Developer says Xbox 360 more powerful than PS3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

Stopped reading at "most PS3 exclusives will likely continue to suck," he says."

lucky_star

I seriously loled when he said that.

Avatar image for brennan7777
brennan7777

3253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 brennan7777
Member since 2005 • 3253 Posts

I think the cows will discount him because he developed Guitar Hero. Maybe I'm wrong. *posts*

SgtKevali

Well ok if we cant discount him for that can we discount him for saying PS3 exclusives will continue to suck?

Avatar image for theseekar
theseekar

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 theseekar
Member since 2010 • 1537 Posts

[QUOTE="theseekar"]

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

How bout those dated character models then?

XboximusPrime

They are not dated at all tbh

the character models arent that great. Wake is really the only decent one. Im talking gameplay, not movies.

Alan looks great and many NPC look great too, just not all

Also is a tiny price to pay, to get the level of detail, environment and scale of AW

Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#104 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

Liiiees, I tell you! LIIIEEES!!!

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="theseekar"]

They are not dated at all tbh

theseekar

the character models arent that great. Wake is really the only decent one. Im talking gameplay, not movies.

Alan looks great and many NPC look great too, just not all

Also is a tiny price to pay, to get the level of detail, environment and scale of AW

and all the foliage, am I right?
Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

I can't believe we're still talking about this. The two systems are virtually identical in terms of the end result, with the PS3 arguably being slightly more powerful (AFAIK no one has sunk the time, effort and resources into graphics on the 360 the same way Sony's first party devs have on the PS3). Don't we have more important (read: more entertaining) things to bicker about?

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#107 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
I won't lie - I don't know much when it comes to complex coding and development. That being said I know one thing as a consumer: 'Dat triple run the Uncharted and GoWIII which are the two best looking games I've played.
Avatar image for theseekar
theseekar

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 theseekar
Member since 2010 • 1537 Posts

I can't believe we're still talking about this. The two systems are virtually identical in terms of the end result, with the PS3 arguably being slightly more powerful (AFAIK no one has sunk the time, effort and resources into graphics on the 360 the same way Sony's first party devs have on the PS3). Don't we have more important (read: more entertaining) things to bicker about?

PBSnipes

With Alan Wake and best RDR version, 360 seems greatly superior to PS3 for me

How are they virtually identical ?

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

However, going about it another direction, I would really like for these devs to put up or shut up about 360 being supposedly more powerful. Atleast with PS3, its showing it can dish out better graphics, regardless of wether or not it is less pwerful to some. So really, if 360 is more powerful, it needs to show it in its Exclusives. Which its not.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

Guitar Hero and Rock Band aren't graphically demanding games, I'd rather trust the likes of Crytek to answer the age old question.

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

BTW, when did this guy say this? this year? I swear to god if it was like 2007 im going to be pissed I wasted all this effort on this thread.

Avatar image for theseekar
theseekar

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 theseekar
Member since 2010 • 1537 Posts

However, going about it another direction, I would really like for these devs to put up or shut up about 360 being supposedly more powerful. Atleast with PS3, its showing it can dish out better graphics, regardless of wether or not it is less pwerful to some. So really, if 360 is more powerful, it needs to show it in its Exclusives. Which its not.

XboximusPrime

Well, alan Wake has vastly bigger and more open levels, actual huge thick forests with actual foliage, and dynamic volumetrci lighting on top, that not a single PS3 exclusive has

So, has proven it is more poerfull already, easilly too, since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#113 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

The PS3 and 360 are pretty much equal in power. I'd say the PS3 has a tiny edge, but it's not much.

When you're talking multiplats, 360 has the advantage. In a theoretical situation where you have 2yrs. and equal budgets to produce a game on both 360 and PS3, the 360 will almost always prevail against the PS3 because you don't have to bother with offloading graphics work to the Cell. What the guy said about shader power is true. John Carmack confirmed this.

It's one of those weird situations where the PS3 released a year after the 360 with tons of misleading hype from Sony saying the PS3 crushes the 360 in gfx potential, but in reality the 360 holds it own against the PS3. Imagine if the Xbox only had 3 games that barely looked better than the best PS2 games after 4yrs, and even crazier if the PS2 consistently produced better looking multiplats.

I think Sony got caught in a catch 22 where ATI had already given MS an advanced GPU, and Nvidia was shifting from the 7xxx series gpu to the 8xxx series, so the 8xxx series would be too expensive and push production costs to close to $1,000 for Sony. They had to go with an affordable 7xxx series, so they grabbed a 7800/7900GT and renamed it the "Reality Synthesizer". Good stuff.

Sony's 1st party devs have become the industry standard, and Sony has made incredible strides making sure they're well funded. That's the difference maker so far.

Avatar image for theseekar
theseekar

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 theseekar
Member since 2010 • 1537 Posts

There is no graphics king

If you want crisp coriddors go for Uncharted 2

If you want huge open andthick forests and next gen lighting go for Alan Wake

That is all, each has its strenghts

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW doestheseekar
too bad 99% of gaiming industry (including reviewers, AND GS) don't share your opinion :(
Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#116 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8287 Posts

*Reads title* Oh, this could be interesting...

[QUOTE="bphan"]

Jason Booth, a game developer who has worked on both Guitar Hero games and Rock Band,

R3FURBISHED

NOPE!

Haha that was my reaction too.
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts

BTW, when did this guy say this? this year? I swear to god if it was like 2007 im going to be pissed I wasted all this effort on this thread.

XboximusPrime
that's what you get when you don't read the OP
Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

However, going about it another direction, I would really like for these devs to put up or shut up about 360 being supposedly more powerful. Atleast with PS3, its showing it can dish out better graphics, regardless of wether or not it is less pwerful to some. So really, if 360 is more powerful, it needs to show it in its Exclusives. Which its not.

theseekar

Well, alan Wake has vastly bigger and more open levels, actual huge thick forests with actual foliage, and dynamic volumetrci lighting on top, that not a single PS3 exclusive has

So, has proven it is more poerfull already, easilly too, since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does

AW character models arent great, the game is linear as hell, it is NOT open because you really cant explore the levels that much, and the PS3 is certainly capable of forests with foliage. The only great looking things about AW where the enviorments and the lighting. that most certainly does not prove 360 is more powerful.

