Did Titanfall really do anything?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WeepsForFools
WeepsForFools

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 WeepsForFools
Member since 2012 • 793 Posts

@Sweenix:

You are truly ignorant if you think Titanfall only sold a little more than 1.2 million worldwide. Like, staggeringly ignorant.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#203 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#204 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

@blackace said:

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

EA needs everyone and that's the worst assumption i've ever read.

EA is a company first and foremost with offices all over the world. They want all the money.

Aren't you curious why they haven't come out with titanfall numbers ?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2014/05/06/ea-net-revenue-down-releases-no-titanfall-sales-numbers/

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#205 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

@locopatho said:

Fantastic game. The real way of seeing how good it is: look at all the cows crying about it. Same with Gears last gen: PC/360 game that they spent the whole gen crying and calling shit... cos it was SO FUCKING GOOD :D

@Floppy_Jim said:

Is that the game people wouldn't shut up about from May 2013 until March 2014 and then suddenly no one seemed to talk about anymore?

Because we bought it and played the shit out of it.

Wouldn't that increase the amount of talk about the game though?

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#206 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

I'm glad you deleted that reply @Animal-Mother.

It was pretty stupid

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#207  Edited By Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

It came and went and no one really gives a shit about it anymore. Hardly the big next gen revolution people were hyping it to be

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#208 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

@RR360DD said:

I'm glad you deleted that reply @Animal-Mother.

It was pretty stupid

I realized my reading comprehension was off on that. My bad.

Avatar image for Crypt_mx
Crypt_mx

4739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#209  Edited By Crypt_mx
Member since 2007 • 4739 Posts

I'm a little late to this thread and haven't read any other posts but I'll throw in my two cents on this matter.

TitanFall is a great game, a shooter that feels familiar but plays a little differently. I think Titanfall will open the door for shooters to try new things, because people really are interested in new gameplay elements. Titanfall created a standard, devs are going to consider wall running, double jumping and more vertical gameplay areas. Devs are going to consider things like grunts and spectres (AI on the battlefield), they are going to consider alternate gameplay experiences (like the Titan). Hell, I expect every shooter with a "Prestige" system to take notes from TF's Generation Challenges. Essentially, I believe Titanfall kicked off the next gen of shooters, it is a baby step in innovation, but it will lead to much more.

Avatar image for handssss
handssss

1907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 handssss
Member since 2013 • 1907 Posts

@blackace said:

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

they'll side with the money. if MS wants to keep EA in their pocket, it'll cost substantially more this gen because the Xbone isn't winning.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211  Edited By locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

@Floppy_Jim said:

@locopatho said:

Fantastic game. The real way of seeing how good it is: look at all the cows crying about it. Same with Gears last gen: PC/360 game that they spent the whole gen crying and calling shit... cos it was SO FUCKING GOOD :D

@Floppy_Jim said:

Is that the game people wouldn't shut up about from May 2013 until March 2014 and then suddenly no one seemed to talk about anymore?

Because we bought it and played the shit out of it.

Wouldn't that increase the amount of talk about the game though?

Not really no. There's way more to talk about before a game releases, unless there is a significant story. I feel to urge to talk about games like Metal Gear Solid after I play them. Something like Titanfall, or Mario Galaxy that is pure gameplay? Not at all, you can't really talk about feelings/experiences.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#213 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

@getyeryayasout said:

I barely play competitive shooters online anymore, but finally played Titanfall (360) for a bit last night. It looked okay, ran smoothly for the most part, and was fun. I think if MS could have secured X1 exclusivity for the title it would have made a bigger impact as far as SW goes, and in the real world MS would have sold more X1's due to the exclusivity. As it stood, most people were happy to play on their 360's and PC's that they already own. I doubt it had the impact that MS was hoping it had on X1 sales, that's for sure.

Pretty well-rounded point. At the end of the day, i'm glad it was multiplat as the game brought a new level to competitive FPS (popular). The game has great fluidity and motion when traversing the maps.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180135 Posts

@blackace said:

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

Sony is selling well this gen....EA isn't going to ignore Sony. EA needs Sony as well....

Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#215 joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:

The way the media sucked it's TITAN you would have thought it was the second coming of gaming.

How they give that game a 9 and not Mario Kart 8 is beyond me.

Did you seriously think a game that MS and EA threw so much money at would score less than a 9? GS wouldnt have the balls to give it anything lower.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#216  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

@joel_c17 said:

Did you seriously think a game that MS and EA threw so much money at would score less than a 9? GS wouldnt have the balls to give it anything lower.

Why?

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217  Edited By Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51583 Posts

@blackace said:

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

They sided with Sony last gen.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#218  Edited By Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

@Chutebox said:

@blackace said:

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

They sided with Sony last gen.

They side with whoever fills their wallets faster, and with the ps4 selling faster than xbone you can be damn sure they will hop on the hype train. In all honesty is more likely than they will make multiplats all gen long, more munys that way.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219  Edited By Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51583 Posts

@Krelian-co said:

@Chutebox said:

@blackace said:

@UnbiasedPoster said:

I'm sure it did something. It taught EA that they better not bite the hand that feeds. This gen, they need Sony.

Sony needs EA more then the other way around. Since EA is an American company, they will side with Microsoft faster then Sony. I won't be surprised if we see more deals between M$ & EA in the future. Especially after the E3.

They sided with Sony last gen.

They side with whoever fills their wallets faster, and with the ps4 selling faster than xbone you can be damn sure they will hop on the hype train. In all honesty is more likely than they will make multiplats all gen long, more munys that way.

Heh, I think they side with whoever Activision doesn't side. Last gen it was other way around.

Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#220  Edited By joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

@joel_c17 said:

Did you seriously think a game that MS and EA threw so much money at would score less than a 9? GS wouldnt have the balls to give it anything lower.

Why?

Because both EA and MS have recently been uncovered paying websites for positive previews, its not a big stretch to imagine they would do the same for reviews.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#221 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

@joel_c17 said:

@lundy86_4 said:

@joel_c17 said:

Did you seriously think a game that MS and EA threw so much money at would score less than a 9? GS wouldnt have the balls to give it anything lower.

Why?

Because both EA and MS have recently been uncovered paying websites for positive previews, its not a big stretch to imagine they would do the same for reviews.

So, it's just an assumption that GS wouldn't have the balls to score it lower, in case they missed a paycheque? I'm not saying it's unheard of, but that hardly means it's true.

Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#222 joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

@joel_c17 said:

@lundy86_4 said:

@joel_c17 said:

Did you seriously think a game that MS and EA threw so much money at would score less than a 9? GS wouldnt have the balls to give it anything lower.

Why?

Because both EA and MS have recently been uncovered paying websites for positive previews, its not a big stretch to imagine they would do the same for reviews.

So, it's just an assumption that GS wouldn't have the balls to score it lower, in case they missed a paycheque? I'm not saying it's unheard of, but that hardly means it's true.

Yep just an assumption

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#223  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

@joel_c17 said:

Yep just an assumption

Well... I read ya loud and clear. I was expecting a completely different outcome lol.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#225 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

@W1NGMAN- said:

@getyeryayasout said:

I barely play competitive shooters online anymore, but finally played Titanfall (360) for a bit last night. It looked okay, ran smoothly for the most part, and was fun. I think if MS could have secured X1 exclusivity for the title it would have made a bigger impact as far as SW goes, and in the real world MS would have sold more X1's due to the exclusivity. As it stood, most people were happy to play on their 360's and PC's that they already own. I doubt it had the impact that MS was hoping it had on X1 sales, that's for sure.

It's utter trash on the 360, and I honestly believe it effected the overall perception of Titanfall ... we're talking about a 70+ million install base full of FPS players, yet somehow it only managed to hit around 500 to 700K??

No doubt in my mind word of mouth played a huge role, and both EA and MS dropped the ball in releasing a blatantly half assed product on the market.

I'll be fair... You're both full of speculation. The 360 version reviewed well according to MC.

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#226 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

@getyeryayasout said:

I barely play competitive shooters online anymore, but finally played Titanfall (360) for a bit last night. It looked okay, ran smoothly for the most part, and was fun. I think if MS could have secured X1 exclusivity for the title it would have made a bigger impact as far as SW goes, and in the real world MS would have sold more X1's due to the exclusivity. As it stood, most people were happy to play on their 360's and PC's that they already own. I doubt it had the impact that MS was hoping it had on X1 sales, that's for sure.

It's utter trash on the 360, and I honestly believe it effected the overall perception of Titanfall ... we're talking about a 70+ million install base full of FPS players, yet somehow it only managed to hit around 500 to 700K??

No doubt in my mind word of mouth played a huge role, and both EA and MS dropped the ball in releasing a blatantly half assed product on the market.

Side note.

How can Gamespot sit there and say this ...

"Titanfall still thrives on the Xbox 360 and delivers the same competitive thrills"

-No, just no. The FR is atrocious on the 360 with continual screen tearing and the absolute worst texture work this gen. Seriously, where are the freakin textures?? It's ridiculous that Gamespot can call the 360 version a 9, absolutely ridiculous.

