Could the 360 run God Of War 3?

The game got best graphics out of any system

of course PC could run it, but probly not 4 years 3 months ago lol

I guess so, but as no one has ported it and given the same sort of optimization the PS3 has it's all just speculation, the PS3 only has a tiny little bit more raw power than the xbox if it was a number the PS3 would have 103 and xbox would have 100.... As you can imagine 3 is a small number to try and find in a game so i'm gonna go ahead and say yes xbox could run it if it was ported with lots of optimizing.

The game got best graphics out of any system

of course PC could run it, but probly not 4 years 3 months ago lol

mejiseike

The 360 could run it, sure. Would it look better? Would it look worse? Who knows... I personally don't think there'd be much difference.

The 360 could run it, sure. Would it look better? Would it look worse? Who knows... I personally don't think there'd be much difference.

Doolz2024

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

The game got best graphics out of any system

of course PC could run it, but probly not 4 years 3 months ago lol

blackace

It's all a moot point anyway.

but can it play crysis

[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="mejiseike"]

The game got best graphics out of any system

of course PC could run it, but probly not 4 years 3 months ago lol

babyeatermax

I guess so, but as no one has ported it and given the same sort of optimization the PS3 has it's all just speculation, the PS3 only has a tiny little bit more raw power than the xbox if it was a number the PS3 would have 103 and xbox would have 100.... As you can imagine 3 is a small number to try and find in a game so i'm gonna go ahead and say yes xbox could run it if it was ported with lots of optimizing.

JohnF111

so if it were to be ported, it really wouldnt be that much better on the ps3 then the 360?

and i heard it was like 35 gigs... that would be like 3-4 dvds

have they really made a game yet that truly distinguishes the 2 systems?

The game got best graphics out of any system

of course PC could run it, but probly not 4 years 3 months ago lol

mejiseike

I don't think it could but I am not a video game developer LOL!! I think it would but it would probably take multiple discs and also Mejisike if you want to play GOD of War that bad just buy a PS3 if you don't have one already You are trying to start a system war!!!! Stop it now LOL!!

We don't know, it was designed for the PS3 so obviously in it's current form no but if it were to be somehow ported to the 360 then none of us know if it would run or not.soulitane

[QUOTE="babyeatermax"][QUOTE="blackace"] XBox 360 is basically a PC. So yes, it can run GoW 3. It may need to be on mutiple disk depending on the size however. That's the only difference though. Doolz2024

Crysis 2 looks much better

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

[QUOTE="babyeatermax"] The 360 has never produced a character model as well designed and detailed as Kratos or something the scale and beauty of Poseidon leviathan form.babyeatermax

That is not true at all. That doesn't even make sense logically.

It is perfectly possible for something to be capable of something, but never have done it.

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

The game got best graphics out of any system

of course PC could run it, but probly not 4 years 3 months ago lol

BillyLee912

I don't think it could but I am not a video game developer LOL!! I think it would but it would probably take multiple discs and also Mejisike if you want to play GOD of War that bad just buy a PS3 if you don't have one already You are trying to start a system war!!!! Stop it now LOL!!

its in the system wars thread thing... and its about the god of war... so why not? lol

and ive also read somewhere that FF15 is being made for the PS3 only cuz the 360 will not be able to run it... is that true??

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

[QUOTE="babyeatermax"] The 360 has never produced a character model as well designed and detailed as Kratos or something the scale and beauty of Poseidon leviathan form.babyeatermax

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

"bu..bu..but no one has ever tried to make a graphics-intensive 360 game...so...we'll never know. we won't know, really!"

excuses. :roll:

i could say that as well. no one has ever made a PS3 game that looks better than Crysis, so....we'll never know. until then, i'm saying that it is possible for the PS3 to produce Crysis-like graphics. :roll:

no, of course it can't run on the 360 don't be daft

[spoiler] :P haha, because its optimised for the ps3 cell, if it was optimised for the 360 cpu im sure it could [/spoiler]

Of course not. MS would have to launch a new Slim redesign to run GOW3

Sure it could, would it look worse? Who knows.

