Cows - are you going to pay $39.95 to download Warhawk?

40 is fine.

im no cow, but i am buying it. i feel sorry for my friend who bought shadowrun for the 360, it sure is not worth 60.00. but yep ill be dling warhawk for 39.99

Why would 29.95 be the right price...Have you played the game. Its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion. Adrian_Cloud

Well, for a multiplayer only game that you can download (meaning, it probably doesn't have 40 maps or anything like that), I would say that $29.95 seems more like a better price for something of that nature. This is why I had ZERO intention of buying Shadowrun. $59.95 for a multiplayer only game with a limited number of game modes and maps is a ripoff. $39.95 is better, but still a bit too high.

Oh, and have YOU played the game? How else can YOU make the statement "its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion."???

This is as worth it as Shivering Isles was for Oblivion on 360. ($30)

VEEEEEEERY worth it.

Yes i would but im buying it retail for headset for 69.99ssjgoku808

Thats 59.99 with a headset.

I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.REVENGEotSITH

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

[QUOTE="ssjgoku808"]Yes i would but im buying it retail for headset for 69.99Bread_or_Decide

Thats 59.99 with a headset.

Oh, and have YOU played the game? How else can YOU make the statement "its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion."???REVENGEotSITH

There was a beta a while back. It ran around the time of the Halo 3 Beta, give or take a week.

[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]Why would 29.95 be the right price...Have you played the game. Its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion. REVENGEotSITH

Well, for a multiplayer only game that you can download (meaning, it probably doesn't have 40 maps or anything like that), I would say that $29.95 seems more like a better price for something of that nature. This is why I had ZERO intention of buying Shadowrun. $59.95 for a multiplayer only game with a limited number of game modes and maps is a ripoff. $39.95 is better, but still a bit too high.

Oh, and have YOU played the game? How else can YOU make the statement "its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion."???

I've played it extensively, and I think it is an excellent game. However I will be getting the bundle just because it's the better value IMO.

I heard it comes with a headset. If so, that's a good deal to me.

lol forget it. didn't read the posts after.

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"] Oh, and have YOU played the game? How else can YOU make the statement "its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion."???-Spock-

There was a beta a while back. It ran around the time of the Halo 3 Beta, give or take a week.

Well, you can play a beta or a demo and geta sense for the game, the controls, etc., but I don't think you can assess VALUE from them. The value in something like this comes from the number of game modes, maps, etc. - all which translate to longevity. $60 for something you play through once isn't a great value. $60 for something that you put hundreds of hours into is. Thus, why I asked him if he's played the full game or not - the only way you can truly assess the game's value and whether it is worth $39.95.

[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]Why would 29.95 be the right price...Have you played the game. Its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion. REVENGEotSITH

Well, for a multiplayer only game that you can download (meaning, it probably doesn't have 40 maps or anything like that), I would say that $29.95 seems more like a better price for something of that nature. This is why I had ZERO intention of buying Shadowrun. $59.95 for a multiplayer only game with a limited number of game modes and maps is a ripoff. $39.95 is better, but still a bit too high.

Oh, and have YOU played the game? How else can YOU make the statement "its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion."???

I can easily make that statement since i'm very interested in this game, and the amount of gameplay variety it offers. Add 20$ for a measly 8 hour single player, i think not. Thats more of a rip off.

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

yep, just like rumble= last gen.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.smurf999

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

yep, just like rumble= last gen.

I dont get it, this thread clearly indicates that if lemmings pay for content they are getting shafted. But the cows, "its teh suppose to!!" :shock:

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.dmaximum

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

UT3 is a mostly online only experience thats going to be 60.

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Buying downlodable content is totally different to buying a fully fledged game. I think the price points are good for both versions although ill be getting the downloadable version as i already have a sweet headset. If gears of war was released on both Dvd and the Xbox store for $39 and $59 would that be unacceptable?

[QUOTE="dmaximum"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Bread_or_Decide

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

UT3 is a mostly online only experience thats going to be 60.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.dmaximum

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Are you saying there will be no future downloadable maps or content in the future with this game? See where Im going? :shock:

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.dmaximum

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Well, we are off topic. But sony did charge $8 for two maps in Resistance. I hope nobody bought it.

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="dmaximum"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.dmaximum

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

UT3 is a mostly online only experience thats going to be 60.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.meischris39

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Buying downlodable content is totally different to buying a fully fledged game. I think the price points are good for both versions although ill be getting the downloadable version as i already have a sweet headset. If gears of war was released on both Dvd and the Xbox store for $39 and $59 would that be unacceptable?

Hell no that wouldnt be acceptable. The price would need to be the same across the board. Unless the Xbox store version had 40% less content than the dvd version.

[QUOTE="dmaximum"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Are you saying there will be no future downloadable maps or content in the future with this game? See where Im going? :shock:

yes but the original question was "is $39.99 a good price for the GAME itself?" No one else was talking about DL content and its true that charging for maps n stuff that could be free is bs but what can you do.

[QUOTE="-Spock-"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"] Oh, and have YOU played the game? How else can YOU make the statement "its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion."???REVENGEotSITH

There was a beta a while back. It ran around the time of the Halo 3 Beta, give or take a week.

Well, you can play a beta or a demo and geta sense for the game, the controls, etc., but I don't think you can assess VALUE from them. The value in something like this comes from the number of game modes, maps, etc. - all which translate to longevity. $60 for something you play through once isn't a great value. $60 for something that you put hundreds of hours into is. Thus, why I asked him if he's played the full game or not - the only way you can truly assess the game's value and whether it is worth $39.95.

I played the beta for almost two months straight (many, many hours) and i can't wait to play again. Personally, I haven't had that much fun online since Socom 2, and for me that's saying a lot. And I think that the beta of this game was pretty much the full version.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.mazdaspeed-rx8

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Yea, I can see where the misunderstanding is. No, Im not talking about the game itself your paying for, Im talking about the "future" downloadable content. Maps, weapons etc.

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

they've ALWAYS maintained a double standard.... this is nothing new....

this kinda of blows for them.. paying that for a game w/o being able to trade it in when you're done.....

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]Are you saying there will be no future downloadable maps or content in the future with this game? See where Im going? :shock:

ANti_RiCeR

yes but the original question was "is $39.99 a good price for the GAME itself?" No one else was talking about DL content and its true that charging for maps n stuff that could be free is bs but what can you do.

Yes I think that is a good price/deal for the game. Glad we see eye to eye on the DL content. :)

im no cow, but i am buying it. i feel sorry for my friend who bought shadowrun for the 360, it sure is not worth 60.00. but yep ill be dling warhawk for 39.99

mazdaspeed-rx8

Comedy masterpiece .

[QUOTE="mazdaspeed-rx8"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Yea, I can see where the misunderstanding is. No, Im not talking about the game itself your paying for, Im talking about the "future" downloadable content. Maps, weapons etc.

what exactly are you trying to prove? totally pointless so far... let's not talk about optional charges and go off topic plz.

ur constant attempts of getting cows "OWNED" makes u look pretty fanboyish urself :roll:

[QUOTE="dmaximum"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.kevy619

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

Well, we are off topic. But sony did charge $8 for two maps in Resistance. I hope nobody bought it.

[QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

they've ALWAYS maintained a double standard.... this is nothing new....

this kinda of blows for them.. paying that for a game w/o being able to trade it in when you're done.....

tango90101

I think this is my first "fanboy" statement in the boards, here it goes:

Not every game is meant to be played once and be traded... cough....Gears of cough war...

Why would 29.95 be the right price...Have you played the game. Its certainly a great price for a game of its value in my opinion. Adrian_Cloud

Then again, I'm not exactly what you would call a 'cow.'

[QUOTE="REVENGEotSITH"]I would have thought that $29.95 was the right price. Just wondering if Cows are going to rush out and download it at this price.Magical_Zebra

Cows made it perfectly clear that paying for content= getting owned. Is it a double standard now? :shock:

With Sony fanboys, it always is.

what exactly are you trying to prove?grayfox_2k

Nothing. Just that cows "claim ownage" on the lemmings for paying for dl content.

totally pointless so far...grayfox_2k

let's not talk about optional charges and go off topic plz.grayfox_2k

ur constant attempts of getting cows "OWNED" makes u look pretty fanboyish urself :roll:

grayfox_2k

[QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

they've ALWAYS maintained a double standard.... this is nothing new....

this kinda of blows for them.. paying that for a game w/o being able to trade it in when you're done.....

alex77k

I think this is my first "fanboy" statement in the boards, here it goes:

Not every game is meant to be played once and be traded... cough....Gears of cough war...

Your fanyboy statement fails with flying colors. If you buy a game, then trade it in, I dont need to tell you who just got owned, and it aint the store you bought the game from. :lol:

Sheep shouldn't talk considering they are getting raped on the VC prices. Lems shouldn't talk because they are paying for desktop themes and avatars.

Warhawk is a full game not downloadable content.

[QUOTE="alex77k"][QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="Magical_Zebra"]

they've ALWAYS maintained a double standard.... this is nothing new....

this kinda of blows for them.. paying that for a game w/o being able to trade it in when you're done.....

Magical_Zebra

I think this is my first "fanboy" statement in the boards, here it goes:

Not every game is meant to be played once and be traded... cough....Gears of cough war...

Your fanyboy statement fails with flying colors. If you buy a game, then trade it in, I dont need to tell you who just got owned, and it aint the store you bought the game from. :lol:

It never pays to trade it in. Better off selling it to a friend and getting far more then gamestop offers. They'll give you 25 for gears and turn around and sell it used for 56. Barely even a discount above SRP.

I'd pay that much for the game, I'd even pay for the retail set considering it comes with an expensive headset.

It never pays to trade it in. Better off selling it to a friend and getting far more then gamestop offers. They'll give you 25 for gears and turn around and sell it used for 56. Barely even a discount above SRP.Bread_or_Decide

So true. I haven't traded in one game since I got an ebay seller's account. You will get ripped off if you trade to EB or GS, that much is a guarantee.