Could Uncharted have been done on the 360?

yeah, go ahead and role your eyes. Uncharted does not have any loading times, rather the game flows from start to finish wihout seeing one load screen. If you played it, you would know this.

MotoRacer81

Making the game HDD-required would solve that problem.

Also, you're off on my Oblivion looked better on the PS3. It wasn't because of the PS3's shader capability, but rather extra development time.

[QUOTE="MotoRacer81"]

yeah, go ahead and role your eyes. Uncharted does not have any loading times, rather the game flows from start to finish wihout seeing one load screen. If you played it, you would know this.

LosDaddie

Making the game HDD-required would solve that problem.

Also, you're off on my Oblivion looked better on the PS3. It wasn't because of the PS3's shader capability, but rather extra development time.

it was extra development time because the PS3 required extra dev time and because it can support more shaders than the 360 can. That's fact. Look at the hardware specs!!

Plus making the HDD required?? no, that would mean so many xbox owners will have to spend an extra 100 dollars for their system, and that is not anything that M$ would attempt asking as it's not the consumer's fault that they released an SKU with no standard HDD. That is not a logical argument. Maybe the next xbox will have that, but not this one.

[QUOTE="skyform"][QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="skyform"]

To be honest i think there is no chance that Uncharted would run on 360, only if it would be a complet different game and look different aswell.

Xbox 360 could not run such a detailed game so smooth and especially it won't be as jaggie free as it's on the PS3. There is way to much geometry, fantastic animations and physics for the 360 to run this.

Every single thing in Uncharted is done very good, there is no game except Crysis that has such a graphical/technical detail and deepness.

kingtito

The fanboys on this site never cease to amaze me.

Little news flash for you, ANYTHING the PS3 can do can also be done on the 360.

Yes you are so right im such a fanboy, the bigest PS3 fanboy ever, that's why i have the Xbox 360 since launch and tons of games for it but have the PS3 only for 2 months and 4 games for it :roll:

Still doesn't exclude you from being a fanboy. Maybe your parents bought you the 360 last year. I do know going by your post that your are indeed a COW.

I feel so sorry for fanboys like you, for fanboys like you im one day a cow and another day a lemming :lol:

When i defend a game for the 360 then cows attack me and call me a lemming and when it's a PS3 game then lemmings attack me im a cow, this is ridicule.

My parents didn't buy me the 360, i have my own job and im buying everything by my self and as i already said i have it since the launch and not last year.

I like both consoles because both have their own great games and advantages but think what you want if it makes you feel better.

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="MotoRacer81"]

yeah, go ahead and role your eyes. Uncharted does not have any loading times, rather the game flows from start to finish wihout seeing one load screen. If you played it, you would know this.

MotoRacer81

Making the game HDD-required would solve that problem.

Also, you're off on my Oblivion looked better on the PS3. It wasn't because of the PS3's shader capability, but rather extra development time.

it was extra development time because the PS3 required extra dev time and because it can support more shaders than the 360 can. That's fact. Look at the hardware specs!!

:lol:

No. Oblivion came out on x360 & PC first because the PS3 WASN'T EVEN OUT YET. So, Bethseda had a whole year to port it to the PS3.

And I love for you to prove how the PS3's shader capabilites are superior to the x360's.

Plus making the HDD required?? no, that would mean so many xbox owners will have to spend an extra 100 dollars for their system, and that is not anything that M$ would attempt asking as it's not the consumer's fault that they released an SKU with no standard HDD. That is not a logical argument. Maybe the next xbox will have that, but not this one.

MotoRacer81

You should stop posting when you obviously know very little. There are already games that require the x360's HDD.

ummm... yeah i dont know if you got the memo, but you're not suppose to make sense in system wars...

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

It just amazes me that gamers can be convinced that two console with basically the same specs (3.2GHz CPU, 500MHz GPU, 512MB total RAM) cannot run the same game(s). Or even that one console has much more "potential" than the other.