A high-end PC could definitely run it 4 years ago. Better than the PS3 too.

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

[QUOTE="babyeatermax"] The 360 has never produced a character model as well designed and detailed as Kratos or something the scale and beauty of Poseidon leviathan form.babyeatermax

Who are you to say it isn't, anyway? How do you know, for a fact, that there is no possible way it could be done on the 360?

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

rawr89

dude... i dont think theres any games that look as good as uncharted or god of war 3... thats not fair lol

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

rawr89

Do you even know what constitutes evidence?

What games "look better" is a subjective judgment and has no bearing on a console's ability to run a certain game.

The only thing that would constitute evidence is actual data, meaning technical specs. There is absolutely no way a subjective judgment on what looks better is evidence of anything.

Sure it could, would it look worse? Who knows.

A high-end PC could definitely run it 4 years ago. Better than the PS3 too.

tagyhag

except that the PS3 has been around for 5 years now. and with the same specs ever since 2006.

if GoW3 was shown on PS3 on 2006 no one would believe that PS3 can do that kind of graphical fidelity. but it's true. a PS3 bought in 2006 can produce GoW3, UC2, etc.

in short, the PS3 can do this kind of graphics ever since.

i could say that as well. no one has ever made a PS3 game that looks better than Crysis, so....we'll never know. until then, i'm saying that it is possible for the PS3 to produce Crysis-like graphics. :roll:

rawr89

Ridiculous comparison.

There are things that Crysis does that is clearly beyond the ability of console hardware. For that, one can point to actual data such as RAM. On the other hand, you just have subjective "looks".

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thats pretty arrogant but I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

Of course not. MS would have to launch a new Slim redesign to run GOW3

tonitorsi

[QUOTE="rawr89"]

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

GreySeal9

Do you even know what constitutes evidence?

What games "look better" is a subjective judgment and has no bearing on a console's ability to run a certain game.

The only thing that would constitute evidence is actual data, meaning technical specs. There is absolutely no way a subjective judgment on what looks better is evidence of anything.

so you're saying UC2, Killzone 3, God Of War 3 all looking better than Gears of War 2, Crackdown, Fable 3, Halo Reach, etc. is ENTIRELY subjective? rofl you must be blind.

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thatspretty arrogant and egotisticalbut I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

Foulcry

If someone says that it can do what the PS3 can do, that's not arrogance and that's surely not egotism.

For instance, if I said, "I am better looking than everybody here," that would be egotistical.

On the other hand, if I said, "I look just as good as you do," that's not egotistical.

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thatspretty arrogant and egotisticalbut I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

Foulcry

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thatspretty arrogant and egotisticalbut I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

Foulcry

you have a great point there, like both paragraphs lol

but saying that the PS3 eclusives are better is true, but for the time it takes to make a PS3 exclusive, the 360 wouldve made 2. what if the 360 exclusives took the same amount of time and money to make a game... would it be better then the PS3?

The real question is: What game on the 360 looks like God of War 3? If the answer is none, then that is the answer. MS has had plenty of time to do something with their system and the architecture is not as complex.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="rawr89"]

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

rawr89

Do you even know what constitutes evidence?

What games "look better" is a subjective judgment and has no bearing on a console's ability to run a certain game.

The only thing that would constitute evidence is actual data, meaning technical specs. There is absolutely no way a subjective judgment on what looks better is evidence of anything.

so you're saying UC2, Killzone 3, God Of War 3 all looking better than Gears of War 2, Crackdown, Fable 3, Halo Reach, etc. is ENTIRELY subjective? rofl you must be blind.

I'm not blind. I just understand the difference between objectivity and subjectiity.

Yes, I'm saying those games look better is COMPLETELY subjective. Is there any way you can scientifically prove it? If not, you are merely going by what looks better to your eyes. Just because most people agree with you doesn't make it any less subjective.

If you believe that saying those games look better than the 360 ones is objective, prove it to me objectively. Can you do that?

[QUOTE="Foulcry"]

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thatspretty arrogant and egotisticalbut I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

If someone says that it can do what the PS3 can do, that's not arrogance and that's surely not egotism.

For instance, if I said, "I am better looking than everybody here," that would be egotistical.

On the other hand, if I said, "I look just as good as you do," that's not egotistical.

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thatspretty arrogant and egotisticalbut I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

Foulcry

MGS4??Is this some kind of joke?Sub hd game with laughable textures and post processing from like 2003?Sure thing...I mean,even PSP2 can handle it but its obviouslly to much for 360 :)

The real question is: What game on the 360 looks like God of War 3? If the answer is none, then that is the answer. MS has had plenty of time to do something with their system and the architecture is not as complex.

Shewgenja

That is not a valid argument.

Simply because a game doesnn't exist that looks as good doesn't mean that one can't exist.

The only way to prove that 360 can't run God of War is to come up with some technical reason---that can be backed up by data---that shows that it is not possible.

[QUOTE="rawr89"]i could say that as well. no one has ever made a PS3 game that looks better than Crysis, so....we'll never know. until then, i'm saying that it is possible for the PS3 to produce Crysis-like graphics. :roll:

GreySeal9

Ridiculous comparison.

There are things that Crysis does that is clearly beyond the ability of console hardware. For that, one can point to actual data such as RAM. On the other hand, you just have subjective "looks".

so GoW3 with all its Titans, in real-time, on 720p, with MLAA applied, at an average of 40 fps, can run on the 360? don't kid yourself. when was the last 360 that ran above 30 frames on HD? PS3 can even do 3D with GT5, with 16 cars on track, 1080p, dynamic weather.

we're not going by art here, we're going by how smooth a game can run with everything that's going on. Halo Reach, the only Halo game in HD, drops below 30 frames. really now?

[QUOTE="Foulcry"]

The problem with 360 fans is they think anything can run on the system and whatever the PS3 can do the 360 can do just as good or better. I think thatspretty arrogant and egotisticalbut I also think people who are strictly PS3 fans put the PS3 on a golden pedestal. Like it's this ultra powerful system that can shoot bolts of lightning at you. I'm not being biased at all as I enjoy all three systems but come on to say the PS3 is a little more powerful then th 360 is ridiculous. The exclusives for PS3 are way better looking in my opinion.

360 almost always gets the better Multiplats but that's because 360 is it's native console and the PS3 versions are ports and developers are too lazy to put in the extra time they put in the 360 version. "The system is too hard to develope for" They say. 360 has some great games and some of those games are very pretty to look at but come on we all know God of War 3, Uncharted, MLB 10: The Show, Killzone 2 and Metal Gear Solid 4 could be pulled off on the 360 yes probablybut they won't look as good as they do on the PS3. Look at FFXIII for instance 360 pulled it off but it doesn't look as merely asgood as it does on the PS3.

Bus-A-Bus

MGS4??Is this some kind of joke?Sub hd game with laughable textures and post processing from like 2003?Sure thing...I mean,even PSP2 can handle it but its obviouslly to much for 360 :)

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="rawr89"]i could say that as well. no one has ever made a PS3 game that looks better than Crysis, so....we'll never know. until then, i'm saying that it is possible for the PS3 to produce Crysis-like graphics. :roll:

rawr89

Ridiculous comparison.

There are things that Crysis does that is clearly beyond the ability of console hardware. For that, one can point to actual data such as RAM. On the other hand, you just have subjective "looks".

so GoW3 with all its Titans, in real-time, on 720p, with MLAA applied, at an average of 40 fps, can run on the 360? don't kid yourself. when was the last 360 that ran above 30 frames on HD? PS3 can even do 3D with GT5, with 16 cars on track, 1080p, dynamic weather.

we're not going by art here, we're going by how smooth a game can run with everything that's going on. Halo Reach, the only Halo game in HD, drops below 30 frames. really now?

And now you need to prove, using hardware specs, why it is impossible for the 360 to do those things. Saying that it hasn't does not cut it.

Yes and no. The 360 would not be able to run it exactly the same, because of the different architectures and strengths of the hardware the game's graphics would suffer in some places but may be improved in others. These sort of things are not a simple question, noone here can give an adequate answer. ferret-gamer

But some people here sure think they can.