Consoles look good for 5 year old hardware? No its Optimization...

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

Crysis, Crysis Warhead, Metro 2033, ARMA 2, ARMA 2:OA, Battlefield BC2, Gothic 4, STALKER Clear Sky, STALKER CoP, Mafia 2...I could go on with multiplats or games like Starcraft 2.

UC2, just like KZ2 and GoW3, are good. They just aren't that good.

theuncharted34

I totally disagree. BFBC2 looks exactly like its consoles counterpart. Same with Mafia 2 minus the physx. STALKER unmdded is an incredibly bland looking games, with horrible character models. Crysis games, Metro 2033, Arma games and total wars games are the few PC titles that truly look like something that couldn't be done on consoels. Everything else is completely meh. Most games give you nothing more than a resolution bump.

why is your name i5750at4ghz, but you don't see the differences between console games and pc games graphically?

Because the difference isn't there for the most part. At least not yet. If you're telling me a resolution bump is something to be happy about, you must not have been gaming on the PC for long.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I totally disagree. BFBC2 looks exactly like its consoles counterpart. Same with Mafia 2 minus the physx. STALKER unmdded is an incredibly bland looking games, with horrible character models. Crysis games, Metro 2033, Arma games and total wars games are the few PC titles that truly look like something that couldn't be done on consoels. Everything else is completely meh. Most games give you nothing more than a resolution bump.i5750at4Ghz

I disagree. BFBC2 is a good step up from consoles. I was in the beta for PS3 and rented it before buying it for PC. Pretty big difference. Mafia 2 looks a lot better over its console counterparts. I wouldn't call STALKER bland. Its area is barren and abandoned. A Resolution bump and AA is huge, especially for Wii games. A lot of clairty and some extra detail is more than welcomed.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] I totally disagree. BFBC2 looks exactly like its consoles counterpart. Same with Mafia 2 minus the physx. STALKER unmdded is an incredibly bland looking games, with horrible character models. Crysis games, Metro 2033, Arma games and total wars games are the few PC titles that truly look like something that couldn't be done on consoels. Everything else is completely meh. Most games give you nothing more than a resolution bump.ChubbyGuy40

I disagree. BFBC2 is a good step up from consoles. I was in the beta for PS3 and rented it before buying it for PC. Pretty big difference. Mafia 2 looks a lot better over its console counterparts. I wouldn't call STALKER bland. Its area is barren and abandoned. A Resolution bump and AA is huge, especially for Wii games. A lot of clairty and some extra detail is more than welcomed.

Well if you happy who am I to tell you not to be. But imo a resolution bump is the bare minimum. I want more and better animations, bigger and more detailed maps. Larger and more varied textures. I want PC gaming to be like it was 10 years ago. Pushing my machine to the limit. However it isn't that and hasn't been that for quite some time now. I've yet to see my CPU hit 100% in a game. Back in the day even with a monster overclock games would bring your rig to its knees.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#54 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Name me 10 PC games that look better.i5750at4Ghz

Crysis, Crysis Warhead, Metro 2033, ARMA 2, ARMA 2:OA, Battlefield BC2, Gothic 4, STALKER Clear Sky, STALKER CoP, Mafia 2...I could go on with multiplats or games like Starcraft 2.

UC2, just like KZ2 and GoW3, are good. They just aren't that good.

BFBC2 looks exactly like its consoles counterpart.

I've seen this game maxed out in Directx11 and honestly it impressed me more than my 360 version with missing graphical features, 720p with no AA and noticeably less detail, I almost want that version now.

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#55 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

its been like this since the nes your point ?

Avatar image for EvanTheGamer
EvanTheGamer

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 EvanTheGamer
Member since 2009 • 1550 Posts

Optimization, which leads to the games still looking good despite the five-year old console generation. In the end, Consoles do still look good for five-year hardware.

iAtrocious

This, this is why console hardware doesn't need constant upgrades like PC hardware.

Avatar image for rawr89
rawr89

1746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 rawr89
Member since 2010 • 1746 Posts

if a game like Uncharted 3 or Killzone 3 or God Of War 3 was shown in 2006 for the PS3 no one would believe it.

the fact is that, 5 years ago the PS3 can already do graphics like this.

Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

Just because you can crank up a game to 1080p with AA/AF at 60fps doesn't mean it will blow away any console game. Take for example Deus Ex, Freedom Fighters, Singularity, Amnesia, Oblivion, Halo PC, Alien vs Predetor, Manhunt, Alpha Protocal, etc cant stand up to Uncharted 2 at 720p/30fps

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

great thing about optimization is when next gen rolls aroud the graphics will look ahead from this gen yet use little to no power (Hopefully)

Avatar image for gregbmil
gregbmil

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 gregbmil
Member since 2004 • 2703 Posts

Alot of threads are talking about how console graphics are keeping up with PC. And for 5 year old hardware its looking good.....Well its not. Console hardware is wack and the reason game graphics seem to improve is because of optimization. Credit goes to the programmers.

Here's a pic of a Donkey for no reason.

mattuk69
Who cares? Optimization or not they still look really good
Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

[QUOTE="mattuk69"]

Alot of threads are talking about how console graphics are keeping up with PC. And for 5 year old hardware its looking good.....Well its not. Console hardware is wack and the reason game graphics seem to improve is because of optimization. Credit goes to the programmers.

gregbmil

Who cares? Optimization or not they still look really good

Hmm reading back it does look like im bashing console graphics which im not. Was just trying to say optimization is whats keeping consoles up with the PC. And making games look great and always improved.

Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts
O MY GOSH, people arent allowed to think console games look good just because theres things that look better on the pc???? /tired argument
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXw-Qlp8P3k&feature=related Post 4:30 Watch in HD. I just had to do it.... Oh and to truly understand how pathetic the 640-720p 0AA console settings are try to connect a PC monitor to a console...The result is vomiting,,,
Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
No, kidding, wut, really? :/ Duh. That doesn't change the fact that the games look really good for the hardware.
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
No, kidding, wut, really? :/ Duh. That doesn't change the fact that the games look really good for the hardware. rolo107
Its nothing spectacular. The viewing distance the blurr the confined enviroments. The 0 AA all explain why there is this hilarious mirage of great console graphics.... God MGS runs at 640p rez....A freaking 9500GT could smoke it....And that card is beyond crap...
Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts
wow, really? had no idea... hardware ISN'T wack when it can produce such graphical games like K2, Uncharted, gears of war...is it? It still runs on that 5 year old hardware...lol
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]wow, really? had no idea... hardware ISN'T wack when it can produce such graphical games like K2, Uncharted, gears of war...is it? It still runs on that 5 year old hardware...lol

Try playing tetris from 400 feet distance it will look great...
Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

[QUOTE="rolo107"]No, kidding, wut, really? :/ Duh. That doesn't change the fact that the games look really good for the hardware. True_Gamer_
Its nothing spectacular. The viewing distance the blurr the confined enviroments. The 0 AA all explain why there is this hilarious mirage of great console graphics.... God MGS runs at 640p rez....A freaking 9500GT could smoke it....And that card is beyond crap...

MGS4 is 1024x768 upscaled up to 1080p

Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXw-Qlp8P3k&feature=related Post 4:30 Watch in HD. I just had to do it.... Oh and to truly understand how pathetic the 640-720p 0AA console settings are try to connect a PC monitor to a console...The result is vomiting,,,True_Gamer_

I have my PS3 and Xbox 360 hooked up to a HD 1080p PC monitor, looks outstanding....

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#70 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

Well, as already pointed out this is a no brainer, but dont act like PC games arent heavily optimized as well. Not just engine code, but assets as well. For example PC games still have to use normal maps to achieve high levels of surface detail as well. Its not as if PC devs are rigging up 50 million tri + meshes straight out of Zbrush or Mudbox and throwing them at the engine.

sandbox3d

PC games are optimized for a different reason than the consoles (which have static hardware).

PC hardware isn't static, so game devs have to account for 32-bit machines with 2 GB RAM and GPUs back to 2006, to 64-bit Windows, Direct-X versions, graphics drivers for two GPU manufacturers, etc.

That's why it's amazing to see games run virtually error-free out of the box.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#71 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

I think everyone knows that. Still devs are doing a great job optimizing this gen ;)

I remember, in previous gens, that most console games looked like crap when compared to PC ones.

Avatar image for DarthBilf
DarthBilf

1357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 DarthBilf
Member since 2004 • 1357 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

no.

well, I explained why the pc can't make console games look last gen, but whatever man. Hey, It's no big deal. The pc beats the living crap out of consoles.

ChubbyGuy40

I can say those looked better with a straight face and stand behind it. Oblivion modded looks good even today. FEAR still looks good too but it showed aged rather quick. Just stating there was never a period were console beat PC visually.

I remember an interview with one of the Oblivion devs back when it was released saying that the 360 version would obviously be better looking.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62038 Posts

Yes... It is. So? optimization occurs with pretty much every game (for the most part). Even PC games are optimized for set pieces of hardware.

Even so, the games still look good. The reason some look "close" to PC games is due to budgetary constraints, time constraints etc etc placed upon developers.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#74 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

So if it wasn't for the devs, console games would look bad, uh?? :roll:

GreenGoblin2099
No way, that is not possible.
Avatar image for SpArKs424
SpArKs424

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 SpArKs424
Member since 2010 • 2203 Posts

Alot of threads are talking about how console graphics are keeping up with PC. And for 5 year old hardware its looking good.....Well its not. Console hardware is wack and the reason game graphics seem to improve is because of optimization. Credit goes to the programmers.

Here's a pic of a Donkey for no reason.

mattuk69

If consoles weren't around hypothetically PC would be a generation ahead .

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#76 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Did you dust off your pc to post this? This is so old there is vegetation growing on it.
Avatar image for edwise18
edwise18

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 edwise18
Member since 2008 • 1533 Posts
And the end result is that they still look good for 5 year old hardware. Gotcha.
Avatar image for edwise18
edwise18

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 edwise18
Member since 2008 • 1533 Posts

[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXw-Qlp8P3k&feature=related Post 4:30 Watch in HD. I just had to do it.... Oh and to truly understand how pathetic the 640-720p 0AA console settings are try to connect a PC monitor to a console...The result is vomiting,,,Adamantium4k2

I have my PS3 and Xbox 360 hooked up to a HD 1080p PC monitor, looks outstanding....

So do I and it looks great. Don't know what that guy's talking about.
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Yah console games can look ok but I play games on consoles for their exclusives not for graphics so I don't mind worse graphics on consoles.

Heck I still play my DS.

But people who think console games are even close to the big hitters on PC are kidding themselves.

When you first play games like Crysis then go back to console games you will notice a huge downgrade in graphical quality.

But that only matters to those who really care about graphics which ironically a lot of console gamers do.

Just tried Crysis again and even on my old 2007 PC is looks good.

.

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

Yah console games can look ok but I play games on consoles for their exclusives not for graphics so I don't mind worse graphics on consoles.

Heck I still play my DS.

But people who think console games are even close to the big hitters on PC are kidding themselves.

When you first play games like Crysis then go back to console games you will notice a huge downgrade in graphical quality.

But that only matters to those who really care about graphics which ironically a lot of console gamers do.

Just tried Crysis again and even on my old 2007 PC is looks good.

.

Hakkai007

Why is your crysis so blurry? mine looks alot sharper, but has a ton of jaggies even with 4xaa. And stop staring at the sun, its bad for your eyes. :P

whats mods are you using?

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXw-Qlp8P3k&feature=related Post 4:30 Watch in HD. I just had to do it.... Oh and to truly understand how pathetic the 640-720p 0AA console settings are try to connect a PC monitor to a console...The result is vomiting,,,

This really depends on the monitor. Most computer monitors are made to be used at they're highest settings, so it can't handle the lower resolutions as good as a TV can. My PS3 looks better on my 52" TV, than my PC and that crappy monitor I got. Even when it's using higher settings, 1680x1050 res,and a smaller image. TV's have alot of software and hardware to improve the picture.
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Why is your crysis so blurry? mine looks alot sharper, but has a ton of jaggies even with 4xaa. And stop staring at the sun, its bad for your eyes. :P

whats mods are you using?

markinthedark

It's not blurry just the sun is so freakin bright.

It's a custom map.