So I bought Crysis on PS3 along with 2 year warranty because of the buy 60 dollars worth of stuff and get 10 back next month, huge mistake. The game plays worse than it looks and there is no quicksave, epic fail. Maximum buyers remorse.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
welcome to a watered down portSo I bought Crysis on PS3 along with 2 year warranty because of the buy 60 dollars worth of stuff and get 10 back next month, huge mistake. The game plays worse than it looks and there is no quicksave, epic fail. Maximum buyers remorse.
Grawse
hermits wont let this go they got crysis so what? omg teh game looks better on new hardware. the point is this game runs on consoles when pc gamers said it would never happen.
dontshackzmii
Actually they said that the Crysis we have on PC wouldnt run on consoles and thats been proven with this ultra dumbed down "remake" on a completely new game engine that was stripped down for Crytek games to work on consoles.
What some PC gamers wont let go of is the lies spewed out by some of you console fanboys. We like to set the record straight, lest we listen forever to it skipping and repeating on lies from the console fanboys. How many times have we heard that the console version is superior to the PC version when it clearly is nowhere near, that PC cant use a controller or be plugged into a TV, that the PC has no games or that PC gaming is dying? Consolites just wont let it go. The real question here is, why cant you fanboys just stop lieing?
Ram really hurts the consoles, otherwise I think they would be able to do a very solid part. It looks good all things considering but, you can see they had to tone quite a bit in certain areas.
It's not just RAM but that does play a big part. Consoles also lack good memory bandwidth and BUS width.Ram really hurts the consoles, otherwise I think they would be able to do a very solid part. It looks good all things considering but, you can see they had to tone quite a bit in certain areas.
Innovazero2000
[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"]It's not just RAM but that does play a big part. Consoles also lack good memory bandwidth and BUS width. Which plays a big role in how much you can render at one time and how fast you and generate new items.Ram really hurts the consoles, otherwise I think they would be able to do a very solid part. It looks good all things considering but, you can see they had to tone quite a bit in certain areas.
RyviusARC
How the hell do people get AA on the foilage on Crysis1? I can't get it on my 6950.Fightingfan
Here's a quote from Tweakguides
r_UseEdgeAA [0,1,2] - This setting controls the level of edge blurring applied to reduce the impact of jagged edges in the game, particularly on foliage. A value of 1 applies some mild edge blurring, which can reduce the jaggedness and shimmering of the image, but will reduce FPS slightly; a value of 2 further blurs/thickens jagged edges for another potential drop in FPS. Note this setting will only work if your Shaders Quality setting is on High or above, and can't work in conjunction with normal AA; Edge AA is automatically disabled when regular AA is enabled.
You can see an animated image quality comparison of it by going here, http://www.tweakguides.com/images/Crysis_EdgeAA.gif
So open up the console in game and type in "r_useedgeaa 2" (without quotations) and it should work for you as long as you turned off the Anti-Aliasing from the graphics menu first. As said EdgeAA and normal AA don't work at the same time. You can only have one or the other.
[QUOTE="Lucianu"]
[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]
hermits wont let this go they got crysis so what? omg teh game looks better on new hardware. the point is this game runs on consoles when pc gamers said it would never happen.
dontshackzmii
And it never happened, it is a irrefutable fact that the maxed PC version is impossible to run on the stone age hardware of the consoles. Everybody knows you can port any game to any system with enough draw backs, that is not something to brag about. And the console version looks horrendously bad, but i guess it's better than nothing.
no it does not
You are right, but compared to PC it does.[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]How the hell do people get AA on the foilage on Crysis1? I can't get it on my 6950.Mystic-G
Here's a quote from Tweakguides
r_UseEdgeAA [0,1,2] - This setting controls the level of edge blurring applied to reduce the impact of jagged edges in the game, particularly on foliage. A value of 1 applies some mild edge blurring, which can reduce the jaggedness and shimmering of the image, but will reduce FPS slightly; a value of 2 further blurs/thickens jagged edges for another potential drop in FPS. Note this setting will only work if your Shaders Quality setting is on High or above, and can't work in conjunction with normal AA; Edge AA is automatically disabled when regular AA is enabled.
You can see an animated image quality comparison of it by going here, http://www.tweakguides.com/images/Crysis_EdgeAA.gif
So open up the console in game and type in "r_useedgeaa 2" (without quotations) and it should work for you as long as you turned off the Anti-Aliasing from the graphics menu first. As said EdgeAA and normal AA don't work at the same time. You can only have one or the other.
This thread is a complete waste of time, Honestly who here actually believed that the console version would look better than the pc version. I mean COME ON! the requirements for this game when it came out 4 YEARS AGO was higher than what we have in our consoles and they said back then it wouldnt run on consoles. People believe anything sheesh...
Losingends from his posts.This thread is a complete waste of time, Honestly who here actually believed that the console version would look better than the pc version. I mean COME ON! the requirements for this game when it came out 4 YEARS AGO was higher than what we have in our consoles and they said back then it wouldnt run on consoles. People believe anything sheesh...
gamespot4life
[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]
hermits wont let this go they got crysis so what? omg teh game looks better on new hardware. the point is this game runs on consoles when pc gamers said it would never happen.
pelvist
Actually they said that the Crysis we have on PC wouldnt run on consoles and thats been proven with this ultra dumbed down "remake" on a completely new game engine that was stripped down for Crytek games to work on consoles.
What some PC gamers wont let go of is the lies spewed out by some of you console fanboys. We like to set the record straight, lest we listen forever to it skipping and repeating on lies from the console fanboys. How many times have we heard that the console version is superior to the PC version when it clearly is nowhere near, that PC cant use a controller or be plugged into a TV, that the PC has no games or that PC gaming is dying? Consolites just wont let it go. The real question here is, why cant you fanboys just stop lieing?
Here's the problem with that: if everyone on this forum who either doesn't know what they're talking about or is intentionally lying about it were to disappear, you'd have to argue against people who actually know what they're talking about, and deal with questions that have more than one valid answer. That's not what people seem to want around here.I'm sure these pictures are overrexaggerated but who cares anyway, Crysis isn't very good and is just overrated by the Hermits. Your better off not playing it, sure it has nice graphics but that's it, the AI sucks, the multiplayer is mediocre ect...Just stick with Killzone, Cod, Halo ect... those are all clearly superior, and in Killzones case, looks superior too.
I'm sure these pictures are overrexaggerated but who cares anyway, Crysis isn't very good and is just overrated by the Hermits. Your better off not playing it, sure it has nice graphics but that's it, the AI sucks, the multiplayer is mediocre ect...Just stick with Killzone, Cod, Halo ect... those are all clearly superior, and in Killzones case, looks superior too.
ShadowMoses900
It holds a 91 on Metacritic. "Crysis isn't very good" doesn't really hold up in this instance, especially since you are claiming Hermits are overrating it.
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I'm sure these pictures are overrexaggerated but who cares anyway, Crysis isn't very good and is just overrated by the Hermits. Your better off not playing it, sure it has nice graphics but that's it, the AI sucks, the multiplayer is mediocre ect...Just stick with Killzone, Cod, Halo ect... those are all clearly superior, and in Killzones case, looks superior too.
lundy86_4
It holds a 91 on Metacritic. "Crysis isn't very good" doesn't really hold up in this instance, especially since you are claiming Hermits are overrating it.
Reviews are opinions and mine is the only one that matters to me. Just like yours is the only one that matters to you. It's important to listen to other opinions and respect them, but in the end your own opinion is what matters most. And in mine (and most other people) Crysis is nothing, and if you want to argue metacritic than clearly COD, Killzone (The FPS graphics king btw), and Halo are all higher scoring than Cryisis. Still those are just opinions...
Reviews are opinions and mine is the only one that matters to me. Just like yours is the only one that matters to you. It's important to listen to other opinions and respect them, but in the end your own opinion is what matters most. And in mine (and most other people) Crysis is nothing, and if you want to argue metacritic than clearly COD, Killzone (The FPS graphics king btw), and Halo are all higher scoring than Cryisis. Still those are just opinions...
ShadowMoses900
Reviews aren't entirely opinions. Do you not think that they have review criteria to try and keep at least some consistancy across the board? On top of that, the MC is an average of those reviews, showing consistently high scores.
However, you have essentially declared everyone as overrating a game that you do not particularly like. So, you're claiming your opinion is worth more than everybody elses?
Killzone 2 has the same MC rating, and Killzone 3 has a lower score.
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
Reviews are opinions and mine is the only one that matters to me. Just like yours is the only one that matters to you. It's important to listen to other opinions and respect them, but in the end your own opinion is what matters most. And in mine (and most other people) Crysis is nothing, and if you want to argue metacritic than clearly COD, Killzone (The FPS graphics king btw), and Halo are all higher scoring than Cryisis. Still those are just opinions...
lundy86_4
Reviews aren't entirely opinions. Do you not think that they have review criteria to try and keep at least some consistancy across the board? On top of that, the MC is an average of those reviews, showing consistently high scores.
However, you have essentially declared everyone as overrating a game that you do not particularly like. So, you're claiming your opinion is worth more than everybody elses?
Killzone 2 has the same MC rating, and Killzone 3 has a lower score.
Umm...reviews are an opinion. Sorry you don't think for yourself but they are. Doesn't matter if there is a "criteria" or not it's all just an opinion, that' it. You should only use reviews as a general refrence but not the end all be all. And I didn't say that my opinion was better than others, just that the one that matters most to me is my own, as it should be. I do listen to others but my own is the one that I care most about, sorry if that offendsyou for some reason :?
And Killzone is the better game IMO and alot of other peoples aswell, doesn't make us right mind you, just an opinon.
Of course, why have an open area game where you get to use your own imagination and own playstyle when you can have no option, no imagination needed and your led by the hand through corridors ;) Each to their own I guess, just find it a shame that FPS's have gone this way, when a game in 2007 showed how they should have gone.I'm sure these pictures are overrexaggerated but who cares anyway, Crysis isn't very good and is just overrated by the Hermits. Your better off not playing it, sure it has nice graphics but that's it, the AI sucks, the multiplayer is mediocre ect...Just stick with Killzone, Cod, Halo ect... those are all clearly superior, and in Killzones case, looks superior too.
ShadowMoses900
Umm...reviews are an opinion. Sorry you don't think for yourself but they are. Doesn't matter if there is a "criteria" or not it's all just an opinion, that' it. You should only use reviews as a general refrence but not the end all be all. And I didn't say that my opinion was better than others, just that the one that matters most to me is my own, as it should be. I do listen to others but my own is the one that I care most about, sorry if that offendsyou for some reason :?
And Killzone is the better game IMO and alot of other peoples aswell, doesn't make us right mind you, just an opinon.
ShadowMoses900
I said "aren't entirely". There is a certain amount of objectivity gained from having a general criteria in place. I'm also not saying that reviews are "the end all be all."
I'm not even remotely offended, so no need to apologize.
You do realise you're grabbing really compressed shots right? Way to be misleading.ocstew
Not even compressed shots can hide those seriously bad textures, especially on the Koreans. That's just horrible.
Even if true, the textures are the worst part of these versions. But they have more bloom, so it looks better. Moths to a flame, moths to a flame....[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="ocstew"]You do realise you're grabbing really compressed shots right? Way to be misleading.loco145
Losingends from his posts.[QUOTE="gamespot4life"]
This thread is a complete waste of time, Honestly who here actually believed that the console version would look better than the pc version. I mean COME ON! the requirements for this game when it came out 4 YEARS AGO was higher than what we have in our consoles and they said back then it wouldnt run on consoles. People believe anything sheesh...
mitu123
What does that mean?? Losingends? can someone clear that up for me
Losingends from his posts.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="gamespot4life"]
This thread is a complete waste of time, Honestly who here actually believed that the console version would look better than the pc version. I mean COME ON! the requirements for this game when it came out 4 YEARS AGO was higher than what we have in our consoles and they said back then it wouldnt run on consoles. People believe anything sheesh...
gamespot4life
What does that mean?? Losingends? can someone clear that up for me
That's the guy's name who truly believed that Crysis on 360 would look better than PC. :roll:Even if true, the textures are the worst part of these versions. But they have more bloom, so it looks better.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="ocstew"]You do realise you're grabbing really compressed shots right? Way to be misleading.loco145
Blooming the hell out of the game to hide how it looks doesn't make it better :evil:
I guess if I bought the game on my PS3 then at least I would be able to finish it without the game crashing. It runs smooth as a button until the later levels when it randomly 'stops responding' and I cant continue playing. The same has just happened on Warhead!
Losingends from his posts.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="gamespot4life"]
This thread is a complete waste of time, Honestly who here actually believed that the console version would look better than the pc version. I mean COME ON! the requirements for this game when it came out 4 YEARS AGO was higher than what we have in our consoles and they said back then it wouldnt run on consoles. People believe anything sheesh...
gamespot4life
What does that mean?? Losingends? can someone clear that up for me
Name of a user.I dont think he really believes console version looks better PC. Some hermits say console has better lighting but I like PC lighting .Zensword
It has a more advanced lighting system, since it uses the Crysis 2 one. The problem is that it is hardly used on Crysis because it focused on various light sources and that hardly happens in the jungles of Crysis unlike the city the Crysis 2. The worst part is that most of what it lights doesn't look that good, and in a lot of chances it could be used to show off, the console version has awful draw distance so you will probably just see some bright bloom, kinda mist-fog looking thing on the day and overwhelming darkness that hardly lets you look at stuff in the night. It is a missed opportunity in most cases.
What are the recommended Crysis mods these days?
I currently use CCC because it gives better performance as well as making it look better.
Anyone got some good maps?
What are the recommended Crysis mods these days?
I currently use CCC because it gives better performance as well as making it look better.
Anyone got some good maps?
kraken2109
http://www.overclock.net/pc-games/1014933-guide-crysis-mods-56k-warning.html
There's a good starting list. Also you gotta check out the MechWarrior mod.
Console damage control part 999,999,998. Console gamer: . Crysis 1 on console looks better than Crysis 1 on PC because Crytek CEO said so! . *PC gamer posts pics and video footage detailing that the PC version looks better* Console gamer: Well......the differences are hardly noticeable! *PC gamer posts more vidz and pics showing how large the differences are* Console gamer: You're just an elitist and graphics don't matter! Meanwhile in another argument.... Console gamer #1: Gears of War 3 looks better than that jagfest UC3 Console gamer #2: No UC3 easily looks better than that grey and brown Gear of War 3 gameRyviusARC
That pretty much sums up SW in it's entirety :P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment