Critic ratings vs community ratings: Which do you trust more?

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for skelly34
Skelly34

2353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Skelly34

Poll Critic ratings vs community ratings: Which do you trust more? (57 votes)

I trust heavily bribed, unprofessional "critics" that probably work for a SONY/MS blog. 19%
I trust a bunch of casual scum and fanboy trolls to tell me if a game is good or not. 21%
Neither, I'm not an idiot. What the fuck kind of question is that? 75%
 • 
Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#51  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

Critics Overall scores thru Gamerankings/Metacritic for most of exclusives because of some haters from other platforms trolling hard and scoring games like ZERO or ONE with some idiotic reasons but i always care way more about what community has to say for multiplatform games , similar to what i think about movies and IMDB. Its always about users

For example every critic praised Diablo 3 when it first released and game was the biggest mess Blizzard ever released or for example they praising Destiny new expansion as we speak as an AAA caliber . Well ... hell no ! Ill go with overall community ratings and opinions anyday for multiplatform gaming . OVERALL not individually.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#52 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

@speedfreak48t5p said:
@jg4xchamp said:

A Beacon of Truth in a sea of darkness my friend.

Sounds intriguing. How many copies of Mafia 2 does one need to burn to become a member?

Zero. The church of champ doesn't focus only on salvation my friend, but those that can add their own guidance so the church can avoid it's own mistakes of buying a shitty, abhorent, testament to a personal individual shit taste and low ass fucking standards, because they themselves are either ignorant or too fucking stupid to have actual good taste and settled to enjoy Mafia 2 and its shittyness. That and those stupid people who bought Mafia 2 thinking Mafia 1 was a good game, so Mafia 2 must be good. Dimwits, same people that thought all-Star Batman would be a good comic.

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#53 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

@guard12 said:

I watch previews or gameplay videos and make my own decision. I don't care for reviews from either side.

I agree

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#54 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

overall community ratings are always more accurate than the critic's even on metacritic.

MGSV with 1,851 votes = 83/100

MGSV with 74 critics = 93/100

-

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebea105efb64
deactivated-5ebea105efb64

7262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-5ebea105efb64
Member since 2013 • 7262 Posts

I trust youtube.

Avatar image for a-new-guardian
A-new-Guardian

2458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 A-new-Guardian
Member since 2015 • 2458 Posts

None. I play the games myself and judge the games.

I do read and listen to both though for information only. And if I ever do listen I will listen to fellow gamers I trust like people who recommended P4G to me in the lounge.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21753 Posts

I trust my opinion and my brother's above all else. After that, I have a few youtubers that I listen to on occasion.

Avatar image for darkangel115
darkangel115

4562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 darkangel115
Member since 2013 • 4562 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

Neither. Critics usually suck at games or have pretentious tastes and the community is fucking stupid

this^

Avatar image for d_parker
d_parker

2128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 85

User Lists: 0

#59 d_parker
Member since 2005 • 2128 Posts

Casual scum for me. In all the filth that is the masses, is truth.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#60 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Community by far these days.

They PAY MONEY to play these games, they are by default going to have more reasonable opinions.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#61 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

Critics. Sites/specific writers can build up their credibility for me and they at least try to be impartial. I can find specific writers that have similiar taste with me. Community ratings aren't worth much unless you have no real preferences of quirky tastes, as they're just grouping of random people scores. People who you don't know and who make have completely different taste from you.

Avatar image for PsychoLemons
PsychoLemons

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 PsychoLemons
Member since 2011 • 3183 Posts

Neither, use your brain.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a7fcf5e55c95
deactivated-5a7fcf5e55c95

2103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-5a7fcf5e55c95
Member since 2011 • 2103 Posts

Between the two I would trust critics more, but even they I take with a grain of salt. Usually use them as a reference point of whether I should definitely or definitely not get a certain game. User reviews are a joke in my opinion of the highest level. There are some who take it seriously and then there are others who give games unrealistic scores because they either "hated" it, are a fanboy, or found about some feature by the developer that outraged them. So extreme scores would be 0 and 10 so either a game looks really good or really bad by its user score.

Avatar image for drinkerofjuice
drinkerofjuice

4567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By drinkerofjuice
Member since 2007 • 4567 Posts

Critic reviews have the tendency to be untrustworthy, and when they're not they can simply be poorly written. You have people who are well versed in video games but really don't know the fundamentals of good writing. I'd argue EDGE and Eurogamer are among the few exceptions however.

Then you have gamers, who I also wouldn't trust. Collectively, their taste is pretty awful, and they don't have a grasp of what a great game is supposed to consist of. Their views also tend to be poorly formulated.

So I trust me and a very select few above all else.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#65 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

Neither, I usually ask friends that have the same taste in games as me what they think to a game if they have it and I dont. Metacritic is the most useless website you can go to for critic scores because of all the PS and MS specific review sites that like to inflate the scores, and the MC user scores are even worse.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@jg4xchamp said:

Neither.

Gaming critics are glorified dick riders and the gaming community? Straight up has bad taste.

I stick to the Church of Champ.

Pretty much this.

Although I attend the church of Breadiology.

Avatar image for Quaker-w00ts
Quaker-w00ts

1646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 Quaker-w00ts
Member since 2009 • 1646 Posts

I weigh both the same. Both are informative but sometimes the bias overwhelms the review, which makes it tedious to look through a lot of reviews. Sometimes a lot of people are dumbassess too which makes it really hard to gain anything from actual community reviews.