crytek-mediocrity that is hyped up. If only the company can actually make tech equivalent to that of valve, naughty dog, epic, frostbite and ubisoft I really should believe they were compenent. Instead I have to see stuff that isn't impressive at all and insist because they tell me dozens of times how powerful their tech is that it is good.
crytek-mediocrity that is hyped up. If only the company can actually make tech equivalent to that of valve, naughty dog, epic, frostbite and ubisoft I really should believe they were compenent. Instead I have to see stuff that isn't impressive at all and insist because they tell me dozens of times how powerful their tech is that it is good.
I remember more things happening around you during certain parts of that level on the PC version. But aside from that, that's Crysis alright. I'm still impressed on how they fit the game into consoles while keeping the gameplay intact.
crytek-mediocrity that is hyped up. If only the company can actually make tech equivalent to that of valve, naughty dog, epic, frostbite and ubisoft I really should believe they were compenent. Instead I have to see stuff that isn't impressive at all and insist because they tell me dozens of times how powerful their tech is that it is good.
Admittedly the PC version looks better. But for a console game this is amazing. The real question will be: did they gimp the gameplay to work on console. I've seen enough Crysis videos to question how well this will work. My 360 cries trying to play games that look a lot worse.
lol I love dual analog ;). Seriously though, the nighttime video (didn't watch it all) is hard to judge graphics on. Looks better in some ways, given that its a new engine with more features, but overall not as good, since PC obviously will have better AA, resolution, and framerate.
lol I love dual analog ;). Seriously though, the nighttime video (didn't watch it all) is hard to judge graphics on. Looks better in some ways, given that its a new engine with more features, but overall not as good, since PC obviously will have better AA, resolution, and framerate.
NaveedLife
Skip ahead to about halfway through the video, the sun rises. I did notice some texture pop-in when the guy zoomed his rifle.
Looks really nice, did see a lot of pop in, especially from the distance and would be interesting to see what the water and under the water looks like,the ray beams of sun that you see under the water, I'm interested to see if all this has been kept in. Plus if trees break off depending on were you shoot them etc, all these little touches, leaves moving when you run through thim etc.
Any1 else noticed the trees have no physx? Anyway for consoles it looks great. For PC it looks medicore at best when you get some mods running.
EZs
Of course they don't have any PhysX, the CryEngine 3 uses Havok.
So it will run best on AMD cards?
People seem to get confused between physx and physics. Physx is a physics engine that allows nvidia cards to do fancy effects. Crysis didn't use physx, neither did Crysis 2.
maybe its just me but I didnt get anything out of that video... considering the quality of it. I cant tell if its the game looking bad or the quality of the video it self.
It looks pretty great, normally I wouldn't buy a game twice for another system, but $20 and some gameplay and lighting changes? I'm interested in that.
Log in to comment