Dark souls III pc minimum GTX970 can at least reach 60fps,another port game?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gtx021
gtx021

515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 gtx021
Member since 2013 • 515 Posts

official upgraded PC req.
stated GTX970 for recommendation ..holy siht!another port game? same quality as console but high price hardware ,tiny Frame per second higher than console?

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#2 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

Its 970 recommended, not required.

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

double = tiny, you heard it here folks

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

I'm playing Dark Souls 3 on a GTX 960 system and a GTX 980 Ti system, and it runs pretty well on both. The 960 hangs out between 30 and 60 frames per second with maxed settings at 1920x1080, while the 980 Ti maintains 60 without issue at 2560x1440. Options are fairly limited (see them here), and the frames per second are capped at 60, but otherwise it’s a functional port. Not a PC player’s dream, by any means, but Dark Souls 3 runs and looks better than any other in the series at release.

PCG

So, good port

Avatar image for ten_pints
Ten_Pints

4072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 Ten_Pints
Member since 2014 • 4072 Posts

Double the frame rate requiring double the hardware spec... shocking.

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

60 fps cap... why...

Avatar image for remiks00
remiks00

4249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#7 remiks00
Member since 2006 • 4249 Posts

@mjorh said:

I'm playing Dark Souls 3 on a GTX 960 system and a GTX 980 Ti system, and it runs pretty well on both. The 960 hangs out between 30 and 60 frames per second with maxed settings at 1920x1080, while the 980 Ti maintains 60 without issue at 2560x1440. Options are fairly limited (see them here), and the frames per second are capped at 60, but otherwise it’s a functional port. Not a PC player’s dream, by any means, but Dark Souls 3 runs and looks better than any other in the series at release.

PCG

So, good port

Pretty much. Not sure what the problem is here.

I still have a 770 which seems to be slightly better than a 960, and will have no problems with this game.

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

@dynamitecop said:

60 fps cap... why...

well I doubt From being incompetent with technical things comes as new to people, so it was to be expected as their physics engine is tied to the frame rate

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

@howmakewood said:
@dynamitecop said:

60 fps cap... why...

well I doubt From being incompetent with technical things comes as new to people, so it was to be expected as their physics engine is tied to the frame rate

Well that's unfortunate, I do not understand why some studios still use these archaic rendering methods..

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

@dynamitecop said:
@howmakewood said:
@dynamitecop said:

60 fps cap... why...

well I doubt From being incompetent with technical things comes as new to people, so it was to be expected as their physics engine is tied to the frame rate

Well that's unfortunate, I do not understand why some studios still use these archaic rendering methods..

when you can milk with old stuff why bother doing something better, look battlefield vs cod f.e

Avatar image for thehig1
thehig1

7556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#12 thehig1
Member since 2014 • 7556 Posts

@gtx021: same quality as console ? It's 60fps v sub 30fps on console.

That's a huge difference

Avatar image for remiks00
remiks00

4249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#13 remiks00
Member since 2006 • 4249 Posts

@thehig1: Ikr. It's definitely not the same quality as console.

Avatar image for leandrro
leandrro

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#14 leandrro
Member since 2007 • 1644 Posts

a GTX 970 to run past gen visuals on single player

Avatar image for bigfatmistake
Bigfatmistake

383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Bigfatmistake
Member since 2016 • 383 Posts

@gtx021 said:

tiny Frame per second higher than console?

Are console gamers born with bad eyes or are they just fanboys?

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

I didn't know that a frame per second can be tiny... Consolites inventing new mind-breaking abstract concepts lol

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#17  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@dynamitecop: could be worse. Could be a 30 cap.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@leandrro said:

a GTX 970 to run past gen visuals on single player

What about on your 300$ potato rig?

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

minimum is a 6870 or equivalent, that's a dinosaur mid-range card. Not a 970. What even is this thread?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62044 Posts

60fps on a 970? I'm good with that.

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

And what about the KB/M controls? Does it have decent controls this time?

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#22 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

@zeeshanhaider: why would you ever play Dark Souls with a KBM?

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 silversix_  Online
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@zeeshanhaider said:

And what about the KB/M controls? Does it have decent controls this time?

are you one of those guys who plays fighters with a kb/mouse?

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

@silversix_ said:
@zeeshanhaider said:

And what about the KB/M controls? Does it have decent controls this time?

are you one of those guys who plays fighters with a kb/mouse?

Yup, though I don't play much fighter games.

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

@Blabadon said:

@zeeshanhaider: why would you ever play Dark Souls with a KBM?

Because I can't play 3D games with controllers.

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#26 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

@zeeshanhaider: curious, disability?

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

@Blabadon said:

@zeeshanhaider: curious, disability?

