Any games you liked a lot but scored way lower than they should have?
My picks:
Lost Odyssey (AAA)
Too Human (AA)
Blue Dragon (AA-AAA)
Infinite Undiscovery (AA)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Any games you liked a lot but scored way lower than they should have?
My picks:
Lost Odyssey (AAA)
Too Human (AA)
Blue Dragon (AA-AAA)
Infinite Undiscovery (AA)
Call of Juarez - Bound in Blood
Brothers in Arms - Hell's Highway
Both these FPS imo excel above many ofthe so called "best" because they have good story, interesting characters, well written dialogue and just overall good gameplay/graphics for an FPS.
I would pick these over MW2, Killzone 2, Halo 3 etc any day.
*sigh* Every game said so far has been AA. What the heck... I said criminally underrated, meaning giving mediocre scores when they are actually great games.Call of Juarez - Bound in Blood
Brothers in Arms - Hell's Highway
Both these FPS imo excel above many ofthe so called "best" because they have good story, interesting characters, well written dialogue and just overall good gameplay/graphics.
Snagal123
Edit: guy after you guys said crack in time also, I quit. Apparently no one plays games that aren't AA. Sad. I'm not talking about the Zelda: TP .1 point difference, etc. but huge values. Something that might confuse someone between whether it is a quality game or not.
R&C ACiT really should've been a 9.0. Also the attention it got did not match the quality of the game.
game said so far has been AA. What the heck... I said criminally underrated, meaning giving mediocre scores when they are actually great games.
Edit: guy after you guys said crack in time also, I quit. Apparently no one plays games that aren't AA. Sad. I'm not talking about the Zelda: TP .1 point difference, etc. but huge values. Something that might confuse someone between whether it is a quality game or not.
GamerX2311
OK how about.
Stalker - Clear Sky - 7.0
Kane & Lynch - 6.0 - I know everyone hates on this game for "that reason" but it wasn't that bad at all, the last few levels weren't great but the rest was quite solid. I'm looking forward to the sequel.
Shadowgrounds 6.9 - Old school type top down shooter, amazing graphics and physics, fun gameplay, cheap, AAAE if you ask me, same dev made Trine.
Elebits (Wii)
I MAED A GAM3 W1TH Z0MB1ES!!!1 (360)
Hotel Dusk: Room 215 (DS)
Opoona (Wii)
The first three games I mentioned were all well received critically but not so well commercially. Opoona got mixed critical reviews and abysmal sales, but I absolutely loved it.
[QUOTE="GamerX2311"]
game said so far has been AA. What the heck... I said criminally underrated, meaning giving mediocre scores when they are actually great games.
Edit: guy after you guys said crack in time also, I quit. Apparently no one plays games that aren't AA. Sad. I'm not talking about the Zelda: TP .1 point difference, etc. but huge values. Something that might confuse someone between whether it is a quality game or not.
Snagal123
OK how about.
Stalker - Clear Sky - 7.0
Kane & Lynch - 6.0 - I know everyone hates on this game for "that reason" but it wasn't that bad at all, the last few levels weren't great but the rest was quite solid. I'm looking forward to the sequel.
Shadowgrounds 6.9 - Old school type top down shooter, amazing graphics and physics, fun gameplay, cheap, AAAE if you ask me, same dev made Trine.
may i ask what "that reason" is
may i ask what "that reason" is
Poison_1vy
The story went Jeff Gerstmann was sacked because he gave it a 6.0 and Eidos were spending alot on advertising at Gamespot and forced them to do it, none of it is proven or anything, and who cares we got Giant Bomb because of it so its all good.
But people seem to throw hate on Kane & Lynch for this reason without ever playing it. Sure it had its flaws, but it's not as bad as people like to make out.
Super Mario Galaxy.. (:
shoryuken_
hhahah u funny guy
i like you but do not agree with said statement
also on topic its mgs4 cwatididthar?
For what reason?[QUOTE="Snagal123"]
Stalker - Clear Sky - 7.0
mo0ksi
It had a terrible main quest overall, and just a boatload of small annoyances that brought the game down to its knees.
It was still a very fun game to play after all of the patches. I would give it about a 9, maybe 8.5.Folklore (great, creative game) Kane & Lynch (story was great) Too Human (great action) Halo Wars (game was full of action) Uncharted 1 (great game all around)navyguy21
Uncharted's average score of 88 (MC) isn't exactly "criminally underrated".
Yeah they both should have recieved much better, and the SoC should have been AAA.Both S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games deserved better IMO. :)
longtonguecat
Alot of Wii games
Viking: Battle for Asgard
Only games I can think of off the top of my head. (Both those according to GS scores not other websites)
EDIT: Bah! How could I forget Afro Samurai.
Sonic unleashed deserves AA and it got 3.5...other than that it...nothing really...all games got +/- 3 points than i predicted.awdxfvOh yea, I agree. That was awful. It's like they didn't care what game it was- they just saw sonic and resumed prejudices.
Well I might as well just say it....Shattered Horizon, It got (7.5)...
From the GS review:
The GoodI'm rather confused by the Super Metroid review for the Virtual Console. The game scored 8.5, but all the review did was praise it. Personally, I think Super Metroid is AAAA material (or at least 9.5).
Also, to quote myself:
Shadow the Hedgehog is a prime example that comes to mind. I don't get why they said that shooting was useless; I found it quite useful.I
By GS? I'd go with Ratchet Tools as well as Fire Embleme Radiant Dawnand Uncharted 1.
Overall? Lost lost odyssey and Folklore. Both were amazing games..
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment