• 52 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. I'd probably lean towards DICE now though,

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts

For now, I respect DICE more. Of course that's subject to change depending on what they do with BF3.

Avatar image for Justinge3
Justinge3

2506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#3 Justinge3
Member since 2008 • 2506 Posts
Easily Dice.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

The last good DICE game was either BF2 or Mirrors Edge IMO, the last good COD game was COD4. So both companies now suck IMO.

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. Right now, I guess DICE since BC2 is pretty good.

argetlam00

Even if it does get consolized, its still expected to be better than anything IW can pump out, especially now.

Avatar image for redskins26rocs
redskins26rocs

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 redskins26rocs
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts

i say dice they seem to want to keep on improving bad company 2

Avatar image for quijeros
quijeros

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 quijeros
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

The last good DICE game was either BF2 or Mirrors Edge IMO, the last good COD game was COD4. So both companies now suck IMO.clyde46

Seconded. After MW2 and BC2, I'm not a big fan of either developer right now.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
Neither. Valve FTW! (Plus ubisoft, Blizzard, Rockstar, etc)
Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts

Dice, as I love Battlefield 1942 and Mirror's Edge. I don't really care for Battlefield that much anymore but I am interested in Mirror's Edge 2 and I hope they don't ruin it.

Avatar image for 2-10-08
2-10-08

2775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#10 2-10-08
Member since 2008 • 2775 Posts

IW. Call of Duty still controls better than BC 2, and DICE janked a lot of features from Cod 4 to implement in BC 2. And then they made fun of MW 2 in game. Lame.

Avatar image for AznKSor
AznKSor

1400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 AznKSor
Member since 2010 • 1400 Posts

Easily Dice. Justinge3
Lol you're all over IW today arent you :P But i choose Dice overall.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

I guess Dice, though the MOH beta was a piece of ******.

Unless they completely revamp and fix MOH there is no way I am getting MOH

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts
This was a close one for me. Traditionally I cant say that I like one over the other when it comes to COD and Battlefield. I had a lot of fun with COD up through COD4, and same with Battlefield up through 2142 on the PC. At the same time, I have been disappointed each of their last couple of releases. In the end I choose DICE for two reasons, Mirror's Edge and 1943. Mirror's Edge is one of the most underrated games I have ever played. I just cant seem to get enough. 1943 is Battlefield on the console done right. Sure there are limited classes and weapons, but the overall feel of the game is much closer to the PC versions than Bad Company. For $15, its an awesome deal.
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48954 Posts

If Battlefield 3 won't be a true sequel to battlefield 2 (BC2 was sort of BF2.5) ... than I won't really care much about either of them.

If battlefield 3 however turns out to be a great game and not held back by consoles (meaning large maps, 64 people, mod support, ...) which I'm sure DICE can do ... than DICE > IW.

Avatar image for phatkav
phatkav

1357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 phatkav
Member since 2005 • 1357 Posts

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. I'd probably lean towards DICE now though,

argetlam00

So just because the game is going to consoles that means it will be consolized? The game could still be a true sequel to BF2 and not be consolized.

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#16 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

If Battlefield 3 won't be a true sequel to battlefield 2 (BC2 was sort of BF2.5) ... than I won't really care much about either of them.

If battlefield 3 however turns out to be a great game and not held back by consoles (meaning large maps, 64 people, mod support, ...) which I'm sure DICE can do ... than DICE > IW.

R4gn4r0k
They better do BF3 right. Bad Company pales in comparison to BF2. BF3 needs to be a legit Battlefield.
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. I'd probably lean towards DICE now though,

phatkav

So just because the game is going to consoles that means it will be consolized? The game could still be a true sequel to BF2 and not be consolized.

There are two things that can happen if Battlefield 3 goes multiplatform.

1) The game is developed by a team on consoles and ported to PC

2) The game is developed by seperate teams for consoles and for PC

I wouldn't be highly optimistic with option #2. Consoles will be holding back the PC version and the devs are going to dumb down the game for it to appeal to the console market and also butcher many features that could have been available on PC. Don't even get me started on the technical limitations.

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. I'd probably lean towards DICE now though,

phatkav

So just because the game is going to consoles that means it will be consolized? The game could still be a true sequel to BF2 and not be consolized.

Evidence is to the contrary. A true sequel needs to have a lot more in it than they have shown on Bad Company. It would have bigger maps, more vehicles, and a lot more people in the game. Aircraft, UAVs, Tanks, APCs, Jeeps, ATVs, Boats, Artillery, etc. all on the same map with 64 players. The maps would have to be much bigger and more intricate than anything seen in Bad Complany. The ability to create squads on the fly, plus better squad leader orders, and an overall commander also are missing in Bad Company. So far neither DICE or IW have done anything close without serious lag issues. Bad Co 2 starts to lag when you max out the room as it is. DICE would have to get a lot better at developing for the consoles for a true sequel to work. Then there are the mic issues...LOL.
Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="phatkav"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. I'd probably lean towards DICE now though,

argetlam00

So just because the game is going to consoles that means it will be consolized? The game could still be a true sequel to BF2 and not be consolized.

There are two things that can happen if Battlefield 3 goes multiplatform.

1) The game is developed by a team on consoles and ported to PC

2) The game is developed by seperate teams for consoles and for PC

I wouldn't be highly optimistic with option #2. Consoles will be holding back the PC version and the devs are going to dumb down the game for it to appeal to the console market and also butcher many features that could have been available on PC. Don't even get me started on the technical limitations.

Well, MAG is doing a lot of the things that DICE left out of Bad Company with 256 players. Granted the graphics arent at the same level, but I have to believe its possible to have better graphics and make a 64 player game work. MAG has the command structure, all the explosions, artillery, UAV, semi-active aircraft (bombing runs, C-130 air drops, and attack choppers flying in as spawn points), APCs and Jeeps, bunkers with turrets firing constantly, grenades and rocket launchers going off all the time, etc. MAG Interdiction mode is just like Conquest. 16 APCs, a command structure, 128 players, and artillery on each side. I think it could be done if DICE wanted to. With a 64 player max, the graphics could be improved and more vehicles could be present without lagging up the place.
Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="phatkav"]

So just because the game is going to consoles that means it will be consolized? The game could still be a true sequel to BF2 and not be consolized.

-ArchAngeL-777-

There are two things that can happen if Battlefield 3 goes multiplatform.

1) The game is developed by a team on consoles and ported to PC

2) The game is developed by seperate teams for consoles and for PC

I wouldn't be highly optimistic with option #2. Consoles will be holding back the PC version and the devs are going to dumb down the game for it to appeal to the console market and also butcher many features that could have been available on PC. Don't even get me started on the technical limitations.

Well, MAG is doing a lot of the things that DICE left out of Bad Company with 256 players. Granted the graphics arent at the same level, but I have to believe its possible to have better graphics and make a 64 player game work. MAG has the command structure, all the explosions, artillery, UAV, semi-active aircraft (bombing runs, C-130 air drops, and attack choppers flying in as spawn points), APCs and Jeeps, bunkers with turrets firing constantly, grenades and rocket launchers going off all the time, etc. MAG Interdiction mode is just like Conquest. 16 APCs, a command structure, 128 players, and artillery on each side. I think it could be done if DICE wanted to. With a 64 player max, the graphics could be improved and more vehicles could be present without lagging up the place.

Mag doesnt even come close to a 64 person server on pc. Plus...in mag you dont see many teams at the same time, and it ends up being more of a 32 person mp. Also, whenever a game is put on console it is consolized. Except bioware games and crysis 2, but we will see about that one.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#22 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="phatkav"]

So just because the game is going to consoles that means it will be consolized? The game could still be a true sequel to BF2 and not be consolized.

-ArchAngeL-777-

There are two things that can happen if Battlefield 3 goes multiplatform.

1) The game is developed by a team on consoles and ported to PC

2) The game is developed by seperate teams for consoles and for PC

I wouldn't be highly optimistic with option #2. Consoles will be holding back the PC version and the devs are going to dumb down the game for it to appeal to the console market and also butcher many features that could have been available on PC. Don't even get me started on the technical limitations.

Well, MAG is doing a lot of the things that DICE left out of Bad Company with 256 players. Granted the graphics arent at the same level, but I have to believe its possible to have better graphics and make a 64 player game work. MAG has the command structure, all the explosions, artillery, UAV, semi-active aircraft (bombing runs, C-130 air drops, and attack choppers flying in as spawn points), APCs and Jeeps, bunkers with turrets firing constantly, grenades and rocket launchers going off all the time, etc. MAG Interdiction mode is just like Conquest. 16 APCs, a command structure, 128 players, and artillery on each side. I think it could be done if DICE wanted to. With a 64 player max, the graphics could be improved and more vehicles could be present without lagging up the place.

Yeah, Frontlines and MAG have proven that console online games can offer the same level of depth if not more than in BF2. MAG in particular has a great tactical way to play with squad and platoons seperated, while the field commander option is reminiscent of BF2. It just seems like PC gamers are clinging to the old days of the 90's when PC's were the absolute hardcore of the hardcore and consoles weren't as perfected.

Also, you guys are WAY late to the party- BF3 has been confirmer for consoles and a beta for all systems (minus Wii of course) will be available with Medal of Honor.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

WTF? Is this a trick question?

I do like IW, for COD2, and COD4, but DiCE made this so..

.

they get extra points.

Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

I will give more respect to Dice since they make other games besides the Battlefield series while IW just does Call Of Duty. If I was working with IW I would hate it because I would like to develop different games instead of the same series over and over again.

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

its not battliefield 3...it will be bad company 3.....just wait they will just change the 4 main characters...BF series cant work well on a console,

Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts

To be honest, if the rumored consolization of Battlefield 3 occurs, I will hate DICE far more than IW. I'd probably lean towards DICE now though,

argetlam00
I doubt it's rumoured if the BF3 beta is included with EVERY MoH LE game
Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts

IW. Call of Duty still controls better than BC 2, and DICE janked a lot of features from Cod 4 to implement in BC 2. And then they made fun of MW 2 in game. Lame.

2-10-08
and now medal of honor's multiplayer is basically a cod clone.
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45436 Posts
Infinity Ward makes good COD campaigns while DICE makes better multiplayer games, I respect them equally. And I might add I respect Treyarch just as much as I respect IW, even though people give them crap they truly don't deserve.
Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
Would have said IW before MW2 but now its anyone other than IW.
Avatar image for Ultizer
Ultizer

1037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Ultizer
Member since 2010 • 1037 Posts

COD 4 is better than any Dice game

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

COD 4 is better than any Dice game

Ultizer

Battlefield 2 says high.

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

Old DICE > New DICE> IW

Unless BF3 is a true sequel to BF2 and not dumbed down due to consoles then they will regain my full respect.

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

I guess Dice, though the MOH beta was a piece of ******.

Unless they completely revamp and fix MOH there is no way I am getting MOH

dercoo

you gonna judge a game thats not even released yet? In BETA stages not even a full fledge demo? lulz.

Avatar image for erglesmergle
erglesmergle

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 erglesmergle
Member since 2009 • 1769 Posts

IW for a smooth polished games. DICE for fun gameplay.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#35 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
I gotta say I would love to see the results of this poll before Modern Warfare 2 came out.
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

I guess Dice, though the MOH beta was a piece of ******.

Unless they completely revamp and fix MOH there is no way I am getting MOH

Santesyu

you gonna judge a game thats not even released yet? In BETA stages not even a full fledge demo? lulz.

I played betas and know the final product is better, but that beta was in its own league of failure.

Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

[QUOTE="Santesyu"]

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

I guess Dice, though the MOH beta was a piece of ******.

Unless they completely revamp and fix MOH there is no way I am getting MOH

dercoo

you gonna judge a game thats not even released yet? In BETA stages not even a full fledge demo? lulz.

I played betas and know the final product is better, but that beta was in its own league of failure.

agreed, i been in beta for 10+ games and they all were better than that beta

Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

Both are great devs...so for me its a draw !!

Personally i played much more the COD series compared to the BF series...

I see a lot of hate towards MW2, but in all honesty BF:BC2 was practically the same as BF:BC with a few 'new' additions... While i liked both MW2 & BF:BC2, I still expected more from both titles..

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

Neither has produced a game this gen that has run admirably online, so neither. When one does, I will go with them.

Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts
DICE is hella overrated. Respawn vs Bungie vs Guerilla is where it's at.
Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#41 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

GSC Gameworld.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
IW, never liked battlefied games.
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
DICE.
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

IW. Call of Duty still controls better than BC 2, and DICE janked a lot of features from Cod 4 to implement in BC 2. And then they made fun of MW 2 in game. Lame.

2-10-08

Care to give a list? Since I didint notice anything cod4 like in BC2. There was no perks or kill streak ablities.

Avatar image for 2-10-08
2-10-08

2775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#45 2-10-08
Member since 2008 • 2775 Posts

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

IW. Call of Duty still controls better than BC 2, and DICE janked a lot of features from Cod 4 to implement in BC 2. And then they made fun of MW 2 in game. Lame.

finalfantasy94

Care to give a list? Since I didint notice anything cod4 like in BC2. There was no perks or kill streak ablities.

- Mgnm ammo = stopping power; body armor = juggernaut; explosive damage up= danger close, ammo up= bandolier The ability to sprint without continuously holding down L3 A linear single player experience There's a part in the single player where you have to shoot a hostage that's being held up, same thing happened in mile high club. Default controller configuration (grenade launcher and rpg being set to d pad, grenade being assigned a button)
Avatar image for ExESGO
ExESGO

1895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ExESGO
Member since 2010 • 1895 Posts
DICE. To be specific, the old DICE (back during the days of Battlefield 2).
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

IW. Call of Duty still controls better than BC 2, and DICE janked a lot of features from Cod 4 to implement in BC 2. And then they made fun of MW 2 in game. Lame.

2-10-08

Care to give a list? Since I didint notice anything cod4 like in BC2. There was no perks or kill streak ablities.

- Mgnm ammo = stopping power; body armor = juggernaut; explosive damage up= danger close, ammo up= bandolier The ability to sprint without continuously holding down L3 A linear single player experience There's a part in the single player where you have to shoot a hostage that's being held up, same thing happened in mile high club. Default controller configuration (grenade launcher and rpg being set to d pad, grenade being assigned a button)

Are you actually telling me that IW invented these? "Linear singleplayer campaign", hahahaha. Yeah, if any shooter has a linear campaign after CoD4 its automatically "jacked".

Call of Duty 4 likely jacked the medals and accolades from Battlefield 2. Along with the level up system.

Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#48 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
[QUOTE="dkjestrup"]DICE is hella overrated. Respawn vs Bungie vs Guerilla is where it's at.

Respawn? They haven't done anything.
Avatar image for Brickz187
Brickz187

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Brickz187
Member since 2007 • 994 Posts

Treyarch

Avatar image for XxChicagoTedXx
XxChicagoTedXx

407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 XxChicagoTedXx
Member since 2009 • 407 Posts

I don't see why everyone hates DICE for going multiplat. As long as they don't forget their origins and completely blow off the PC, like somebody we know, then I am all for it.