BF5 looks much much better. You can take some good looking pics from Crysis 3, but in general, the game is nothing impressive anymore.
Crysis 3 easily. It's also technically superior to many current gen games.
Too Bad its complete crap and by far worst and most forgettable game in series that made Crysis 2 feel like Crysis 1.
CryEngine is hard to beat when utilized fully, but at the same time Battlefield 5 looks pretty damn amazing, especially in motion with explosions and action and all kinds of stuff going on.
But yeah, Crysis 3 has aged wonderfully, still looks amazing.
Crysis 3 easily. It's also technically superior to many current gen games.
Too Bad its complete crap and by far worst and most forgettable game in series that made Crysis 2 feel like Crysis 1.
Crysis 3 is better than Crysis 2 in every way imaginable.
Crysis 3 easily. It's also technically superior to many current gen games.
Too Bad its complete crap and by far worst and most forgettable game in series that made Crysis 2 feel like Crysis 1.
Crysis 3 is better than Crysis 2 in every way imaginable.
Not in any way or form.
I had some fun with Crysis 2 but 3? its one of the most boring, bland shooter i have played plus it was short like 5 hours and even that i couldnot even complete it because it was so boring, and cloaking there is also too overpowered.
Crysis 3 was complete and pure trash.
The only good thing about 2/3 was the improved alien enemies, and I guess a bow, if that's your fetish.
BF V easily.
It's just a shame they decided to go with a WW2 shooter, than halfway thought: "Nah, screw this" and they went with a Fortnite style for their uniforms.
I'd rather have had a more authentic style with the locations and uniforms. The pacific comes close though.
not much of a graphics comparison is it really. same spec machine? resolution? settings? framerate? or just a handful of random images copied from google
One of the worst graphics comparisons I've ever seen, actually. Regular SW stuff.
Judging from experience instead of 6 random screenshots from a random user, BFV looks better overall. I'd say they're pretty similar though. BFV looks more real. Crysis 3 has too much "pretty effects" making it look more like a dream or something rather than reality.
@Macutchi: I'm sorry. It's my first thread here, so I forgot to mention. Both games are running at 1080P, Ultra. Although I got a terrible F.P.S. on my rig, I managed to get some good shots.
However, the 2nd B.F. 5 shot is official from Origin store.
@Macutchi: I'm sorry. It's my first thread here, so I forgot to mention. Both games are running at 1080P, Ultra. Although I got a terrible F.P.S. on my rig, I managed to get some good shots.
However, the 2nd B.F. 5 shot is official from Origin store.
i feel bad now. don't mind me pal, at least you're contributing
@Macutchi: No need to feel bad :-). I thank you for letting me know what I need to do every time I post a graphics-related thread with screenshots taken from my P.C.
@mrbojangles25:
"CryEngine is hard to beat when utilized fully,"
- The CryEngine looks great from a picture standpoint but not so much in motion.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment