Crysis 2 vs Kilzone 3 (PC vs PS3) Ultimate Graphical Showdown

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for poorfamz
poorfamz

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 poorfamz
Member since 2010 • 303 Posts

OMG, watch the new PC footage of Crysis 2, and then go watch the new PS3 footage of Killzone 3.......Can you believe those graphics are running on a 5 year old hardware? It looks so F'N realistic......and this is online multiplayer, 24 players max, huge maps, 720p on a 5 year old hardware. No sub-HD here

Crysis 2 PC - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1YDkLIGtqU&hd=1

Killzone 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYqyAcYlk8Y&feature=player_embedded#!

Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts
From my understanding all footage of crysis 2 has been at 360 spec.
Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

>PC vs PS3

PS3 has no chance here, move on.

Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

Both games looking impressive8)

Avatar image for Snakemaster9
Snakemaster9

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Snakemaster9
Member since 2010 • 1420 Posts

PC will always have better graphics then consoles, Please, do not try to make a comparison. If you do, compare a PS3 Crysis 2 to a PS3 Killzone 3

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

get some PC footage first. the crysis 2 footage you linked to is obvious console footage/settings or if that is PC then it is a downgrade from the original.

Avatar image for BigBoss154
BigBoss154

2956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BigBoss154
Member since 2009 • 2956 Posts

PC = automatic win.

On consoles though, I think KZ3 will beat it.

Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

The lighting in the killzone 3 video looks phenominal. Both games look awsome.

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

OMG, watch the new PC footage of Crysis 2, and then go watch the new PS3 footage of Killzone 3.......Can you believe those graphics are running on a 5 year old hardware? It looks so F'N realistic......and this is online multiplayer, 24 players max, huge maps, 720p on a 5 year old hardware. No sub-HD here

Crysis 2 PC - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1YDkLIGtqU&hd=1

Killzone 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYqyAcYlk8Y&feature=player_embedded#!

poorfamz

Its not PC.Its console settings rendered with PC(proly to get higher framerate for trailer).I think both look great.I would give KZ3 advantage with AA,textures and sound and Crysis 2 with post processing effects like motion blur and lighting.

Avatar image for Postal_Guy
Postal_Guy

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Postal_Guy
Member since 2006 • 2643 Posts

I love those KZ3 gun sounds. theyre so awesome.

OT: Crysis 2 no contest

Avatar image for Zensword
Zensword

4510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Zensword
Member since 2007 • 4510 Posts

They both look equally amazing IMO.

Avatar image for LordRork
LordRork

2692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#12 LordRork
Member since 2004 • 2692 Posts

OMG, watch the new PC footage of Crysis 2, and then go watch the new PS3 footage of Killzone 3.......Can you believe those graphics are running on a 5 year old hardware? It looks so F'N realistic......and this is online multiplayer, 24 players max, huge maps, 720p on a 5 year old hardware. No sub-HD here

poorfamz

Graphics aren't just about resolution, though. While it's important, it doesn't take into account AA, AF or draw distances.

Killzone 3 does look very good, and is impressive for 5 year old hardware. Console devs have all sorts of "cheats" to ensure that their games look good - limited fields of view (no need for long draw distances), easily repeatable segments of terrain (lowering the memory footprint)...limited numbers of textures, etc etc.

But Crysis 2 on a 1-2 year old PC is going to crush anything the PS3 can do, purely on the basis it has more modern hardware, rendering techniques and drivers.

It's when the PS4 comes along that things get interesting (for a year or two, at any rate).

Avatar image for Drakan11
Drakan11

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Drakan11
Member since 2009 • 763 Posts
What I got out of those two videos is that Killzone 3 looks a lot more fun. I don't really care which game looks better (I am sure Crysis will on PC). They both don't make my eyes bleed.
Avatar image for urbangamez
urbangamez

3511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 urbangamez
Member since 2010 • 3511 Posts

>PC vs PS3

PS3 has no chance here, move on.

Orchid87

Agreed

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#16 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

Oh look, it's this thread again.

Avatar image for jettpack
jettpack

3192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 jettpack
Member since 2009 • 3192 Posts

killzone 2 looks great, but its crysis no contest. i cant wait for a comparison between the single player in both of these games.

Avatar image for VensInferno
VensInferno

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 VensInferno
Member since 2010 • 3395 Posts

PC-Crysis 2 vs PS3 Killzone 3 =PC-Crysis 2

PS3-Crysis 2 vs PS3 Killzone 3=PS3 Killzone 3

Avatar image for poorfamz
poorfamz

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 poorfamz
Member since 2010 • 303 Posts

[QUOTE="Orchid87"]

>PC vs PS3

PS3 has no chance here, move on.

urbangamez

Agreed

Did you read?

5 year old hardware vs 2011 PC specs.....Give KZ3 some props atleast

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

[QUOTE="urbangamez"]

[QUOTE="Orchid87"]

>PC vs PS3

PS3 has no chance here, move on.

poorfamz

Agreed

Did you read?

5 year old hardware vs 2011 PC specs.....Give KZ3 some props atleast

The problem is that trailer is CONSOLE SETTINGS,not PC.PC maxed will blow KZ3 and any other console game into oblivion.Believe it.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#21 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

They both look great! Also that´s not PC footage from Crysis2.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

Let's wait until they're released please? we'll probably get a whole bunch of these threads lol

hmm... Crysis 2 on the PC max settings will probably make killzone 3 look last gen to be honest.

I wonder how well my 5770 will fair against this beast :(

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
lbjkurono23

12544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 lbjkurono23
Member since 2007 • 12544 Posts

Wouldn't it be a better comparison if it was the ps3 version... I mean we already know the pc version will look better than KZ3.

Avatar image for urbangamez
urbangamez

3511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 urbangamez
Member since 2010 • 3511 Posts

Did you read?

5 year old hardware vs 2011 PC specs.....Give KZ3 some props at least

poorfamz

Thats the problem, its been 5 yrs, ok for 4 -12 yr olds, not for teen & mature audiences, move on with latest technology

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

The PS3 is not a super computer. It is a 5 year old computer that was barely good when it launched. All consoles are like that, except the Wii which is a ten year old computer.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

The PS3 is not a super computer. It is a 5 year old computer that was barely good when it launched. All consoles are like that, except the Wii which is a ten year old computer.

Fizzman

two examples of consoles being top of the line or very close to it when launched would be the n64 and the xbox 360.

the Ps3 was pretty good back in 2006, but since the 360 and ps3 are the same pretty much while the ps3 is a whole year older is why it was just pretty good instead of top of the line.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#27 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

The PS3 is not a super computer. It is a 5 year old computer that was barely good when it launched. All consoles are like that, except the Wii which is a ten year old computer.

theuncharted34

two examples of consoles being top of the line or very close to it when launched would be the n64 and the xbox 360.

the Ps3 was pretty good back in 2006, but since the 360 and ps3 are the same pretty much while the ps3 is a whole year older is why it was just pretty good instead of top of the line.

Dont forget Neo Geo and Xbox1.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

The PS3 is not a super computer. It is a 5 year old computer that was barely good when it launched. All consoles are like that, except the Wii which is a ten year old computer.

PAL360

two examples of consoles being top of the line or very close to it when launched would be the n64 and the xbox 360.

the Ps3 was pretty good back in 2006, but since the 360 and ps3 are the same pretty much while the ps3 is a whole year older is why it was just pretty good instead of top of the line.

Dont forget Neo Geo and Xbox1.

I don't know anything about the neo geo :P

but yeah the xbox was pretty beastly for 2001. Gamecube wasn't that far behind either.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

That Killzone 3 video looks pretty meh.

You can tell the consoles are suffering heavily from old hardware especially when you view things like at 1:22 in the video.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#30 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

two examples of consoles being top of the line or very close to it when launched would be the n64 and the xbox 360.

the Ps3 was pretty good back in 2006, but since the 360 and ps3 are the same pretty much while the ps3 is a whole year older is why it was just pretty good instead of top of the line.

theuncharted34

Dont forget Neo Geo and Xbox1.

I don't know anything about the neo geo :P

but yeah the xbox was pretty beastly for 2001. Gamecube wasn't that far behind either.

NeoGeo was the king of sprites and 2d graphics back on 16bit gen. I wish i could have had one but the console and it´s games were incredibly expensive!

Avatar image for poorfamz
poorfamz

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 poorfamz
Member since 2010 • 303 Posts

That Killzone 3 video looks pretty meh.

You can tell the consoles are suffering heavily from old hardware especially when you view things like at 1:22 in the video.

Hakkai007
I bet Crysis 2 wouldn't even come close if ran on a $300 PC
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

NeoGeo was the king of sprites and 2d graphics back on 16bit gen. I wish i could have had one but the console and it´s games were incredibly expensive!

PAL360

You bet it was.....dam expensive.

also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kGJBv6Wr4

Avatar image for sinpkr
sinpkr

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 sinpkr
Member since 2010 • 1255 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Dont forget Neo Geo and Xbox1.

PAL360

I don't know anything about the neo geo :P

but yeah the xbox was pretty beastly for 2001. Gamecube wasn't that far behind either.

NeoGeo was the king of sprites and 2d graphics back on 16bit gen. I wish i could have had one but the console and it´s games were incredibly expensive!

lol i wish i had a neogeo. i gotta say thou it would look really out of place in my house

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

Let's wait until they're released please? we'll probably get a whole bunch of these threads lol

hmm... Crysis 2 on the PC max settings will probably make killzone 3 look last gen to be honest.

I wonder how well my 5770 will fair against this beast :(

theuncharted34

Crytek has said it will run better then the original crysis did and you will be able to run it on higher settings then before. I have a 5770 and i can achive this levels of graphics in crysis so if crysis 2 is better optimised and looks better like crytek calims then it should fair fairly well.

Quad Hd Crysis!

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Given that Crysis 1 pushed modern PC technology, which is considerably more powerful than what is running in 2005 spec consoles. The only reason Crysis 2 would fail to beat a console game; is because of restrictions being placed on it that didn't exist in its predecessor. In this case, cross platform compatibility with consoles.

Given that the point of Cows going after Crysis in the past; was to prove the capabilities of their system could compare with modern PC hardware. Beating a version of Crysis designed to scale with current gen consoles in mind; wouldn't really be a victory in that old campaign. But as people like to remind me, that's history.

In today's comparison, same games with higher numbers, I just don't think this comparison says anything significant about PS3. A console beating a console limited version of Crysis wouldn't really say anything about PS3s capabilities, the PC isn't being fully utilized; like with Crysis 1.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

Let's wait until they're released please? we'll probably get a whole bunch of these threads lol

hmm... Crysis 2 on the PC max settings will probably make killzone 3 look last gen to be honest.

I wonder how well my 5770 will fair against this beast :(

DJ_Headshot

Crytek has said it will run better then the original crysis did and you will be able to run it on higher settings then before. I have a 5770 and i can achive this levels of graphics in crysis so if crysis 2 is better optimised and looks better like crytek calims then it should fair fairly well.

Quad Hd Crysis!

quad HD is 4x 1080p right? isn't that just video mode or something? :P

what settings do you play the game at?

Actually I don't have my rig yet but I'm ordering all the parts february 7 :D

Avatar image for N3xus9
N3xus9

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 N3xus9
Member since 2004 • 566 Posts

Both graphics look great, but from those gameplay videos Crysis 2 looks way more fun with all the different suit modes evolving the way multiplayer combat is played. Looks to be TF2 level of fun.

KZ3 looks like a great multiplayer game, but apart from the graphics there certainly nothing there to distinguish it from every other MP shooter before it. However I will wait for the official release, as there may be some hitherto unknown features added. This point in time though MP on C2 looks like the winner for me!

Avatar image for poorfamz
poorfamz

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 poorfamz
Member since 2010 • 303 Posts

Both graphics look great, but from those gameplay videos Crysis 2 looks way more fun with all the different suit modes evolving the way multiplayer combat is played. Looks to be TF2 level of fun.

KZ3 looks like a great multiplayer game, but apart from the graphics there certainly nothing there to distinguish it from every other MP shooter before it. However I will wait for the official release, as there may be some hitherto unknown features added. This point in time though MP on C2 looks like the winner for me!

N3xus9

Do you like BFBC2? Then you will love Killzone

And No, it is nothing like COD, it's100X better, i also didn't believe it when i first heard it

Avatar image for N3xus9
N3xus9

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 N3xus9
Member since 2004 • 566 Posts

[QUOTE="N3xus9"]

Both graphics look great, but from those gameplay videos Crysis 2 looks way more fun with all the different suit modes evolving the way multiplayer combat is played. Looks to be TF2 level of fun.

KZ3 looks like a great multiplayer game, but apart from the graphics there certainly nothing there to distinguish it from every other MP shooter before it. However I will wait for the official release, as there may be some hitherto unknown features added. This point in time though MP on C2 looks like the winner for me!

poorfamz

Do you like BFBC2? Then you will love Killzone

And No, it is nothing like COD, it's100X better, i also didn't believe it when i first heard it

yep liked BFBC2 but thought the MP in KZ2 was average. So hopefully they have added some new elements in, to beef up the MP component.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
Compared to the PC, Killzone 3 doesn't look that great at all. In fact, it looks like Fallout 3 or New Vegas with graphical mods. Which is decent, but still not very good.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

[QUOTE="N3xus9"]

Both graphics look great, but from those gameplay videos Crysis 2 looks way more fun with all the different suit modes evolving the way multiplayer combat is played. Looks to be TF2 level of fun.

KZ3 looks like a great multiplayer game, but apart from the graphics there certainly nothing there to distinguish it from every other MP shooter before it. However I will wait for the official release, as there may be some hitherto unknown features added. This point in time though MP on C2 looks like the winner for me!

poorfamz

Do you like BFBC2? Then you will love Killzone

And No, it is nothing like COD, it's100X better, i also didn't believe it when i first heard it

Killzone 2 was nothing like BC2, it didn't have vehicles or destructible environments that actually mattered in the gameplay front(I know it had some, but nothing on BC2 level) in the MP from what I remember, where the hell did you come up with that?
Avatar image for flashn00b
flashn00b

3961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 flashn00b
Member since 2006 • 3961 Posts

Though I am convinced that the PS3 is indeed a good system, the huge differences in recommended viewing distance means that developers can get away with crappier textures.

Avatar image for poorfamz
poorfamz

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 poorfamz
Member since 2010 • 303 Posts

[QUOTE="poorfamz"]

[QUOTE="N3xus9"]

Both graphics look great, but from those gameplay videos Crysis 2 looks way more fun with all the different suit modes evolving the way multiplayer combat is played. Looks to be TF2 level of fun.

KZ3 looks like a great multiplayer game, but apart from the graphics there certainly nothing there to distinguish it from every other MP shooter before it. However I will wait for the official release, as there may be some hitherto unknown features added. This point in time though MP on C2 looks like the winner for me!

DragonfireXZ95

Do you like BFBC2? Then you will love Killzone

And No, it is nothing like COD, it's100X better, i also didn't believe it when i first heard it

Killzone 2 was nothing like BC2, it didn't have vehicles or destructible environments that actually mattered in the gameplay front(I know it had some, but nothing on BC2 level) in the MP from what I remember, where the hell did you come up with that?

they have similar class sytems, medic, sniper, etc. Revive system, destructible env, vehicles

But Haters gonna Hate

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="poorfamz"]

Do you like BFBC2? Then you will love Killzone

And No, it is nothing like COD, it's100X better, i also didn't believe it when i first heard it

poorfamz

Killzone 2 was nothing like BC2, it didn't have vehicles or destructible environments that actually mattered in the gameplay front(I know it had some, but nothing on BC2 level) in the MP from what I remember, where the hell did you come up with that?

they have similar class sytems, medic, sniper, etc. Revive system, destructible env, vehicles

But Haters gonna Hate

KZ2 didn't have a single vehicle in the multiplayer and it's maps aren't as big and wide open, and the destructible environments weren't close to BC2, in BC2 you can destroy buildings and make holes on the ground that impacted the gameplay, barely anything blows it in KZ2, but I give you classes. And OT: Crysis 2 on PC maxed out.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
PC vs PS3? PC will win every time.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#46 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

Crysis 2 PC hasn´t been shown yet,and when they do it´s going to be superior in every way to KZ2,unless they´ve downgraded the PC version because of multiplatform development,wich wouldn´t surprise me at all.

In fact,I´m pretty much expecting that to be the case.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

That C2 trailer was in-freakin-credible! I almost bit a hole through my lip :shock:

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
PS3 gamer wins. But in all seriousness KZ3 will beat out Crysis 2 on consoles and looses to PC crysis.
Avatar image for klusps
klusps

10386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#49 klusps
Member since 2005 • 10386 Posts

Killzone 3 and Crysis 2 on console could be debatable but compared to the PC version of Crysis 2, no chance.