Sub-HD textures on a next-gen system? Man, that's some serious Grade A BS.
$500!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Thing is, Sony never said that the added GDDR5 was going to make games look better. MS said the Cloud would enhance games like we've never seen. You mention that devs aren't utilising it but least we know that its there if they need it. So far, we have yet to see a real demonstration of what the Cloud can do. TitanFall is a massive boon for MS yet for all the touted cloud features, well where are they?[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]
You mean like how the use of 8GB GDDR5 should be visible in PS4 games straight away?
Oh wait ... devs have been saying they aren't close to utilising it all yet.
Come on, I know some of you guys aren't this stupid. Respawn have said they're only scratching the surface in regards to using the cloud.
RR360DD
And it is. Have you seen anything like Drivatar AI done before in a racer?
If the rumours of the new Halo are true, it will make huge use of the cloud. Just because the cloud is there doesn't mean every single game will tap it out, why would you expect such a thing. Respawn have said it will handle AI and physics, so why don't we wait and see when the game is finished if thats the case.
Lets not forget cows keep bring up that 35% drive club bullshit :lol:
"Wait and see",how poignant. Respawn can say all they want about AI and Physics but currently they can't be seen and for a game that has a lot riding on it that is not good.Uhh FM5 looks like an incredible game. It must be hard for you fanboys to keep your jealousy in check over the other factions games. Meanwhile, us manticores enjoy all that the gaming industry has to offer. :cool: Not really, FM5 once again like Titanfall has static foliage, no swaying trees, prebaked shadows and lighting, no dynamic weather and very limited track. It's just last gen in 1080p that's it.[QUOTE="gpuking"]Lemmings should just give it up, it would only make yourself look more stupid by fighting this loosing war. Pick another game like Ryse or Forza, at least they are native 1080p even though both still look like ass crack next to PS4 games.22Toothpicks
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] It's the only response to your obvious BS. Next time instead of hyping PR BS, wait for stuff to actually show so you don't look stupid.Chutebox
"It's the only response because I'm butthurt"
Yeah, just what I thought chute.
I'm looking forward to the release of this game.
Perhaps take your own advice and wait for stuff to actualy be disproven before you bash it so you don't look so stupid.
:cool:
Never said you were butthurt. Come on. So me asking for proof of this cloud, not seeing it, then calling you on your BS makes me look stupid? Ya, you're a tool man. I know you can do better."So me asking for proof of this cloud, not seeing it"
Thats an unreasonable request when the games a year from release, and you know it.
Do we have any idea what way TitanFall was networked at E3? Or hold old the build was? Heck, it could've been LAN.
Come on ...
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Thing is, Sony never said that the added GDDR5 was going to make games look better. MS said the Cloud would enhance games like we've never seen. You mention that devs aren't utilising it but least we know that its there if they need it. So far, we have yet to see a real demonstration of what the Cloud can do. TitanFall is a massive boon for MS yet for all the touted cloud features, well where are they? clyde46
And it is. Have you seen anything like Drivatar AI done before in a racer?
If the rumours of the new Halo are true, it will make huge use of the cloud. Just because the cloud is there doesn't mean every single game will tap it out, why would you expect such a thing. Respawn have said it will handle AI and physics, so why don't we wait and see when the game is finished if thats the case.
Lets not forget cows keep bring up that 35% drive club bullshit :lol:
"Wait and see",how poignant. Respawn can say all they want about AI and Physics but currently they can't be seen and for a game that has a lot riding on it that is not good."that is not good."
Actually its totally meaningless. If it can't be seen when the game is actually out there and being played, then come back to me.
"Wait and see",how poignant. Respawn can say all they want about AI and Physics but currently they can't be seen and for a game that has a lot riding on it that is not good.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]
And it is. Have you seen anything like Drivatar AI done before in a racer?
If the rumours of the new Halo are true, it will make huge use of the cloud. Just because the cloud is there doesn't mean every single game will tap it out, why would you expect such a thing. Respawn have said it will handle AI and physics, so why don't we wait and see when the game is finished if thats the case.
Lets not forget cows keep bring up that 35% drive club bullshit :lol:
RR360DD
"that is not good."
Actually its totally meaningless. If it can't be seen when the game is actually out there and being played, then come back to me.
Going by that logic, you can't say shit about Drive Club then.[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="clyde46"] "Wait and see",how poignant. Respawn can say all they want about AI and Physics but currently they can't be seen and for a game that has a lot riding on it that is not good. clyde46
"that is not good."
Actually its totally meaningless. If it can't be seen when the game is actually out there and being played, then come back to me.
Going by that logic, you can't say shit about Drive Club then.I never do. I only bring it up in response to idiots like tormento who foam at the mouth with hypocrisy
Going by that logic, you can't say shit about Drive Club then.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]
"that is not good."