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#227  Edited By W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

@W1NGMAN- said:

@getyeryayasout said:

I barely play competitive shooters online anymore, but finally played Titanfall (360) for a bit last night. It looked okay, ran smoothly for the most part, and was fun. I think if MS could have secured X1 exclusivity for the title it would have made a bigger impact as far as SW goes, and in the real world MS would have sold more X1's due to the exclusivity. As it stood, most people were happy to play on their 360's and PC's that they already own. I doubt it had the impact that MS was hoping it had on X1 sales, that's for sure.

It's utter trash on the 360, and I honestly believe it effected the overall perception of Titanfall ... we're talking about a 70+ million install base full of FPS players, yet somehow it only managed to hit around 500 to 700K??

No doubt in my mind word of mouth played a huge role, and both EA and MS dropped the ball in releasing a blatantly half assed product on the market.

I'll be fair... You're both full of speculation. The 360 version reviewed well according to MC.

I'm currently playing the 360 version, my roommate owns the X1 version. I was one of the people skeptical that there would be any difference whats so ever. It truly blows my mind how bad the 360 version is, it's honestly the ugliest game I played all of last gen.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#229  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

@W1NGMAN- said:

I'm currently playing the 360 version, my roommate owns the X1 version. I was one of the people skeptical that there would be any difference whats so ever. It truly blows my mind how bad the 360 version is, it's honestly the ugliest game I played all of last gen.

Dude, I don't doubt it. It's ugly as balls on the X1. Still, it doesn't prove your point... That being said, the person you responded to didn't either, so **** it :P

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#231 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

@W1NGMAN- said:

I'm currently playing the 360 version, my roommate owns the X1 version. I was one of the people skeptical that there would be any difference whats so ever. It truly blows my mind how bad the 360 version is, it's honestly the ugliest game I played all of last gen.

Dude, I don't doubt it. It's ugly as balls on the X1. Still, it doesn't prove your point... That being said, the person you responded to didn't either, so **** it :P

Well obviously I can't prove my point, the purpose of this entire thread really is to speculate. Facts are Titanfall didn't sell amazing considering the type of hype and money that went into promoting it, and it didn't have an impact like MS would have hoped. I'm just trying to get an understanding as to why ... and my why is the release of the 360 version.

No point in a forum if you're strictly talking facts.

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#233 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

@getyeryayasout said:

@lundy86_4: I wasn't trying to prove a point and the thread is pretty well asking us to speculate. Quit breakin' balls. :P

When do the textures eventually fully load? I've gone full matches with no textures :/

Avatar image for trugs26
trugs26

7541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#235 trugs26
Member since 2004 • 7541 Posts

Titanfall's legacy will probably be defined by its multi-platform sequels. This is just the beginning.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#236  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

@Animal-Mother said:

March came and went and with it came some awesome games. Mainly Titanfall. It scored a 9.0 here and has an average of 86 on metacritic.

Nonetheless Titanfall went on to be the best selling game of March but was swiftly dethroned by Infamous in April being the best selling Next generation game ( Why do people still say that. We're in the generation son).

But did it really set the world on fire like people expected?

Titanfall came and went and so did the clamor around it. It moved an ok number of Xbox Ones in March but still failed to beat the PS4.

And then April came and Titanfall seemed hit a brick wall in moving large amount of XB1s. With sales peaking at 115K

So what is Titanfalls legacy? I've played it and while it's great nonetheless I feel like Respawn missed a golden opportunity making it MP Only. It's loads of fun and should be given a shot. But where does it stand in the history of games? Especially with the MASSIVE amount of hype it had.It seemingly came and went and didn't do much else than have people clamoring for the better half of a year. It certainly didn't set the world on fire and certainly wasn't that knock out AAA the one absolutely needed to move consoles.

So where does it stand to you guys? Is it another game that falls into the ether and have subsequent sequels that sell a million and call it a day? Or does Titanfall find a way to rise above the rest and really make a name for itself?

No it didnt set the world on fire ... period.

I feel hype victim myself ... I paid for PC version and i dont even play anymore. Good game but just that... Good... nothing to be THAT hyped for .. its just an okish game

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237  Edited By Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
@Dire_Weasel said:

It's definitely an enjoyable new IP but the sequel needs a single-player campaign.

I don't get this desire for a 4 hour long quick-time events. Which is what people want and what devs would have made for this game.

