DF exposed!!!

We have been using Digital Foundry this whole gen and they have been the deciding word on how the games have been from textures, lighting, scale and smoothness. It also part of the scale tipping of the ps4 vs xbox one debate, showing the ps4 in the performance leader when in comes to the areas I mentioned above.

But they have been a LYING this whole gen why? Things are finally coming out where it shows xbox 1 running the games better, more particles, and better af th.an the ps4 counterparts. I'm not saying ALL of the xbox one vs ps4 games are better on the xbox one but more than they are giving the xbox one credit for, and its 2 ways this can go.

Here at Digital Foundry, we have conflicting memories of our initial Xbox One playthrough of Ryse. With a deluge of next-gen games to look at, we never did complete the campaign, nor sample the multiplayer. But there was the sense that the gameplay was a real grind, and we only really persisted - as much as time allowed - in order to sample what was clearly an exciting leap forward in rendering technology, combined with stunning art direction and some spectacular set-pieces. Returning to the Xbox One game this week, it's clear that Ryse is rich with breathtaking spectacle, with the third campaign level's beachhead assault standing out in particular. 10 months on, many of its technological achievements have still yet to be matched.

1. They play they ps4 games but just really look at the xbox one games and write their findings.

2. xbox one never had a chance in the first place.

That's not what it says at all

Who cares, it was a shit game.

Gs eating my posts? What the ****.

And you're criticizing DF for their analysis of Ryse? Didn't they name it like the best looking game ever ?

This thread is a dark place.

Yeah, I am confused.

TC not only makes a huge assumption, he also makes a even bigger assumption that their ryse playthru applies to all Xboxone games. Its ridiculous.

"1. They play they ps4 games but just really look at the xbox one games and write their findings." statement is cringe-worthy.

PS4 has a better GPU but a similar CPU to the xboxone. Of course, the PS4 version of multiplatform games are going to look better. This is the most boring generation yet because their hardware are so comparable.

Tc's usually got his head up his ass so he's used to it.

I don't see anything that says the Xone version of any game is better than the PS4

@Shewgenja: that's because of the crushed blacks on X1

You have a serious reading comprehension problem.

/thread

This isn't the government TC manipulating on what was said won't get people to believe you

I only liked them last gen....now they suck

@lostrib: What the hell you talking about they did say that on the pc preview them are not my words thats DF words

@Tighaman: the conclusions you come to are not upheld by what DF says

@Chutebox: What didnt I comprehend? That they really never played ryse only a couple of levels? What about the rest of the games they reviewed since it was a very large catalog of games to look at? Was they too not looked at thoroughly? thats what I'm saying and we have plenty of games that show that.

Isn't Ryse a corridor game.

I'm sure a good dev can make a still picture of the best quality. I still think it's unfair to say it's the best looking game when a game like Infamous is bigger and looks AT THE VERY LEAST.....just as good.

Since when does an outlet need to play 100% of a game in order to benchmark it? A few sections here and there are enough to get a sense of how a game performs. DF's article on Ryse was about the technical aspects of it, not a review. Get over it.

@lostrib: no them conclusions are mines based off what is shown in their own examinations and what they said above my conclusions

Topic should read: TC's inability to reason exposed!!!!

I don't think you understand what Digital Foundry is exactly. Digital Foundry is just a tech and performance analysis based part of Eurogamer. When you click on "reviews" it sends you to the Eurogamer site. Digital Foundry just counts pixels and frames. They don't actually have to play an entire game to do that. So them not playing through an entire game is no crime.

And your conclusions are not supported by the evidence you have provided

@GoldenElementXL: fam I know how they are and what they do and the analysis been off but its also been part of this propaganda if they would tell the real truth all of the time instead of wave riding it would be a different scene in gaming than just trying to reach 1080 p

lems brain is a weird thing, they see thing they want to see, they are so desperate to "prove" DF is wrong just because they constantly prove how inferior xbone is to ps4. Their latest excuse is "bu bu bu teh gaming sites are biased TEH PARITY!!!!!!111111"

I feel exposed.

put your pants back on

So THAT'S why people are staring at me in the office! And here I thought they finally caught on to my devilishly good looks...

@Krelian-co: fam I got them both in my household I don't care I want games to evolved beyond resolutions and since this has been a hot topic many devs cutting things that can improve the smoothness of the game, more textures, more doors to open , more things to discover just to hit that resolution is stupid

i'm confused....

Fifa 15 Face off. Watch the video. PS4 version drops to 22 FPS. The lowest recorded drop in their faceoff. DF conclusion X1 suffers from dips in FPS in cut scenes the worse.

Just saying...

Aliens?

@Tighaman: I'm sure DF lied about a few things, or gotten things completely wrong in the past. Anything positive about the XB1 they tend to ignore or downplay it. This is a European site, so it doesn't really surprise me. This is one of the reasons why there are less XB1 reviews for multiplat games. Critics are only reviewing and scoring the PS4 version and completely ignoreing the XB1 version which is lame.

Seriously, this is a new low. Being a fanboy is one thing, but going so far as to act like some propaganda minister for the sake of your plastic box is more sad than a Twilight marathon.

@Shewgenja: for you to be blind and turn away from the truth makes you a fanboy a bunch of robots. if your friend jumped off the bridge you would jump too ass people

For god sake it was DF who used a 7850 to represent the xbox one on a comparison they did which only intention was to help the xbox one weak image.

They compared several games including Tomb Raider and they comparison failed.

They got wrong things in favor of the xbox one as well..

Based on direct confirmation from Ghost Studios' rendering engineer, Andreas Brinck, the PS4 also gives us the more accurate horizon-based ambient occlusion (HBAO), as seen on the PC's maximum settings. By comparison, the Xbox One relies on an approximate measure with its screen-space approach to shading (SSAO), producing a prominent silhouette around each car's exterior, plus a persistent shade under spoilers during a race. For the final build, all of this does indeed remain the same - leaving the PS4 with a respectable, if not spectacular, advantage in the visual stakes.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-need-for-speed-rivals-next-gen-face-off

This article was edit,and that part there ^^ was added in the original one DF claimed the xbox one version had HBAO while the PS4 lack it,when it was the other way around,and this was done by the same moron who claimed thief was superior on xbox one..lol when it had lower resolution,had problems with shadows,lower frames and lacked parallax mapping.

Don't forget how DF was going article after article about the xbox one secret sauces,they did like 5 in a row vs 1 for the PS4,on one they even claim the games would be the benchmarks and that games would speak for them self which is why DF acted so surprise when they saw the huge gap ghost and BF4 had vs the xbox one.

Stop been a cry baby and admit the xbox one is weak sauce..hahaha

They aren't reviewing the games dude.

@Tighaman: So you are saying Digital Foundry is anti Xbox One, while @tormentos claims they were trying to make the Xbox One look better than it actually is? I don't know who to believe.

@blackace: Lmao, I doubt you complained about the PS3 versions mutiplats being ignored last gen. Get over it dude. Try hiding your biases better next time.

hahahhahaha conspiracy theories. ps4 is just the lead console this gen just like x360 was last gen. there isnt a elaborate conspiracy against x1 and ms

It's funny I've heard both lems and cows dismiss the findings of df as biased. This lets me know they are doing a good job.

1- they make tech analisys not game reviews

2- i dont have and i dont want a ps4, but i feel all the time that DF tries to protect Xbox One

3- HD7850 > HD7770 > Xbox One

DF "ryse on X1 = PC highest settings"

This is beyond a "Lems brain". This is some next level secret government experiential shit.

@leandrro said:

DF "ryse on X1 = PC highest settings"

But will it run on your 300$ PC without an OS?

@Tighaman:

Stupidest damn thread in a long time.

Is this really the best you can come up with?

@MonsieurX said:

@leandrro said:

DF "ryse on X1 = PC highest settings"

But will it run on your 300$ PC without an OS?

haha, the console fanboy sole argument