Crysis has been matched if not Surpassed!

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

Nameless-Hero

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

First,

in b4 hermits in denial

Second I have to say they are very close to each other, i cant give a nod to either one till I see it in action.

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

cobrax25

[QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

cobrax25

please elaborate on how this doesn't look close to Crysis?

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

[QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

cobrax25

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

true, it doesn't looks as good as crysis and i really don't think console version will look anything like that

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

FrozenLiquid

[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

Nameless-Hero

please elaborate on how this doesn't look close to Crysis?

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

let me remind you what Crysis looks like in case you have forgotten.

and I have seen nothing to sugest that farcry 2 will be more destructable...or that it will look anything like that on a console.

[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

naval

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

true, it doesn't looks as good as crysis and i really don't think console version will look anything like that

ok so if it doesn't look as good on consoles what about the PC version u cant deny tht it looks good and is an unfinished game, and from what i hear Crysis was not well optimised even top of the line hardware struggles to run it at max settings above 1080

Looks great but I sincerely doubt it will look like that on consoles. If it does then who cares, everyone gets to enjoy it. However, if you're banking on it turning out like that I think maybe you should consider a little more of a reserved opinion when it comes to gaming.

To the guy above me: I'm glad we have your first hand knowledge of Crysis to explain things to us. Don't you get tired of hyping graphics on consoles and then being disappointed. Do yourself a favor, when you see a video of a game don't expect it to look like that, unless it's the actual game someone has purchased.

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"] [QUOTE="cobrax25"]

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

PBSnipes

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"] [QUOTE="cobrax25"]

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

PBSnipes

But effects like weather, wind and wild animals have been done before, and technically not difficult to do by today's standards. Nobody has ever made a forest setting to the level of realism of Crysis, specifically because a very realistic forest will have too high a polygon count for most PCs, and based on the way Crysis performs, it apprently still is.

[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"] [QUOTE="cobrax25"]

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

jhcho2

But effects like weather, wind and wild animals have been done before, and technically not difficult to do by today's standards. Nobody has ever made a forest setting to the level of realism of Crysis, specifically because a very realistic forest will have too high a polygon count for most PCs, and based on the way Crysis performs, it apprently still is.

and I have seen nothing to sugest that farcry 2 will be more destructable...or that it will look anything like that on a console.

cobrax25

[QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

cobrax25

please elaborate on how this doesn't look close to Crysis?

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

let me remind you what Crysis looks like in case you have forgotten.

and I have seen nothing to sugest that farcry 2 will be more destructable...or that it will look anything like that on a console.

easily countered without cherrypicking

last time i checked you couldn't burn the grass in crysis, or shoot off individual leaves and branches of trees.

[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"] [QUOTE="cobrax25"]

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

jhcho2

But effects like weather, wind and wild animals have been done before, and technically not difficult to do by today's standards. Nobody has ever made a forest setting to the level of realism of Crysis, specifically because a very realistic forest will have too high a polygon count for most PCs, and based on the way Crysis performs, it apprently still is.

It doesn't look anywhere near as good as Crysis. Dunia's greatest assets are gameplay-enchancing features, not the graphical quality.

Oh..and if you think console versions will look anywhere near as good as PC version you're in denial.

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

Nameless-Hero

That's running on a PC with 8800's, the console versions are coming at a later date and will NOT look anything like that. From what I've seen, CryEngine 2 is capable of much more, although the shadow and lighting effect look fantastic, it's not Crysis.

The good news is, an 8800GT is less than $250 bucks, and it should easily be able to play this game and every other game out there with ease.

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

Nameless-Hero

Here is goes im going to kill the thread right now. The game was being run on skulltrail. Which is a 8 core board. Nice try though. Better luck next time. I am also tagging this. Good job.

It doesn't look anywhere near as good as Crysis. Dunia's greatest assets are gameplay-enchancing features, not the graphical quality.

Oh..and if you think console versions will look anywhere near as good as PC version you're in denial.

AdrianWerner

no my friend u are the one in denial in thinking this game doesn't look anywhere close to Crysis, maybe im looking at different pics and video than you, or maybe u are on the high horse that is crysis and cant admit this looks just as good, or maybe it;s because its coming to consoles, either way its not even a finished game and already looks this good.

It doesn't look anywhere near as good as Crysis. Dunia's greatest assets are gameplay-enchancing features, not the graphical quality.

Oh..and if you think console versions will look anywhere near as good as PC version you're in denial.

AdrianWerner

I think Crysis looks better, and theres a chance that Far Cry 2 won't look as good as the videos when its is release

Plus Far Cry 2 looks much more empty, but I will keep an open mind about it

I just think its sad that people are trying to pass this off as the 360 version.Killfox

Didn't they also with Project Offset?