It's really a testament of how little the gamers know about game development.

bluewrxman

Yeah, I remembered that once I hit "Submit".

[QUOTE="MotoRacer81"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="MotoRacer81"]

yeah, go ahead and role your eyes. Uncharted does not have any loading times, rather the game flows from start to finish wihout seeing one load screen. If you played it, you would know this.

LosDaddie

Making the game HDD-required would solve that problem.

Also, you're off on my Oblivion looked better on the PS3. It wasn't because of the PS3's shader capability, but rather extra development time.

it was extra development time because the PS3 required extra dev time and because it can support more shaders than the 360 can. That's fact. Look at the hardware specs!!

:lol:

No. Oblivion came out on x360 & PC first because the PS3 WASN'T EVEN OUT YET. So, Bethseda had a whole year to port it to the PS3.

And I love for you to prove how the PS3's shader capabilites are superior to the x360's.

Plus making the HDD required?? no, that would mean so many xbox owners will have to spend an extra 100 dollars for their system, and that is not anything that M$ would attempt asking as it's not the consumer's fault that they released an SKU with no standard HDD. That is not a logical argument. Maybe the next xbox will have that, but not this one.

MotoRacer81

You should stop posting when you obviously know very little. There are already games that require the x360's HDD.

dude, I know the PS3 wasn't out when Oblivion came out. I was trying to say that developement on the PS3 needs more time anyway specially when it first came out. Time shouldn't matter here.

I don't want to bore you with all the specs, but the PS3 is capable of 100billion shader operation/second, where the 360 is only capable of less than half of that, 48 billion/second. That's of course the maximum they can do in theory, but still the PS3 is twice as capable as the 360 in shader operations. don't tell me to stop posting. the facts are here.

[QUOTE="3dbullseye"]

I was watching a developer vid on gametrailers about the ps3 power and uncharted being developed on it. They mentioned a lot of talk about shaders, I thought the 360 had better shader capabilities then the ps3? I am wondering if the game would have been possible on the 360, and dont talk about blu-ray..we all know games can use multiple discs. I'm talking about pure graphic and processor power. Of course naughty dog would say no since they are ps3 exclusive (these comments from devs always make me laugh cause it's not like they would even try to develop their game on the competing console).

whocares4peace

http://www.xboxtoday.ca/11172007/20/ps3_uncharted_possible_on_xbox_360

Nice link. /sarcasm

Also if you read that clearly it says, yes it's possible on the 360, if you downgrade it enough to work on the system.

There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsangryfodder

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]:lol: unchartered is just all watch and no play, the ai is so dumb my toast (that I'm eating right now) are smarter than them, that there is the animation glitches, omg the game just has a good story and presentation but where gameplay is concerend unchartered is garbage, and yes it is possible on 360, and the gameplay would have been better too.muff07

The game was marked down on Gamespot because the AI was too good(a Gamespot frist) and was praised across many sites eg.edge,ign and 1up.

On topic i think graphically it would be capable but i think it would have to be edited heavily and as such would propably be similar to madden ps3 in quality of portation(ie AWFUL (youve gotta hate madden on the ps3))

if this is true then who ever reviewed it was plan and simple, high, the guys run toward the open and when you shoot them the just stay there and do nothing in the open. UC is garbage, and yes it could be ran on the 360 no doubt about it, there is nothing special about the graphic that I've never seen before.

dude, I know the PS3 wasn't out when Oblivion came out. I was trying to say that developement on the PS3 needs more time anyway specially when it first came out. Time shouldn't matter here. MotoRacer81

Time does matter though. Any game can be improved with extra dev time.

I don't want to bore you with all the specs, but the PS3 is capable of 100billion shader operation/second, where the 360 is only capable of less than half of that, 48 billion/second. That's of course the maximum they can do in theory, but still the PS3 is twice as capable as the 360 in shader operations. don't tell me to stop posting. the facts are here.

MotoRacer81

Your post would be 100% correct if both GPUs' architecture were the same.

If you really want to learn something, then head over to Beyond3d.com and arsetechnica.com

Uncharted could be done on 360 and it would look a little better with sharper textures and more than likely faster load times.MadExponent

uncharted has no load times, n00b54uc3.

I was watching a developer vid on gametrailers about the ps3 power and uncharted being developed on it. They mentioned a lot of talk about shaders, I thought the 360 had better shader capabilities then the ps3? I am wondering if the game would have been possible on the 360, and dont talk about blu-ray..we all know games can use multiple discs. I'm talking about pure graphic and processor power. Of course naughty dog would say no since they are ps3 exclusive (these comments from devs always make me laugh cause it's not like they would even try to develop their game on the competing console).

3dbullseye

Mass Effect has as good graphics as Drake, but 10x bigger levels, which means 360 could do 10x the Drake's graphics, even in this engine that is NOT ground up made for 360

The REAL question is, could Mass Effect, Fable 2, Project Offset be done on PS3 ?

you probably shouldnt of played it on easy. i'm just saying. and about the post ya uncharted probably could run on the 360

:lol: unchartered is just all watch and no play, the ai is so dumb my toast (that I'm eating right now) are smarter than them, that there is the animation glitches, omg the game just has a good story and presentation but where gameplay is concerend unchartered is garbage, and yes it is possible on 360, and the gameplay would have been better too.amorbis1001

you probably shouldnt of played it on easy. i'm just saying. and about the post ya uncharted probably could run on the 360

iamshivy

I played it on normal, which is suitable for some great ai.I played fear on normal and the ai was spectacular same with stalker and a few other so. unchartered had some dumb ai, the guy with the shoot gun show this especially, he runs out in the open gets shots and still stays there to get shot some more. then the camera sometie get into the was, and the animations sometimes get stuck while I am jumping to a ledge. the game is alright and presentation was amazing.

Square said that FF13 will be using the maximum capabilities of the ps3. And as the ps3's maximum capability surpasses that of the 360's, its not possible.mustaf_nur89

Thats bogus. They don't mean like processing ability. It means they'll have a crapload of FMVs all in 1080p and 5.1. Unless you want to say that the maximum potential of the PS3 has already hit its peak... barely after a year.

[QUOTE="MotoRacer81"]

dude, I know the PS3 wasn't out when Oblivion came out. I was trying to say that developement on the PS3 needs more time anyway specially when it first came out. Time shouldn't matter here. LosDaddie

Time does matter though. Any game can be improved with extra dev time.

I don't want to bore you with all the specs, but the PS3 is capable of 100billion shader operation/second, where the 360 is only capable of less than half of that, 48 billion/second. That's of course the maximum they can do in theory, but still the PS3 is twice as capable as the 360 in shader operations. don't tell me to stop posting. the facts are here.

MotoRacer81

Your post would be 100% correct if both GPUs' architecture were the same.

If you really want to learn something, then head over to Beyond3d.com and arsetechnica.com

so what are you trying to say? even though the PS3 has double the shader capability, the 360 is still better because of its architecture? Ok. Point me to where you can get that information if that's what you're trying to say.

I am not denying the 360, but it seems that once the devs are able to properly tap into the PS3, we are going to see some awesome looking games, even better than what we're seeing right now. Just look at GOW for example, a ps2 game that I could probably mistaken for an HD game. The gams will look better on the PS3 specially when you know it's got some Horse power under the hood. I will head over to the websites you mentioned to see what's going on.

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsProductNumber49

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="MotoRacer81"]

dude, I know the PS3 wasn't out when Oblivion came out. I was trying to say that developement on the PS3 needs more time anyway specially when it first came out. Time shouldn't matter here. MotoRacer81

Time does matter though. Any game can be improved with extra dev time.

I don't want to bore you with all the specs, but the PS3 is capable of 100billion shader operation/second, where the 360 is only capable of less than half of that, 48 billion/second. That's of course the maximum they can do in theory, but still the PS3 is twice as capable as the 360 in shader operations. don't tell me to stop posting. the facts are here.