Avatar image for Sweenix
Sweenix

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#238 Sweenix
Member since 2013 • 5957 Posts

@WeepsForFools said:

@Sweenix:

You are truly ignorant if you think Titanfall only sold a little more than 1.2 million worldwide. Like, staggeringly ignorant.

Do you have figures or a source to back your claim up? because atleast i'm using a source

Avatar image for ShadowHawk676
ShadowHawk676

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 ShadowHawk676
Member since 2012 • 111 Posts

It was another bland FPS game, I think people are getting sick of shooters. I know I am.

Avatar image for melonfarmerz
melonfarmerz

1294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#241 melonfarmerz
Member since 2014 • 1294 Posts

Titanfall did quite a bit. For instance, it was very successful at being a lot funner than Infamous

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#242 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38065 Posts

@Floppy_Jim said:

@locopatho said:

Fantastic game. The real way of seeing how good it is: look at all the cows crying about it. Same with Gears last gen: PC/360 game that they spent the whole gen crying and calling shit... cos it was SO FUCKING GOOD :D

@Floppy_Jim said:

Is that the game people wouldn't shut up about from May 2013 until March 2014 and then suddenly no one seemed to talk about anymore?

Because we bought it and played the shit out of it.

Wouldn't that increase the amount of talk about the game though?

I don't post while playing. I love the game, loved the Hype thread Cow DC, and still play it. I still play Left Behind DLC for TLOU but don't talk about it. I guess that game is shit then.

Avatar image for mrxboxone
MrXboxOne

799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#243 MrXboxOne
Member since 2013 • 799 Posts

Just so we are clear, Titanfall is still the most played next gen title for either X1 and PS4 since it's first week. Let that sink in.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#244  Edited By mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

Titanfall is like the most controversial game , man the opinions toward this game has been so various u know i've never been in a dilemma of buying a game like this....having read the comments here , i might not get it.

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#245 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@Floppy_Jim said:

@locopatho said:

Fantastic game. The real way of seeing how good it is: look at all the cows crying about it. Same with Gears last gen: PC/360 game that they spent the whole gen crying and calling shit... cos it was SO FUCKING GOOD :D

@Floppy_Jim said:

Is that the game people wouldn't shut up about from May 2013 until March 2014 and then suddenly no one seemed to talk about anymore?

Because we bought it and played the shit out of it.

Wouldn't that increase the amount of talk about the game though?

I don't post while playing. I love the game, loved the Hype thread Cow DC, and still play it. I still play Left Behind DLC for TLOU but don't talk about it. I guess that game is shit then.

Well no, I assume you only have one pair of hands and eyes http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131120001458/elderscrolls/images/f/f0/Facepalm.gif

Avatar image for Kell_the_Gamer
Kell_the_Gamer

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246  Edited By Kell_the_Gamer
Member since 2012 • 885 Posts

@Animal-Mother: "Did Titanfall really do anything?" It got a few people download Origin

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247  Edited By opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

I personally believe titanfall is a pretty fun game, and did a good job of trying to combine competitive and arena based FPS together. I would say it did not just come and go. Titanfall is still on the top of most sales charts, and is brought up in a lot of threads, even this thread itself shows titanfall had an obvious impact being really the only game this gen to have a 5 page and growing thread several months after release.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#248  Edited By cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38065 Posts

@Floppy_Jim said:

@cainetao11 said:

@Floppy_Jim said:

@locopatho said:

Fantastic game. The real way of seeing how good it is: look at all the cows crying about it. Same with Gears last gen: PC/360 game that they spent the whole gen crying and calling shit... cos it was SO FUCKING GOOD :D

@Floppy_Jim said:

Is that the game people wouldn't shut up about from May 2013 until March 2014 and then suddenly no one seemed to talk about anymore?

Because we bought it and played the shit out of it.

Wouldn't that increase the amount of talk about the game though?

I don't post while playing. I love the game, loved the Hype thread Cow DC, and still play it. I still play Left Behind DLC for TLOU but don't talk about it. I guess that game is shit then.

Well no, I assume you only have one pair of hands and eyes

Was referring to the comment "bought it and played the shit out of it". I was too busy playing to post about it.

Avatar image for RimacBugatti
RimacBugatti

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#249  Edited By RimacBugatti
Member since 2013 • 1632 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide: I had already packed away my Xbone and was considering taking it back out for Titanfall but I decided against it as it didn't look at all exciting. Thanks for eassuring me that I did the right thing. So long Xbone. :)

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#250 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

@cainetao11: Reminds me of the "If faction X has so many games then why are they posting here?" argument, as if people could not possibly have time to do both. But w/e. Enjoy the game.