Dead Rising 3 is 720p/30fps

that's because lems are an instinct race in year 2013.

OT: New Bosman video is out - www.gametrailers.com/videos/3iw7co/the-final-bosman-the-battle-of-the-bands

"720 is still a pretty big number!"

1080p vs 720p...lol But but Kotaku and superdae have new specs...lol

They should have name it xbox 720p for real...hahaha So many arguments that you pulled in favor of the xbox one and seeing it sink into 720p abyss is epic..lol

well at least the UI is running in 1080P

not even 60fps some of the time?

how disappointing.

Lems would bash PS4 games, but you dont have any...

@silversix_ said:

Now im sure gameplay will be good/decent but graphics... oh my. Absolutely mediocre looking title. You see this kind of fuglyness and ask yourself if this thing was released in 07 or on a brand new next gen system lol but i bet its not about the graphics anymore, lem? Its all about zombies count right? LOL

Nice picture taken off a tv. Everyone who has seen and or played DR3 say the graphics and gameplay are both great.

I fail to see anything even remotely bad based off that comment alone

@multipass35: This game has __________ graphics, don't even try to deny it. May be a fun game but graphics are just shit. Why is this even coming on X1? Decrease zombies about (DR1/DR2 had enough zombies on screen), the rest is pretty much copy/paste from X1 to 360 and you save five hundred US dollars... This is the 720p power at work!

I will hunt down that one person that buys an Xbox One here just to play this game.

@multipass35 said:

@silversix_ said:

Now im sure gameplay will be good/decent but graphics... oh my. Absolutely mediocre looking title. You see this kind of fuglyness and ask yourself if this thing was released in 07 or on a brand new next gen system lol but i bet its not about the graphics anymore, lem? Its all about zombies count right? LOL

Nice picture taken off a tv. Everyone who has seen and or played DR3 say the graphics and gameplay are both great.

Compared to early Gamecube games? Well yeah...

Lmao, now this is getting ridiculous.

I wouldn't constitute own-age as being someone who amasses 8500+ posts repeating his insecurity's over a gaming forum.

Yeah, it's a very good looking 360 game. I don't see what the problem is.

Was this supposed to be on the 360? I'm not bashing, it just doesn't look next gen to me. Looks like it could be fun and I will check it out once I get a One or it comes to PC/PS4.

@Gue1: I'm willing to bet it can do 60fps... come on Capcom, "time to get serious"

Hope you got the reference...

Darn, I was really hoping I would like this game. But with the lack of P's it has, I just have to hate it.

Because Dead Rising has never been done before. Good thing Dead Rising 3 will give us this totally new experience.

Lmao, so funny how graphics/performance doesnt matter to lems anymore.

Does nobody remember a game called "Heavenly Sword" the final boss fight had at least 1000 men running around on screen at once. And people praise this game for a couple of hundred zombies on screen... WTF?

The most resource taxing game released on consoles so far this gen can't run at 1080p and 60fps at launch, how terribly OBVIOUS THAT IT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN.

The only bigger resource hog that I can think of off the top of my head MAY be Project Sparx.

It probably had 30 or so who you could fight, and as you killed them, they were replenished.

Except Capcom spend 3 interviews, saying the zombies will have intelligence, and even work together.........

Same, upscale to 1080p from 720p, no prob with that for a game with this character count but 30fps needs to be killed with fire.

I've watched gameplay and have seen nothing other than standard fare for zombie AI. XBone just isn't that powerful and is marginally superior to even the Wii U. I hate to break that to you but you're just going to have to deal with it for the next 7-8 years

My guess is that this is more of a Capcom issue than an X1 hardware issue.

720p and 30fps? Even the most cud-chewing bovine of all will admit the dev has to take the blame for most of that.

For a minute I thought you're talking about the 360 lol.

Dat DC.

30FPS 720p is all they could achieve with Microsoft helping them code the game.

Pretty disappointing. Doesn't bode well for the future.

On the bright side, DR3 actually looks like a fun game, one of the exclusives I'd buy if I were crazy enough to buy a launch console.

Or you could wait for the game to come out and not make things u like pretending the Wii can handle all the cars driving, destructible environments and zombies on the screen at a smooth frame rate at the same time. But hey, lying is a real life issue you have.

Not too impressed with that.

My goodness cows, 360 and PS3 launch games were the same way. Why do you think so many launch games are being delayed?

Im tired of all this crooked logic and misinformation.

Let me make this as basic as possible.

-Launch games are HORRIBLY optimized

-Launch games are merely ported to next gen

-PS4 has a simpler architecture (a la 360 = easier/faster porting)

-360 has a more complex architecture (a la PS3 via coding for ESRAM)

-Launch games are often rushed to meet launch windows and holiday. Little known hardware + rush job = crap performance. (Drive Club, Killer Instinct)

-Some devs actually CARE more than others. Activision is going to port and release, patch games later. Ubi chose to delay to make game better.

We all know XB1 is weaker, but it isnt so weak that it cant produce 1080p. It has more than enough RAM, GPU/CPU power. If 360/PS3 can, next gen can. The REASON it doesnt as often as PS4 CURRENTLY is ESRAM. Devs arent used to programming for or with it. Same with Cell. Large pool of GDDR5 is a cake walk = Launch games are more stabl = you can up the resolution.

Whether lems what to admit it or not, Forza 5 is just a reworked 360 game, so of course it isnt tough to get 1080p/60fps, but that also applies to many PS4 launch games.

This fanboyism needs to stop!

yeah 720p at -30fps LMFAO

Wii U has Bayonetta 2 which has one of the most robust combat systems ever created with several enemies on screen at once (each with their own AI and attacks) and that game is 1080p/60fps.

Youll be waiting a long ass time then, Its microsoft studios so no PS4 version lol.

Youll be waiting a long ass time then, Its microsoft studios so no PS4 version lol.

@Netret0120: graphics > gameplay

Look at all those tears, no need to be mad bandodger,remind which was the account i made fun of you lol,#BANDODGER.

next gen consoles are really garbage, damn thanks for bringing this to my attention Gue

DR3 doesn't run on PS4, hence it's artwork and it's workload profile doesn't exist for PS4.

Please give me some examples of some upcoming launch titles on either console that are not "generic".

It's the most overused term typically employed to give a pseudo-intellectual "dis" to any game...for any reason.

Take Ryse for example:

Are there tons of games taking place in Rome, or even in that time period?

Are there tons of games with its combat system?

Are there tons of games with its game mechanics?

I'd sincerely like to know what the "hardc0r3" gamer deems as an "original" title today.

What does that mean exactly?

Did you mean "extinct"...as in there are no surviving members left?

what combat system? what game mechanic? both are laughable... Rome setting is awesome and i already stated that multiple times. So you have nice theme (which doesn't exactly make a game great on its own), combat as shitty as it gets and game mechanic? lol WHAT? What game mechanic, QTE that can't fail? Come'on... I know cool kids like to trash on BF4 to sound like a smartass but its multiplayer is far from generic. Its campaign is 1000000% generic but don't drag its multi in the same bag. How many games do you see doing what BF does? yeaaaaaaah... KZ:SF looks generic a little bit but from what im hearing its multiplayer is pretty unique so until i play it i can't judge.

Guys, please remove me from the quote chain, I keep getting notifications even when it has nothing to do with me ;__;

@Bruin1986: yes my bad. They all left SW after the colossal fuckup E3 was for them

Meanwhile i can get 30fps at 4k on my pc.....

That's just pathetic.

You do realize that resolution and frame rate are only a couple of the innumerable factors that effect the image quality of a game correct?

AA, lighting engine, and most importantly, per pixel detail, also greatly effect the graphics of a game.

There is this idiotic notion going around that unless a game is 1080p/60fps, it's not "next gen", as if that is the sole definition.

Ryse, a 30fps/900p game, is by far the most graphically impressive game at launch. In videos uploaded today, I literally paused the video when they showed the jungle level just to stare at the graphics. I've seen direct feed, 1080p videos of BF4, COD, Forza, Killzone, DR3, etc...and Ryse is the only game that's literally stunned me.

But hey, maybe I'm just a stupid fanboy, excuse me, "lemming". lol

It looks almost certain that we are going to see sub-hd games for X1 at some point.

LOL not again..