Crysis: Worth the Buy?

  • 80 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts

It's better than any console shooter I've ever played :)

anshul89
Resistance: Fall of Man is a better video game than Crysis.
You played it on Easy and you played it like Halo. You had no imagination or impetus to challenge yourself. That game was not meant for you.dgsag
No, the game is, in reality, terrible. And the AI, sound, and polishing in certain sections is unbelievably bad for the reviews and acclaim this game was given. And the multiplayer... kill yourself.
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
[QUOTE="stiggy321"][QUOTE="anshul89"]

It's better than any console shooter I've ever played :)

Resistance: Fall of Man is a better video game than Crysis.
You played it on Easy and you played it like Halo. You had no imagination or impetus to challenge yourself. That game was not meant for you.dgsag
No, the game is, in reality, terrible. And the AI, sound, and polishing in certain sections is unbelievably bad for the reviews and acclaim this game was given. And the multiplayer... kill yourself.

Let me guess. You are A. a fanboy B. have never played the game. And deny it, it's obvious that you're biased. No one would call Crysis "terrible". Not as good as what they expected but nowhere in the same universe as "terrible". The gameplay is unique, the game looks great even on lower settings, I would know since I have a crappy PC.
Avatar image for Heyhuub
Heyhuub

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Heyhuub
Member since 2010 • 317 Posts

I bought it to benchmark my new pc, heard about it being a decent shooter but being more about the graphics.

But when i first played it i absolutely loved it, definetly one of the best shooters of recent times.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="anshul89"]

It's better than any console shooter I've ever played :)

stiggy321
Resistance: Fall of Man is a better video game than Crysis.

No. Progressive unique shooter design. Far greater than a shooter that follows the same predictable design tropes. Isn't a fair comparison, Resistance is terrible compared.
Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Yes. My friend played it on a weak laptop and said it was the best game he ever played. I just hope you can get a steady framerate.XPierreKirbyX
I dont know if I would trust your friends picks for future reference. The game is decent and allows you to play stealthy or run and gun which is nice, but outside of graphics and physics it is just good not great. You can get it very cheap now so if you are interested I would say just get it.
Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

the game is alright. get war head its better . the first one was meh to me. so many bugs

dontshackzmii

The first crysis was better than war head.(better level design much more freedom etc.)

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#58 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

Get the game,it´s one of the best FPS´s ever made.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#59 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

the game is alright. get war head its better . the first one was meh to me. so many bugs

JangoWuzHere

I thought Warhead played more like Bad company 2. Only more buggy and not as fun or unique as the original Crysis

Lolwut.

The only thing the original Crysis had over Warhead was a longer campaign and, of course, being the first game there was no bar to set. Apart from that, Warhead schooled Crysis in pacing, A.I (the aliens are sooo much better in Warhead), set-pieces, presentation, and just general awesomeness. It made the original look like an overly elaborate work-in-progress.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#60 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

the game is alright. get war head its better . the first one was meh to me. so many bugs

MK-Professor

The first crysis was better than war head.(better level design much more freedom etc.)

Man you and JangoWuzHere musn't have played both games through entirely. I mean, the last third of the game botched any chances the original game has over Warhead, especially when Warhead's finale actually left on a good note.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

[QUOTE="dgsag"]Except, running and gunning is next-to-impossible on Delta, the difficulty level that forces players to approach the game differently from a traditional shooter.

jun_aka_pekto

You can run and gun in Delta. I played the demo and the full game. I was well into Recovery before I even knew I was supposed to have a cloak. That's what Happens when I just jump right in without reading instructions. Then after that, I didn't realize I had a combat and sniper scopes until Awakening was almost over....again failure to read adequately the instructions.

Do you have proof that you did this? Because, frankly, I think you're lying. You're saying that you didn't use cloak once all the way through awakening on delta mode? That's bs. If you did use cloak, realize that that's not running and gunning.
Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

the game is alright. get war head its better . the first one was meh to me. so many bugs

FrozenLiquid

The first crysis was better than war head.(better level design much more freedom etc.)

Man you and JangoWuzHere musn't have played both games through entirely. I mean, the last third of the game botched any chances the original game has over Warhead, especially when Warhead's finale actually left on a good note.

Yes Ι have played both games through entirely, the original crysis 7 times and the Warhead 3 times so I know very well which game is better...

Avatar image for IgorAntunov
IgorAntunov

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 IgorAntunov
Member since 2010 • 368 Posts
'Worth the buy'? Are you serious? It's can be found for $10 brand new, and it's better than 90% of games on any platform. It is also still the technical showpiece for new pc hardware.
Avatar image for Esnedon
Esnedon

332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Esnedon
Member since 2009 • 332 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

the game is alright. get war head its better . the first one was meh to me. so many bugs

FrozenLiquid

The first crysis was better than war head.(better level design much more freedom etc.)

Man you and JangoWuzHere musn't have played both games through entirely. I mean, the last third of the game botched any chances the original game has over Warhead, especially when Warhead's finale actually left on a good note.

I agree. The last section of Warhead was really epic. There's aliens everywhere, a huge storm appoaching, Koreans trying to fight and failing... and you just get out your nifty PAX Cannon and blow the crap out of them. Then, of course, this giant walker climbs over the mountain and starts shooting at you. Wasn't really as hard as I thought it would be, though.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="dgsag"]Except, running and gunning is next-to-impossible on Delta, the difficulty level that forces players to approach the game differently from a traditional shooter.

DragonfireXZ95

You can run and gun in Delta. I played the demo and the full game. I was well into Recovery before I even knew I was supposed to have a cloak. That's what Happens when I just jump right in without reading instructions. Then after that, I didn't realize I had a combat and sniper scopes until Awakening was almost over....again failure to read adequately the instructions.

Do you have proof that you did this? Because, frankly, I think you're lying. You're saying that you didn't use cloak once all the way through awakening on delta mode? That's bs. If you did use cloak, realize that that's not running and gunning.

Yea so true. How can u not kno their is cloak when u try the special abilities all of them show up. You can so not run and gun

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

if you like FPS gameplay youll like crysis's gameplay. theres no way you cant. since you choose how to play.

you can hate the story , you can hate the setting, you cant hate the gameplay without hating yourself.

and yes its worth the buy unless you NEED a good story

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="dgsag"]Except, running and gunning is next-to-impossible on Delta, the difficulty level that forces players to approach the game differently from a traditional shooter.

DragonfireXZ95

You can run and gun in Delta. I played the demo and the full game. I was well into Recovery before I even knew I was supposed to have a cloak. That's what Happens when I just jump right in without reading instructions. Then after that, I didn't realize I had a combat and sniper scopes until Awakening was almost over....again failure to read adequately the instructions.

Do you have proof that you did this? Because, frankly, I think you're lying. You're saying that you didn't use cloak once all the way through awakening on delta mode? That's bs. If you did use cloak, realize that that's not running and gunning.

Well, with your reading comprehension, I'm not surprised you think I'm lying. Read again please.

And no. I'm not that good.........yet. But no cloak all the way through at Delta? It might be worth a try.

Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

One of the best shooters out there to play, and as good as the greats; Halo, Half-Life, Team Fortress, etc....

(Although Some would say that it's even better, but that's their opinion, and not mine).....

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

Great game...
Dont listen to the haters, this game is good looking and good playing. The only real grudge i have against it is that you only have US and NK Assault rife, UZI, Pistols, Sniper rifle, Shotgun, Missle Launcher and the 2 alien weapons.

A little gun diversity wouldnt hurt.

And if you bought your computer right now, and its eaven a half decent gaming comp (8800GT, mid range dual core, 2 gigs RAM) it will run great.

Overall its one of the best games out there this gen.

And if possible get the Warhead expansion, it realy improves MP.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b5d7639964d6
deactivated-5b5d7639964d6

8225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-5b5d7639964d6
Member since 2008 • 8225 Posts
Yes, totally. Even if you can only run it in low settings. Don't listen to those idiots that never played it and the bigger idiots that say it sucks and is just pretty graphics.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#71 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
Yes. It's the PC's best FPS this gen, and the gameplay/graphics are fantastic. The free mods make it even more of a blast. Anyone who says otherwise is just your usual PC-hater, or hasn't played the game.
Avatar image for arto1223
arto1223

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 arto1223
Member since 2005 • 4412 Posts

not at all. but if you have a good pc its nice too look at and play around with

lespaul1919

Go back to your consoles.

Yes the game is worth it. While you are at it, pick up Warhead. Read almost any review out there and they will talk about how the gameplay, sound design, physics, level design, and of coarse the graphics are all top notch. The game is one of the best shooters of the past few years and also one of the best PC games. Do not listen to those people that say all the game has is graphics because they have never played it or have way too high of standards. If you need more convincing, just go play the demo.

Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts
[QUOTE="stiggy321"][QUOTE="anshul89"] Resistance: Fall of Man is a better video game than Crysis. [QUOTE="dgsag"] You played it on Easy and you played it like Halo. You had no imagination or impetus to challenge yourself. That game was not meant for you.ocstew
No, the game is, in reality, terrible. And the AI, sound, and polishing in certain sections is unbelievably bad for the reviews and acclaim this game was given. And the multiplayer... kill yourself.

Let me guess. You are A. a fanboy B. have never played the game. And deny it, it's obvious that you're biased. No one would call Crysis "terrible". Not as good as what they expected but nowhere in the same universe as "terrible". The gameplay is unique, the game looks great even on lower settings, I would know since I have a crappy PC.

What would me being a "fanboy" have to do with my dislike for a one game? I've played Crysis plenty, and it is terrible. The game play is not "unique," and even if a video game has "unique gameplay," that does not mean it is a good video game. Lots of games look great this generation... and I'm sorry, on low settings it does not look that "great."
Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts
you dont want to miss on the best fps of this generation do you?
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

What would me being a "fanboy" have to do with my dislike for a one game? I've played Crysis plenty, and it is terrible. The game play is not "unique," and even if a video game has "unique gameplay," that does not mean it is a good video game. Lots of games look great this generation... and I'm sorry, on low settings it does not look that "great."stiggy321

if you did not like the gameplay youre doing it wrong and shouldnt be playing FPS games.

you can dislike the story, the characters, the setting, the graphics, the anything. if you didnt like the gameplay that was because you were doing it wrong or you just dont like FPS.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="stiggy321"] What would me being a "fanboy" have to do with my dislike for a one game? I've played Crysis plenty, and it is terrible. The game play is not "unique," and even if a video game has "unique gameplay," that does not mean it is a good video game. Lots of games look great this generation... and I'm sorry, on low settings it does not look that "great."washd123

if you did not like the gameplay youre doing it wrong and shouldnt be playing FPS games.

you can dislike the story, the characters, the setting, the graphics, the anything. if you didnt like the gameplay that was because you were doing it wrong or you just dont like FPS.

I'll never understand the "you're doing it wrong" argument. It is possible for people's opinions to differ from yours without some sort of failure on their part.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#77 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="stiggy321"] What would me being a "fanboy" have to do with my dislike for a one game? I've played Crysis plenty, and it is terrible. The game play is not "unique," and even if a video game has "unique gameplay," that does not mean it is a good video game. Lots of games look great this generation... and I'm sorry, on low settings it does not look that "great."lowe0

if you did not like the gameplay youre doing it wrong and shouldnt be playing FPS games.

you can dislike the story, the characters, the setting, the graphics, the anything. if you didnt like the gameplay that was because you were doing it wrong or you just dont like FPS.

I'll never understand the "you're doing it wrong" argument. It is possible for people's opinions to differ from yours without some sort of failure on their part.

The problem is that this person is lying about playing the game. All of the reasons he gave for not liking the game were the typical, exaggerated, and untruthful reasons that any fakeboy would give for hating Crysis. The problem is that any person who actually has played Crysis can tell you a different story about the gameplay. It is a fun and polished game that is strategic and challenging. It excels in more than just graphics, much to the disappointment of the consolites.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
its the best sp fps this gen. if you have a gaming computer from 2007 or newer it will run fine on med which still looks great.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
you should also get warhead to go with it as it is the other side of what happening. It beat out cod4 and halo 3 for 2007 soty not because of graphics but because it is a better game.
Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#80 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="stiggy321"] What would me being a "fanboy" have to do with my dislike for a one game? I've played Crysis plenty, and it is terrible. The game play is not "unique," and even if a video game has "unique gameplay," that does not mean it is a good video game. Lots of games look great this generation... and I'm sorry, on low settings it does not look that "great."lowe0

if you did not like the gameplay youre doing it wrong and shouldnt be playing FPS games.

you can dislike the story, the characters, the setting, the graphics, the anything. if you didnt like the gameplay that was because you were doing it wrong or you just dont like FPS.

I'll never understand the "you're doing it wrong" argument. It is possible for people's opinions to differ from yours without some sort of failure on their part.

Just because he didn't like it doesn't meant the game is terrible. I didn't like MGS4, but I won't say "Don't buy this piece of garbage, it sucks ****!" to everyone who never played the game, because it got good reviews and deserves to be called a "good game" even if I didn't like it myself.