Could the 360 run God Of War 3?

MOD... nuff said

pcs suck, im not spending $5k on a computer that will last 2 years

mejiseike

LOL

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

MOD... nuff said

pcs suck, im not spending $5k on a computer that will last 2 years

lawlessx

considering no one i know has played crysis....

and troll? this is my thread....

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="mejiseike"]

MOD... nuff said

pcs suck, im not spending $5k on a computer that will last 2 years

mejiseike

considering no one i know has played crysis....

and troll? this is my thread....

How exactly does making a thread mean you can't be a troll?

And if you're not a troll, you're a deluded cow.

[QUOTE="rawr89"]

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

mejiseike

dude... i dont think theres any games that look as good as uncharted or god of war 3... thats not fair lol

Crysis

Crysis: Warhead

Metro 2033

ARMA 2

STALKER

Crysis 2

on the PC all say hello and look better too then those games.

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

MOD... nuff said

pcs suck, im not spending $5k on a computer that will last 2 years

lawlessx

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"] and there goes any creditability you had left :lol:coreybg

considering no one i know has played crysis....

and troll? this is my thread....

How exactly does making a thread mean you can't be a troll?

And if you're not a troll, you're a deluded cow.

what does weight have to do with this.... good job buddy!

and people keep talking about crysis on this site, ive never once heard anyone talk about crysis and i go to college with over 30k kids... we play supersmash and maden on campus... plenty of nerdy kids there haha i even brought the game up and no ones played it

i mean ya the game looked really good, but i just got it and couldnt run it on the highest with my computer and its not bad at all... better than most

How could a PC not run it 4 years ago? DudeNtheRoom

Hell no. The 360 would insta-RROD if it tried to run a game as graphically awesome as The God III. Wahahaha, enjoy your Alan Wake kids, that's as good as it gets.

[QUOTE="coreybg"]

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

considering no one i know has played crysis....

and troll? this is my thread....

mejiseike

How exactly does making a thread mean you can't be a troll?

And if you're not a troll, you're a deluded cow.

what does weight have to do with this.... good job buddy!

and people keep talking about crysis on this site, ive never once heard anyone talk about crysis and i go to college with over 30k kids... we play supersmash and maden on campus... plenty of nerdy kids there haha i even brought the game up and no ones played it

i mean ya the game looked really good, but i just got it and couldnt run it on the highest with my computer and its not bad at all... better than most

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

[QUOTE="rawr89"]

no and never.

lems will always say, "bu..bu..but teh 360 devs don't do graphics! they care more for gameplay!" or "bu..bu..but 360 has a better GPU!" or "bu..bu..but Sony showers first-party devs with lots and lots of money!"

we will end this gen with no 360 game looking better than a PS3 game and lems will say this until the end. pathetic. :roll:

there's evidence and those are the games. deal with it. ever since 2008 there are no 360 games that look better than PS3 ones. tell me one 360 game that looks better than Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3.

USS_Data

dude... i dont think theres any games that look as good as uncharted or god of war 3... thats not fair lol

Crysis

Crysis: Warhead

Metro 2033

ARMA 2

STALKER

Crysis 2

on the PC all say hello and look better too then those games.

oh wow i never mentioned 'PC' in my post and yet you PC guys aka the "me too" guys are always here.

PS3: omg UC2 looks better than anything on the 360!

360: hellz yeah teh devs are just too lazzzzzy. Sony is giving Naughty Dog some moolah!

PC: hey hey hey we exist too! remember our games that's jsut overflowing with graphics?? us too, us too! mention PC too!

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]

[QUOTE="rawr89"]

except that the PS3 has been around for 5 years now. and with the same specs ever since 2006.

if GoW3 was shown on PS3 on 2006 no one would believe that PS3 can do that kind of graphical fidelity. but it's true. a PS3 bought in 2006 can produce GoW3, UC2, etc.

in short, the PS3 can do this kind of graphics ever since.

theuncharted34

It doesn't matter how long the PS3 has been around for. When the PS3 came out, a high-end PC could already destroy it in terms of hardware, so it would still run GOW3 better and look better.

you mean the 8800 right? yep that's pretty much the baseline for when pc graphics start looking better than all console games. that and a core 2 duo. even then, if that particualr set that I just mentioned had a game as optimised as well as a game like uncharted 2, it would probably look twice as good as that.

if a sandy bridge cpu and a 580 were optimised to hell and back that would be just amazing :P

Radeon X1900 is already two times the non-raster workload Fold @Home performance over CELL i.e. Current games are raster based and GPUs are optimized for this type workloads.Geforce 7 series can't even sustain DX9c's 32bit floating point performance.

It would be interesting to see Radeon X1900 running Crysis 2 PC DX9c mode vs Crysis 2 Xbox 360 vs Crysis 2 PS3.

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

[QUOTE="coreybg"]

How exactly does making a thread mean you can't be a troll?