[QUOTE="Killfox"]I just think its sad that people are trying to pass this off as the 360 version.Lonelynight

Didn't they also with Project Offset?

Yes. Look how that turned out. INTEL bought the crap out of them and will still probably try and pass it off as the 360 version.

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

It doesn't look anywhere near as good as Crysis. Dunia's greatest assets are gameplay-enchancing features, not the graphical quality.

Oh..and if you think console versions will look anywhere near as good as PC version you're in denial.

FrozenLiquid

Well..Crysis has better textures, models, much better shaders and more densenly filled levels. It makes it look far more realistic, not just because of details themselves, but especialy because of density of objects on levels, coupled with better animation (from what was show so far)

If I had to use the photograph analogy..Crysis is like a photograph of real-place, FC2 is like a cartoon movie, not looking like reality, but unlike Crysis it moves

I have to ask this, how many of you lives or lived in an island in Asia? I lived in one(Penang) which some areas are like the ones in Crysis. And just for fun heres a pic of Crysis

No its defitnaly not as good looking as Crysis.

And no we dont even know what the console version will be like of Far Cry 2.

And no Crysis is not possible on consoles.

Why do I have to repeat myself, directed at the same users again and again and again.

No offence but to everyone who says Far Cry 2 looks anywhere near Crysis is blind or hasnt played Crysis.

The Far Cry 2 player model/gun model alone should tlel you its nowhere near... all you are looking at there is slightly better than average vegetation.

I mean .. my god its nowhere near.

The weather effects are impressive however ... I wish Crysis had done rain, I honestly dont see anything AMAZING about this... the weather, thats about it.

[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

Nameless-Hero

please elaborate on how this doesn't look close to Crysis?

do you actually think the game will look anything like that on a console?

and no....it deffinetly doesnt look as good as crysis.

let me remind you what Crysis looks like in case you have forgotten.

and I have seen nothing to sugest that farcry 2 will be more destructable...or that it will look anything like that on a console.

easily countered without cherrypicking

last time i checked you couldn't burn the grass in crysis, or shoot off individual leaves and branches of trees.

2. Crysis has been released. Far Cry 2 hasent. We dont know how great it REALLY looks until we play it ourselves.

3. We dont even know how it will look or play on consoles - every screen and tech demo has been on PC.

:D

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

Nameless-Hero

Prove them.

You cant?

Surprise surprise.

Crysis possible on consoles - even Crytek disagrees with you.

Prove it.

You cant?

Surprise Surprise.

ITs as if you desperatley want a game that is of Crysis level on consoles, and will scream every second a game seems to come close.

Even convincing yourself the 360 or PS3 can run Crysis is a laughable stance.

Looks amazing.. i dunno if it were on PC/PS3/or 360 but i can imagine it will look great on all three.

However, Far Cry 2 and Crysis are very different.

Crysis is in the jungle and has way MORE vegetation than Farcry 2.. which requires alot of RAM

let me remind you what Crysis looks like in case you have forgotten.

cobrax25

Did we really need reminding?

[QUOTE="Nameless-Hero"]

thats right i said it, Farcry 2 has equeled Crysis graphically if not surpassed it in some areas. it has a better lighting system, better physics engine, its more destructable and its coming to the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3. if this game is not downgraded on consoles will hermits admit that Crysis was possible on consoles all along. thanks to new compression technology they can fit much more vegetation on screen than befor without using much memory, and the 360 and PS3 have more than enough cpu and GPU muscle to handle the engine.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30927.html

skrat_01

Prove them.

You cant?

Surprise surprise.

Crysis possible on consoles - even Crytek disagrees with you.

Prove it.

You cant?

Surprise Surprise.

ITs as if you desperatley want a game that is of Crysis level on consoles, and will scream every second a game seems to come close.

Even convincing yourself the 360 or PS3 can run Crysis is a laughable stance.

typical hermit cant see past his computer moniter, as i have already said the weather system is more advanced, vegetation is burnable moving realistically with the wind, actual tree branches are destructable and almost every leaf, and the lighting effects look better imo no way to really convince you.

surprise surprise what are u 10? lol

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

let me remind you what Crysis looks like in case you have forgotten.

bearbones

Did we really need reminding?

apparently the TC does.

typical hermit cant see past his computer moniter, as i have already said the weather system is more advanced, vegetation is burnable moving realistically with the wind, actual tree branches are destructable and almost every leaf, and the lighting effects look better imo no way to really convince you.

surprise surprise what are u 10? lol

Nameless-Hero

Do you have proof that it will all look like that when it is release?