Crysis 3 PC obviously looks better then the new Killzone.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="osirisx3"]

keep feeding that Napoleon complex hermits.

osirisx3

That doesn't apply at all.

Hermits aren't the short kid on the playground who has to puff himself up to seem important, they're already the varsity quarterback with all the women and athletic superiority over their peers, they just can't stop shoving that into everyone else's faces.

:lol: keep telling your self that so you can sleep at night.

I don't need to. I'm one of the few PC gamers who doesn't need to justify his gaming habits. The games do that for me. :cool:

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

:lol: Are hermits defending themselves? How cute

 

Sorry, KZ4 does look better

super600

Do you still believe crysis 3 has been topped by killzone.

Hermits, let go of Crysis 3. I'm sure another graphics king on PC will come along

I think we should wait till we see the new Killzone before we jump to any conclusions.That demo was an early build,game is not out till the end of the year.

A game running on a rig that's likely double the cost of the PS4 (if rumours are true) looks better than a alpha or whatever stage PS4 game? Imagine that...

Eh I don't know. Crysis doesn't have that massive environment feel KZ trailer had. It may be pre rendered baloney but KZ looked better to me. I am also sure KZ will look better than it does now, it is probably still in early beta stages. Crysis 1 with mods is still best imo. 

Human-after-all

Crysis 3 has some pretty massive areas later in the game that can actually be accessed and played in.

[QUOTE="Human-after-all"]

Eh I don't know. Crysis doesn't have that massive environment feel KZ trailer had. It may be pre rendered baloney but KZ looked better to me. I am also sure KZ will look better than it does now, it is probably still in early beta stages. Crysis 1 with mods is still best imo. 

Ben-Buja

Crysis 3 has some pretty massive areas later in the game that can actually be accessed and played in.

Yep, someone on the GAf posted this

Cows spent the last 8 years claiming they had a graphics king

It really sucks, but I think they'll also spend the next 8 years claiming they have a graphics king :(

Cows spent the last 8 years claiming they had a graphics king

It really sucks, but I think they'll also spend the next 8 years claiming they have a graphics king :(

Ly_the_Fairy

Herms gonna Herm

NineTailedGoku

can we get some gameplay pics?Nengo_Flow

can we get some gameplay pics?Nengo_Flow

There ya go buddy :)

Man I want this game so bad!

Maybe in pics, KZ looked way better in running footage, the amount of shlt on screen was insane. GG is amazing when it comes to having tons of shlt happening on screen with sick graphics. 

Knowing Sony first party devs I'm going to assume some things are scripted or pre baked

Knowing Sony first party devs I'm going to assume some things are scripted or pre baked

NoodleFighter

i will be able to play both on PS4, can your uber upgraded gaming rig do that? 

There ya go buddy :)

seanmcloughlin

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

 

There ya go buddy :)

faizan_faizan

Gun models are some of the best I've seen. they're even better looking than BF3s. But BF3 has more of them. 

Also that's probably the worst screen out of all the ones posted :P The textures on the left are a bit bleh

i will be able to play both on PS4, can your uber upgraded gaming rig do that? 

OldSnakePS3

Considering that to make it look like that you need hardware that is even more powerful than the unreleased consoles I wouldn't be surprised. At least that's what I expected from launch titles. There will be time later to see what software actually made for a certain hardware can provide.

[QUOTE="OldSnakePS3"]

i will be able to play both on PS4, can your uber upgraded gaming rig do that? 

Jebus213

LOL console fanboys.. They just dont get it 

First they say you need 2000 dollars to max crysis 3, which infact you  need about $800 , as long as you got a quad core cpu and a gtx 670  or 7970 or higher you will be maxing this game at 1080p with at minimum 30 frames per second.     If you lower the resolution just a tiny bit, you can play on very high graphic settings with lesser gpu's.    This is to play the game at 1080p.

Did you guys know that ps4 is is not actually playing at 1080 p? take a look at this article.http://www.tomshardware.com/news/playstation-4-ps4-amd-apu-hardware,21191.html  . Playstation 4 is playing its games at 1280x800 MAX, Not 1080 p.     Goes to show playstation made this sacrifice to push more graphic quality in an attempt to compare to pc graphics, however if pc users lower the rez to that size as well, they will be more than destroying crysis 3.

Its like maxing out everything completely at 480p and then coming here and telling us , ps4 has better graphics . HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH nice joke. Any medicore gpu playing at that lower rez ps4 is playing at can expect to see very high graphical settings on crysis 3.

Now the hermits what to say, killzone has better graphics. NICEEEEEE JOKE.   If you think killzone has better graphics its actually down to preference of ART style.    Crysis 3 and KillZone have different ART styles. If you think killzone looks better than crysis 3, it really means you like the art style better. Not that it actually is pushing more Graphics than crysis 3.

The killzone graphics looked good, i give you that, but to say its better than crysis 3? you gotta be dreaming son. Play this at  1080p on youtube .     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHwbeZEOZVc&list=FLGqf82gZWsoJ_jHAggd1jPw&index=2   Killzone my assssssssssss

And Crysis 3 is still a more generic game than the new Killzone which willl offer a better single player campaign than Crysis 3 as usual.

[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="OldSnakePS3"]

i will be able to play both on PS4, can your uber upgraded gaming rig do that? 

lunar1122

LOL console fanboys.. They just dont get it 

First they say you need 2000 dollars to max crysis 3, which infact you  need about $800 , as long as you got a quad core cpu and a gtx 670  or 7970 or higher you will be maxing this game at 1080p with at minimum 30 frames per second.     If you lower the resolution just a tiny bit, you can play on very high graphic settings with lesser gpu's.    This is to play the game at 1080p.

Did you guys know that ps4 is is not actually playing at 1080 p? take a look at this article.http://www.tomshardware.com/news/playstation-4-ps4-amd-apu-hardware,21191.html  . Playstation 4 is playing its games at 1280x800 MAX, Not 1080 p.     Goes to show playstation made this sacrifice to push more graphic quality in an attempt to compare to pc graphics, however if pc users lower the rez to that size as well, they will be more than destroying crysis 3.

Its like maxing out everything completely at 480p and then coming here and telling us , ps4 has better graphics . HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH nice joke. Any medicore gpu playing at that lower rez ps4 is playing at can expect to see very high graphical settings on crysis 3.

Now the hermits what to say, killzone has better graphics. NICEEEEEE JOKE.   If you think killzone has better graphics its actually down to preference of ART style.    Crysis 3 and KillZone have different ART styles. If you think killzone looks better than crysis 3, it really means you like the art style better. Not that it actually is pushing more Graphics than crysis 3.

The killzone graphics looked good, i give you that, but to say its better than crysis 3? you gotta be dreaming son. Play this at  1080p on youtube .     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHwbeZEOZVc&list=FLGqf82gZWsoJ_jHAggd1jPw&index=2   Killzone my assssssssssss

That 1280x800 resolution was for the Playstation Eye not the PS4.

I actually think crysis 3 doesn't look better, I think it looks different for sure with a much sharper image.

the killzone footage wow's me just a bit more. I can't wait to see what guerilla's finished product looks like.

Hopefully it plays well too.

I actually think crysis 3 doesn't look better, I think it looks different for sure with a much sharper image.

the killzone footage wow's me just a bit more. I can't wait to see what guerilla's finished product looks like.

Hopefully it plays well too.

ReadingRainbow4

Killzone has a better presentation (at least in the trailer), everything comes together nicely. It's when you stop and look around that crysis 3 obviously looks better. Part of that could be that the game was built around 4 gigs of memory though.

[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]

I actually think crysis 3 doesn't look better, I think it looks different for sure with a much sharper image.

the killzone footage wow's me just a bit more. I can't wait to see what guerilla's finished product looks like.

Hopefully it plays well too.

topgunmv

Killzone has a better presentation (at least in the trailer), everything comes together nicely. It's when you stop and look around that crysis 3 obviously looks better. Part of that could be that the game was built around 4 gigs of memory though.

meh, I think I'm just all crysis'd out.

the presentation for killzone just looked stunning, It's really hard for us to judge texture quality and whatnot because we don't have it infront of us.

I think crysis 3 is deffinitely not without fault tho, some of those textures are ugly. It's got some impressive bits but the way some of the people on this site are lauding it is a bit laughable.

I actually think crysis 3 doesn't look better, I think it looks different for sure with a much sharper image.

the killzone footage wow's me just a bit more. I can't wait to see what guerilla's finished product looks like.

Hopefully it plays well too.

ReadingRainbow4

[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]

I actually think crysis 3 doesn't look better, I think it looks different for sure with a much sharper image.

the killzone footage wow's me just a bit more. I can't wait to see what guerilla's finished product looks like.

Hopefully it plays well too.

faizan_faizan

that city scape was breathtaking, I've never seen anything in a game come close to that.

and I've played every major pc release on the best possible settings. The detail on those buildings is pretty damn sweet.

especially when he get's on the helicopter and goes through them, some complex geometry is at work there.

There ya go buddy :)seanmcloughlin

Nope

shots are never a good tool for comparison. Killzone looked more impressive. deal with it

.

SAGE_OF_FIRE

I noticed this too... I was wondering why they didn't show the whole demo. You can forget Samaritan graphics too.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]

I actually think crysis 3 doesn't look better, I think it looks different for sure with a much sharper image.

the killzone footage wow's me just a bit more. I can't wait to see what guerilla's finished product looks like.

Hopefully it plays well too.

ReadingRainbow4

that city scape was breathtaking, I've never seen anything in a game come close to that.

and I've played every major pc release on the best possible settings. The detail on those buildings is pretty damn sweet.

especially when he get's on the helicopter and goes through them, some complex geometry is at work there.

This is way more visually breathtaking for me, REAL SIMULATED GRASS that isnt 2d sprites or preplaced grass textures.    This grass moves while you walk threw it and blows with the wind in unison instead of repeating  the same grass animation over and over that all games do.  If you fly a helicopter over this grass, It reactsssss. If you explode  a grenade in the grass it reacts. 

[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] KZ didn't even look next gen to me.lunar1122

that city scape was breathtaking, I've never seen anything in a game come close to that.

and I've played every major pc release on the best possible settings. The detail on those buildings is pretty damn sweet.

especially when he get's on the helicopter and goes through them, some complex geometry is at work there.

This is way more visually breathtaking for me, REAL SIMULATED GRASS that isnt 2d sprites or preplaced **** textures. This grass moves while you walk threw it and blows with the wind in unison instead of repeating a the same grass animation over and over.

I actually think they go overboard with the grass, lol.

Nope

shots are never a good tool for comparison. Killzone looked more impressive. deal with it

Vatusus

Translation:

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

.

SAGE_OF_FIRE

can someone post high res screenshots of the last 2 levels, i just admire the overcast blueish look

Crysis 3 actually looks really good. I wasn't going to buy after it got 7.5ed but I'm a sucker for space levels :)

[QUOTE="strangeisland"]

can someone post high res screenshots of the last 2 levels, i just admire the overcast blueish look

ferret-gamer

I stopped these from loading.

If these are spoiler shots then put them in a spoiler tag.

yes thankyou:D that unerground level looked especially phenomenal

ferret-gamer

No doubt Crysis 3 has great graphics but I played it a little and I hated it.

All i see of crysis is a guy walking around a field and a close up of a guys face.

Killzone obviously has alot more going on the screen at once with graphics to match.

No contest.

All i see of crysis is a guy walking around a field and a close up of a guys face.

Killzone obviously has alot more going on the screen at once with graphics to match.

 

No contest.

Evo_nine

There's just as much going on in the later levels of Crysis 3, not to mention that the playable area is much bigger as the ones we've seen in KZ:SF. How can anyone be impressed by "the scale" of things going on in the Killzone trailer? The playable area was tiny and the rest on rails, as for the explosions and crap, even the Call of Duty campaign has similar many things going on at once. It takes way more than that to impress me.

Look at Arma 3 for some truly impressive scale.

Eh I don't know. Crysis doesn't have that massive environment feel KZ trailer had. It may be pre rendered baloney but KZ looked better to me. I am also sure KZ will look better than it does now, it is probably still in early beta stages. Crysis 1 with mods is still best imo. 

Human-after-all

Graphics isnt a matter of opinion.. its all mathematics and mathematically there's dozens of pc games out now that smear the  floor with anything that will ever hit next gen consoles.

[QUOTE="Evo_nine"]

All i see of crysis is a guy walking around a field and a close up of a guys face.

Killzone obviously has alot more going on the screen at once with graphics to match.

No contest.

Ben-Buja

There's just as much going on in the later levels of Crysis 3, not to mention that the playable area is much bigger as the ones we've seen in KZ:SF. How can anyone be impressed by "the scale" of things going on in the Killzone trailer? The playable area was tiny and the rest on rails, as for the explosions and crap, even the Call of Duty campaign has similar many things going on at once. It takes way more than that to impress me.

Look at Arma 3 for some truly impressive scale.

show me a screenshot of a zoomed up soldier in the backgound. If it looks as good as the other pics i will admit it.