Did they upgrade Red Dead Redemption graphics on the PS3?

I remember all the face-offs, and I was horrified at how badly ripped off PS3 owners got by rockstar and their lazy port. I remember the blurry graphics compared with the super sharp look of the 360 version.

So when I bought RDR today for cheap, I wasn't expecting much. Before playing it downloaded a patch and off I went... but the graphics seem very crisp, and the only bad thing I can see is a lack of AA. So did they remove the PS3 blur filter, previously used as a cheap form of AA?

Most of the things you notice on still screen shots, you wont notice when you playing it on your HDTV.

I think you were just taking the multiplat comparisons a bit too seriously.

There are very few cases where the difference is noticably large and none where one version is downright broken.

the comparisons made it sound as if the ps3 version was a blurry mess.thetruespin

[QUOTE="thetruespin"]the comparisons made it sound as if the ps3 version was a blurry mess.gaming25

Mmmm nope. RDR on the PS3 is crap if compared head to head with the 360 version.

Now, if you dont do that, its a great looking game by itself

It looked fantastic on Ps3.

I wondered what the fuss was about too. The PS3 version was always a sharp looking game to me, just jaggy.Floppy_Jim

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="thetruespin"]the comparisons made it sound as if the ps3 version was a blurry mess.DragoonKain1687

Mmmm nope. RDR on the PS3 is crap if compared head to head with the 360 version.

Now, if you dont do that, its a great looking game by itself

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="thetruespin"]the comparisons made it sound as if the ps3 version was a blurry mess.DragoonKain1687

Mmmm nope. RDR on the PS3 is crap if compared head to head with the 360 version.

Now, if you dont do that, its a great looking game by itself

PS3 version was not a port. Anyway, it looks great on PS3 too, just not as great.

I remember all the face-offs, and I was horrified at how badly ripped off PS3 owners got by rockstar and their lazy port. I remember the blurry graphics compared with the super sharp look of the 360 version.

So when I bought RDR today for cheap, I wasn't expecting much. Before playing it downloaded a patch and off I went... but the graphics seem very crisp, and the only bad thing I can see is a lack of AA. So did they remove the PS3 blur filter, previously used as a cheap form of AA?

thetruespin

Yea...same goes for FF13.Magik85

What? PS3's version of FF13 was superior to 360s.

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]I wondered what the fuss was about too. The PS3 version was always a sharp looking game to me, just jaggy.thetruespin

Most of the things you notice on still screen shots, you wont notice when you playing it on your HDTV.

GTSaiyanjin2

Just because it looks SLIGHTLY better on X360 doesnt mean it doesnt look great on PS3...shadow8585

Exactly, I'm playing it right now on my PS3, and honestly it's still pretty amazing looking, even if there's a few less shadows, and trees. You really don't notice it (at least I don't) because the game is so much fun and still great to look at on both platforms, which is probably why the PS3 version scored the same.

I have both and the PS3 version misses some objects , has a less stable framerate and runs at a slightly lower resolution , you wont notice it unless you play them side by side .

I play the PS3 version online with friends and have no more Xbox live Gold .

Still a great game on both consoles , i'm in the middle of Undead nightmare on 360 right now and it's awesome , the graphics are even better with awesome looking God rays coming out of the clouds .

no. The problem was the ps3 ran at 640p while the 360 ran at 720p, plus No AA on the ps3 version. Less objects/missing objects (grass) on the ps3 version. And finally the draw distance was way better on the 360 version.

I remember all the face-offs, and I was horrified at how badly ripped off PS3 owners got by rockstar and their lazy port. I remember the blurry graphics compared with the super sharp look of the 360 version.

So when I bought RDR today for cheap, I wasn't expecting much. Before playing it downloaded a patch and off I went... but the graphics seem very crisp, and the only bad thing I can see is a lack of AA. So did they remove the PS3 blur filter, previously used as a cheap form of AA?

thetruespin

lol wut? they pretty much looked the same except the PS3 version had a liitle less grass in some areas and in some parts the textures where a little blurry, you can only notice those things when you compared screen still shots, but when actually playing the game they lookk the same with the PS3 version looking brighter. You sir are overly super over reacting about minor things you dont see even notice while playing the game.

[QUOTE="thetruespin"]

I remember all the face-offs, and I was horrified at how badly ripped off PS3 owners got by rockstar and their lazy port. I remember the blurry graphics compared with the super sharp look of the 360 version.

So when I bought RDR today for cheap, I wasn't expecting much. Before playing it downloaded a patch and off I went... but the graphics seem very crisp, and the only bad thing I can see is a lack of AA. So did they remove the PS3 blur filter, previously used as a cheap form of AA?

J-WOW

lol wut? they pretty much looked the same except the PS3 version had a liitle less grass in some areas and in some parts the textures where a little blurry, you can only notice those things when you compared screen still shots, but when actually playing the game they lookk the same with the PS3 version looking brighter. You sir are overly super over reacting about minor things you dont see even notice while playing the game.

I noticed everything. Maybe that's just me though (I notice everything :P).

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="thetruespin"]the comparisons made it sound as if the ps3 version was a blurry mess.DragoonKain1687

Mmmm nope. RDR on the PS3 is crap if compared head to head with the 360 version.

Now, if you dont do that, its a great looking game by itself

By your logic JC2 on PC makes the the console version look like an NES game.

[QUOTE="DragoonKain1687"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] Huh? RDR was never a "blurry mess" on the PS3. Both versions looked basically the same.RyviusRan

Mmmm nope. RDR on the PS3 is crap if compared head to head with the 360 version.