MotoRacer81

Your post would be 100% correct if both GPUs' architecture were the same.

If you really want to learn something, then head over to Beyond3d.com and arsetechnica.com

so what are you trying to say? even though the PS3 has double the shader capability, the 360 is still better because of its architecture? Ok. Point me to where you can get that information if that's what you're trying to say.

I am not denying the 360, but it seems that once the devs are able to properly tap into the PS3, we are going to see some awesome looking games, even better than what we're seeing right now. Just look at GOW for example, a ps2 game that I could probably mistaken for an HD game. The gams will look better on the PS3 specially when you know it's got some Horse power under the hood. I will head over to the websites you mentioned to see what's going on.

:lol: unchartered is just all watch and no play, the ai is so dumb my toast (that I'm eating right now) are smarter than them, that there is the animation glitches, omg the game just has a good story and presentation but where gameplay is concerend unchartered is garbage, and yes it is possible on 360, and the gameplay would have been better too.amorbis1001

you've never played uncharted before. as for dumb ai *cough*Mass Effect*cough*squad members shooting at walls*cough*

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsProductNumber49

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

negative

so what are you trying to say? even though the PS3 has double the shader capability, the 360 is still better because of its architecture? Ok. Point me to where you can get that information if that's what you're trying to say.

MotoRacer81

I never said it was better, just different. The way RSX & Xenos process shaders & pixels are different. If you had done some research on your own, then you would know this.

Comparing raw performance numbers of either console really just proves that you've bought into Sony's hype machine. I don't really blame you though.

Here's some knowledge:

Xbox360 GPU

May be too long of a read for you. But at least you can compare it to what you "know" about the RSX.

Why are you argueing with a brick wall? lolLiquid-GEAR

See, while you guys just parrot Sony's hype, I've done my own research.

The "brick wall" would actually be cows who believe Sony's hype.

More knowledge on the PS3 GPU

How RSX Works

Now if you come back after readin both articles and think both GPUs can be compared with numbers alone, then you obviously didn't understand either article.

i think it could yes.

it would need to be completly rebuilt from the ground up of course and all the tech would need to be designed for 360 rather than PS3. the game would also probably demand a HDD to be in the 360 (something which MS seems to be allowing devs to demand for 360 games now) to assist with data streaming. but int he end i think the end product would end up being the same.

[QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="3dbullseye"][QUOTE="stefanlek"][QUOTE="3dbullseye"]

Ahh, thanks for that, i wasn't really hoping it would get ported, im sure it's a great game and would love to play it but wasn't trying to start any rumors...was just curious about the technicle aspects. Afterall, it is an impressive looking game graphicly. I do wish square would see the light andbring FF 13 to 360 though, that'd make me never even question getting a ps3 :(So the hard drive is the bog down huh, thats a shame.

l3erserker

FFXIII cant be done on 360. It isnt powerful enough. Nor has it got hd as standard.

square say that?

Square said that FF13 will be using the maximum capabilities of the ps3. And as the ps3's maximum capability surpasses that of the 360's, its not possible.

Fanboy much??????

Please you're going to tell me a FF game is going to use any system to it's fullest???? It's a movie with some gameplay inbetween. The Wii could do a FF13.

Don't believe dev hype, they just want to sell the game.

lol, wow. You really think thats being a fanboy? If you look on IGN in a interview with nomura on FFXIII exclusity, he says that they are going to use the PS3's capabilities to the max. If they were going to port it, he says they would have had to keep that in mind.

The wii could do a FF13. LMAO, that's a good one. and no its not a movie with gameplay in between. There's hardly been any footage of the game (only one trailer im aware of, please enlighten me if you've seen more). I turn the fanboyism to you, you blind lemming. And just a side note, I own both an XBOX 360 and a PS3.

Yes FF13 is nothing more than one big CGI filled game. If you've ever played ANY FF game you'd know that there really isn't much to them. No physics, no real AI and likeI said, a hell of a lot of CGI. Hmm why would I listen to any dev when half say they're games can't run on other systems besides the one they're making it for.

So having a 360 and PS3 means you're NOTa fanboy??? Then I guess you can say I'm not one either since I own both as well. Not to mention I'm not the one claiming 1 game CAN'T run on another system. Seeing as how both are very very close spec wise it pretty ludicrous to make such a bold statement.

Just in case the cows forgot, MS did say devs can now make games that would require an HDD. They just warned them that it COULD possibly exclude part of the user base.

[QUOTE="3dbullseye"]

I was watching a developer vid on gametrailers about the ps3 power and uncharted being developed on it. They mentioned a lot of talk about shaders, I thought the 360 had better shader capabilities then the ps3? I am wondering if the game would have been possible on the 360, and dont talk about blu-ray..we all know games can use multiple discs. I'm talking about pure graphic and processor power. Of course naughty dog would say no since they are ps3 exclusive (these comments from devs always make me laugh cause it's not like they would even try to develop their game on the competing console).

whocares4peace

http://www.xboxtoday.ca/11172007/20/ps3_uncharted_possible_on_xbox_360

It can be done. As long as the HDD was required, they wouldn't have any problems doing Uncharted on the XBox 360. I agree though, that the game would have to be done from scratch though as the architecture for both systems are completely different. I don't see this game ever coming over to the 360, which is fine by me. One of the reasons I bought a PS3 was to play this game alone with Resistance, Heavenly Sword, FFXIII & White Knight.

[QUOTE="stefanlek"][QUOTE="3dbullseye"]

Ahh, thanks for that, i wasn't really hoping it would get ported, im sure it's a great game and would love to play it but wasn't trying to start any rumors...was just curious about the technicle aspects. Afterall, it is an impressive looking game graphicly. I do wish square would see the light andbring FF 13 to 360 though, that'd make me never even question getting a ps3 :(So the hard drive is the bog down huh, thats a shame.

3dbullseye

FFXIII cant be done on 360. It isnt powerful enough. Nor has it got hd as standard.

square say that?

ya they did

[QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsLiquid-GEAR

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

I have played and own both there is no way anyone with eyes can say uncarted looks better then GOW all it is is foliage the AI isnt that great also its better than Mass effect but thats what happens when u rush a game.

Mass effect is way larger then uncharted with better grapics so Disk space wouldnt be an issue

IN sheer game processing power the 360 comes out on top although the PS3 has everything else wrapped up apart from the RAM issues.

Now the pixel shader issue the XBOXuses a new pixel shader technology to get around it the ps3 sheer amont of 'pipelines' to the point were all tho the PS3 has more its still the equivalent to the Xbox

I remember somewhere in an interview Naughty Dog (the only Sony developer I really respect honestly) said that the 360 was capiable of doing Uncharted's Graphics. The thing was ps3 has the standard HD, and the larger Blue Ray space, not to mention the complete difference in the archectures. It would have to be completely redone. Reguardless of the graphics, they said the game in a way could be to different from what they have now.Innovazero2000

[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsukillwegrill

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

I have played and own both there is no way anyone with eyes can say uncarted looks better then GOW all it is is foliage the AI isnt that great also its better than Mass effect but thats what happens when u rush a game.

Mass effect is way larger then uncharted with better grapics so Disk space wouldnt be an issue

IN sheer game processing power the 360 comes out on top although the PS3 has everything else wrapped up apart from the RAM issues.

Now the pixel shader issue the XBOXuses a new pixel shader technology to get around it the ps3 sheer amont of 'pipelines' to the point were all tho the PS3 has more its still the equivalent to the Xbox

its funny how you say Gears of War looks better when most other people seem to say Uncharted looks better.

[QUOTE="ukillwegrill"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsZero5000X

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

I have played and own both there is no way anyone with eyes can say uncarted looks better then GOW all it is is foliage the AI isnt that great also its better than Mass effect but thats what happens when u rush a game.

Mass effect is way larger then uncharted with better grapics so Disk space wouldnt be an issue

IN sheer game processing power the 360 comes out on top although the PS3 has everything else wrapped up apart from the RAM issues.

Now the pixel shader issue the XBOXuses a new pixel shader technology to get around it the ps3 sheer amont of 'pipelines' to the point were all tho the PS3 has more its still the equivalent to the Xbox

its funny how you say Gears of War looks better when most other people seem to say Uncharted looks better.

Well it really depends on what u mean bylooks better if by that u mean its alot prettier than gears of war then ur correct but if u mean its a bigger technical achievement (in respect to graphics)packed with detail then its Gow

IM not saying uncharted dosent look its just not as good as GOW its artistic direction dosent command a high use of detail

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"]I remember somewhere in an interview Naughty Dog (the only Sony developer I really respect honestly) said that the 360 was capiable of doing Uncharted's Graphics. The thing was ps3 has the standard HD, and the larger Blue Ray space, not to mention the complete difference in the archectures. It would have to be completely redone. Reguardless of the graphics, they said the game in a way could be to different from what they have now.crispytheone88

Blu-ray is not needed, the hard drive DOES make a diffrence

for the last time, the PS3 and 360 are quite evenly matched, Uncharted could be done on the 360, but would have to be redone, as it uses the spu's, but the 360 could do the game the Gpu on the 360 is more powerful

really, arguing graphics between these two system is truely nitpicking, they are both extremely powerful, they just use diffrent methods to get to the same end, the problem with the PS3 is that it uses a totally diffrent method than the PC, so developers have a harder time working wiht the system, and porting games frm PC or 360

Im sorry but if it was done on the 360 there would be compromizes the PS3 is simply more powerful.When you look at first party Sony games they continue to look better and better while 360 games really arent looking any more impressive then Gears of War. Id say Mass Effect looks better but it has so much texture pop in and load times it shows the 360 is struggling to do it while Uncharted not only looks better then Mass Effect but runs with little to no issues and its only a second gen title. Fact is as of now Uncharted is the best looking game on either of the two consoles and there are several PS3 titles coming out that could surpass it.

[QUOTE="Zero5000X"][QUOTE="ukillwegrill"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsukillwegrill

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

I have played and own both there is no way anyone with eyes can say uncarted looks better then GOW all it is is foliage the AI isnt that great also its better than Mass effect but thats what happens when u rush a game.

Mass effect is way larger then uncharted with better grapics so Disk space wouldnt be an issue

IN sheer game processing power the 360 comes out on top although the PS3 has everything else wrapped up apart from the RAM issues.

Now the pixel shader issue the XBOXuses a new pixel shader technology to get around it the ps3 sheer amont of 'pipelines' to the point were all tho the PS3 has more its still the equivalent to the Xbox

its funny how you say Gears of War looks better when most other people seem to say Uncharted looks better.

Well it really depends on what u mean bylooks better if by that u mean its alot prettier than gears of war then ur correct but if u mean its a bigger technical achievement (in respect to graphics)packed with detail then its Gow

IM not saying uncharted dosent look its just not as good as GOW its artistic direction dosent command a high use of detail

Um I own both and Uncharted destorys Gears of War from a visual perspective.( look at my gamertag if you have any doubts "TheSterls". Uncharted has way better lighting, far superior animations way better explosions and particle effects, larger enviornments, more interactive enviornments and it even manges to have better textures please tell me in what way is Uncharted not superior to Gears of War from a visual perspectve? And no im nota fanboy these are simple facts if you were to ask me which one is a better game I would easily go with Gears of War( although there both great) due to its much better replay value with online co-op and death match.

I 2 own both of the games im not a fan of uncharted it seems to be PITFALL 07 with guns

But thats no the point i feel Gow is more detailed in every aspect then uncharted mainly due to the graphical stylings of the game.

i admit its hard to accurately compare the 2 due to their obvious differences its like trying to compare GOW and the windwaker in terms of graphics

Uncharted could be done on 360 and it would look a little better with sharper textures and more than likely faster load times.MadExponent

[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsukillwegrill

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

I have played and own both there is no way anyone with eyes can say uncarted looks better then GOW all it is is foliage the AI isnt that great also its better than Mass effect but thats what happens when u rush a game.

