![](http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/6302/8490778441c131e8e186o.jpg)
![](http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/2008/8491872392b333fc99bfo.jpg)
![](http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/3642/8491874632af6534ae6co.jpg)
![](http://www.abload.de/img/1lhsnr.jpg)
![](http://www.abload.de/img/2ass6l.jpg)
![](http://www.abload.de/img/3tfscm.jpg)
![](http://www.abload.de/img/4rysei.jpg)
![](http://www.abload.de/img/13ms54.jpg)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I say we wait until Crysis 3 releases for PS4. KZ4 and Crysis 3 differ drastically in art style and visuals.
Also maxing Crysis 3 took 8GB RAM, KZ4 uses 4GB GDDR5.
Your obvious post is obvious but I give credit where credit is due. Killzone 4 looked pretty great.
Eh I don't know. Crysis doesn't have that massive environment feel KZ trailer had. It may be pre rendered baloney but KZ looked better to me. I am also sure KZ will look better than it does now, it is probably still in early beta stages. Crysis 1 with mods is still best imo.Â
making out crysis3 takes both ddr3 and gddr5....I say we wait until Crysis 3 releases for PS4. KZ4 and Crysis 3 differ drastically in art style and visuals.
Also maxing Crysis 3 took 8GB DDR3, KZ4 uses 4GB GDDR5.
Your obvious post is obvious but I give credit where credit is due. Killzone 4 looked pretty great.
Blazerdt47
killzone... known for its massive environments... :PEh I don't know. Crysis doesn't have that massive environment feel KZ trailer had. It may be pre rendered baloney but KZ looked better to me. I am also sure KZ will look better than it does now, it is probably still in early beta stages. Crysis 1 with mods is still best imo.Â
Human-after-all
They both look like sex. I don't know how you could possibly unbiasedly judge which looks better without taking a f*cking microscope to them.
[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]making out crysis3 takes both ddr3 and gddr5....I say we wait until Crysis 3 releases for PS4. KZ4 and Crysis 3 differ drastically in art style and visuals.
Also maxing Crysis 3 took 8GB DDR3, KZ4 uses 4GB GDDR5.
Your obvious post is obvious but I give credit where credit is due. Killzone 4 looked pretty great.
Silenthps
My mistake, I keep typing DDR3/GDDR5 in various threads about Durango and PS4. Thanks for correcting me. :P
Those look great, too bad Crysis sucks. Such a waste...Ghost120xYeah, I wish they or someone else could use that great engine on other games.
I agree. But, assuming the KZ4 alpha is accurate, it'd be up there too although not quite as lofty as Crysis 3 (at least not until I see more of KZ4). The two would be in the same bracket.
obviously, Â but you will never convince anyone.
go up to a dude with an ugly girlfriend and ask how he can stand it and the answer will be she is pretty.
why? Â because love affects your vision.
and when you're the butthole of the gaming community.It's easy to deny it when you've been waiting for years for the new consoles. :'(
-Unreal-
Not sure if srs.[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="super600"]
Not close. Character models look less detail and the particle effects are the most impressive part of K:SF.
super600
The character models are not great looking.
What the hell?What? Most character models in that Killzone video couldn't even stand up to Crysis 3 models, only the solider you played as and the Helghast did, but the random NPCs, not really.ÂNot close. Character models look less detail and the particle effects are the most impressive part of K:SF.
super600
Not sure if srs.[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="super600"]
Not close. Character models look less detail and the particle effects are the most impressive part of K:SF.
super600
The character models are not great looking.
Okay you should clarify. You're saying the Crysis 3 character models are less detailed than the Killzone ones. Right?[QUOTE="super600"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"] Not sure if srs.-Unreal-
The character models are not great looking.
Okay you should clarify. You're saying the Crysis 3 character models are less detailed than the Killzone ones. Right?I'm saying that the crysis 3 ones are more detailed than the killzone sf ones.
Okay you should clarify. You're saying the Crysis 3 character models are less detailed than the Killzone ones. Right?[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="super600"]
The character models are not great looking.
super600
I'm saying that the crysis 3 ones are more detailed than the killzone sf ones.
Oh, so that's what you meant.What? Most character models in that Killzone video couldn't even stand up to Crysis 3 models, only the solider you played as and the Helghast did, but the random NPCs, not really.[QUOTE="super600"]
Not close. Character models look less detail and the particle effects are the most impressive part of K:SF.
mitu123
Â
Read my most recent post.
keep feeding that Napoleon complex hermits.
osirisx3
That doesn't apply at all.
Hermits aren't the short kid on the playground who has to puff himself up to seem important, they're already the varsity quarterback with all the women and athletic superiority over their peers, they just can't stop shoving that into everyone else's faces.
Killzone shadow fall is the best looking game I have seen to date The crazy scale, the number of high poly characters on screen at once, the big environments, and all of it being rendered at the extreme high fidelity of graphics its at, its a no contest, shadow fall is truly next generation Crysis 3 on pc looks stunning, but it cant compare to Killzone shadow fall Funny how Cryteck said PS4 games would not look much better then crysis 3! Yeah, what a fail that was lol. Killzone looked a generation ahead of Crysis 3 and the crysis 3 engine ect Cryteck was just trying to damage control while touting their own horn! Cryteck is a joke. Bunch of bold faces liars trying to hype their game and engine. Forget about cryteck! Guerilla games makes better looking, better playing, and just better games periodhardmicro
:lol::lol:
Okay you should clarify. You're saying the Crysis 3 character models are less detailed than the Killzone ones. Right?[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="super600"]
The character models are not great looking.
super600
I'm saying that the crysis 3 ones are more detailed than the killzone sf ones.
Okay. Because the topic title is "Crysis 3 looks better than killzone" and you started by saying "Not close. Character models look less detail.."particle effects that have been done already? you call that impressive? this is impressive and was done in 2007Not close. Character models look less detail and the particle effects are the most impressive part of K:SF.
super600
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLwh9S0jtak
Okay you should clarify. You're saying the Crysis 3 character models are less detailed than the Killzone ones. Right?[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="super600"]
The character models are not great looking.
super600
I'm saying that the crysis 3 ones are more detailed than the killzone sf ones.
Oh.[QUOTE="osirisx3"]
keep feeding that Napoleon complex hermits.
The_Game21x
That doesn't apply at all.
Hermits aren't the short kid on the playground who has to puff himself up to seem important, they're already the varsity quarterback with all the women and athletic superiority over their peers, they just can't stop shoving that into everyone else's faces.
:lol: keep telling your self that so you can sleep at night.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment