Consoles have higher standards than the PC

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SouljaBoyHater
SouljaBoyHater

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SouljaBoyHater
Member since 2008 • 76 Posts

Exhibit A:

Half Life 2 on PC: 9.2

Half Life 2 on XBox: 8.4 or something like that. Not AAA, though.

Exhibit B:

FEAR on PC: 9.1

FEAR on XBox 360 and PS3: A an AA scores.

Exhibit C:

Universe at War on PC: 7.5

Universe at War on 360: 6.5

LOL! This is absolutely HILARIOUS! Half Life 2 got a 9.2 in 2004 on PC... Imagine if it was 2008 and it was on the 360, what it would get! :D Halo 3, in 2007, got a 9.5 on the 360!

So basically, consoles own the PC. On top of that, the PC has been around for years and has no AAAAE.

Nintendo 64, PS1, PS2, and DreamCast all have at least one AAAAE, and they're lifespan was incredibly short compared to PC's. PC has been around since, what, ever, and it's highest rated game is only a 9.5, I think. If it's not, it still doesn't have a 10.

I'd rather eat poo than play any of the crap games on PC. :D

Note: ***I couldn't think of a good reference to poo because my brother kicked me in the head today. Sorry.***

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

Exhibit A:

Half Life 2 on PC: 9.2

Half Life 2 on XBox: 8.4 or something like that. Not AAA, though.

Exhibit B:

FEAR on PC: 9.1

FEAR on XBox 360 and PS3: A an AA scores.

Exhibit C:

Universe at War on PC: 7.5

Universe at War on 360: 6.5

LOL! This is absolutely HILARIOUS! Half Life 2 got a 9.2 in 2004 on PC... Imagine if it was 2008 and it was on the 360, what it would get! :D Halo 3, in 2007, got a 9.5 on the 360!

So basically, consoles own the PC. On top of that, the PC has been around for years and has no AAAAE.

Nintendo 64, PS1, PS2, and DreamCast all have at least one AAAAE, and they're lifespan was incredibly short compared to PC's. PC has been around since, what, ever, and it's highest rated game is only a 9.5, I think. If it's not, it still doesn't have a 10.

I'd rather eat poo than play any of the crap games on PC. :D

Note:***I couldn't think of a good reference to poo because my brother kicked me in the head today. Sorry.***

SouljaBoyHater

Sounds like you deserved it. Hope he does it again :P

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

Exhibit A: Half Life 2 also got Shooter GOTY, which bassiclly proves the exact opposite, that PC games have higher standards.

Exhibit B: If you read the review, it clearly states that the 360 version had control issues.

Exhibit C: again if you actually read the review you would know that the 360 version had a lot of techinical problems, + its an RTS which is of course gonna be better on the PC.

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
maybe because they suck on the consoles? tbh i have same standards for both systems.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

LOL! This is absolutely HILARIOUS! Half Life 2 got a 9.2 in 2004 on PC... Imagine if it was 2008 and it was on the 360, what it would get! :D

SouljaBoyHater

9.5

Avatar image for turaaggeli
turaaggeli

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 turaaggeli
Member since 2007 • 785 Posts

Exhibit A:

Half Life 2 on PC: 9.2

Half Life 2 on XBox: 8.4 or something like that. Not AAA, though.

Exhibit B:

FEAR on PC: 9.1

FEAR on XBox 360 and PS3: A an AA scores.

Exhibit C:

Universe at War on PC: 7.5

Universe at War on 360: 6.5

LOL! This is absolutely HILARIOUS! Half Life 2 got a 9.2 in 2004 on PC... Imagine if it was 2008 and it was on the 360, what it would get! :D Halo 3, in 2007, got a 9.5 on the 360!

So basically, consoles own the PC. On top of that, the PC has been around for years and has no AAAAE.

Nintendo 64, PS1, PS2, and DreamCast all have at least one AAAAE, and they're lifespan was incredibly short compared to PC's. PC has been around since, what, ever, and it's highest rated game is only a 9.5, I think. If it's not, it still doesn't have a 10.

I'd rather eat poo than play any of the crap games on PC. :D

Note: ***I couldn't think of a good reference to poo because my brother kicked me in the head today. Sorry.***

SouljaBoyHater

Judging by these retarded threads you keep making, it looks like your brother has kicked you in the head before....several times.

Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
1/10 wok7. You are trying to hard and failing.
Avatar image for SouljaBoyHater
SouljaBoyHater

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SouljaBoyHater
Member since 2008 • 76 Posts
[QUOTE="SouljaBoyHater"]

LOL! This is absolutely HILARIOUS! Half Life 2 got a 9.2 in 2004 on PC... Imagine if it was 2008 and it was on the 360, what it would get! :D

Hewkii

9.5

Yes, those other four games in The Overrated Box did nothing to higher the score. :roll:

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Yes, those other four games in The Overrated Box did nothing to higher the score. :roll:

SouljaBoyHater

obviously not since it got the same score on the PC.

Avatar image for SouljaBoyHater
SouljaBoyHater

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SouljaBoyHater
Member since 2008 • 76 Posts
[QUOTE="SouljaBoyHater"]

Yes, those other four games in The Overrated Box did nothing to higher the score. :roll:

Hewkii

obviously not since it got the same score on the PC.

Five games bundled in one box for the same price as a normal game is, of course, going to get a higher score. Half Life 2 alone only managed to get a 9.2. Stop owning yourself. :|

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Five games bundled in one box for the same price as a normal game is, of course, going to get a higher score. Half Life 2 alone only managed to get a 9.2. Stop owning yourself. :|

SouljaBoyHater

though logically, wouldn't the PC version get a 10?

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

Nintendo 64, PS1, PS2, and DreamCast all have at least one AAAAE, and they're lifespan was incredibly short compared to PC's. PC has been around since, what, ever, and it's highest rated game is only a 9.5, I think. If it's not, it still doesn't have a 10.SouljaBoyHater

This goes in direct contrast to the flawed statements you've made above.

Only consoles get 10's like candies because of their low standards.

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="SouljaBoyHater"]

Yes, those other four games in The Overrated Box did nothing to higher the score. :roll:

SouljaBoyHater

obviously not since it got the same score on the PC.

Five games bundled in one box for the same price as a normal game is, of course, going to get a higher score. Half Life 2 alone only managed to get a 9.2. Stop owning yourself. :|

Yeah and it only managed to average an 96 on metacritic out of 80+ reviews.

Did any Halo game get that? Thought not.

Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
Don't feed the trolls!
Avatar image for tonythestudent
tonythestudent

2592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 tonythestudent
Member since 2004 • 2592 Posts
Is this Wok7?
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49137 Posts

Exhibit A:

Half Life 2 on PC: 9.2

Half Life 2 on XBox: 8.4 or something like that. Not AAA, though.

Exhibit B:

FEAR on PC: 9.1

FEAR on XBox 360 and PS3: A an AA scores.

Exhibit C:

Universe at War on PC: 7.5

Universe at War on 360: 6.5

LOL! This is absolutely HILARIOUS! Half Life 2 got a 9.2 in 2004 on PC... Imagine if it was 2008 and it was on the 360, what it would get! :D Halo 3, in 2007, got a 9.5 on the 360!

So basically, consoles own the PC. On top of that, the PC has been around for years and has no AAAAE.

Nintendo 64, PS1, PS2, and DreamCast all have at least one AAAAE, and they're lifespan was incredibly short compared to PC's. PC has been around since, what, ever, and it's highest rated game is only a 9.5, I think. If it's not, it still doesn't have a 10.

I'd rather eat poo than play any of the crap games on PC. :D

Note: ***I couldn't think of a good reference to poo because my brother kicked me in the head today. Sorry.***

SouljaBoyHater


Is your brother Wok7 ?

But no really this thread is weak flaimbate. If the console have HIGER standards then home come pc doens't have a AAAAE and consoles do ? Contradictions FTW
Avatar image for Uberbadassmufuh
Uberbadassmufuh

1006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Uberbadassmufuh
Member since 2004 • 1006 Posts

Control issues.

Weaker graphics.

Poor framerate.

Thread.

Avatar image for crozon
crozon

1180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 crozon
Member since 2003 • 1180 Posts
enjoy eating poo, i am just going to enjoy my PC games