Consoles vs PC - Library

The PC has a 30+ years old gaming library, with thousands and thousands of titles. The comparison would only be fair if you compare the PC with all consoles, from Odyssey to the current generation. ;)

Keep making new threads, but the polls will remain the same.

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] Indeed,I feel a dejá vu.

CaseyWegner

I made a thread like this weeks ago, proving the 360 has more AAA and AA games this gen. Then they started crying "OMG! The consoles have lower standards!" "(Insert pc game title) is better then (insert 360 game title)" "Crysis has awesome graphics! Pc has better graphics!". Then after that *POSTS GIANT PICTURE OF MEDICORE GAMES*.

you did what?

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA

Lol roflcopter, even the mods started proving you wrong!!! xD

I'm pretty sure 90% of people who claim that RTS games are 'boring' either haven't played one for 15 years or are judging entirely on gameplay videos.

If you've played games like Dawn of War II, Company of Heroes, World in Conflict, and Starcraft II you would know that RTS games can be far more intense and engaging than any FPS or Action game out there.

After a close match of Dawn of War II i find i'm exhausted because of how much i've had to concentrate on the match. I simply don't get that with any other genre.

I'm pretty sure 90% of people who claim that RTS games are 'boring' either haven't played one for 15 years or are judging entirely on gameplay videos.

If you've played games like Dawn of War II, Company of Heroes, World in Conflict, and Starcraft II you would know that RTS games can be far more intense and engaging than any FPS or Action game out there.

After a close match of Dawn of War II i find i'm exhausted because of how much i've had to concentrate on the match. I simply don't get that with any other genre.

with_teeth26

I have to agree with you. I don't play much mp due to being so bad at it but even the single player, story or skirmish modes are intense. I adore RTS games.

Oh this again? fine, lemme see...

On the Wii: I like most of the things I see on the Wii, it is quite different then what is on PC, so a good chunk of the Wii library appeals to me.

On 360 and PS3? Well since they and thier games seem more like PC imitations then no, there is nothing on those consoles that I look at and think "wow That looks good"

Which might have something to do with me started gaming fairly long ago (the NES) so everything I see on 360 and PS3, is something Ive seen before, and playied before, When I see a game like HALO I think "yey quake 2 reboot" Halo is a good game, it is just, It feels like quake in its mechanics (and granted its why HALO has good mp :P) but the PC had something like it 4 years before.

Same with most other games, the 3rd person shooters, generally fits the consoles better, but they neverclicked with me. And I loathe sports games in thier entirety :P

So it basicly comes down to taste, I like what the PC offers, most games are multiplat tho which means itdoessnt matter, I havent seen an exclusive that had me raise eyebrows for a good longtime, with the exeption of Nintendo games that is ^^

3 against 1? :?

Edit: Nvm, PC is still winning :lol:

[QUOTE="ducati101"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

No they just bore me.

roflcopter317

Are you delusional or something? I proved the 360 has more AAA and AA games this gen, which is the only thing that matters.

The math is not strong in this one...