Crysis who? (graphics related)

  • 165 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#101 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yes, you were. You are obviously lieing. I played Crysis with a mix of high/very high settings, with no AA. My frame rate would vary, and it still looked light years beyond anything a console can produce. Someone who says they can tweak out a computer like you said you did should be able to figure out how to use Prnt Scrn, and post a pic on the internet. RE5 doesn't even look close, no 360 or PS3 game does. Just stop already. mazdero

I played the demo on low settings at 800x600 with about 15 fps and it blew me away, both the visuals and the environment interactions. Tossing a grenade into a shack with the physics turned on made it chug like a train pulling far too many cars but it was still glorious to see it 'splode.

I still can't wait to try out the full game on max settings.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="scogburn"]appartley karisil nothing is going to please u so i will give up i got a lady to tend too so u can jus eat the peanuts out u know watteh_VU
Can somebody translate this?

He said "I can't please you and my mom says I have to go to bed so you can enjoy your dinner which may include nuts". Or something along those lines.

LMAO. Omg, that was an epic translation. That made my day teh_VU. On topic, TC, 2 8800 GT's in SLI is weaker than my GTX 260 and I can't run it at those settings and get a steady framerate. I can barely do 1680 x 1050 with 4x AA. Although, I'm using my own custom autoexec, I might be able to achieve more but I like the look of mine.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

ill be accepting apologies from all u in march when it comes out and u look at ur $1000-$2000 pcs and say maybe i should get an xbox for $200

ohh and too the kid who says i dont know how to tweak my comp sorry buddy i just didnt have time to learn to do all that stuff i was to busy working and being with

my wife to worry about postin my pics on my space...and anytime u wanna learn to take ur comp to the brink (safely) send me a message ill hit u with some

knowledge ....guy who posted vids has the idea watch em

scogburn
This is funny, because I have the RE5 demo on my 360 and it looks like garbage except for the character models, honestly.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts
[QUOTE="scogburn"]

ill be accepting apologies from all u in march when it comes out and u look at ur $1000-$2000 pcs and say maybe i should get an xbox for $200

ohh and too the kid who says i dont know how to tweak my comp sorry buddy i just didnt have time to learn to do all that stuff i was to busy working and being with

my wife to worry about postin my pics on my space...and anytime u wanna learn to take ur comp to the brink (safely) send me a message ill hit u with some

knowledge ....guy who posted vids has the idea watch em

DragonfireXZ95

This is funny, because I have the RE5 demo on my 360 and it looks like garbage except for the character models, honestly.

my thoughts exactly... well not exactly though i agree it has great character models but the environments look average/bland and surely RE5 is not visually impressive as many believe (saying RE5 is the new console graphics king) just because an exclusive game out on a specific console is shortly coming out which the media is saying as visually the best thing out on consoles... (if you know what i mean :P)

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#108 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts
[QUOTE="scogburn"][QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

U guys are crazy unless my eyes are bad (which their not) dont get me wrong Crysis looked amazing i didnt think anyhting in the foreseeable future could beat it not even re5.... until i played it last night. My comp isnt garbage either its good enough to play crysis on my 46" aqous at very high 4X ali enabled w/mods its not the comp. Im not some fanboy tryin to get a rise outta u, im jus sayin im a believer Imo Re5>Crysis>warhead>.scogburn

Wait your saying you can play Crysis at 1920x1080 at Very High Settings with 4x Anti-Aliasing Enabled? Yeah, I will believe it when I see it. Anyone who has played Crysis at those settings knows that Resident Evil 5 on a console doesn't even come close to that.

Give me a 3DMark Vantage score (Link to your score) and then, maybe, maybe I will believe you about how well you can play Crysis.

look bro i really dont care if u believe me or not im jus sayin my opinion. im not even sayin re5 is a good game (its actually really clumsy feeling) if i turn on my xbox and switch between the both of them re5 looks better... and ive never ran vantage but in 06 i was just shy of 19k good frames in crysis arnt really that hard people try to turn it in to the holy grail..i did it on parts i bought a year ago(minus the aa maxed) i gave my other card to my brother since then because it want necessary and he is broke

Tell us the specs of your current rig at least?
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#109 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
so what he likes re 5 more.... and there people that dont like crysis graphics... eg mgs4 awards....
Avatar image for shakes_1
shakes_1

238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 shakes_1
Member since 2003 • 238 Posts

My specs are AMD Athlon X2 5600, 4gb of ram, 2 8800 Gt's in sli. I can only run Crysis at 1280x1024 high settings with no aa and actually turn 2 of the settings to medium. I bumped it to very high settings for this screenshot and 4x AA at 1280x1024 res and this is the results.

Avatar image for St_muscat
St_muscat

4315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#111 St_muscat
Member since 2007 • 4315 Posts
Obviously some one hasn't actually played Crysis or Crysis Warhead on medium or higher in real life because looking at screenshots doesn't count TC. But if you said it's the best looking console game then at least me and many other people could agree with you to a certain extent.
Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#112 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts
RE5's beauty only goes skin deep. Yes, it sure does look pretty in screenshots. However, there's very little environmental action at all. I walked up to some linen hanging on a clothesline in one of the areas, and it was as if Chris was pushing against a brick wall :?
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#114 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]Except it's technically inferior to Crysis. So your opinion really means nothing. fluxorator
I'm not disputing your point... But honestly. WHO CARES. No one plays games to marvel at the technical superiority over other games. You play to HAVE FUN. Sure sometimes graphics can make things fun, but drooling over a couple of numbers and figures means sh*t.

Then why aren't you bashing the TC for making a bloody thread about how one good-looking game looks better than another, as well?

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts
[QUOTE="scogburn"]U guys are crazy unless my eyes are bad (which their not) dont get me wrong Crysis looked amazing i didnt think anyhting in the foreseeable future could beat it not even re5.... until i played it last night. My comp isnt garbage either its good enough to play crysis on my 46" aqous at very high 4X ali enabled w/mods its not the comp. Im not some fanboy tryin to get a rise outta u, im jus sayin im a believer Imo Re5>Crysis>warhead>.thepwninator
46"? 4X AA? Very high? Damn, son. What the hell have you got in your rig? Twin GTX 295s?

hes packing something big... NOT, listen up, unless you have a tri sli / quad SLI / Quad crossfire config, you will never do 1920x1080 with 4XAA, so dont even try to contradict that and.. my single quad core / 4850 rig does about 30-40 at 1680x1050 with no AA and its modded, will KILL RE5 in all ways
Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts
uhhh the 360 uses a GPU running on a R600 core (i think). I'm pretty sure its not made by Nvidia either...ahmedkandil
modified R660 core, pretty much an HD 2600 pro by ATI
Avatar image for Angry_PolarBear
Angry_PolarBear

961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 Angry_PolarBear
Member since 2008 • 961 Posts
crysis is not a person it's supposed to be "Crysis what?", but anyway, i disagree with you TC.
Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"]Can anyone confirm that two 8800 GT's in SLI can run Crysis at Very High settings at 1920x1080 at 4xAA at above 30 fps?teh_VU
I have 2 4850's running in crossfire a q9450 @ 3.2gHz and I cannot run that. I get about 30 FPS at 1680x1050 on very high with mods but no AA. I'm pretty sure that the 4850 is a faster card than an 8800 GT.

the 4850 is much faster, almost 30%, id post my own screens, but pphotobucket is too slow so i just cant be bothered to post 30 screens
Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

ill be accepting apologies from all u in march when it comes out and u look at ur $1000-$2000 pcs and say maybe i should get an xbox for $200

ohh and too the kid who says i dont know how to tweak my comp sorry buddy i just didnt have time to learn to do all that stuff i was to busy working and being with

my wife to worry about postin my pics on my space...and anytime u wanna learn to take ur comp to the brink (safely) send me a message ill hit u with some

knowledge ....guy who posted vids has the idea watch em

scogburn
mine was 845$ and will still kick your's a$$ >.>
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]Except it's technically inferior to Crysis. So your opinion really means nothing. fluxorator
I'm not disputing your point... But honestly. WHO CARES. No one plays games to marvel at the technical superiority over other games. You play to HAVE FUN. Sure sometimes graphics can make things fun, but drooling over a couple of numbers and figures means ****.

1) You have to edit your post because you have commited a TOS violation. You need to edit replace all the letters in that banned word with *, just like I did when I edited your post myself above.

2) Have you been on SW lately? There have been DOZENS of "X console game looks better than Crysis." And quite frankly, I am sick ad tired of them. The numbers speak for themselves and anyone who ignores the numbers are trying to convince themselves of something not true.

3) If Crysis character models had more polygons than RE5 models, I am not going to claim they look better. they just don't. The same applies to EVERYTHING about RE5.

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

before getting to crysis, please, RE5, get to dead space wont ya? (1680x1050, ingame AA enabled max settings, but il try to force 4XAA through CCC....)

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts
[QUOTE="shakes_1"]

My specs are AMD Athlon X2 5600, 4gb of ram, 2 8800 Gt's in sli. I can only run Crysis at 1280x1024 high settings with no aa and actually turn 2 of the settings to medium. I bumped it to very high settings for this screenshot and 4x AA at 1280x1024 res and this is the results.

Hellboard

The cake is a lie,, its not as good as the original idea...not that great...

2nd shot isnt a bullshot, because a modded install with higher motion blur/contrast WILL look like that
Avatar image for McJugga
McJugga

9453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 McJugga
Member since 2007 • 9453 Posts
You said you bought your PC last year. Nothing last year could play crysis at 1080P on Very High with 4XAA at 40 FPS. So... You are obviously lying.
Avatar image for 1xcalibur1
1xcalibur1

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 1xcalibur1
Member since 2008 • 442 Posts
Is RE5 even 1080P btw?
Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#126 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="shakes_1"]

My specs are AMD Athlon X2 5600, 4gb of ram, 2 8800 Gt's in sli. I can only run Crysis at 1280x1024 high settings with no aa and actually turn 2 of the settings to medium. I bumped it to very high settings for this screenshot and 4x AA at 1280x1024 res and this is the results.

GTR2addict

The cake is a lie,, its not as good as the original idea...not that great...

2nd shot isnt a bullshot, because a modded install with higher motion blur/contrast WILL look like that

Well, It is a bullshot.

Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#127 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="McJugga"]You said you bought your PC last year. Nothing last year could play crysis at 1080P on Very High with 4XAA at 40 FPS. So... You are obviously lying.

It actually can...
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="McJugga"]You said you bought your PC last year. Nothing last year could play crysis at 1080P on Very High with 4XAA at 40 FPS. So... You are obviously lying.Hellboard
It actually can...

Maybe in Tri-SLI 8800 Ultra!!! Overclocked everything of course!!! With liquid nitrogen!

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
This is getting very repetitive, you're giving console fans a bad name :lol: everyone's laughing at you. We don't even need to defend Crysis, it's obvious which game looks better.
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#130 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="GTR2addict"][QUOTE="Hellboard"]

The cake is a lie,, its not as good as the original idea...not that great...

swazidoughman

2nd shot isnt a BEEP, because a modded install with higher motion blur/contrast WILL look like that

Well, It is a BEEP

Actually.... no it cant i tried.. the second pic was made before the game and it requires a ridiculous high amount of dynamic lighting to look like that.. judging by how much dynamic lighting makes saints row 2 to lag...id say that pcs aint capable of that yet... but dont think consoles do the trick neither assassin creed or gears of war have dynamic lighting....at all :(

Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#131 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts

[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="McJugga"]You said you bought your PC last year. Nothing last year could play crysis at 1080P on Very High with 4XAA at 40 FPS. So... You are obviously lying.organic_machine

It actually can...

Maybe in Tri-SLI 8800 Ultra!!! Overclocked everything of course!!! With liquid nitrogen!

i tested my self a quadcore pc with 8800 gtx on very high.. dont use vista simple... change he high to very high...
Avatar image for Jade_Monkey
Jade_Monkey

4830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#132 Jade_Monkey
Member since 2004 • 4830 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"]

[QUOTE="Hellboard"] It actually can...Hellboard

Maybe in Tri-SLI 8800 Ultra!!! Overclocked everything of course!!! With liquid nitrogen!

i tested my self a quadcore pc with 8800 gtx on very high.. dont use vista simple... change he high to very high...

Very high isn't on XP, so how did you use it ? A hack ?

Avatar image for Jade_Monkey
Jade_Monkey

4830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#134 Jade_Monkey
Member since 2004 • 4830 Posts

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]organic_machine

What was your FPS (min/AVG/Max) ?

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#135 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Thats crazy because Killzone dominates RE5 graphically but still behind Crysis.
Avatar image for Syferonik
Syferonik

3060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Syferonik
Member since 2006 • 3060 Posts
i do like RE5 a lot it kickass and my 09 GOTY for sure but looking better than Crysis on ULTRAHIGH is a big nono cant. And Re5 win in gameplay compared to crysis anyway.
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

Maybe in Tri-SLI 8800 Ultra!!! Overclocked everything of course!!! With liquid nitrogen!

Jade_Monkey

i tested my self a quadcore pc with 8800 gtx on very high.. dont use vista simple... change he high to very high...

Very high isn't on XP, so how did you use it ? A hack ?

Very High IS in XP, Ultra is not.

EDIT: Apparently, I was wrong, I have never played Crysis on XP, but I though XP had VH settings, but I just looked it up and it can only be used in XP with a mod / tweak.

Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#138 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

Maybe in Tri-SLI 8800 Ultra!!! Overclocked everything of course!!! With liquid nitrogen!

Jade_Monkey

i tested my self a quadcore pc with 8800 gtx on very high.. dont use vista simple... change he high to very high...

Very high isn't on XP, so how did you use it ? A hack ?

yeah big diffirence eh??

Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#139 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"][QUOTE="Hellboard"] i tested my self a quadcore pc with 8800 gtx on very high.. dont use vista simple... change he high to very high...Nagidar

Very high isn't on XP, so how did you use it ? A hack ?

Very High IS in XP, Ultra is not.

ultra is in shader model 4 video cards :)

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="Jade_Monkey"]

Very high isn't on XP, so how did you use it ? A hack ?

Hellboard

Very High IS in XP, Ultra is not.

ultra is in shader model 4 video cards :)

Is it? Didn't know that, haven't played Crysis in a loooooong time.

Avatar image for h575309
h575309

8551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141 h575309
Member since 2005 • 8551 Posts
I couldnt care less if it beats crysis in graphics. ive played crysis on good settings it looks great. fantastic even. that doesnt take away the fact that re5's graphics are still great and some of the best. im so sick of everyone comparing games to crysis. more than one game can have nice looking graphics you know.
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#142 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="Nagidar"]

Very High IS in XP, Ultra is not.

Nagidar

ultra is in shader model 4 video cards :)

Is it? Didn't know that, haven't played Crysis in a loooooong time.

yeah 8800 gtx, ultra and the 9 series...

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="Hellboard"]

ultra is in shader model 4 video cards :)

Hellboard

Is it? Didn't know that, haven't played Crysis in a loooooong time.

yeah 8800 gtx, ultra and the 9 series...

I have a 4870, maybe I should re-install Crysis again and check it out, see what the difference is.

Avatar image for Gnr_Helsing
Gnr_Helsing

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Gnr_Helsing
Member since 2004 • 1602 Posts
Crysis graphics is much more detailed than RE5, but I say RE5 is the better game.
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#145 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="Nagidar"]

Is it? Didn't know that, haven't played Crysis in a loooooong time.

Nagidar

yeah 8800 gtx, ultra and the 9 series...

I have a 4870, maybe I should re-install Crysis again and check it out, see what the difference is.

you need to download the ultra map..... ultra was firstly found out when a russian designer was screwing with the command lines on very high that so in what density the effects will be used, and high and very high simply sets some effects from on to off.... But only the 4870 icq has shader model 4 not the simple version...

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"]

One pic that shows it all.

:lol: At first (before I saw the text as I was scrolling down), I assumed the picture was going to be of the guy in the pic doing something pertaining to failure (and with a fitting caption), then I realized it was one of the guys from Crysis.

No way is RE5 even close to crysis on ultra high settings. Sorry, my PC runs crysis on max settings and RE5 is not even close. The trees done have light passthrough, there is no water in RE5, and crysis has amazing water effects, including light rays, and spectrum bending, which gives you the colours of a rainbow in teh reflections on the water. Not to mention the god rays in crysis, that don't exist on RE5. RE5 also has lower resolution textures, just look at a door textre up close. But i still like RE5, just you can't say its better looking than crysis, because its not even close.
Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#147 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

[QUOTE="Hellboard"][QUOTE="McJugga"]

Maybe in Tri-SLI 8800 Ultra!!! Overclocked everything of course!!! With liquid nitrogen!

organic_machine

i tested my self a quadcore pc with 8800 gtx on very high.. dont use vista simple... change he high to very high...

Very high isn't on XP, so how did you use it ? A hack ?

custom very high config, looks and runs better than DX10
Avatar image for eNT1TY
eNT1TY

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 eNT1TY
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
Can anyone confirm that two 8800 GT's in SLI can run Crysis at Very High settings at 1920x1080 at 4xAA at above 30 fps?karasill
I have a very similar set-up to what the TC posted and i run crysis on very high at 1900x1200 minus that AA though at 35 fps so i doubt you can get over 30 with 4xAA (at least certainly not consistently). I'll will mention that i did various tweaks to the .cfg files to achieve my decent frame (much like the TC may have done). When AA is enabled I'm mostly in the teens fps wise and some times single digits though on the right scenes i'll dabble with the 20s (very infrequently and only indoors).
Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts
I'm calling BS on your rig.
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#150 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"]Can anyone confirm that two 8800 GT's in SLI can run Crysis at Very High settings at 1920x1080 at 4xAA at above 30 fps?eNT1TY
I have a very similar set-up to what the TC posted and i run crysis on very high at 1900x1200 minus that AA though at 35 fps so i doubt you can get over 30 with 4xAA (at least certainly not consistently). I'll will mention that i did various tweaks to the .cfg files to achieve my decent frame (much like the TC may have done). When AA is enabled I'm mostly in the teens fps wise and some times single digits though on the right scenes i'll dabble with the 20s (very infrequently and only indoors).

i think they can, after you patch crysis the sli works better, but in vista am not sure you gonna get so high settings, in xp yes, and crysis warhead hell yeah...