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#119 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
[QUOTE="theseekar"]since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW doesGiancar
too bad 99% of gaiming industry (including reviewers, AND GS) don't share your opinion :(

Yeah, I just don't even see how he thinks that...
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#120 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Proof is in the pudding, and the pudding has uncharted 2 and God of War 3. He can take his rehash franchises and bias and go away.

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="theseekar"]since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW doesNAPK1NS
too bad 99% of gaiming industry (including reviewers, AND GS) don't share your opinion :(

Yeah, I just don't even see how he thinks that...

now he gonna post, that wall of AW reviews that says it has great graphics as prove that it is the best looking game ever, that kills U2 gphxs wise, and none ps3 game comes close to it :lol:
Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

Sony has all of these people duped by impressive marketing spin

bphan

lolz.

in general, this is ridiculously true.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#124 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="bphan"]

Sony has all of these people duped by impressive marketing spin

HavocV3

lolz.

in general, this is ridiculously true.

For the time of the article yes it was true.

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

If were thinking with 2007 logic, then maybe this article would make since. But right now in theyear 2010, it dosent hold up that well considering PS3 Exclusives dont suck anymore.

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#126 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"][QUOTE="Giancar"] too bad 99% of gaiming industry (including reviewers, AND GS) don't share your opinion :(

Yeah, I just don't even see how he thinks that...

now he gonna post, that wall of AW reviews that says it has great graphics as prove that it is the best looking game ever, that kills U2 gphxs wise, and none ps3 game comes close to it :lol:

:lol: Seriously, get this man a PS3 and some Uncharted of Jee-Oh-Dubs Trey (GoWIII).
Avatar image for psyko0815
psyko0815

449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 psyko0815
Member since 2010 • 449 Posts

So, now we know Jason Booth is a 360 fanboy. What's the big deal?

Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts

*Reads title* Oh, this could be interesting...

[QUOTE="bphan"]

Jason Booth, a game developer who has worked on both Guitar Hero games and Rock Band,

R3FURBISHED

NOPE!

Lol Same thing I was thinking. That's pretty much the deal with 99% of the threads in SW.
Avatar image for theseekar
theseekar

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 theseekar
Member since 2010 • 1537 Posts

[QUOTE="theseekar"]since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW doesGiancar
too bad 99% of gaiming industry (including reviewers, AND GS) don't share your opinion :(

Is that so ?

Gamingtrend
Graphics: 97
Lighting engine is the best I've ever seen
Environments are lush and visually stunning

Chud
It sure is a great looking game. The environments are truly breathtaking, and you'll want to just stop and check out the sights. When you get to a high point it seems like you can see for miles without anything breaking up. Of course the lighting in the game is absolutely astounding as well, although it's a bit strange that they don't put you in complete darkness too often

Xboxaddict
Visuals: 9.2 / 10
So let me say this....you will not want this game to end, you will not want to take the straight path, you will want to seek out every corner of the game. You will be amazed at the scenery, the scope of the visuals and the details featured throughout

Hardgame2
Graphics 9.5

Planetxbox360
Graphics 9
The graphics department is so strong that it only serves to add to the overall experience that is Alan Wake. The lighting system is superb (the developers had no choice but to nail this) and other than some minute frame-rate jumps and a few blurry textures we have no complaints in the looks department. Simply put it's one of the best looking Xbox 360 games out there.

IGN UK
9.5 Graphics
Refreshingly, Alan Wake's story occurs almost exclusively outdoors and developer Remedy should be applauded for its cohesive, uniformly beautiful game world. There's a real sense of place as you trudge through abandoned mining towns, forests and farm yards, taking in local landmarks and stunning hill top vistas
Characters models disappoint but the stunning lighting effects, breathtaking mountain vistas and pain-staking attention to detail make Alan Wake's journey unforgettable.

Todojuegos
Graficos: 9.5

Gamepro.de
Graphics: 10/10
+
Landscapes
Locations
Special effects

Todoxbox360
Graficos: 9.5/10

Gamer365(Hungarian) Alan Wake 9.5/10
PROS
- The presentation: one of the best looking Xbox360 game.
- Fantastic atmosphere, that won't let you stop playing.

Vandal
Graphics 9.1

3djuegos
Graphics 9

Gamerevolution
Alan Wake also looks gorgeous. The lighting, weather, and particle effects are simply stunning. Sure, there's a bit more motion blur than is probably necessary and the edges of objects can look fuzzy and pixilated from time to time, but it all fits into the game's dream-like tone

Videogamer
Graphics 9
Much has been made of Alan Wake's less-than HD resolution, but the bottom line is that it's a stunning looking title. No game released so far this generation features lighting effects more impressive, or so much going on. At times, with the wind blowing, smoke in the air, objects flying around, flares alight and enemies coming at you, there'd be an argument for this being one of the most visually striking games ever released. It's that impressive. During certain dramatic moments the game even pauses and pans around Alan, giving you a chance to take it all in.
Things take an unfortunate turn for the worse during the game's many non-interactive cutscenes, however. Quite why isn't clear, but in these scripted video sequences the animations appear to be jerky and the lip syncing is terrible. It doesn't hurt the overall experience too much, as the voice acting is still excellent and the direction superb, but compared to the high quality on show at all other times, it's somewhat jarring to see a car judder along a road and a woman speak as though she's a ventriloquist's dummy.
The world is linear, with the path to your objective usually quite obvious, but there are just enough 'off the beaten path' locations to make you believe Bright Falls is a real place

Meristation
Visualmente bellisimo, con elementos sorprendentes.

Destructoid
The game manages to be one of the most visually accomplished 360 games out there. The game has a fantastic and evocative artistic **** and there are some wonderful setpieces and lighting.

Worthplaying
When you're not engaged in nighttime combat, Alan Wake offers players stunning visuals of the Pacific Northwest. Natural vistas are rendered superbly, with soaring mountaintops and lush treetops. By and large, Alan Wake is a visually gorgeous game and one that serves to showcase the visual prowess of the Xbox 360.

Xbox360achievements
Graphics 9
Remedy have done great things with Alan Wake's setting, creating a wide-open and varied environment with suitably impressive character models. Throw in some fantastic lighting effects and the only mark against the score is the obvious sub-720p visuals at various points in certain cutscenes.

IGN US
Graphics 9
Stellar lighting effect and environmental design foster an atmosphere of authenticity to make the scares and thrills more affecting. Bright Falls and its forested mountainous surroundings are masterfully realized and resonate with realism.
Outstanding environmental design and some brilliant visuals and sound make Bright Falls and its mountainous surroundings look and feel alive

Nzgamer
Graphics 9

Gameplanet
A beautifully crafted world, stunningly presented

Gamepro
PROS: Strong story and haunting conclusion; great voice-acting; gorgeous environments

411mania
Graphics look amazing throughout the game.
Graphically, the game looks great. The light and darkness adds a lot to the graphics with various effects. Plus, Bright Falls and the surrounding area has a lot of detail and is great to explore. While it may not be open world, you can still get off the beaten trailer and wander around to see the area while you get to the next area.

Co-optimus
Your quest will take you through dark forests, lumber mills, lakesides, tunnels, and farms; all making the area of Bright Falls feels like an eerily realistic setting for the horror that unfolds before you

Filefront
Pros:
Addicting, clever story
Beautiful lighting
Immersive setting

Itwire
Exceptional graphics

Perezstart
Locations, both man-made and natural, all look amazingly realistic, and the changes in weather and time of day are very well done. Considering how much detail there is in Alan Wake, especially when there are never any noticeable loading times, I'm highly impressed Remedy was able to fit all of it onto 1 disc

Loudmouthedgamers
Graphics: The imagery inside the game can be breathtaking. Giant snow capped mountains surround Bright Falls and in the initial opening sequence of the game the view is spectacular and continues to be spectacular throughout the game. The water looks real as does the surrounding areas. Since you spend so much time in the dark Remedy wants you to experience the game as if you were there. So they ask you to adjust the brightness of the game to their required specs. It is really important to the story to follow this instruction. When you are in the dark you feel like you are there with only a flashlight to guide you. It feels like they spent a lot of time getting the dark just right. You really have to focus to make your way around just like in real life. Every area looks like a natural environment that looks like it was painstakingly created.

Justpushstart
For an Xbox 360 game, Alan Wake has pushed the limits of the console by rendering a very crisp and detailed environment. The very precise and detailed designs of the dark forest in Bright Falls will give gamers an eerie and atmospheric experience. You can expect most of your time running through the dark forest while finding your way through to the next area. Aside from the detailed environments, gamers will take notice of the lighting effects in the game. For the first time ever, Alan Wake is the pioneering the game that uses the lighting effects to produce a perfect shadow

Aeropause
Yes, the lighting effects are amazing in Alan Wake

Techland
If Beauty Is In the Eye of the Beholder, Then This Game Is: Hypnotically Moody. Clearly, the interplay between light and shadow means a lot in Alan Wake and the graphics execute that relationship beautifully. The way that lights smoulder through the forest haze and flares emit a vital but eerie glow that just makes everything feel very charged with threat. Shadows dance with your every move and the whole time you're fighting off panic that the world of Bright Falls isn't just a backdrop; it feels alive and full of mystery and personality. The art direction really shines with regard to how environments look and feel in Alan Wake. While the sun is up, Bright Falls looks like a peaceful, quaint tourist town in the Pacific Northwest. It makes you want to visit that part of the country. But, the same locations where you were chatting up folks become eerily malevolent at night
Read more: http://techland.com/2010/05/05/to-fall-into-darkness-techland-reviews-alan-wake/#ixzz0n4wRYGrr
http://plaza.fi/s/f/editor/images/alan_wake_arv_01.jpg

Incgamers
Atmospheric, gripping, gorgeous, and clever

Capsulecomputers
The graphics are also beautiful. Remedy has left no visual detail overlooked in the development of Alan Wake. The lighting and environment add to the atmosphere of the game, which adds to the thrill of the game.

Escapist Magazine
Gorgeous mountain scenery

Computer and Videogames
Beautiful, believable world
At points, thanks to gorgeous visuals, a standout score and deafening, psychedelic sound effects, Alan Wake really does feel like an interactive Hollywood disaster movie

Gameinformer
Graphics:
A combination of beautiful landscape details and realistic lighting effects make Alan Wake one of Xbox 360's visual darlings

OXM online
Just look at the pics

Gamereactor
Graphics 9/10
Amazing graphics, atmospheric, scary sound

Gamezone
Graphics 9/10

Spaziogames
Graphics 9/10

Junkie Gamer
Setting the scene for Alan Wake, Remedy have truly delivered, the town of Bright Falls and the surrounding areas are gorgeous and reminiscent of the type of back water town seen in Rambo

NZ Herald
Brilliant environments

Electric Pig
Employing spookily realistic lighting effects, Alan Wake looks fantastic

VG Chartz
The internet buzz on Alan Wake has clearly revolved around its amazing graphics and whether they can top anything else currently on the 360. Yes it does. Graphically it beats out Gears of War with relative ease. The environments, the character models, and the incredible lighting effects all add up to make Alan Wake an absolute beauty

Venture Beat
The graphics are by-and-large beautiful, although flaws show up frequently in the animations. From Cauldron Lake to the town of Bright Falls, the depiction of natural beauty is wonderful. The water is reflective. The forests are full of foliage with wind-blown trees, bushes, plants and dirt. At night, the malevolent Dark Presence takes control and a scary mood takes over. The foliage then becomes a place where the enemies can hide and ambush you

Avatar image for WiiMan21
WiiMan21

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#130 WiiMan21
Member since 2007 • 8191 Posts

because you know...Guitar hero and Rockband has over the top graphics...

Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="bphan"]

Sony has all of these people duped by impressive marketing spin

Espada12

lolz.

in general, this is ridiculously true.

For the time of the article yes it was true.

I like how the TC didn't point out how old this article was. It dates back to at least 2007.

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#132 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts

Dear theseekar,

You have become the laughing stock of these boards in just three days and for good reason. I'm gonna' type the next part in bold so you'll read it. I think you know all about making text reeeealy noticeable. NONE OF THOSE CRITICS AGREE WITH YOU. NONE OF THOSE EXCERPTS SAY, "PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does," BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE. THEY JUST THINK ITS A GREAT LOOKING GAME. Alan Wake looks really nice, man. Just not that good.

Love, NAPK1NS

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

OK but what do all those reviews have to do with comparing AW to games on the PS3. They are just saying it's visually good but not comparing it to any PS3 games....

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
360 may not have the best graphics, but it has the best games, Imo, we should all give the cows abreak, the Ps3 is slightly more powerful than the 360,let's face it, it's the first time in history the playstation has actually been the most powerful console,for me though the slight power difference isn't worth the extra 60 quid, and i much prefer the 360's library.
Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#135 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts

[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="theseekar"]since PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW doestheseekar

too bad 99% of gaiming industry (including reviewers, AND GS) don't share your opinion :(

Is that so ?

Gamingtrend
Graphics: 97
Lighting engine is the best I've ever seen
Environments are lush and visually stunning

Chud
It sure is a great looking game. The environments are truly breathtaking, and you'll want to just stop and check out the sights. When you get to a high point it seems like you can see for miles without anything breaking up. Of course the lighting in the game is absolutely astounding as well, although it's a bit strange that they don't put you in complete darkness too often

Xboxaddict
Visuals: 9.2 / 10
So let me say this....you will not want this game to end, you will not want to take the straight path, you will want to seek out every corner of the game. You will be amazed at the scenery, the scope of the visuals and the details featured throughout

Hardgame2
Graphics 9.5

Planetxbox360
Graphics 9
The graphics department is so strong that it only serves to add to the overall experience that is Alan Wake. The lighting system is superb (the developers had no choice but to nail this) and other than some minute frame-rate jumps and a few blurry textures we have no complaints in the looks department. Simply put it's one of the best looking Xbox 360 games out there.

IGN UK
9.5 Graphics
Refreshingly, Alan Wake's story occurs almost exclusively outdoors and developer Remedy should be applauded for its cohesive, uniformly beautiful game world. There's a real sense of place as you trudge through abandoned mining towns, forests and farm yards, taking in local landmarks and stunning hill top vistas
Characters models disappoint but the stunning lighting effects, breathtaking mountain vistas and pain-staking attention to detail make Alan Wake's journey unforgettable.

Todojuegos
Graficos: 9.5

Gamepro.de
Graphics: 10/10
+
Landscapes
Locations
Special effects

Todoxbox360
Graficos: 9.5/10

Gamer365(Hungarian) Alan Wake 9.5/10
PROS
- The presentation: one of the best looking Xbox360 game.
- Fantastic atmosphere, that won't let you stop playing.

Vandal
Graphics 9.1

3djuegos
Graphics 9

Gamerevolution
Alan Wake also looks gorgeous. The lighting, weather, and particle effects are simply stunning. Sure, there's a bit more motion blur than is probably necessary and the edges of objects can look fuzzy and pixilated from time to time, but it all fits into the game's dream-like tone

Videogamer
Graphics 9
Much has been made of Alan Wake's less-than HD resolution, but the bottom line is that it's a stunning looking title. No game released so far this generation features lighting effects more impressive, or so much going on. At times, with the wind blowing, smoke in the air, objects flying around, flares alight and enemies coming at you, there'd be an argument for this being one of the most visually striking games ever released. It's that impressive. During certain dramatic moments the game even pauses and pans around Alan, giving you a chance to take it all in.
Things take an unfortunate turn for the worse during the game's many non-interactive cutscenes, however. Quite why isn't clear, but in these scripted video sequences the animations appear to be jerky and the lip syncing is terrible. It doesn't hurt the overall experience too much, as the voice acting is still excellent and the direction superb, but compared to the high quality on show at all other times, it's somewhat jarring to see a car judder along a road and a woman speak as though she's a ventriloquist's dummy.
The world is linear, with the path to your objective usually quite obvious, but there are just enough 'off the beaten path' locations to make you believe Bright Falls is a real place

Meristation
Visualmente bellisimo, con elementos sorprendentes.

Destructoid
The game manages to be one of the most visually accomplished 360 games out there. The game has a fantastic and evocative artistic **** and there are some wonderful setpieces and lighting.

Worthplaying
When you're not engaged in nighttime combat, Alan Wake offers players stunning visuals of the Pacific Northwest. Natural vistas are rendered superbly, with soaring mountaintops and lush treetops. By and large, Alan Wake is a visually gorgeous game and one that serves to showcase the visual prowess of the Xbox 360.

Xbox360achievements
Graphics 9
Remedy have done great things with Alan Wake's setting, creating a wide-open and varied environment with suitably impressive character models. Throw in some fantastic lighting effects and the only mark against the score is the obvious sub-720p visuals at various points in certain cutscenes.

IGN US
Graphics 9
Stellar lighting effect and environmental design foster an atmosphere of authenticity to make the scares and thrills more affecting. Bright Falls and its forested mountainous surroundings are masterfully realized and resonate with realism.
Outstanding environmental design and some brilliant visuals and sound make Bright Falls and its mountainous surroundings look and feel alive

Nzgamer
Graphics 9

Gameplanet
A beautifully crafted world, stunningly presented

Gamepro
PROS: Strong story and haunting conclusion; great voice-acting; gorgeous environments

411mania
Graphics look amazing throughout the game.
Graphically, the game looks great. The light and darkness adds a lot to the graphics with various effects. Plus, Bright Falls and the surrounding area has a lot of detail and is great to explore. While it may not be open world, you can still get off the beaten trailer and wander around to see the area while you get to the next area.

Co-optimus
Your quest will take you through dark forests, lumber mills, lakesides, tunnels, and farms; all making the area of Bright Falls feels like an eerily realistic setting for the horror that unfolds before you

Filefront
Pros:
Addicting, clever story
Beautiful lighting
Immersive setting

Itwire
Exceptional graphics

Perezstart
Locations, both man-made and natural, all look amazingly realistic, and the changes in weather and time of day are very well done. Considering how much detail there is in Alan Wake, especially when there are never any noticeable loading times, I'm highly impressed Remedy was able to fit all of it onto 1 disc

Loudmouthedgamers
Graphics: The imagery inside the game can be breathtaking. Giant snow capped mountains surround Bright Falls and in the initial opening sequence of the game the view is spectacular and continues to be spectacular throughout the game. The water looks real as does the surrounding areas. Since you spend so much time in the dark Remedy wants you to experience the game as if you were there. So they ask you to adjust the brightness of the game to their required specs. It is really important to the story to follow this instruction. When you are in the dark you feel like you are there with only a flashlight to guide you. It feels like they spent a lot of time getting the dark just right. You really have to focus to make your way around just like in real life. Every area looks like a natural environment that looks like it was painstakingly created.

Justpushstart
For an Xbox 360 game, Alan Wake has pushed the limits of the console by rendering a very crisp and detailed environment. The very precise and detailed designs of the dark forest in Bright Falls will give gamers an eerie and atmospheric experience. You can expect most of your time running through the dark forest while finding your way through to the next area. Aside from the detailed environments, gamers will take notice of the lighting effects in the game. For the first time ever, Alan Wake is the pioneering the game that uses the lighting effects to produce a perfect shadow

Aeropause
Yes, the lighting effects are amazing in Alan Wake

Techland
If Beauty Is In the Eye of the Beholder, Then This Game Is: Hypnotically Moody. Clearly, the interplay between light and shadow means a lot in Alan Wake and the graphics execute that relationship beautifully. The way that lights smoulder through the forest haze and flares emit a vital but eerie glow that just makes everything feel very charged with threat. Shadows dance with your every move and the whole time you're fighting off panic that the world of Bright Falls isn't just a backdrop; it feels alive and full of mystery and personality. The art direction really shines with regard to how environments look and feel in Alan Wake. While the sun is up, Bright Falls looks like a peaceful, quaint tourist town in the Pacific Northwest. It makes you want to visit that part of the country. But, the same locations where you were chatting up folks become eerily malevolent at night
Read more: http://techland.com/2010/05/05/to-fall-into-darkness-techland-reviews-alan-wake/#ixzz0n4wRYGrr
http://plaza.fi/s/f/editor/images/alan_wake_arv_01.jpg

Incgamers
Atmospheric, gripping, gorgeous, and clever

Capsulecomputers
The graphics are also beautiful. Remedy has left no visual detail overlooked in the development of Alan Wake. The lighting and environment add to the atmosphere of the game, which adds to the thrill of the game.

Escapist Magazine
Gorgeous mountain scenery

Computer and Videogames
Beautiful, believable world
At points, thanks to gorgeous visuals, a standout score and deafening, psychedelic sound effects, Alan Wake really does feel like an interactive Hollywood disaster movie

Gameinformer
Graphics:
A combination of beautiful landscape details and realistic lighting effects make Alan Wake one of Xbox 360's visual darlings

OXM online
Just look at the pics

Gamereactor
Graphics 9/10
Amazing graphics, atmospheric, scary sound

Gamezone
Graphics 9/10

Spaziogames
Graphics 9/10

Junkie Gamer
Setting the scene for Alan Wake, Remedy have truly delivered, the town of Bright Falls and the surrounding areas are gorgeous and reminiscent of the type of back water town seen in Rambo

NZ Herald
Brilliant environments

Electric Pig
Employing spookily realistic lighting effects, Alan Wake looks fantastic

VG Chartz
The internet buzz on Alan Wake has clearly revolved around its amazing graphics and whether they can top anything else currently on the 360. Yes it does. Graphically it beats out Gears of War with relative ease. The environments, the character models, and the incredible lighting effects all add up to make Alan Wake an absolute beauty

Venture Beat
The graphics are by-and-large beautiful, although flaws show up frequently in the animations. From Cauldron Lake to the town of Bright Falls, the depiction of natural beauty is wonderful. The water is reflective. The forests are full of foliage with wind-blown trees, bushes, plants and dirt. At night, the malevolent Dark Presence takes control and a scary mood takes over. The foliage then becomes a place where the enemies can hide and ambush you

I'm confused, are you trying to prove the Cows point? I don't see any comparisons to PS3 there, lots of qualifiers on the graphics, 1 lousy stinking 10 for graphics... If it was going to be hailed as king, you'd be seeing lots of 10, lots of comparisons to PS3 titles, and very few if any qualifiers on the graphics goodness.

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#136 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

i dont know as much about the PS3 hardware as i know about the Wii, but doesnt the PS3 have some sort of limit on the number of programmable shaders u can have or fixed functions. something like that i dont remember exactly. maybe it was how large u could make it or something like that. I am 100% sure though that it has a cap on something. Both consoles have their advanteges though. PS3 has its SPU, and superior GPGPU capabilities while 360 has the PC like architecture which everyone is used to, and is barely limited with what u can program in terms of shaders etc. Either way the end results dont look that much different, and all rely's on the devs dedication to taking advantage of a specific hardware architecture. actually IMO uncharted2 is the console graphics king. it just shows how far a dev can go if they properly utilize the hardware. u could argue that half the stuff in that game is prebaked, but either way it looks great. correct if im wrong cuz im honestly not sure about this. Wii hardware is my speciality cuz i be a sheep. :P

XboximusPrime

This is what I know about PS3s tech limitations.