And if you're not a troll, you're a deluded cow.

ocstew

what does weight have to do with this.... good job buddy!

and people keep talking about crysis on this site, ive never once heard anyone talk about crysis and i go to college with over 30k kids... we play supersmash and maden on campus... plenty of nerdy kids there haha i even brought the game up and no ones played it

i mean ya the game looked really good, but i just got it and couldnt run it on the highest with my computer and its not bad at all... better than most

haha funny

ya its an electronics store.... Sony

its got a i5 2.66 quad core, 4 gigs of ram, HD 5650

it will play on high, but its just not smooth and its really glitchy

And Rawr89s posts are hilarious lol and true in a way

[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="mejiseike"]

what does weight have to do with this.... good job buddy!

and people keep talking about crysis on this site, ive never once heard anyone talk about crysis and i go to college with over 30k kids... we play supersmash and maden on campus... plenty of nerdy kids there haha i even brought the game up and no ones played it

i mean ya the game looked really good, but i just got it and couldnt run it on the highest with my computer and its not bad at all... better than most

mejiseike

haha funny

ya its an electronics store.... Sony

its got a i5 2.66 quad core, 4 gigs of ram, HD 5650

it will play on high, but its just not smooth and its really glitchy

And Rawr89s posts are hilarious lol and true in a way

Wait is it a notebook? That's your problem right there, laptops aren't made for high end gaming.

[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="mejiseike"]

what does weight have to do with this.... good job buddy!

and people keep talking about crysis on this site, ive never once heard anyone talk about crysis and i go to college with over 30k kids... we play supersmash and maden on campus... plenty of nerdy kids there haha i even brought the game up and no ones played it

i mean ya the game looked really good, but i just got it and couldnt run it on the highest with my computer and its not bad at all... better than most

mejiseike

haha funny

ya its an electronics store.... Sony

its got a i5 2.66 quad core, 4 gigs of ram, HD 5650

it will play on high, but its just not smooth and its really glitchy

And Rawr89s posts are hilarious lol and true in a way

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

[QUOTE="ocstew"] Yeah somehow I think you got your PC in an electronics store and expect it to play Crysis. I bet you're mad because you can't run Crysis on its highest settings even though your PC is probably rubbish.ocstew

haha funny

ya its an electronics store.... Sony

its got a i5 2.66 quad core, 4 gigs of ram, HD 5650

it will play on high, but its just not smooth and its really glitchy

And Rawr89s posts are hilarious lol and true in a way

dude... who cares, besides the graphics this isnt that great of a game anyways, and it wasnt that high of a price tag, hence why i bought it. go play your wow or whatever you pc guys play

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="mejiseike"]

MOD... nuff said

pcs suck, im not spending $5k on a computer that will last 2 years

considering no one i know has played crysis....

and troll? this is my thread....

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

[QUOTE="ocstew"] Yeah somehow I think you got your PC in an electronics store and expect it to play Crysis. I bet you're mad because you can't run Crysis on its highest settings even though your PC is probably rubbish.soulitane

haha funny

ya its an electronics store.... Sony

its got a i5 2.66 quad core, 4 gigs of ram, HD 5650

it will play on high, but its just not smooth and its really glitchy

And Rawr89s posts are hilarious lol and true in a way

Wait is it a notebook? That's your problem right there, laptops aren't made for high end gaming.

I paid about $2000 AUD for my Dell Studio XPS 1645 that includes Intel Core i7 740 Quad Core (8 threads), AMD Radeon HD 5730M, 6GB 1333Mhz DRR3 memory, blu-ray/dvd-rw, 500GB 7200 RPM HD and RGB-LED 16" inch 1920x1080p Samsung designed LCD.

ASUS N61JQ laptop with similar spec as my Dell Studio XPS 1645 laptop playing Crysis at smooth frame rateshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1w45_VuGZk

ASUS N61JQ laptop is generally cheaper than my Dell Studio XPS 1645 laptop.

I later added an external(DIY ViDock) desktop AMD Radeon HD 5770 card to my laptop. http://forum.notebookreview.com/gaming-software-graphics-cards/418851-diy-vidock-experiences-274.html#post7112152

Most Intel Core i5s are dual core (4 threads) types.

[QUOTE="soulitane"]

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]

haha funny

ya its an electronics store.... Sony

its got a i5 2.66 quad core, 4 gigs of ram, HD 5650

it will play on high, but its just not smooth and its really glitchy

And Rawr89s posts are hilarious lol and true in a way

ronvalencia

Wait is it a notebook? That's your problem right there, laptops aren't made for high end gaming.

I paid about $2000 AUD for my Dell Studio XPS 1645 that includes Intel Core i7 740 Quad Core (8 threads), AMD Radeon HD 5730M, 6GB 1333Mhz DRR3 memory, blu-ray/dvd-rw, 500GB 7200 RPM HD and RGB-LED 16" inch 1920x1080p Samsung designed LCD.

ASUS N61JQ laptop with similar spec as my Dell Studio XPS 1645 laptop playing Crysis at smooth frame rateshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1w45_VuGZk

ASUS N61JQ laptop is generally cheaper than my Dell Studio XPS 1645 laptop.

I later added an external(DIY ViDock) desktop AMD Radeon HD 5770 card to my laptop. http://forum.notebookreview.com/gaming-software-graphics-cards/418851-diy-vidock-experiences-274.html#post7112152

Most Intel Core i5s are dual core (4 threads) types.

wanted an xps... looked at the price tag and said no lol and idk i just dont see the point of buying a really expensive rig

computers are for (in order) listening/ getting music, starcraft 2, school, internet, internet games, youtube, then games