Mass effect is way larger then uncharted with better grapics so Disk space wouldnt be an issue

IN sheer game processing power the 360 comes out on top although the PS3 has everything else wrapped up apart from the RAM issues.

Now the pixel shader issue the XBOXuses a new pixel shader technology to get around it the ps3 sheer amont of 'pipelines' to the point were all tho the PS3 has more its still the equivalent to the Xbox

MANY Including several websites say it looks better Oh and me ofcourse, so you fail. :)

[QUOTE="ukillwegrill"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="angryfodder"]There is NO WAY the 360 could do uncharted - the 360 doesn't do flopsLiquid-GEAR

It did gears of war that looks better and has way better AI...

What's the matter with you fanboys?

I have played and own both there is no way anyone with eyes can say uncarted looks better then GOW all it is is foliage the AI isnt that great also its better than Mass effect but thats what happens when u rush a game.

Mass effect is way larger then uncharted with better grapics so Disk space wouldnt be an issue

IN sheer game processing power the 360 comes out on top although the PS3 has everything else wrapped up apart from the RAM issues.

Now the pixel shader issue the XBOXuses a new pixel shader technology to get around it the ps3 sheer amont of 'pipelines' to the point were all tho the PS3 has more its still the equivalent to the Xbox

MANY Including several websites say it looks better Oh and me ofcourse, so you fail. :)

Look it up GS even did somin on it

If ND was third party and had a chance to develop for it then maybe. ND said Uncharted could be done on the 360; however, there would be problems with load times. Don't know what they exactly said but I remember seeing that.

[QUOTE="skyform"]

To be honest i think there is no chance that Uncharted would run on 360, only if it would be a complet different game and look different aswell.

Xbox 360 could not run such a detailed game so smooth and especially it won't be as jaggie free as it's on the PS3. There is way to much geometry, fantastic animations and physics for the 360 to run this.

Every single thing in Uncharted is done very good, there is no game except Crysis that has such a graphical/technical detail and deepness.

kingtito

The fanboys on this site never cease to amaze me.

Little news flash for you, ANYTHING the PS3 can do can also be done on the 360.

LOL...fanboy number 2. Anything you say??? Haha. I should sig this.

[QUOTE="skyform"]

To be honest i think there is no chance that Uncharted would run on 360, only if it would be a complet different game and look different aswell.

Xbox 360 could not run such a detailed game so smooth and especially it won't be as jaggie free as it's on the PS3. There is way to much geometry, fantastic animations and physics for the 360 to run this.

Every single thing in Uncharted is done very good, there is no game except Crysis that has such a graphical/technical detail and deepness.

kingtito

The fanboys on this site never cease to amaze me.

Little news flash for you, ANYTHING the PS3 can do can also be done on the 360.

LOL...fanboy number 2. Anything you say??? Haha. I should sig this.

:lol: unchartered is just all watch and no play, the ai is so dumb my toast (that I'm eating right now) are smarter than them, that there is the animation glitches, omg the game just has a good story and presentation but where gameplay is concerend unchartered is garbage, and yes it is possible on 360, and the gameplay would have been better too.amorbis1001

dude the AI is the best I have evr seen,and Ive played tons of games

start reading reviews

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]:lol: unchartered is just all watch and no play, the ai is so dumb my toast (that I'm eating right now) are smarter than them, that there is the animation glitches, omg the game just has a good story and presentation but where gameplay is concerend unchartered is garbage, and yes it is possible on 360, and the gameplay would have been better too.-PS360FTW-

dude the AI is the best I have evr seen,and Ive played tons of games

start reading reviews

Just ignore him. He's nothing but a fanboy.

9.6 > > > > > > 8.0

/thrend