The RSX (PS3s GPU) dosent have as many Shader pipelines as 360s GPU, nor does it have as many memory pipelines or whatever. This leads to bottlenecks caused by the RAM which is 542 MBs of Ram split in half, and tied to the CPU and GPU. (276mbs for the CPU, 276mbs for the GPU and they cant be adjusted to devote more RAM to either CPU or GPU) this is what causes bottlenecks, unlike the 360 unified RAM scheme which can share any amount of the 546mb RAM 360 has between the CPU and GPU as it needs it. Meaning if the game requires more ram on CPU for a part, itll devote more RAM on the CPU. This is a overall better way to go at it. Also, the Bluray drive in teh PS3 is actually a first generation one that more close to a protoype model if anything, so it reads very slowly. This is why we have Mandatory installs on games alot of times.

The trick to getting better performance out of PS3 is to devote resources to having the SPUs of the Cell (the PS3s CPU)offload workload from teh RSX, thus freeing it up to make more advanced graphical things. However, not a whole lot of devs have the time and resources to do this properly, so we constantly have the PS3 version being a little bit worse graphicaly. And honestly, why would devs waste the extra money when:

A. 360 version is probaly going to sell more overall

B. they can release a version that works well enough on PS3, and not have to spend extra money.

This really is the price you pay when you have a overly complicated Archetecture. The only exception is PS2, but even the PS2s archetecture wasnt as complicated as PS3s and PS2 was wooping everything adn selling more software, so Devs had incentive to work extra on that.

You are wrong on the ram. The RSX can at anytime use the RSX memory pool, and vs. versa. it uses a turbo-cache design that some nvidia gpus have. The memory transfter speed is a bit slower doing this, but its still works. So even though there not shared it still has access. If comparing gpus think geforce 7900 vs ati 1900xt both great cards. The geforce had more speed in raster ops and triangles, but the 1900xt was better at shader operations due to the shared arch. This is why you couldn't do AA with HDR lighting in games with nvidia cards until the geforce 8 series, but 1900xt could do it. Now the cell is much faster and it also uses Rambus memory that runs at same damn clock speed of the cpu 3.2ghz. That memory speed i am sure helps a lot considering the 360 (and RSX) rely on ddr2 at 700mhz. Couple that with the spe's doing physics, animation, sound, (sometimes FSAA - god of war, sabetuer)
Avatar image for DEATH775
DEATH775

4216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#137 DEATH775
Member since 2005 • 4216 Posts
"PS3 exclusives will most likely continue to suck" ??? seriously I got both the 360 and PS3. Most of the exclusive on the PS3 is awesome.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#138 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I have a hard time believing that when the PS3's CPU is much better than 360's...

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

Dear theseekar,

You have become the laughing stock of these boards in just three days and for good reason. I'm gonna' type the next part in bold so you'll read it. I think you know all about making text reeeealy noticeable. NONE OF THOSE CRITICS AGREE WITH YOU. NONE OF THOSE EXCERPTS SAY, "PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does," BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE. THEY JUST THINK ITS A GREAT LOOKING GAME. Alan Wake looks really nice, man. Just not that good.

Love, NAPK1NS

NAPK1NS
the real laughing stocks are the people that ripped alan wake and FFXIII apart for being SUB-HD on the 360, then said the RDR being SUB-HD on the Ps3 was somehow insignificant, at least the seekar is prepared to Pony up and provide backing for his arguments, i would give him 10 out of 10 for effort, and no offence, but where did any reviewer say that GOW 3 or uncharted 2 where better looking than any 360 exclusive? they didn't, so your argument works both ways,lol
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#140 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

People still falling for antics of users like theseekar, kennysolidsnake, and honkytonkgamer, I see. Can't you discern the real intent behind posts from peeps like this?

I think some people like to believe that they're being sincere. It's suits their agenda to use fakeboys as a representation of certain sects here on SW. Like when you hear that "lems" hyped Metro 2033 as gfx king because honkytonkgamer, an alt-account fakeboy who's playing an immature joke said it was.

What gives?

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#141 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

i dont know as much about the PS3 hardware as i know about the Wii, but doesnt the PS3 have some sort of limit on the number of programmable shaders u can have or fixed functions. something like that i dont remember exactly. maybe it was how large u could make it or something like that. I am 100% sure though that it has a cap on something. Both consoles have their advanteges though. PS3 has its SPU, and superior GPGPU capabilities while 360 has the PC like architecture which everyone is used to, and is barely limited with what u can program in terms of shaders etc. Either way the end results dont look that much different, and all rely's on the devs dedication to taking advantage of a specific hardware architecture. actually IMO uncharted2 is the console graphics king. it just shows how far a dev can go if they properly utilize the hardware. u could argue that half the stuff in that game is prebaked, but either way it looks great. correct if im wrong cuz im honestly not sure about this. Wii hardware is my speciality cuz i be a sheep. :P

Midnightshade29

This is what I know about PS3s tech limitations.

The RSX (PS3s GPU) dosent have as many Shader pipelines as 360s GPU, nor does it have as many memory pipelines or whatever. This leads to bottlenecks caused by the RAM which is 542 MBs of Ram split in half, and tied to the CPU and GPU. (276mbs for the CPU, 276mbs for the GPU and they cant be adjusted to devote more RAM to either CPU or GPU) this is what causes bottlenecks, unlike the 360 unified RAM scheme which can share any amount of the 546mb RAM 360 has between the CPU and GPU as it needs it. Meaning if the game requires more ram on CPU for a part, itll devote more RAM on the CPU. This is a overall better way to go at it. Also, the Bluray drive in teh PS3 is actually a first generation one that more close to a protoype model if anything, so it reads very slowly. This is why we have Mandatory installs on games alot of times.

