Crysis has been dethroned

Hail to the king baby

Come on now, really?

For the love of god please stop

by a CGI cinematic? shadow_hosi

The TC's is wrong, but also, you are wrong. That isn't CGI, that's the games engine, but on replay modes it looks better.

TC, Crysis won't be dethroned by current gen consoles, so just give it up...I notice TC that you have 42 posts, are you serious about your threads?

Think about it, PC's are upgradable every year, Consoles are stuck in the past with 2005-2006 chipsets. It's not going to happen.

I would take a real life ferarri over crysis but probably not that.

[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]by a CGI cinematic? SolidTy

The TC's is wrong, but also, you are wrong. That isn't CGI, that's the games engine, but on replay modes it looks better.

TC, Crysis won't be dethroned ever, so just give it up...I notice TC that you have 42 posts, are you serious about your threads?

And the circle completes, when they are done trying to one up the graphics they go after the game play instead.

Crysis reviews praised the game play in the game, which is much more dynamic and creative compared to the majority of scripted experiences out there. In order to criticise Crysis's game play you have to ignore all reviews and what it does in comparison to other FPS.

Honestly console users obsession with Crysis in SW is becoming tiring, they dedicate so much time and effort into attacking a 2007 game; then complain about hearing about it so much.

AnnoyedDragon

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]by a CGI cinematic? shadow_hosi

he TC's is wrong, but also, you are wrong. That isn't CGI, that's the games engine, but on replay modes it looks better.

TC, Crysis won't be dethroned by current gen consoles, so just give it up...I notice TC that you have 42 posts, are you serious about your threads?

Think about it, PC's are upgradable every year, Consoles are stuck in the past with 2005-2006 chipsets. It's not going to happen.

The game doesn't have to use any resources for gameplay on replay modes (same for Forza), so we get prettier looking replays.

[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

he TC's is wrong, but also, you are wrong. That isn't CGI, that's the games engine, but on replay modes it looks better.

TC, Crysis won't be dethroned by current gen consoles, so just give it up...I notice TC that you have 42 posts, are you serious about your threads?

Think about it, PC's are upgradable every year, Consoles are stuck in the past with 2005-2006 chipsets. It's not going to happen.

SolidTy

The game doesn't have to use any resources for gameplay on replay modes (same for Forza), so we get prettier looking replays.

uh, no

really? that looks more like a cgi, but it could be a replay as wellshadow_hosi

No,and nice try TC but next time use real gameplay screenshots,we all know how GT5 looks Pre-rendered screenshots are the representation of what the IN GAME engine can do,you can argue all you want ''using game assets'' but is still pre rendered and actual game doesn't look like that.Tessellation

Like they would waste HD video on the disk lol... Its not CGI guys

Car graphics? Seriously? Thats hardly anything to brag about.

Almost all the resources go physics, AI and deformation. Heck, the actual textures and metal surfaces on the exterior consume less processing power than the interiors.

Call me when a racing game looks this good while still having to process firefights, explosions and massive interactive environments.

As I said some days ago, reach photorealism in games with not organic objects are much easier than with organic ones. But Crysis still tramples in both fields:

And the circle completes, when they are done trying to one up the graphics they go after the game play instead.

Crysis reviews praised the game play in the game, which is much more dynamic and creative compared to the majority of scripted experiences out there. In order to criticise Crysis's game play you have to ignore all reviews and what it does in comparison to other FPS.

Honestly console users obsession with Crysis in SW is becoming tiring, they dedicate so much time and effort into attacking a 2007 game; then complain about hearing about it so much.

AnnoyedDragon

As I said some days ago, reach photorealism in games with not organic objects are much easier than with organic ones. But Crysis still tramples in both fields:

Ondoval

Why theres allways a thread about a PS3 exclusive (every single one) looking better than Crysis?????? this is so ridiculous its not even funny :?

Car graphics? Seriously? Thats hardly anything to brag about.

Almost all the resources go physics, AI and deformation. Heck, the actual textures and metal surfaces on the exterior consume less processing power than the interiors.