No! I just can't seem to aim and move with the analog sticks and D-PAD in 3D. It's quite a mess. Tried it few time and then give up.

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#28 Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts

Probably fake requirements since previous Soul games also released high requirements but ran at 60fps even on a potato. BTW, what will it take to run the game at 60fps on Consoles? Oh wait.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 silversix_  Online
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

I don't know what to do, order the pc version from Japan and play the f*** out of this game (bored as hell, nothing to play...) or wait almost three weeks for the $30 pricier version that runs at 30fps but has/will have a bigger online community. Why can't i transfer my saves to the ps4 version or this game being crossplatform... Fromsoft whyyyy!?

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#30 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

@zeeshanhaider: what games have you tried this with?

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
zeeshanhaider

5524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By zeeshanhaider
Member since 2004 • 5524 Posts

@Blabadon said:

@zeeshanhaider: what games have you tried this with?

Left4Dead, FIFA and I think it was Gears or Red Dead Redemption.

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#32 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

@zeeshanhaider: gotcha. From what I understand, they refined the KBM controls a bit more but they still tend to be inferior to the controller this game was designed for.

#ConsoleMasterRace

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

ds 1 was horrendeous with kb+m, ds 2 was ok from what I heard, there was some speedrunner who swore by kb+m. I never bothered trying, too used to playing 3rd person action games with controller

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebea105efb64
deactivated-5ebea105efb64

7262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5ebea105efb64
Member since 2013 • 7262 Posts

@silversix_ said:
@zeeshanhaider said:

And what about the KB/M controls? Does it have decent controls this time?

are you one of those guys who plays fighters with a kb/mouse?

I do. Because my arsehole friends always breaking my controllers.

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

@Gamerno6666 said:
@silversix_ said:
@zeeshanhaider said:

And what about the KB/M controls? Does it have decent controls this time?

are you one of those guys who plays fighters with a kb/mouse?

I do. Because my arsehole friends always breaking my controllers.

Next time you break your arsehole freinds with your controllers :P

Avatar image for enzyme36
enzyme36

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By enzyme36
Member since 2007 • 5582 Posts

BB scared the hell out of me ever buying a From Soft game on PS4.... need that SSD load time and plus from all accounts it looks like a decent PC port.

Avatar image for EvanTheGamer
EvanTheGamer

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 EvanTheGamer
Member since 2009 • 1550 Posts

It's always recommended to get the Sony version, this case PS4.

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

@EvanTheGamer said:

It's always recommended to get the Sony version, this case PS4.

can you elaborate

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@EvanTheGamer: Enjoy your low frame rates and choppy gameplay.

Avatar image for EvanTheGamer
EvanTheGamer

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 EvanTheGamer
Member since 2009 • 1550 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@EvanTheGamer: Enjoy your low frame rates and choppy gameplay.

If you've ever played a Souls game, they aren't even choppy on a PS3/PS4.

You get the Sony versions for the best experiences and biggest online communities, that means lots of summons at any level of your soul memory.

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

@EvanTheGamer said:
@Juub1990 said:

@EvanTheGamer: Enjoy your low frame rates and choppy gameplay.

If you've ever played a Souls game, they aren't even choppy on a PS3/PS4.

You get the Sony versions for the best experiences and biggest online communities, that means lots of summons at any level of your soul memory.

I own demon souls +dark souls + bloodborne on sony consoles and none of them are w/o issues

best experience? at 30fps? okay

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62044 Posts
Loading Video...

@EvanTheGamer:

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7840 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:
Loading Video...

@EvanTheGamer:

Avatar image for walloftruth
WallofTruth

3471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#44 WallofTruth
Member since 2013 • 3471 Posts

@EvanTheGamer said:
@Juub1990 said:

@EvanTheGamer: Enjoy your low frame rates and choppy gameplay.

If you've ever played a Souls game, they aren't even choppy on a PS3/PS4.

You get the Sony versions for the best experiences and biggest online communities, that means lots of summons at any level of your soul memory.

But that's totally false. PC has double the framerate, which means it'll be a better experience than the PS4 and X1 version. Then we have to take into account that the whole franchise sold the best on PC. A whooping 40% of sales are from the PC version, the other 60% are from the PS3, 360, PS4 and X1 versions of the franchise.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@EvanTheGamer: http://wccftech.com/dark-souls-series-sold-8-million-copies-40-pc/

Avatar image for EducatingU_PCMR
EducatingU_PCMR

1581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#46 EducatingU_PCMR
Member since 2013 • 1581 Posts

Game looks to run fine, here is a 980 pushing 60fps with only 50% GPU usage.

Loading Video...

There's also benchmarks where 290x = 58fps max settings @ 1440p. Games are not going to run max 60fps on your potato PC, stop crying