Crysis 2 exclusive gameplay fotage from GTTV!!!!

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

It looks on the same level as battlefield bad company 2, call of duty modern warfare 2, killzone 2, hose games. Are you saying this looks significantly superior in any way? I am just bewildered.

Ondoval

Sorry, I played the BC 2 PS3 Beta and the game, as MW2, looks very bad (bland) in console. At least BC 2 has the excuse of the interaction -amd MW2 maybe the 60 fps) but both are weak compared against Killzone 2. Crysis 2 in 360 will trample BC 2 and any COD in terms of visuals.

[QUOTE="gamewhat"]

How can any one say this game looks great? I have seen those kind of graphics on PS3 exclusives (where the cut scenes look as good as the game) on several exclusives in matter of fact. Sorry but those graphics look average. This will not be a graphics king by any means, sorry hardcore lems. Game does look fun though. I will be renting it unless the multi player is popular.

lawlessx

:lol: :|

sounds more like damage control than anything else

How can any one say this game looks great? I have seen those kind of graphics on PS3 exclusives (where the cut scenes look as good as the game) on several exclusives in matter of fact. Sorry but those graphics look average. This will not be a graphics king by any means, sorry hardcore lems. Game does look fun though. I will be renting it unless the multi player is popular.

gamewhat

It will be the graphics king because there is a PC version.

[QUOTE="gamewhat"]

How can any one say this game looks great? I have seen those kind of graphics on PS3 exclusives (where the cut scenes look as good as the game) on several exclusives in matter of fact. Sorry but those graphics look average. This will not be a graphics king by any means, sorry hardcore lems. Game does look fun though. I will be renting it unless the multi player is popular.

Snagal123

It will be the graphics king because there is a PC version.

Possible contender for Graphics King, some parts screamed phenomenal to me and others were meh. So we'll see, the game still has ways to go. Expecting it to be a universal graphics king while the PC obviously is at the top :). Also cannot wait for the PC footage :(killa4lyfe

[QUOTE="killa4lyfe"]Possible contender for Graphics King, some parts screamed phenomenal to me and others were meh. So we'll see, the game still has ways to go. Expecting it to be a universal graphics king while the PC obviously is at the top :). Also cannot wait for the PC footage :(Ninja-Hippo

Possible contender for Graphics King, some parts screamed phenomenal to me and others were meh. So we'll see, the game still has ways to go. Expecting it to be a universal graphics king while the PC obviously is at the top :). Also cannot wait for the PC footage :(killa4lyfe

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"]Haha, I missed this earlier...but I was wondering why everyone all of a sudden dislikes Crysis. Then I watched that gameplay. Cows = Feel threatened that their 'superior' console could get proven equal with a multiplat. Hermits = Still bitter that Crytek are now console developers. Seriously, it looks GREAT for a console game, there is a lot of tech at work there and all of these 'average' posts are hilarious.TintedEyes

Yeah right. If they lean to one side strongly enough to be called a cow, they have an agenda.

^I mean, why does it just happen to to be predominately cows that thinks it looks average? That's not a coincidence.

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

It looks on the same level as battlefield bad company 2, call of duty modern warfare 2, killzone 2, hose games. Are you saying this looks significantly superior in any way? I am just bewildered.

nhh18

Sorry, I played the BC 2 PS3 Beta and the game, as MW2, looks very bad (bland) in console. At least BC 2 has the excuse of the interaction -amd MW2 maybe the 60 fps) but both are weak compared against Killzone 2. Crysis 2 in 360 will trample BC 2 and any COD in terms of visuals.

Yes, as BC 2, when runs in the appropriate platform. I mean, not at sub 720p...

^I mean, why does it just happen to be all the cows that thinks it looks average? That's not a coincidence.

GreySeal9

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

The damage control from cows is hilarious, the game looks better than UC2 by a mile. I bet they will ignore the post above about screen tearing as well.

Espada12

Judging from the video, it barely looks better than Halo Reach.

and reach looks better than UC2!!!

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) Joking aside. I didn't find Crysis 2 graphics to be anything special, same boring gray textures everywhere. Rage looks much better with its diverse range of colors and textures, miles ahead of this and even UC2 IMO.

^I mean, why does it just happen to to be predominately cows that thinks it looks average? That's not a coincidence.

GreySeal9

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

Judging from the video, it barely looks better than Halo Reach.

fun-da-mental

and reach looks better than UC2!!!

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) What a shame

You wish man, I'm shocked crytek could get an a fairly open world game looking better than the so called console graphics king on consoles! Not only does this game stomp UC2 in gameplay (Crysis one already proved that) it's going to stomp it in visuals!!

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

^I mean, why does it just happen to to be predominately cows that thinks it looks average? That's not a coincidence.

Teufelhuhn

OK. I'll shut up now. I just think people should stop pretending that this sort of threada forum called System Wars is not full of agendas.

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

and reach looks better than UC2!!!

Espada12

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) What a shame

You wish man, I'm shocked crytek could get an a fairly open world game looking better than the so called console graphics king on consoles! Not only does this game stomp UC2 in gameplay (Crysis one already proved that) it's going to stomp it in visuals!!

It was joke. Again,I didn't find Crysis 2 graphics to be anything special, same gray textures everywhere, where is the variety?. Rage looks much better with its diverse range of colors and textures, miles ahead of this and even UC2 IMO. Crysis was great on 2% high end PCs. Ever wonder why it sold so poorly?. Anyone can create a best looking game that requires super computer to play. The real achievement is to game devs who manged to make great looking games like Rage running on variety of systems.

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

and reach looks better than UC2!!!

Espada12

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) What a shame

You wish man, I'm shocked crytek could get an a fairly open world game looking better than the so called console graphics king on consoles! Not only does this game stomp UC2 in gameplay (Crysis one already proved that) it's going to stomp it in visuals!!

Why does it stomp UC2 in gameplay? I mean,it's not like the two games have the same sort of mechanics. UC2 does the whole high octane cinematic Gears/Prince of Persia thing very well and Crysis does the sanbox FPS thing very well.

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) What a shame

fun-da-mental

You wish man, I'm shocked crytek could get an a fairly open world game looking better than the so called console graphics king on consoles! Not only does this game stomp UC2 in gameplay (Crysis one already proved that) it's going to stomp it in visuals!!

It was joke. Again,I didn't find Crysis 2 graphics to be anything special, same gray textures everywhere, where is the variety?. Rage looks much better with its diverse range of colors and textures, miles ahead of this and even UC2 IMO. Crysis was great on 2% high end PCs. Ever wonder why it sold so poorly?. Anyone can create a best looking game that requires super computer to play. The real achievement is to game devs who manged to make great looking games like Rage running on variety of systems.

Crysis sold over 1 million in 3 months... the poor sales were all in NA.... I can only imagine what the sales figures have been since hitting steam (where it stayed a top seller for quite some time)

Why does it stomp UC2 in gameplay? I mean,it's not like the two games have the same sort of mechanics. UC2 does the whole high octane cinematic Gears/Prince of Persia thing very well and Crysis does the sanbox FPS thing very well.

GreySeal9

Because UC2 has a barebones TPS gameplay with tacked on stealth/melee elements.. the melee being the worst part.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Why does it stomp UC2 in gameplay? I mean,it's not like the two games have the same sort of mechanics. UC2 does the whole high octane cinematic Gears/Prince of Persia thing very well and Crysis does the sanbox FPS thing very well.

Espada12

Because UC2 has a barebones TPS gameplay with tacked on stealth/melee elements.. the melee being the worst part.

I think the stealth is the only bad part (the melee is servicable IMO), but I'd say that UC2 is a "sum of its parts" game. The parts look fairly typical and not all that impressive on their own (except for the gunplay which I felt was top-tier as far as TPS go), but when combined with the amazing set-pieces and level design, the elements produce agameplay package that really shines IMO.

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Why does it stomp UC2 in gameplay? I mean,it's not like the two games have the same sort of mechanics. UC2 does the whole high octane cinematic Gears/Prince of Persia thing very well and Crysis does the sanbox FPS thing very well.

GreySeal9

Because UC2 has a barebones TPS gameplay with tacked on stealth/melee elements.. the melee being the worst part.

I think the stealth is the only bad part (the melee is servicable IMO), but I'd say that UC2 is a "sum of its parts" game. The parts look fairly typical and not all that impressive on their own (except for the gunplay which I felt was top-tier as far as TPS go), but when combined with the amazing set-pieces and level design, the elements produce agameplay package that really shines IMO.

I wont hate on the set pieces and level design those were really well done, but the melee imo was worse than the stealth, at least you get instant kills with that and don't alert others.. with the melee however.. people are killing you while you are punching away at that one guy.. kinda sucks... this isn't a super hero game, so you can't stand up there fighting and taking bullets. Oh speaking of that.. the bosses are horrible as well...

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Why does it stomp UC2 in gameplay? I mean,it's not like the two games have the same sort of mechanics. UC2 does the whole high octane cinematic Gears/Prince of Persia thing very well and Crysis does the sanbox FPS thing very well.

Espada12

Because UC2 has a barebones TPS gameplay with tacked on stealth/melee elements.. the melee being the worst part.

On the contrary UC2 actually has TPS gameplay to rival that of the best of them (I really can't think of any other game out there that does), and tacked on stealth/melee elements? You can finish entire set pieces with stealth. Pretty sure that's a testament to how awesome stealth was implemented in the game.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

Because UC2 has a barebones TPS gameplay with tacked on stealth/melee elements.. the melee being the worst part.

Espada12

I think the stealth is the only bad part (the melee is servicable IMO), but I'd say that UC2 is a "sum of its parts" game. The parts look fairly typical and not all that impressive on their own (except for the gunplay which I felt was top-tier as far as TPS go), but when combined with the amazing set-pieces and level design, the elements produce agameplay package that really shines IMO.

I wont hate on the set pieces and level design those were really well done, but the melee imo was worse than the stealth, at least you get instant kills with that and don't alert others.. with the melee however.. people are killing you while you are punching away at that one guy.. kinda sucks... this isn't a super hero game, so you can't stand up there fighting and taking bullets. Oh speaking of that.. the bosses are horrible as well...

IDK, I found the melee elements to work pretty well and provide a viable alternativewhen my guns were out of ammo. So we'll just agree to disagree.

I sort of agree about the bosses though. The last one was underwhelming in the extreme, especially considering how insanely awesome some of the setpiece moments were. It felt lazy, as if they ran out of ideas.

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) What a shame

fun-da-mental

You wish man, I'm shocked crytek could get an a fairly open world game looking better than the so called console graphics king on consoles! Not only does this game stomp UC2 in gameplay (Crysis one already proved that) it's going to stomp it in visuals!!

It was joke. Again,I didn't find Crysis 2 graphics to be anything special, same gray textures everywhere, where is the variety?. Rage looks much better with its diverse range of colors and textures, miles ahead of this and even UC2 IMO. Crysis was great on 2% high end PCs. Ever wonder why it sold so poorly?. Anyone can create a best looking game that requires super computer to play. The real achievement is to game devs who manged to make great looking games like Rage running on variety of systems.

Actually Crysis looks great on lots of Computers. I played it when it first came out and it could run on max settings on 1440x900 (no AA or AF of course).

Then when the mods came out it made the game look better and added things like AA without a big hit in performance.

My video card was an 8800gt and was not a high end one yet it could run it at max.

Ignorant people have no idea that Crysis is actually well optimized.

On the contrary UC2 actually has TPS gameplay to rival that of the best of them (I really can't think of any other game out there that does), and tacked on stealth/melee elements? You can finish entire set pieces with stealth. Pretty sure that's a testament to how awesome stealth was implemented in the game.

FrozenLiquid

While the combat of UC2 was indeed very well executed the stealth is not nearly as well done; it is no wonder why there is not nearly as much focus on it, despite the terrible forced trial and error stealth sequence at the start.

Be it not having any actual indicators of how hidden you are, rather line of sight, but any visual cues assisting that are absent... then a complete lack of an alert system to compensate for failure or evasion.... and A.i. that that is so much more geared towards combat.

Sure you can try sneak (I did for many parts, more often than not ending up in combat),but it is so trial and error I cannot see how it is awesome; If the combat combined with the platforming wasn't so strong in overshadowing it (as well as the setpieces complimenting them), things could have been very different.

Honestly though, the forced stealth section was so abysmal I am surprised it is ignored, one of the worst ways to follow up the great opening sequence.

/rant.

Oh yeah Crysis 2, well who knows how its gameplay will be. At least the first actually had proper stealth mechanics implemented, then taking a side saddle, who knows about the second.

edit*

Oh I also thought the melee was great.

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]

On the contrary UC2 actually has TPS gameplay to rival that of the best of them (I really can't think of any other game out there that does), and tacked on stealth/melee elements? You can finish entire set pieces with stealth. Pretty sure that's a testament to how awesome stealth was implemented in the game.

skrat_01

While the combat of UC2 was indeed very well executed the stealth is not nearly as well done; it is no wonder why there is not nearly as much focus on it, despite the terrible forced trial and error stealth sequence at the start.

Be it not having any actual indicators of how hidden you are, rather line of sight, but any visual cues assisting that are absent... then a complete lack of an alert system to compensate for failure or evasion.... and A.i. that that is so much more geared towards combat.

Sure you can try sneak (I did for many parts, more often than not ending up in combat),but it is so trial and error I cannot see how it is awesome; If the combat combined with the platforming wasn't so strong in overshadowing it (as well as the setpieces complimenting them), things could have been very different.

Honestly though, the forced stealth section was so abysmal I am surprised it is ignored, one of the worst ways to follow up the great opening sequence.

/rant.

Oh yeah Crysis 2, well who knows how its gameplay will be. At least the first actually had proper stealth mechanics implemented, then taking a side saddle, who knows about the second.

edit*

Oh I also thought the melee was great.

I totally agree with you on the stealth. That stealth section near the beginning puzzled me. The game should have stuck to what it did amazingly all the way through. The stealth was a bit of unwelcome variety.

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

sayonara89

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

sayonara89

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

FIipMode

MazingerDUDE helped with some Digital Foundry articles, he confirmed FFXIII resolution on 360, Alan Wake resolution and RDR resolution (and other differences) on PS3 :) He is VERY credible.

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

sayonara89

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

FIipMode

Coming from someone once represented compression artifact-covered screen captures as legit screenshots, I'll take this with a grain of salt. But it could be true. Perhaps someone who is relatively neutral and who is knowledgeable about this sort of stuff can shed some light on this for us?

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

sayonara89

MazingerDUDE helped with some Digital Foundry articles, he confirmed FFXIII resolution on 360, Alan Wake resolution and RDR resolution (and other differences) on PS3 :) He is VERY credible.

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

Mestitia

Actually, it would also be ownage against all the cows who claimed that it falls short of UC2 and KZ2 if this turned out to be true.

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] How credible is that though?FIipMode

MazingerDUDE helped with some Digital Foundry articles, he confirmed FFXIII resolution on 360, Alan Wake resolution and RDR resolution (and other differences) on PS3 :) He is VERY credible.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-ninjagaiden2-faceoff-article?page=3

A mighty round of thunderous applause to Digital Foundry contributor MazingerDUDE for his efforts in putting together this mammoth Face-Off. ;)

[QUOTE="Mestitia"][QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Looks great, better than I expected (based on GDC trailer). But I would stop comparing it with other console games if I were you, becouse it's PC version:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=21652437&postcount=820

GreySeal9

Actually, it would also be ownage against all the cows who claimed that it falls short of UC2 and KZ2 if this turned out to be true.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Mestitia"] That would be beyond sad = Would be sexy ownage against all the lemmings though rofl. I doubt it though, let's see how that thread progresses :Psayonara89

Actually, it would also be ownage against all the cows who claimed that it falls short of UC2 and KZ2 if this turned out to be true.

Well, slanted opinions don't matter much to me. but do you seriously think that there will some sort of massive downgrade from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2?

[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Actually, it would also be ownage against all the cows who claimed that it falls short of UC2 and KZ2 if this turned out to be true.

GreySeal9

Well, slanted opinions don't matter much to me. but doyou seriously think that there will some sort of massive downgrade from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2?

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="sayonara89"] U2 definietly looks (much) better, C2 looks on par with K2 to me.sayonara89

Well, slanted opinions don't matter much to me. but doyou seriously think that there will some sort of massive downgrade from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2?

Your last statements say a lot about why you have such a weird vendetta against Crysis 2, so I'm glad you're deciding not to continue on the "Oh, I just hate Crytek PR" facade.

Anyway, let's say it is PC running at lower settings. If you say that UC2 looks better and KZ2 looks on par, what is to stop the console version from looking as good as the PC version of Crysis on this setting (if that is indeed the PC version)?

[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Well, slanted opinions don't matter much to me. but doyou seriously think that there will some sort of massive downgrade from Crysis 1 to Crysis 2?

GreySeal9

Your last statements pretty much speak volumes in regards the true motivation behind your Crysis 2 vendetta, so I'm glad you're not deciding to continue on the "Oh, I just hate Crytek PR" facade.

Yeah, I hate Crytek PR :(

Anyway, let's say it is PC running at lower settings. If you say that UC2 looks better and KZ2 looks on par, what is to stop the console version from looking as good as the PC version of Crysis on this setting (if that is indeed the PC version)?

The reason why this was running on PC and not on consoles - maybe framerate?

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="sayonara89"] C2 looks better than K2 - it's opinion K2 looks better than C2 - it's opinion I never said that's it's running on highest settings ;) Lemmings desperately needs some graphics king, they're hyping almost every new game (exclusive or not, it doesn't matter), that's beyond sad. But Crysis 2 is their biggest chance for that :) sayonara89

Your last statements pretty much speak volumes in regards the true motivation behind your Crysis 2 vendetta, so I'm glad you're not deciding to continue on the "Oh, I just hate Crytek PR" facade.

Yeah, I hate Crytek PR :(

Anyway, let's say it is PC running at lower settings. If you say that UC2 looks better and KZ2 looks on par, what is to stop the console version from looking as good as the PC version of Crysis on this setting (if that is indeed the PC version)?

The reason why this was running on PC and not on consoles - maybe framerate?

Yeah, I'm sure you do hate Crytek PR. I'm just saying that that's not the only reason you have such a strong vendetta against this game.

Anyway, let me put this another way: if you are claiming that this is the PC version and it shouldn't be compared to console games, why do you say that UC2 looks better, thus comparing a console game to this footage?

[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

and reach looks better than UC2!!!

Espada12

Yet UC2 looks 50 times better than Crysis 2:) What a shame

You wish man, I'm shocked crytek could get an a fairly open world game looking better than the so called console graphics king on consoles! Not only does this game stomp UC2 in gameplay (Crysis one already proved that) it's going to stomp it in visuals!!

1. A game in progress stomps a game already came out ? They're different genres; a linear TPS vs an open world FPS. thereforesaying this game is better that game is like saying apples are miles better than oranges. :D

2. Does this look better than UC2 ? We're not sure until we play this game but while those screenshots look great, they dont blow UC2 out of water.