The trick to getting better performance out of PS3 is to devote resources to having the SPUs of the Cell (the PS3s CPU)offload workload from teh RSX, thus freeing it up to make more advanced graphical things. However, not a whole lot of devs have the time and resources to do this properly, so we constantly have the PS3 version being a little bit worse graphicaly. And honestly, why would devs waste the extra money when:

A. 360 version is probaly going to sell more overall

B. they can release a version that works well enough on PS3, and not have to spend extra money.

This really is the price you pay when you have a overly complicated Archetecture. The only exception is PS2, but even the PS2s archetecture wasnt as complicated as PS3s and PS2 was wooping everything adn selling more software, so Devs had incentive to work extra on that.

You are wrong on the ram. The RSX can at anytime use the RSX memory pool, and vs. versa. it uses a turbo-cache design that some nvidia gpus have. The memory transfter speed is a bit slower doing this, but its still works. So even though there not shared it still has access. If comparing gpus think geforce 7900 vs ati 1900xt both great cards. The geforce had more speed in raster ops and triangles, but the 1900xt was better at shader operations due to the shared arch. This is why you couldn't do AA with HDR lighting in games with nvidia cards until the geforce 8 series, but 1900xt could do it. Now the cell is much faster and it also uses Rambus memory that runs at same damn clock speed of the cpu 3.2ghz. That memory speed i am sure helps a lot considering the 360 (and RSX) rely on ddr2 at 700mhz. Couple that with the spe's doing physics, animation, sound, (sometimes FSAA - god of war, sabetuer)

the Ps3 doesn't have as much useable memory as the 360, as the PS3 has a larger OS footprint, also why are you comparing the xenos to the 1900xt, ATI themselves stated that the xenos cannot be compared to existing graphics cards, it uses a completely different custom language for starters, it cab run certain DX10 subroutines and has a tesselator and unified shader architecture, not to mention GOW 3 and the sabetuer both use MLAA not FSAA http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-saboteur-aa-blog-entry
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

i dont know as much about the PS3 hardware as i know about the Wii, but doesnt the PS3 have some sort of limit on the number of programmable shaders u can have or fixed functions. something like that i dont remember exactly. maybe it was how large u could make it or something like that. I am 100% sure though that it has a cap on something. Both consoles have their advanteges though. PS3 has its SPU, and superior GPGPU capabilities while 360 has the PC like architecture which everyone is used to, and is barely limited with what u can program in terms of shaders etc. Either way the end results dont look that much different, and all rely's on the devs dedication to taking advantage of a specific hardware architecture. actually IMO uncharted2 is the console graphics king. it just shows how far a dev can go if they properly utilize the hardware. u could argue that half the stuff in that game is prebaked, but either way it looks great. correct if im wrong cuz im honestly not sure about this. Wii hardware is my speciality cuz i be a sheep. :P

Midnightshade29

This is what I know about PS3s tech limitations.

The RSX (PS3s GPU) dosent have as many Shader pipelines as 360s GPU, nor does it have as many memory pipelines or whatever. This leads to bottlenecks caused by the RAM which is 542 MBs of Ram split in half, and tied to the CPU and GPU. (276mbs for the CPU, 276mbs for the GPU and they cant be adjusted to devote more RAM to either CPU or GPU) this is what causes bottlenecks, unlike the 360 unified RAM scheme which can share any amount of the 546mb RAM 360 has between the CPU and GPU as it needs it. Meaning if the game requires more ram on CPU for a part, itll devote more RAM on the CPU. This is a overall better way to go at it. Also, the Bluray drive in teh PS3 is actually a first generation one that more close to a protoype model if anything, so it reads very slowly. This is why we have Mandatory installs on games alot of times.

The trick to getting better performance out of PS3 is to devote resources to having the SPUs of the Cell (the PS3s CPU)offload workload from teh RSX, thus freeing it up to make more advanced graphical things. However, not a whole lot of devs have the time and resources to do this properly, so we constantly have the PS3 version being a little bit worse graphicaly. And honestly, why would devs waste the extra money when:

A. 360 version is probaly going to sell more overall

B. they can release a version that works well enough on PS3, and not have to spend extra money.

This really is the price you pay when you have a overly complicated Archetecture. The only exception is PS2, but even the PS2s archetecture wasnt as complicated as PS3s and PS2 was wooping everything adn selling more software, so Devs had incentive to work extra on that.

You are wrong on the ram. The RSX can at anytime use the RSX memory pool, and vs. versa. it uses a turbo-cache design that some nvidia gpus have. The memory transfter speed is a bit slower doing this, but its still works. So even though there not shared it still has access. If comparing gpus think geforce 7900 vs ati 1900xt both great cards. The geforce had more speed in raster ops and triangles, but the 1900xt was better at shader operations due to the shared arch. This is why you couldn't do AA with HDR lighting in games with nvidia cards until the geforce 8 series, but 1900xt could do it. Now the cell is much faster and it also uses Rambus memory that runs at same damn clock speed of the cpu 3.2ghz. That memory speed i am sure helps a lot considering the 360 (and RSX) rely on ddr2 at 700mhz. Couple that with the spe's doing physics, animation, sound, (sometimes FSAA - god of war, sabetuer)

Even with the additional XDR memory bandwidth, NVIDIA RSX didn't quite match Taito Type X2's NVIDIA Geforce 7900 GS performance when playing Street Fighter IV. Both NVIDIA G7X based hardware are built to play games.

For primary VRAM, both Xbox 360 and PS3 are fitted with GDDR3 not DDR2.It would be a mistake to equate ATI Xenos with ATI Radeon X1900XT(RV570)i.e. a PC equiped with ATI Radeon X1900XT crushes Xbox 360 when playing based UE3 (heavy deferred shading) i.e. On PC+RV570, why render 1280x720p?

RV570's pixel shaders are equipped with ATI's Ultra-Threads technology i.e. 512 threads for RV570. ATI's Ultra-Threads technology was then improved and applied for ATI Radeon HD 2900, but for all shader types. ATI Xenos is only equipped with 64 threads. Both ATI's Ultra-Threads and NVIDIA's Giga-Threads(G8X) increases register data storage i.e. the fastest data storage method. ATI Radeon HD 48X0 (RV770) has 2.5 Megabytes of register data storage.

As you may already know, CPU's register data storage is faster than L1 cache or SPE local memory. Current NV and ATI PC GPU designs exploits register storage at the extreme levels.

XBox 360 has no problems in matching Taito Type X2's NVIDIA Geforce 7900 GS Street Fighter IV performance.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#143 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Its pretty obvious 360 is as powerfull as PS3 but harcore Sony fans for the obvious resons keep feeding that old myth.

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#144 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Dear theseekar,

You have become the laughing stock of these boards in just three days and for good reason. I'm gonna' type the next part in bold so you'll read it. I think you know all about making text reeeealy noticeable. NONE OF THOSE CRITICS AGREE WITH YOU. NONE OF THOSE EXCERPTS SAY, "PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does," BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE. THEY JUST THINK ITS A GREAT LOOKING GAME. Alan Wake looks really nice, man. Just not that good.

Love, NAPK1NS

delta3074
the real laughing stocks are the people that ripped alan wake and FFXIII apart for being SUB-HD on the 360, then said the RDR being SUB-HD on the Ps3 was somehow insignificant, at least the seekar is prepared to Pony up and provide backing for his arguments, i would give him 10 out of 10 for effort, and no offence, but where did any reviewer say that GOW 3 or uncharted 2 where better looking than any 360 exclusive? they didn't, so your argument works both ways,lol

IGN: "God of War III is, at times, the best looking game we've seen." Why is God of War being brought into this? :?
Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Dear theseekar,

You have become the laughing stock of these boards in just three days and for good reason. I'm gonna' type the next part in bold so you'll read it. I think you know all about making text reeeealy noticeable. NONE OF THOSE CRITICS AGREE WITH YOU. NONE OF THOSE EXCERPTS SAY, "PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does," BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE. THEY JUST THINK ITS A GREAT LOOKING GAME. Alan Wake looks really nice, man. Just not that good.

Love, NAPK1NS

NAPK1NS
the real laughing stocks are the people that ripped alan wake and FFXIII apart for being SUB-HD on the 360, then said the RDR being SUB-HD on the Ps3 was somehow insignificant, at least the seekar is prepared to Pony up and provide backing for his arguments, i would give him 10 out of 10 for effort, and no offence, but where did any reviewer say that GOW 3 or uncharted 2 where better looking than any 360 exclusive? they didn't, so your argument works both ways,lol

IGN: "God of War III is, at times, the best looking game we've seen." Why is God of War being brought into this? :?

lol why is red dead redemption?
Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#146 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"][QUOTE="delta3074"]the real laughing stocks are the people that ripped alan wake and FFXIII apart for being SUB-HD on the 360, then said the RDR being SUB-HD on the Ps3 was somehow insignificant, at least the seekar is prepared to Pony up and provide backing for his arguments, i would give him 10 out of 10 for effort, and no offence, but where did any reviewer say that GOW 3 or uncharted 2 where better looking than any 360 exclusive? they didn't, so your argument works both ways,lolTyrant156
IGN: "God of War III is, at times, the best looking game we've seen." Why is God of War being brought into this? :?

lol why is red dead redemption?

I'm... not bringing in Red Dead...
Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts
IGN: "God of War III is, at times, the best looking game we've seen." Why is God of War being brought into this? :?

lol why is red dead redemption?

I'm... not bringing in Red Dead...

Heh Delta's post is confusing...how do you go from talking about AW and U2 to complaining about people calling RDR and FF13 sub-HD
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#148 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

Dear theseekar,

You have become the laughing stock of these boards in just three days and for good reason. I'm gonna' type the next part in bold so you'll read it. I think you know all about making text reeeealy noticeable. NONE OF THOSE CRITICS AGREE WITH YOU. NONE OF THOSE EXCERPTS SAY, "PS3 exclusives dont even come close to doing any of the above AW does," BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE. THEY JUST THINK ITS A GREAT LOOKING GAME. Alan Wake looks really nice, man. Just not that good.

Love, NAPK1NS

NAPK1NS
the real laughing stocks are the people that ripped alan wake and FFXIII apart for being SUB-HD on the 360, then said the RDR being SUB-HD on the Ps3 was somehow insignificant, at least the seekar is prepared to Pony up and provide backing for his arguments, i would give him 10 out of 10 for effort, and no offence, but where did any reviewer say that GOW 3 or uncharted 2 where better looking than any 360 exclusive? they didn't, so your argument works both ways,lol

IGN: "God of War III is, at times, the best looking game we've seen." Why is God of War being brought into this? :?

so what he basically said was that certain parts of the game are the best looking they have seen, so overall the whole game isn't the best looking they have see, interesting, but my point still stands, where has any reviewer ever stated a Ps3 exclusive 'looks better than anything on the 360'
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#149 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Tyrant156"] lol why is red dead redemption?

I'm... not bringing in Red Dead...

Heh Delta's post is confusing...how do you go from talking about AW and U2 to complaining about people calling RDR and FF13 sub-HD

you ot need to actually read the quote chain, i was pointing out that Seekar isn't the real laughing stock around here, it's the people that contradict themselves all the time, it wasn't ok for AW or split second or FFXIII to be SUB-HD on the 360, but somehow the same people where saying it's OK if it's a Ps3 title, we where talking alan wake where we not? so my post is rellevent if you think about it.
Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#150 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

I just have to look at the huge spaces, the lighting and huge forests of Alan Wake to know 360 is more powerfull, i dont need confirmation of any kind

theseekar

you gotta be kidding me!!