Crysis vs. Fable 2 graphics....

since according to greg splicer, Fable 2 looks better then Crysis....I just wanted to see what everyone else though.

Fable 2.

Greg splicer isn't what you'd call the main authority here. I think crysis right now just shouldn't be compared, because we already know the outcome. 11Marcel

I know, but hes been arguing it on every single thread here...and seems to think that people actually agree with him. 

Crysis > everything.

How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?Pro_wrestler

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

Crysis > everything.

 

Ultra-Alue

That depends on what your basing the graphics on. ArtStyle-to-ArtSyle I could totally see why someone would pic Fable.

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?cobrax75

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Crysis > everything.

 

Ultra-Alue

This is the most true post I have read all day. On the flipside everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Seriously, whoever votes for Fable 2 is blind.RobbieH1234

I agree. Fable isnt impressive at all compard to crysis. And thats just graphically. Imagine if we take physics, lightings, effects etc... in account.

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?cobrax75

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

To say Crysis looks more realistic is obvious, thats the whole direction of its Graphics when compared to real life. Artisticly then you can very well choose either Fable 2 or Crysis.

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

greg_splicer

then Im glad I choose a pic of Crysis over a year old....

Crysis also has real time shadows....and leaves that actual move when you walk through them....

you know what games had trees that sway in the wind.....BF2....and that was back in 2005. 

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

greg_splicer

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

greg_splicer

If you think Fable 2 is 10% done, then you are delusional. 

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

greg_splicer

Well..it's 360 game, if it's early, then it will only get downraged, not upgraded :) 

[QUOTE="greg_splicer"]

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

Vandalvideo

This is from a 4 month old engine, the Crysis engine was made for years before first pics came out

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?Hir0_N

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

[QUOTE="greg_splicer"]

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

AdrianWerner

Well..it's 360 game, if it's early, then it will only get downraged, not upgraded :) 

Like Gears ? That got 10x upgraded ? I mean from the REAL pics, not the obviously pre-rendered ones shown, those are REAL in game fable 2 pics, and as developers confirmed are NOTHING comparing to the final game, most things are placeholders, just put there for a quick show

I say fable 2...  lol jk.  I do like Fable 2's look though, it has a nice fantasy feel to it that really fits it. 

[QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?Pro_wrestler

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

:|

We are comparing the damn graphics leave the artstyle out of this thread. DiRT technically looks better than SMG and nobody is denying it. I mean you are a lemming why are you bringing artstyle when you know pretty much everything on the 360 looks better than on the Wii. Are you trying to say Fable looks better then crysis? If you do, then I feel really sorry for you.

[QUOTE="greg_splicer"]

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

Vandalvideo

If by better you mean the closet depiction of reality then yes, thats obvious...anything other than that is totally a subjective experience.

[QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?Pro_wrestler

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

Problem is that Mario does not use all graphical tricks that Dirt does, Fable 2 does use light beams, stunning HDR-lighting, fully defined amazing shadows, fully 3D trees that move etc as Crysis does, and are vastly superior due to the amazing art style, for example Crysis may have shadows but are not as amazing as those falling in that house, or the self shadowing on each tree and grass below

keep in mind those pics are from a 10% ready game, full with placeholders, not touched by the art team, as confirmed in Fable 2 forums, AND taken from a compressed video of course

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?greg_splicer

Just graphiclly, nothing else.

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

Problem is that Mario does not use all graphical tricks that Dirt does, Fable 2 does use light beams, stunning HDR-lighting, fully defined amazing shadows, fully 3D trees that move etc as Crysis does, and are vastly superior due to the amazing art style, for example Crysis may have shadows but are not as amazing as those falling in that house, or the self shadowing on each tree and grass below

keep in mind those pics are from a 10% ready game, full with placeholders, not touched by the art team, as confirmed in Fable 2 forums, AND taken from a compressed video of course

OMG...Crysis has light beams.....it has shadows that change dynamicly bassed on the position of the sun.

[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?cobrax75

Just graphiclly, nothing else.

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

Problem is that Mario does not use all graphical tricks that Dirt does, Fable 2 does use light beams, stunning HDR-lighting, fully defined amazing shadows, fully 3D trees that move etc as Crysis does, and are vastly superior due to the amazing art style, for example Crysis may have shadows but are not as amazing as those falling in that house, or the self shadowing on each tree and grass below

keep in mind those pics are from a 10% ready game, full with placeholders, not touched by the art team, as confirmed in Fable 2 forums, AND taken from a compressed video of course

OMG...Crysis has light beams.....it has shadows that change dynamicly bassed on the position of the sun.

Hahaha and Fable 2  has shadows from every trees leaf on the tree bark/groung and the grass below, with full HDR in use, moving with the sun too, AND ALL leaves move in the wind, and shadows with them, see the video, it is unbelievable, so again Crysis is beaten hard

Hey Cobra, didn't realize I'd made the same thread :P My bad.

Hahaha, comparing a game released in a few months, to a game 10% ready or less ?? As developers confirmed, most things you see in that pic are placeholders, like the house, rocks, ground etc

And it already has better shadows and lighting, trees sway in the wind, shadows move real time with them, cast on grass etc, no contest

greg_splicer

WTF? It was YOU that compared them in the first place! I am freaking amazed. There really is no competition around here for FOTY. None at all. 

You say its wrong to compare the games, and in the very next paragraph you compare them. Unbelievable :lol:

Like Gears ? That got 10x upgraded ? I mean from the REAL pics, not the obviously pre-rendered ones shown, those are REAL in game fable 2 pics, and as developers confirmed are NOTHING comparing to the final game, most things are placeholders, just put there for a quick show

greg_splicer

I didn't see any big jump in GeoW, not even 50% jump, let alone 1000% one. It will get downraged, as always with 360 

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?greg_splicer

Just graphiclly, nothing else.

