Consoles have no hidden "untapped" power

  • 177 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Instashot
Instashot

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Instashot
Member since 2010 • 665 Posts

Its not like they will magically get stronger, they have a set standard of hardware.

360 GPU=X1900XTX but with added tesselation support

PS3=7800 GTX customized

These will not get stronger somehow the way you guys think they will.

Games like Halo Reach, Gears 3, UC2, and KZ3 is what games will look like pretty much forever until Xbox 3 or PS4 comes out.

I highly doubt Reach or Gears 3 will be playable in 1080p either let alone 720p (Halo 3 wasn't).

Waiting till 2015 or something for new consoles is going to be hard long ride.

I'm not trying to insult consoles, they don't suck and have there places but graphics is what define next gen, its always been this way.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#2 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

So? If every console game looked and played like Crysis, I would have gotten a PC.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

No, they don't.

However, why care about it? They output nice enough graphics without the added power. I'm happy with both PC and console gaming.

Avatar image for -Feath-
-Feath-

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 -Feath-
Member since 2005 • 1452 Posts
No-one says they can get stronger. People say that developers can write more efficient engines that use less power to do more rendering techniques. That is the staple of a standard, closed platform and I've never seen anyone else say otherwise.
Avatar image for telefanatic
telefanatic

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 telefanatic
Member since 2007 • 3008 Posts

You are right thats why i have my PC for eye candy, games like Shogun 2 will blow my mind with gameplay and graphics. Still i cant wait for Reach and Killzone 3 as well.

Avatar image for Instashot
Instashot

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Instashot
Member since 2010 • 665 Posts
[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
But Teh Cell D: I think games on consoles look great considering they're running on 5 year old hardware, sure they might hit a stagnant point in the coming years, but it won't be that big of an issue, it will be a big break for the developers.
Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

untapped power referring to programming skillz of devs that are limited to a hardwareset and the results they are getting out of it.

Avatar image for i_am_interested
i_am_interested

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 i_am_interested
Member since 2009 • 1077 Posts
[QUOTE="-Feath-"]No-one says they can get stronger. People say that developers can write more efficient engines that use less power to do more rendering techniques. That is the staple of a standard, closed platform and I've never seen anyone else say otherwise.

/thread
Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
Untapped Power= Ways to use the hardware in better ways. And yes, they do.
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#12 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

Instashot

There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.

and that's why I said what I said.

Avatar image for 110million
110million

14910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 110million
Member since 2008 • 14910 Posts

But Teh Cell D: I think games on consoles look great considering they're running on 5 year old hardware, sure they might hit a stagnant point in the coming years, but it won't be that big of an issue, it will be a big break for the developers.tagyhag
The comical thing about Teh Cell is that no developer uses it, most developers go for main CPU only and no SPEs, people get confused why games run crappier on PS3, its because its quick ports, its a double edged sword its true, its harder to develop for but at the same time its a lot better than the 360's CPU, its just not worth it to most developers to try.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts
[QUOTE="Instashot"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.

depends most of the nintendo fans will say mario galaxy looks better then all of the games you mentioned
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#15 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

It's all hype to see how powerful consoles really are.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

Instashot

There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.

Mario Galaxy 2 lokks better than almost all those games.

Avatar image for Instashot
Instashot

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Instashot
Member since 2010 • 665 Posts

[QUOTE="Instashot"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

farnham

There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.

depends most of the nintendo fans will say mario galaxy looks better then all of the games you mentioned

Yeah and then I'd show them this

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#20 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

LegatoSkyheart
Yeah Men in Black even have this in their homes... Yeah it's stupid that people still believe games will be taking graphical jumps like from Tetris to Crysis leap wise... We will only see game engine optomisations and refinements, probably more effective compression and that's about it...
Avatar image for LucLongleyMVP
LucLongleyMVP

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 LucLongleyMVP
Member since 2010 • 84 Posts

Fanboys mistake "untapped power" for optimization.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]But Teh Cell D: I think games on consoles look great considering they're running on 5 year old hardware, sure they might hit a stagnant point in the coming years, but it won't be that big of an issue, it will be a big break for the developers.

Correction: Teh Cell is a 9 year old design....
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="tagyhag"]But Teh Cell D: I think games on consoles look great considering they're running on 5 year old hardware, sure they might hit a stagnant point in the coming years, but it won't be that big of an issue, it will be a big break for the developers.

Correction: Teh Cell is a 9 year old design....

Design =/= hardware.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

The reason you dont see many 1080p games is because the consoles are limited to a 128bit memory interface. I think the higher res would require more bandwidth. So at 720p or lower the cansoles can do just fine. And I think the 360's GPU is more in line with a ATI x1800 XT in terms or raw power but with a much newer architecture making it more efficient.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

Well if "untapped" power =/= optimization. You are correct. At least that is what comes to mind right now.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="Instashot"] There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.Instashot

depends most of the nintendo fans will say mario galaxy looks better then all of the games you mentioned

Yeah and then I'd show them this

i dont see the superiority they are good shots of beautiful looking games but it does not say they are so much better looking then smg that you cant pledge for that game without being ridiculed

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

i dont see the superiority they are good shots of beautiful looking games but it does not say they are so much better looking then smg that you cant pledge for that game without being ridiculed

farnham

Doom 3 on the Xbox did not look like that. (Had poor textures)

And Ninja Gaiden did not have Anti-Aliasing x16.

Bullshots are bullshots.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

i dont see the superiority they are good shots of beautiful looking games but it does not say they are so much better looking then smg that you cant pledge for that game without being ridiculed

farnham

If those are real shots, it looks ALOT better the SMG2. There is no doubt about it.

eh let me think for a sec... no.

people see what they want to see.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"] If those are real shots, it looks ALOT better the SMG2. There is no doubt about it.

Advid-Gamer

eh let me think for a sec... no.

people see what they want to see.

no its just that i dont judge graphics by an technical standpoint. its art style that matters to me. doom 3 looks incredibly generic. conker is great looking and i love the fur but its a shot of a bad place (id prefer more colorful ones) ninja gaiden also has better looking places
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

[QUOTE="farnham"]depends most of the nintendo fans will say mario galaxy looks better then all of the games you mentionedloadedboon

Yeah and then I'd show them this

you show them bullshots? :roll:

good thing the conker shot is ingame, I played the hell out of that game, and it looks like that.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Yeah they do.. Its all about making a more efficent game in squeezing out just alittle bit more performance and power.
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

Games on the consoles do actually look better year after year.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
Code Optimization ........ games perform and look better year by year.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#36 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
[QUOTE="-Feath-"]No-one says they can get stronger. People say that developers can write more efficient engines that use less power to do more rendering techniques. That is the staple of a standard, closed platform and I've never seen anyone else say otherwise.

Exactly! Developers are steadily crafting better game engines to better utilize the structure of the PS3/360. Just like they did with the PS2. Even after that system was almost 8-9 years old, games were still looking better and better! I just watched a gameplay video on youtube, which showed Rage running on a 360, and it looked outstanding! The developer was talking about something called mega textures,which they are specifically using to help with the power of the consoles, and it showed. As far as the current state of console graphics, I'm actually fine with the way they look now, and could care less if they didn't get any better.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#37 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"]

i dont see the superiority they are good shots of beautiful looking games but it does not say they are so much better looking then smg that you cant pledge for that game without being ridiculed

tagyhag

Doom 3 on the Xbox did not look like that. (Had poor textures)

And Ninja Gaiden did not have Anti-Aliasing x16.

Bullshots are bullshots.

Yeah but those two games were still great looking games for their time. Doom had incredible lighting, but maybe not the best textures, but still looked great in motion! I also thought Ninja Gaiden was one of the best looking Xbox titles.
Avatar image for HailedJohnDman
HailedJohnDman

1588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 HailedJohnDman
Member since 2010 • 1588 Posts

[QUOTE="Instashot"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

super600

There still isn't a Wii game that looks better than Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3, or Conker on the original Xbox.

Mario Galaxy 2 lokks better than almost all those games.

did he just say that mario galazy looks better than doom 3?

(-_-")

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

LegatoSkyheart

Can't argue there. I haven't seen much of an effort to max out the Wii.

Mario Galaxy 2 lokks better than almost all those games.

super600

There's almost no textures in that shot :?

Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"]

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

Yeah and then I'd show them this

Advid-Gamer

i dont see the superiority they are good shots of beautiful looking games but it does not say they are so much better looking then smg that you cant pledge for that game without being ridiculed

If those are real shots, it looks ALOT better the SMG2. There is no doubt about it.

that Doom 3 shot is a PC maxed out shot. It is even on the back of the PC box, i have it right here. The game looked awfull on xbox. As for ninja shots, just LOL, it did not look like that, infact i'd argue those too are PC shots.

Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts

nobody would have ever thought that certain games that came out during the end of the ps2's lifetime were possible for a few years. yes the consoles won't get stronger, but games MAY keep looking better and better.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#42 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The Wii has Tremendous Untapped power.

(Cause Developers aren't using it!)

windsquid9000

Can't argue there. I haven't seen much of an effort to max out the Wii.

Mario Galaxy 2 lokks better than almost all those games.

super600

There's almost no textures in that shot :?

Like farmham the art of the game looks better then Doom 3 and it looks close to Ninja Gaiden and Conker.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

Like farmham the art of the game looks better then Doom 3 and it looks close to Ninja Gaiden and Conker.

super600

SMG's visuals are far too simplistic to be compared to Doom, or Ninja Gaiden.

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

Wii is liiiike...the most underpowered peace of hardware to ever grace the planet earth at its time.I mean...what the f is with that SMG2 shot?There is white snow,white ball and blue tinted sky...no textures...it looks like N64 would have easy time with that.

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

Its not like they will magically get stronger, they have a set standard of hardware.

360 GPU=X1900XTX but with added tesselation support

PS3=7800 GTX customized

These will not get stronger somehow the way you guys think they will.

Games like Halo Reach, Gears 3, UC2, and KZ3 is what games will look like pretty much forever until Xbox 3 or PS4 comes out.

I highly doubt Reach or Gears 3 will be playable in 1080p either let alone 720p (Halo 3 wasn't).

Waiting till 2015 or something for new consoles is going to be hard long ride.

I'm not trying to insult consoles, they don't suck and have there places but graphics is what define next gen, its always been this way.

Instashot

well thats only if you continue to play those types of games.

for everyone els there is something called art style, and imo most games that manage to create a beautiful art style, look miles better then those that only go for realism.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

Its not like they will magically get stronger, they have a set standard of hardware.

360 GPU=X1900XTX but with added tesselation support

PS3=7800 GTX customized

These will not get stronger somehow the way you guys think they will.

Games like Halo Reach, Gears 3, UC2, and KZ3 is what games will look like pretty much forever until Xbox 3 or PS4 comes out.

I highly doubt Reach or Gears 3 will be playable in 1080p either let alone 720p (Halo 3 wasn't).

Waiting till 2015 or something for new consoles is going to be hard long ride.

I'm not trying to insult consoles, they don't suck and have there places but graphics is what define next gen, its always been this way.

Half-Way

well thats only if you continue to play those types of games.

for everyone els there is something called art style, and imo most games that manage to create a beautiful art style, look miles better then those that only go for realism.

I'm pretty sure he's talking about tech... :?

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

[QUOTE="Half-Way"]

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

Its not like they will magically get stronger, they have a set standard of hardware.

360 GPU=X1900XTX but with added tesselation support

PS3=7800 GTX customized

These will not get stronger somehow the way you guys think they will.

Games like Halo Reach, Gears 3, UC2, and KZ3 is what games will look like pretty much forever until Xbox 3 or PS4 comes out.

I highly doubt Reach or Gears 3 will be playable in 1080p either let alone 720p (Halo 3 wasn't).

Waiting till 2015 or something for new consoles is going to be hard long ride.

I'm not trying to insult consoles, they don't suck and have there places but graphics is what define next gen, its always been this way.

windsquid9000

well thats only if you continue to play those types of games.

for everyone els there is something called art style, and imo most games that manage to create a beautiful art style, look miles better then those that only go for realism.

I'm pretty sure he's talking about tech... :?

so where exactly dose the line between tech and artstyle go? because i cant see it as clearly as you can it seems :P

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#48 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Graphics have been steadily improving since the launch of both consoles. Compare Halo Reach to Perfect Dark 0 or GRAW. It's a world of difference.

"untapped" power just really refers to developers really utilizing the hardware they have. Those first gen games that came with the PS3 and 360 they "used" 100% of the processing power, it's just they weren't using it in the efficient way. Just throwing more processing cycles at something isn't good enough, you need to take in account of your memory management, how you handle your caching, and a lot of stuff with doing processes in parallel as the consoles are more designed for.

As you can see, games have benefited by developers getting a better handle on the differences of the platforms. Each platform uses a different set of programming instructions. This is why 360 games run like crap on the PS3, the low-level differences are very great.

I guess I could go even more detailed, but the real point of it all is that as you spend more time with hardware, you can better optimize you code to get more out of it.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#49 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
They don't. Developers get better though.
Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

Consoles dont need "untapped power" They are made for the games they play and they do their jobs quite well. A pc has "untapped power" why? Because they want the users to do all the work making everything run faster "hotter" so they can mess everything up and have to buy new parts after frying them..lol..

BUT to retrack...Consoles do have some untapped power. Every day developers are unlocking new powere and learning how to code their games to run better, look better and over all perform better. ...SO...where are we now??