Now, if you dont do that, its a great looking game by itself

By your logic JC2 on PC makes the the console version look like an NES game.

I thought it looked meh overall when you compare it to the 360 version.

I thought it looked meh overall when you compare it to the 360 version.

theuncharted34

Well of course, you don't have a gaming PC so you wouldn't know the big difference between the console and PC versions.

It's a much larger difference than what consolites bicker over when comparing their multiplats.

[QUOTE="J-WOW"]

[QUOTE="thetruespin"]

I remember all the face-offs, and I was horrified at how badly ripped off PS3 owners got by rockstar and their lazy port. I remember the blurry graphics compared with the super sharp look of the 360 version.

So when I bought RDR today for cheap, I wasn't expecting much. Before playing it downloaded a patch and off I went... but the graphics seem very crisp, and the only bad thing I can see is a lack of AA. So did they remove the PS3 blur filter, previously used as a cheap form of AA?

lol wut? they pretty much looked the same except the PS3 version had a liitle less grass in some areas and in some parts the textures where a little blurry, you can only notice those things when you compared screen still shots, but when actually playing the game they lookk the same with the PS3 version looking brighter. You sir are overly super over reacting about minor things you dont see even notice while playing the game.

I noticed everything. Maybe that's just me though (I notice everything :P).

i bought the 360 version first, the graphics looked great, then i borrowed the ps3 version froma friend, the graphics looked great. your just trying way too hard to over exagerate the 360 graphics, from someone who has actually played both the difference is not noticeable. nice try.

the game looks amazing on ps3

Dont think so. Maybe they fixed performance, but I doubt graphics. game is still plenty palyable. Also, its Rockstar, who have proved be be quite uncapable of doing simultaneous multiplatform development. And 2K also for that matter.

Actualy, I just remembered I got it today on PS3 via gamefly solely due to curiosity of how bad it really is on PS3. Ill play it some and let you know how it looks. (BTW: if you only have a PS3, please get it even if its a bit better on 360. Great game is a great game.)

I played it only on PS3 but it looked great to me.

[QUOTE="DragoonKain1687"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] Huh? RDR was never a "blurry mess" on the PS3. Both versions looked basically the same.RyviusRan

Mmmm nope. RDR on the PS3 is crap if compared head to head with the 360 version.

Now, if you dont do that, its a great looking game by itself

By your logic JC2 on PC makes the the console version look like an NES game.

not exactly but the game is impressive on PC...not so much on consoles.

PS3 version is still sub HD with jaggies :( & nothing is changing that :P.monkeysmoke

ok, played a bit of it. Honestly, it still looks good. I expected more of a difference considering the backlash. It does look rougher because of little aliasing, and I dont have the 360 version to compare it to, but it still looks good and its totaly enjoyable. I dont know about frame rate because I havent really had combat yet, but then again I dont have a good gauge for frame rate.

ps3 version looks amazing to me :shock:

One thing thats bothering me is the jaggedness of some peopls hair on PS3. Bonnies looks rather bad.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"]PS3 version is still sub HD with jaggies :( & nothing is changing that :P.gaming25

no. the ps3 version is clearly inferior with it's weak draw distance and textures, inconsistent framerate and absence of AA. i know because i've seen both versions in action.

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="monkeysmoke"]PS3 version is still sub HD with jaggies :( & nothing is changing that :P.lazerface216

no. the ps3 version is clearly inferior with it's weak draw distance and textures, inconsistent framerate and absence of AA. i know because i've seen both versions in action.

Well, im playing the PS3 version right now and havent noticed any Framerate problems. Lack of AA is annoying yes, and I guess the draw distances are kinda weak, but I havent had a inferior experince yet. And ive beaten teh gaem on 360. We all need to look up the word inferior.

[QUOTE="lazerface216"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] And it really doesnt matter either since both versions basically look the same.XboximusPrime

no. the ps3 version is clearly inferior with it's weak draw distance and textures, inconsistent framerate and absence of AA. i know because i've seen both versions in action.

Well, im playing the PS3 version right now and havent noticed any Framerate problems. Lack of AA is annoying yes, and I guess the draw distances are kinda weak, but I havent had a inferior experince yet. And ive beaten teh gaem on 360. We all need to look up the word inferior.

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="lazerface216"]

no. the ps3 version is clearly inferior with it's weak draw distance and textures, inconsistent framerate and absence of AA. i know because i've seen both versions in action.

themyth01

Well, im playing the PS3 version right now and havent noticed any Framerate problems. Lack of AA is annoying yes, and I guess the draw distances are kinda weak, but I havent had a inferior experince yet. And ive beaten teh gaem on 360. We all need to look up the word inferior.

Agreed. I remember the comparisons and the 360 clearly looked better. But if you don't have the choice the PS3 version is still a great looking game, and one of my favorites.

The only real differences I noticed between the two versions is that the PS3 has a lot more pop in of graphics, especially off in the distance. Not that it was a deal breaker for playing the game, but it did get annoying.

Anyone who says there is not a huge difference is fooling themselves. I only had a ps3 when this was released. I bought a 360 for reach a few weeks ago, I rebought red dead for the undead nightmare pack, and I wanted to replay it on the 360 for achievements. The graphics are better in to many ways to describe. The image is sharper, the colors are better, the shadows are better, I could go on, but over all all the little things add up and the game looks amazing. I cant stand sony fans that downplay this and then hype graphics of the exclusives, IMO RDR on the 360 looks just as good as any ps3 game.