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

Problem is that Mario does not use all graphical tricks that Dirt does, Fable 2 does use light beams, stunning HDR-lighting, fully defined amazing shadows, fully 3D trees that move etc as Crysis does, and are vastly superior due to the amazing art style, for example Crysis may have shadows but are not as amazing as those falling in that house, or the self shadowing on each tree and grass below

keep in mind those pics are from a 10% ready game, full with placeholders, not touched by the art team, as confirmed in Fable 2 forums, AND taken from a compressed video of course

OMG...Crysis has light beams.....it has shadows that change dynamicly bassed on the position of the sun.

Hahaha and Fable 2 has shadows from every trees leaf on the tree bark/groung and the grass below, with full HDR in use, moving with the sun too, AND ALL leaves move in the wind, and shadows with them, see the video, it is unbelievable, so again Crysis is beaten hard

lol your far behind....trees moved in the wind back in BF2...and even before.....

again...in Crysis...every individual leaf casts a shadow, even while being moved or shot at. 

[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?cobrax75

Just graphiclly, nothing else.

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

Problem is that Mario does not use all graphical tricks that Dirt does, Fable 2 does use light beams, stunning HDR-lighting, fully defined amazing shadows, fully 3D trees that move etc as Crysis does, and are vastly superior due to the amazing art style, for example Crysis may have shadows but are not as amazing as those falling in that house, or the self shadowing on each tree and grass below

keep in mind those pics are from a 10% ready game, full with placeholders, not touched by the art team, as confirmed in Fable 2 forums, AND taken from a compressed video of course

OMG...Crysis has light beams.....it has shadows that change dynamicly bassed on the position of the sun.

Dear God...this looks good 3-4 years ahead of Fable2. Well..I guess we shouldn't be surprised, but still... look at those details, those textures..and most of all the incredible density of vegetation, not the outdated barren simplistic Fable2 vegetation. With such screens I'm begginign to think even on medium settings Crysis will look better than F2. Good job Crytek! 

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?AdrianWerner

Just graphiclly, nothing else.

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

Problem is that Mario does not use all graphical tricks that Dirt does, Fable 2 does use light beams, stunning HDR-lighting, fully defined amazing shadows, fully 3D trees that move etc as Crysis does, and are vastly superior due to the amazing art style, for example Crysis may have shadows but are not as amazing as those falling in that house, or the self shadowing on each tree and grass below

keep in mind those pics are from a 10% ready game, full with placeholders, not touched by the art team, as confirmed in Fable 2 forums, AND taken from a compressed video of course

OMG...Crysis has light beams.....it has shadows that change dynamicly bassed on the position of the sun.

Dear God...this looks good 3-4 years ahead of Fable2. Well..I guess we shouldn't be surprised, but still... look at those details, those textures..and most of all the incredible density of vegetation, not the outdated barren simplistic Fable2 vegetation. With such screens I'm begginign to think even on medium settings Crysis will look better than F2. Good job Crytek! 

You have to be kidding, yes textures are a bit better, but trees are nowhere near as detailed as in Fable 2, more yes, more detailed no

Here are some more pics

what? those purple mono-colered trees are supposed to look impressive?

they look like rocks. 

Wow Greg. That second set of pics you put up is hilarious.

I'm 100% convinced you're a fakeboy now, there's no way anyone can argue that these games are comparable. Art styles shart schtyles, there is no comparison to be made here.  

You have to be kidding, yes textures are a bit better, but trees are nowhere near as detailed as in Fable 2, more yes, more detailed no

 

greg_splicer

Nope...F2 trees look like crap compared to Crysis ones. Crysis trees look like real deal, Fable2 ones are cartooney to hide the low detail level they have. And textures aren't a "bit better" in crysis, they're leagues ahead of Fable2 ones, F2 textures have typycal PC medium settings look. Oh..and look at the crappy grass, pathetic draw-distance and barren empty levels. plus vegetation ends 10 meters from the cemera, from there it's just flat texture. those screens look more like Fable than Crysis. 

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]How can you compare a fantasy RPG to a Sci-fi FPS?Hir0_N

Just graphiclly, nothing else. 

Yes. People need to stop this lame "bu bu not same type of games" excuse. It is easy to compare 2 different genre on the technical aspect as well as in which game is the best. I mean everybody can say Halo is better than Big rigs and they are 2 different genres.

Ok then, lets compare Mario Galaxy to DiRT. Its apparent as to which one looks the best of the two if compared to real life, but wtf is the point other than to say "it looks the best compared to real life?" Makes little sense. Someone could very well choose Mario from an artistic standpoint which could make the graphics better to them, its not always about which one is the closest to reality.. Everyone needs to stop acting all brain washed and Sh*t.

:|

We are comparing the damn graphics leave the artstyle out of this thread. DiRT technically looks better than SMG and nobody is denying it. I mean you are a lemming why are you bringing artstyle when you know pretty much everything on the 360 looks better than on the Wii. Are you trying to say Fable looks better then crysis? If you do, then I feel really sorry for you.

 Logic is logic, graphics are'nt just about how real something looks, in that case Crysis takes the cake. My point is, which you clearly did'nt get, is that someone could very well say graphically fable 2 is better.. and he is not comparing the graphics I believe the question was "Which one looks better" and again, someone could say Fable easily... why is that so hard to understand... and don't feel sorry for me, I don't really care for your opinion & probably won't remember you outside this thread.

P.S. Just because I have MC in my Sig does'nt make me a lemming. You must be a cow since you have a PS3 in yours despite you mocking it with the red text...