Call me when a racing game looks this good while still having to process firefights, explosions and massive interactive environments.

Blue-Sky

Damn!!!

That game looks to have some pretty HEAVY textures, and with a lot of things going on.

My PC is powerful but then I'm not so confident if it can run that at it's highest specs.

Why theres allways a thread about a PS3 exclusive (every single one) looking better than Crysis?????? this is so ridiculous its not even funny :?

PAL360

Because there are a lot of Cows that are disillusional and completely ignorant, they harp on about how powerful the PS3 yet completely discount how powerful a PC is a machine that is required to make those very same games and don't think that today's graphics cards are more powerful then the ones put in the PS3.

I wouldn't be surprised when the new Icore processors come out that they can mimmick "The Cell" and it's "Graphics" kings GPU.

It helps to have a bit more knowledge before "Crowning" a console to be graphics king over what PCs are capable of.

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]Heh, I remember AnnoyedDragon say this a few days ago: [QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

And the circle completes, when they are done trying to one up the graphics they go after the game play instead.

Crysis reviews praised the game play in the game, which is much more dynamic and creative compared to the majority of scripted experiences out there. In order to criticise Crysis's game play you have to ignore all reviews and what it does in comparison to other FPS.

Honestly console users obsession with Crysis in SW is becoming tiring, they dedicate so much time and effort into attacking a 2007 game; then complain about hearing about it so much.

DragonfireXZ95

It's actually mostly Cows that do this harping on about Graphics king.

KZ2 vs Crisys,

Heavy Rain vs Crysis

The next thing you know- Dare I say

"PS3 vs PC, PS3 is more powerful: Proof PS3 so powerful it can launch Titan missiles to the moon!!!"

Power of "Teh Cell"

It's all marketing hype just like "The Emotion" engine.

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]

As I said some days ago, reach photorealism in games with not organic objects are much easier than with organic ones. But Crysis still tramples in both fields:

killab2oo5

Crysis Urban Havok Demo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhJjEoGaprU&feature=channel_page

Search also for the KZ2 trailer reconstruction under the CryEngiene 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBFFXcNYAFU

What is it with you cows trying to dethrone Crysis?
I cannot be done with consoles of this gen.

Crysis Urban Havok Demo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhJjEoGaprU&feature=channel_page

Search also for the KZ2 trailer reconstruction under the CryEngiene 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBFFXcNYAFU

Ondoval

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]

As I said some days ago, reach photorealism in games with not organic objects are much easier than with organic ones. But Crysis still tramples in both fields:

Ondoval

Crysis Urban Havok Demo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhJjEoGaprU&feature=channel_page

Search also for the KZ2 trailer reconstruction under the CryEngiene 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBFFXcNYAFU

wow that KZ2 remake on cryengine 2 totally destroys the original KZ2 LMAO :lol:

Maybe next gen.

Really? When will this stop?:|

Riddle me this, how the hell do you even begin to compare the two? A fantasy sci fi shooter vs. a racing sim?

WHO THE HELL CARES ANYMORE? Cant two ****ing games look good? STOP.

Why theres allways a thread about a PS3 exclusive (every single one) looking better than Crysis?????? this is so ridiculous its not even funny :?

PAL360

Why are people still posting in these? The TC has made like 4 threads with the same bloddy picture of the past few days with another annoyingfanboy title each time. Wait.... WHY AM I POSTING!

Racing sims are boring anyway.

Racing sims are boring anyway.

dommeus

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] Can you guess where in this cycle we are now?AdmiralBison

It's actually mostly Cows that do this harping on about Graphics king.

KZ2 vs Crisys,

Heavy Rain vs Crysis

The next thing you know- Dare I say

"PS3 vs PC, PS3 is more powerful: Proof PS3 so powerful it can launch Titan missiles to the moon!!!"

Power of "Teh Cell"

It's all marketing hype just like "The Emotion" engine.

I've seen that before for the xbox 360 lol.

look at dem sexy ps2 textures :P

Oh my.... This got old a LOOONG time ago. Give it up Cows. Crysis still wins.

I've seen a lot of games compared to Crysis but GT5? :roll: