for something that should be included in the games in the first place. I just felt the industry is not competitive enough when you can have a publisher like Activition profiting from something that only a million in return for 10 times more. By the way, can everyone stop calling out people's age on the internet please?
Avatar image for Valiant_Rebel
Valiant_Rebel

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Valiant_Rebel
Member since 2009 • 4197 Posts

[QUOTE="Valiant_Rebel"]

[QUOTE="washd123"]

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

falconclan

Basically this. Of course no one forces anyone to buy DLC, and even then, some of the DLC can be overpriced. As long as people buy overpriced DLC, it will stay overpriced (not trying to flame anyone).

You can't exactly tell if its over priced or not. For some things its harder, take for example, the oblivion DLC, there is no real way to base how long it will take to beat it or how much you'll replay it.

If its a gears map pack sure, you can make the call. 3 maps for $10, probably not a great deal, 19 maps and a deleted scene, great deal.

I know it's hard to tell and I know some game's DLC value depends on the player. Some people can pull 12+ hours of fun off 3 maps while other people can barely pull 3 hours. It's all on the player. I am mostly referring to map packs. Story based/extended DLC is usually priced well though.

Avatar image for falconclan
falconclan

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#19 falconclan
Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="falconclan"]I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US.Trmpt
You got jipped.

N64 games had a going price at around $100, it just happened to come with a sweet rumble pack. People complain too much, honestly, when games got as cheap as they did in the late 90's, I was ecstatic.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

Console gamers think PC market is the same as console one, which is pure nonsense.

DLC on consoles exist because your sales die out after 2-3 months and you have a horrible used games problem.

on PC none of those problems exist. Free new content is used for combating different problems. PCgames sell good, but over longer periods of time, free content keeps people interested and keeps sales from declining over longer periods. Also free updates act as "loyalty bonus"...a away developer says "you didn't pirate, that's our way of saying thanks"

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

N64 games had a going price at around $100, it just happened to come with a sweet rumble pack. People complain too much, honestly, when games got as cheap as they did in the late 90's, I was ecstatic.

falconclan

What store did you go to?

The most expensive cartridge game I remember seeing was around $70 and that was on the Snes.

It was a while ago but I think they dropped to about $60-$65 during the N64 days.

Avatar image for falconclan
falconclan

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#22 falconclan
Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="falconclan"] N64 games had a going price at around $100, it just happened to come with a sweet rumble pack. People complain too much, honestly, when games got as cheap as they did in the late 90's, I was ecstatic.

Trmpt

What store did you go to?

The most expensive cartridge game I remember seeing was around $70 and that was on the Snes.

It was a while ago but I think they dropped to about $60-$65 during the N64 days.

Nope, even later n64 titles cost upward of $100, and for games thats pretty much the rate man. Excitebike for 64 cost $120 and that came out in like 99.

Avatar image for deactivated-660c2894dc19c
deactivated-660c2894dc19c

2190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-660c2894dc19c
Member since 2004 • 2190 Posts

I, as a console gamer, DO NOT like the idea of download contents at all! It is obviously ruining the industry. Games should get cheaper not more expensive.hoplayletsplay

And there lies one of the problems. Game developing is getting more expensive, but developers and publishers don't want to increase price of the games. DLC is one way to get the money back and I gladly support good games and industry by bying it.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

This is why so few game companies take PC as a serious platform anymore.

Just in case you're wonderin'

EvanTheGamer
Actually, it's because PC gamers make their own DLC. The day one shovelware that console only gamers are happy to lap up isn't so attractive in comparison.
Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

Nope, even later n64 titles cost upward of $100, and for games thats pretty much the rate man. Excitebike for 64 cost $120 and that came out in like 99.

falconclan

I did some research. :D

Third line second paragraph. (this source wouldnt let me copy and paste)

The cost of producing an N64 cartridge was far higher than producing a CD. Publishers had to pass these higher expenses to the consumer and as a result, N64 games tended to sell for higher prices than PlayStation games. While most PlayStation games rarely exceeded US$50, N64 games could reach US$79.99, such as the first pressing of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Games in Sony's line of PlayStation Greatest Hits budget line retailed for US$19.95, while Nintendo's equivalent Player's Choice line retailed for US$29.95. In the United Kingdom, N64 games were priced £54.95 at their time of release, while PlayStation games were priced at £44.95. In the United States games were priced at around roughly $49.99 at the time of their release.

They undoubtedly cost more than Playstation games but no way were they double.

So I stand by what I said....... You got jipped man.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
How old are you? I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US. Games have gotten cheaper recently, and development costs are high.falconclan
You paid that much because it was bundled with the rumble pack. 64 games were not $150 US, they were $50 US. Games have gotten more expensive this generation.
Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts
[QUOTE="falconclan"] How old are you? I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US. Games have gotten cheaper recently, and development costs are high.Danm_999
You paid that much because it was bundled with the rumble pack. 64 games were not $150 US, they were $50 US. Games have gotten more expensive this generation.

No most of them did cost around $70 more or less but $100 is an exaggeration.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#30 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="falconclan"] How old are you? I recall paying $150 for Star Fox 64, and I live in the US. Games have gotten cheaper recently, and development costs are high.Trmpt
You paid that much because it was bundled with the rumble pack. 64 games were not $150 US, they were $50 US. Games have gotten more expensive this generation.

No most of them did cost around $70 more or less but $100 is an exaggeration.

Really? I remember 55 as being the sweet spot. Maybe I was just buying them at the right place.
Avatar image for Arsuz
Arsuz

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Arsuz
Member since 2003 • 2318 Posts
You just keep bending over boy. Next time, could you perhaps squeal like a pig?
Avatar image for TreeMoBMoney
TreeMoBMoney

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 TreeMoBMoney
Member since 2009 • 641 Posts

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

washd123
thats a real elitist way of looking at it.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#33 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="washd123"]

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

TreeMoBMoney
thats a real elitist way of looking at it.

Is it necessarily an incorrect one though? Paid DLC does very well on consoles, it doesn't on PC.
Avatar image for TreeMoBMoney
TreeMoBMoney

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TreeMoBMoney
Member since 2009 • 641 Posts

You just keep bending over boy. Next time, could you perhaps squeal like a pig?Arsuz

This is why pc gamers are gipped all the time, LACK OF FUNDING. Just keep thinking we're getting ripped off and you'll realize soon how very wrong you are. :)

While console gamers are enjoying epic games and dont have to play resort to playing CS. :lol:

Avatar image for TreeMoBMoney
TreeMoBMoney

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 TreeMoBMoney
Member since 2009 • 641 Posts
[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"][QUOTE="washd123"]

-_-

thats one flawed way of looking at it.

or this

console gamers will buy anything that developers push out without thinking about it while pc gamers arent willing to be ripped off

Danm_999
thats a real elitist way of looking at it.

Is it necessarily an incorrect one though? Paid DLC does very well on consoles, it doesn't on PC.

Its all optional though, there not gonna make you pay for something game breaking. Funding funding funding, its a necessity.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

While console gamers are enjoying epic games and dont have to play resort to playing CS. :lol:

TreeMoBMoney

Epic games?

Not even close.

Avatar image for TreeMoBMoney
TreeMoBMoney

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 TreeMoBMoney
Member since 2009 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"]

While console gamers are enjoying epic games and dont have to play resort to playing CS. :lol:

skrat_01

Epic games?

Not even close.

Thats crazy, you have games like that and people are STILL PLAYING CS.
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

PC gamers can create their own content. Console gamers can't.

SpinoRaptor24
On xbox360 you can....by breaking the law of course....
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#39 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"] thats a real elitist way of looking at it.

Is it necessarily an incorrect one though? Paid DLC does very well on consoles, it doesn't on PC.

Its all optional though, there not gonna make you pay for something game breaking. Funding funding funding, its a necessity.

But they are making you pay. And they aren't making PC gamers pay (until Activision has tried now, and it basically failed). And for many companies like EA, the PC is more profitable than the 360 or PS3.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"]

While console gamers are enjoying epic games and dont have to play resort to playing CS. :lol:

TreeMoBMoney

Epic games?

Not even close.

Thats crazy, you have games like that and people are STILL PLAYING CS.

Because CS is a good game. Pretty graphics and big explosions don't necessarily make a game worth having (although the PC does have those too).
Avatar image for TreeMoBMoney
TreeMoBMoney

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 TreeMoBMoney
Member since 2009 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"]

While console gamers are enjoying epic games and dont have to play resort to playing CS. :lol:

skrat_01

Epic games?

Not even close.

Actually, im away on business for about a year, my gaming pc is at my house, that game looks fabulous, and i cant wait to get it, but really, i hate it because ive always loved pc and console gaming (which is what im limited to now, which is more than ok) and pc gamers bragging about free dlc and having to pay for dlc on consoles, well, they just dont fully grasp the reasoning behind it, and its pretty sad that pc doesnt charge, because it would mean great things for the industry, and they could do more, faster, less bugs etc. because they have more money to work with, although the idea has its flaws, so does NOT paying for them.

I see it as the lesser of 2 evils, and in general, a better idea.

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

Epic games?

Not even close.

skrat_01

That was cool but any two countries that put that many planes up in one specific area are IDIOTS.

Avatar image for TreeMoBMoney
TreeMoBMoney

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 TreeMoBMoney
Member since 2009 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]Epic games?

Not even close.

Danm_999

Thats crazy, you have games like that and people are STILL PLAYING CS.

Because CS is a good game. Pretty graphics and big explosions don't necessarily make a game worth having (although the PC does have those too).

CS is ok. even by todays standards, theres dozens of better games out, cs is to broken, exploitable. its just... Meh, its like the diablo 2 of FPS.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

[QUOTE="TreeMoBMoney"]

While console gamers are enjoying epic games and dont have to play resort to playing CS. :lol:

TreeMoBMoney

Epic games?

Not even close.

Actually, im away on business for about a year, my gaming pc is at my house, that game looks fabulous, and i cant wait to get it, but really, i hate it because ive always loved pc and console gaming (which is what im limited to now, which is more than ok) and pc gamers bragging about free dlc and having to pay for dlc on consoles, well, they just dont fully grasp the reasoning behind it, and its pretty sad that pc doesnt charge, because it would mean great things for the industry, and they could do more, faster, less bugs etc. because they have more money to work with, although the idea has its flaws, so does NOT paying for them.

I see it as the lesser of 2 evils, and in general, a better idea.

The PC gaming industry should be fueled by the hardware industry....Thats the only way for it to boom...
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

I don't mind paying for some of the DLC. For the amount of hours I spend playing some games I almost feel like the $60 I paid for the game was a steal. If Naughty Dog releases DLC for Uncharted 2, I'll gladly buy it since they already made such a fantastic game

Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

[QUOTE="falconclan"] N64 games had a going price at around $100, it just happened to come with a sweet rumble pack. People complain too much, honestly, when games got as cheap as they did in the late 90's, I was ecstatic.

falconclan

What store did you go to?

The most expensive cartridge game I remember seeing was around $70 and that was on the Snes.

It was a while ago but I think they dropped to about $60-$65 during the N64 days.

Nope, even later n64 titles cost upward of $100, and for games thats pretty much the rate man. Excitebike for 64 cost $120 and that came out in like 99.

I don't know where you live (or shop for that matter), but around here the average N64 game was about $65 new. The biggest price tag I saw on a new N64 game was $80.

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#47 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts

I don't have a problem with DLC if it's good, not forced down my throat and properly priced. Something like 3 maps for 10 bucks is not a good deal in my books, nor do I want to pay for online modes separately like for e.g. in RE5.

Look at CoD:WaW, the map packs alone made 70 million, to put that in perspective for a full game it equals to sales of over 1.5 million, or it would be enough to make 3 new games. I don't think that sets a good precedent for the industry, there is too much air in the prices considering the low development and distribution costs for DLC, I don't think it's good for gamers or the industry in the long run.

Of course it's not their fault for selling it, but you shouldn't scoff at people for not bying it either.

Avatar image for Next-Gen-Tec
Next-Gen-Tec

4623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Next-Gen-Tec
Member since 2009 • 4623 Posts
PC gamers are cheap when it comes to paying for games or DLC, but they are willing to dish out a lot for their gaming rigs.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#49 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
PC gamers are cheap when it comes to paying for games or DLC, but they are willing to dish out a lot for their gaming rigs.Next-Gen-Tec
My guess would be they see one as worth the cost, the other as not.
Avatar image for Ondoval
Ondoval

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 Ondoval
Member since 2005 • 3103 Posts

A few examples:

Crysis Wars comes with 23 official maps + Sandbox 2.0 editor. Nine of the map comes from the first Crysis, but the patches and Warhead has raised the number to the current 23. But the mp has a autodownloading tool, which gives you the chance to download and install any new custom map you find any time you join in a dedicated server with new mpas. Results:

Added maps inMy documents\My Games\Crysis Wars\Downloads\, Team Instant Action:

Added maps in Power Struggle:

In total, 64 custom maps, + 23 official maps : 87 maps with a single purchase. Plus the custom free levels in the single player -lazy to search now-. Un other games as Unreal Tournament series the situation is similar: UT 2004 comes with near to 100 official maps, but the custom free content overshadows easily those numbers. The same with UT III. I remember myself playing mods as Air Buccaneers, Alien Swarm, Chaos UT... But isn't confined to fps: DoW PRO is one of the finest mod I have played in my life -deeper and a lot more complex than DoW itself-.

So, let me express how shocking is to me when I read that in console players are currently paying to obtain a armor to his horses in Oblivion or paying $ 10-12 to a pack of 3 miserable new maps in a mp as COD or Halo.