Actually its totally meaningless. If it can't be seen when the game is actually out there and being played, then come back to me.
RR360DD
I never do. I only bring it up in response to idiots like tormento who foam at the mouth with hypocrisy
:lol:
Think I'm done here.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="clyde46"] Going by that logic, you can't say shit about Drive Club then. Chutebox
I never do. I only bring it up in response to idiots like tormento who foam at the mouth with hypocrisy
:lol:
Think I'm done here.
Good. It was getting boring.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]:lol: petition, cows favourite pastime I'll allow it.[QUOTE="nyzma23"]
you better sign this petition cows to make titanfall available at ps4 :lol:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/titanfallfortheps4/signatures
clyde46
Why would anyone want that piece of lowtech?
The Division will be available for both platforms and looks 100x better!
"While 60fps is inevitably a slam-dunk for the Source engine if the active hardware here is indeed a PC, it's curious to see Respawn's shorter two-minute trailer, which precedes the gameplay demo, struggling to reach 50fps in spots and showing clearly the devastating effects of double-buffer v-sync when frame rendering runs over the ultra-tight 16.67ms budget. This trailer cuts together a montage of clips to show off more intensive, cinematic scenes alongside gameplay from new levels, where those featuring heavy effects work and broader draw distances visibly suffer from stutter. With one close-up of a Titan descending to just 40fps..."
Power of the Cloud, guys. What a joke.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="tormentos"]
At least Killzone look next gen and not like a 360 game..:lol:
And Forza 5 to hit 60FPS had to turn off everything,is basically a last gen game at 60fps 1080p,Drive club at 35% done is already doing more..:lol:
DragonfireXZ95
You mean drive club with its washe out textures and low detailed cars? 35% done and its a launch game?! Rushed game confirmed :lol:
What a disaster
Here we go, again. Consolites fighting against each other in a test to see who has the shittier graphics. :roll:Lol, I don't know why Hermits are so eager to get in a rivalry about consoles. No one cares about PC yet you guys constantly try to be a part of arguments here. I feel sorry for you guys. You're like the guy in the room flailing his arms around going like "oh oh look at me, Plz pay attention to me".
[QUOTE="blackace"]
[QUOTE="Tessellation"]But cows last week bashed digital foundry and said they know nothing and they get paid by MS now is flip flopping time :cool: dat basement dwellers logicDouevenlift_bro
It's pretty funny because Digital Foundry did a hands on with the PS4 games and showed how bad Killzone, Drive Club, Knack, Thief & AC4 ran on the PS4.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-playstation-4
None of these games are running at 1080p 60FPS like many of the XBox One games. If the PS4 is so much more powerful, ALL their games should be running at 1080p @60fps, but they aren't. Not even their racing game. Cows really need to worry about their own poorly made games.
Come here boy!
You should be in hiding :lol:
The truth hurts, I know. lol!! You should go back to Fantasy Land. I think the elfs and minions miss you. Stupid Cows!![QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Stuff like that should be visible, its the calling card of the Xbox One. The Cloud etc. If a team from DF can't see the benefits then they aren't any. Chutebox
You mean like how the use of 8GB GDDR5 should be visible in PS4 games straight away?
Oh wait ... devs have been saying they aren't close to utilising it all yet.
Come on, I know some of you guys aren't this stupid. Respawn have said they're only scratching the surface in regards to using the cloud.
You're such a tool. Respawn did say that and DF reviews of PS4 games weren't great either. These PS4 were supposedly using actually PS4 devkits. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-playstation-4 You would think these devs would utilize all the power of the GDDR5 Ram so these games can all run at 60fps with no lag. Unfortunately, that's not the case for most PS4 exclusives.[QUOTE="ManatuBeard"]
[QUOTE="clyde46"] I'll allow it. RR360DD
Why would anyone want that piece of lowtech?
The Division will be available for both platforms and looks 100x better!
Hyping the division
:lol:
idiot
Poor RR360DD... ran out of arguments and its so angry that its little titanfall is a titanfail so now uses its last card, insults....
Here we go, again. Consolites fighting against each other in a test to see who has the shittier graphics. :roll:[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]
You mean drive club with its washe out textures and low detailed cars? 35% done and its a launch game?! Rushed game confirmed :lol:
What a disaster
Sagemode87
Lol, I don't know why Hermits are so eager to get in a rivalry about consoles. No one cares about PC yet you guys constantly try to be a part of arguments here. I feel sorry for you guys. You're like the guy in the room flailing his arms around going like "oh oh look at me, Plz pay attention to me".
That's exactly how I picture it. They strive for attention because no one is paying them any mind. lol!! You really can't compare a PC game with a console game since the technology isn't close to being the same. Also PC's can be upgraded on the fly and console hardware can't (except for the HDD). So PC and console comparison is really irrelevant. They should be happy they are even included in the exclusive category.[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]You're such a tool. Respawn did say that and DF reviews of PS4 games weren't great either. These PS4 were supposedly using actually PS4 devkits. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-playstation-4 You would think these devs would utilize all the power of the GDDR5 Ram so these games can all run at 60fps with no lag. Unfortunately, that's not the case for most PS4 exclusives.You mean like how the use of 8GB GDDR5 should be visible in PS4 games straight away?
Oh wait ... devs have been saying they aren't close to utilising it all yet.
Come on, I know some of you guys aren't this stupid. Respawn have said they're only scratching the surface in regards to using the cloud.
blackace
Personally i dont need 60fps.
I also dont understand why limit options to 30fps or 60fps. There are alternatives that have been used with success current gen.
Devs can opt for a middle-term , a non "standard" 45fps (with or without v-sync), or even variable framerate between 30-60 with triple buffer to prevent tear. I dont see a need for exact 60fps every single second, anything above stable 30 gives good gameplay.
Im sure the PS4 game shown will be optimized still... the last thing done in a game is those optimizations.
Respawn did say that and DF reviews of PS4 games weren't great either. These PS4 were supposedly using actually PS4 devkits. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-playstation-4 You would think these devs would utilize all the power of the GDDR5 Ram so these games can all run at 60fps with no lag. Unfortunately, that's not the case for most PS4 exclusives.[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] You're such a tool.ManatuBeard
Personally i dont need 60fps.
I also dont understand why limit options to 30fps or 60fps. There are alternatives that have been used with success current gen.
Devs can opt for a middle-term , a non "standard" 45fps (with or without v-sync), or even variable framerate between 30-60 with triple buffer to prevent tear. I dont see a need for exact 60fps every single second, anything above stable 30 gives good gameplay.
Im sure the PS4 game shown will be optimized still... the last thing done in a game is those optimizations.
Why do you think CoD is so popular. One big reason is its silky smooth gameplay, largely attributed to it running at 60fps.
Its something the ex-IW devs believe in, and considering TitanFall will be a faster game than CoD, that 60fps is pretty much essential. Not all games need 60, but in this game 30fps would just lower the quality.
Here we go, again. Consolites fighting against each other in a test to see who has the shittier graphics. :roll:[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]
You mean drive club with its washe out textures and low detailed cars? 35% done and its a launch game?! Rushed game confirmed :lol:
What a disaster
Sagemode87
Lol, I don't know why Hermits are so eager to get in a rivalry about consoles. No one cares about PC yet you guys constantly try to be a part of arguments here. I feel sorry for you guys. You're like the guy in the room flailing his arms around going like "oh oh look at me, Plz pay attention to me".
And yet again, when the PC is involved, graphics don't matter to consolites. Do you peasants ever come up with anything original?[QUOTE="uninspiredcup"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Graphics make a game do they? TitanFall looks great, I'd much rather take silky smooth 60fps gameplay that the ex-IW guys are known for instead of input-lag ridden, all flash no substance Clownzone
:lol:
I mean the fact TitanFall is running on the ancient Source engine should be indication enough that this is a dev studio NOT trying to woo people over with just pretty graphics. Don't be so shallow.
RR360DD
Dont worry, since it's ex-infinityward, the gamwplay will bw shallow as well.
Soo much butthurt so far before release
Can't wait to see the meltdowns next year when this starts getting AAA after AAA
:cool:
But that would be irrelevent around here as only gamespot scores matter(see : TLoU):lol:
[QUOTE="silversix_"]This game looks to be the next MAG but instead of 64 players it'll be 7v7 :lol: wth RespawnRR360DD
Using your login, MAG is one of the best games ever :lol:
Your opinion is now invalid LOL
Not sure where you bring that "login" but i clearly said IF MAPS ARE WELL DESIGNED. MAG was shit, Titanfall looks to be as mediocre (both of those titles share ugly graphics but at least MAG had a reason, Titanfall has none LOL 7v7 and that ugly). BF3=64 players, great physics, released in 2011, awesome graphics. Titanfall=7v7 LOL, hahaha graphics, sub HD, none existent physics and its for 2014!!!!!! 2014!~!!!! I bet graphics were downgraded when they dropped DRM, cloud doesn't tape 4 X1's together anymore :cry:Another game on Xbox one doing 60 fps and still none for the PS4.CanYouDigltIm trying to figure why a game that looks this crappy is dropping to 40 fps. I guess they didn't have a enough clouds in the sky for the xb1 to call down the power of like 8000 xb1s
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Another game on Xbox one doing 60 fps and still none for the PS4.shinko28Im trying to figure why a game that looks this crappy is dropping to 40 fps. I guess they didn't have a enough clouds in the sky for the xb1 to call down the power of like 8000 xb1sSir, do you know how many clouds it takes for 300k servers? A lot. So calm down.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]This game looks to be the next MAG but instead of 64 players it'll be 7v7 :lol: wth Respawnsilversix_
Using your login, MAG is one of the best games ever :lol:
Your opinion is now invalid LOL
Not sure where you bring that "login" but i clearly said IF MAPS ARE WELL DESIGNED. MAG was shit, Titanfall looks to be as mediocre (both of those titles share ugly graphics but at least MAG had a reason, Titanfall has none LOL 7v7 and that ugly). BF3=64 players, great physics, released in 2011, awesome graphics. Titanfall=7v7 LOL, hahaha graphics, sub HD, none existent physics and its for 2014!!!!!! 2014!~!!!! I bet graphics were downgraded when they dropped DRM, cloud doesn't tape 4 X1's together anymore :cry:And what I'm saying is that more players doesn't equal better. A game that designed around 4v4 can be just as fun as a game designed around 32v32
so #dealwithit :lol:
Not sure where you bring that "login" but i clearly said IF MAPS ARE WELL DESIGNED. MAG was shit, Titanfall looks to be as mediocre (both of those titles share ugly graphics but at least MAG had a reason, Titanfall has none LOL 7v7 and that ugly). BF3=64 players, great physics, released in 2011, awesome graphics. Titanfall=7v7 LOL, hahaha graphics, sub HD, none existent physics and its for 2014!!!!!! 2014!~!!!! I bet graphics were downgraded when they dropped DRM, cloud doesn't tape 4 X1's together anymore :cry:[QUOTE="silversix_"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Using your login, MAG is one of the best games ever :lol:
Your opinion is now invalid LOL
RR360DD
And what I'm saying is that more players doesn't equal better. A game that designed around 4v4 can be just as fun as a game designed around 32v32
so #dealwithit :lol:
I'm not the one that has to deal with it, you're the one who's gonna deal with it, 7v7 last last LAST gen standards. a 2v2 or 4v4 has its place, yes BUT this game has mechs for ultimate chaos and its 7v7? :lol: its like BF4 being 12v12, so bs. I guess X1 can't handle this very advanced next gen engine such as Source and 7v7 is the limit this game can run on X1, what a shame.Not sure where you bring that "login" but i clearly said IF MAPS ARE WELL DESIGNED. MAG was shit, Titanfall looks to be as mediocre (both of those titles share ugly graphics but at least MAG had a reason, Titanfall has none LOL 7v7 and that ugly). BF3=64 players, great physics, released in 2011, awesome graphics. Titanfall=7v7 LOL, hahaha graphics, sub HD, none existent physics and its for 2014!!!!!! 2014!~!!!! I bet graphics were downgraded when they dropped DRM, cloud doesn't tape 4 X1's together anymore :cry:[QUOTE="silversix_"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Using your login, MAG is one of the best games ever :lol:
Your opinion is now invalid LOL
RR360DD
And what I'm saying is that more players doesn't equal better. A game that designed around 4v4 can be just as fun as a game designed around 32v32
so #dealwithit :lol:
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Not sure where you bring that "login" but i clearly said IF MAPS ARE WELL DESIGNED. MAG was shit, Titanfall looks to be as mediocre (both of those titles share ugly graphics but at least MAG had a reason, Titanfall has none LOL 7v7 and that ugly). BF3=64 players, great physics, released in 2011, awesome graphics. Titanfall=7v7 LOL, hahaha graphics, sub HD, none existent physics and its for 2014!!!!!! 2014!~!!!! I bet graphics were downgraded when they dropped DRM, cloud doesn't tape 4 X1's together anymore :cry:
silversix_
And what I'm saying is that more players doesn't equal better. A game that designed around 4v4 can be just as fun as a game designed around 32v32
so #dealwithit :lol:
I'm not the one that has to deal with it, you're the one who's gonna deal with it, 7v7 last last LAST gen standards. a 2v2 or 4v4 has its place, yes BUT this game has mechs for ultimate chaos and its 7v7? :lol: its like BF4 being 12v12, so bs. I guess X1 can't handle this very advanced next gen engine such as Source and 7v7 is the limit this game can run on X1, what a shame.I don't have to deal with anything, I'll be playing BF4 this holiday and love it! Funny how I can enoy games with 64 players, and then enjoy games with as low as 8 players huh?
7v7 is last gen standards yet its winning all these awards. Riiight :lol:
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Not sure where you bring that "login" but i clearly said IF MAPS ARE WELL DESIGNED. MAG was shit, Titanfall looks to be as mediocre (both of those titles share ugly graphics but at least MAG had a reason, Titanfall has none LOL 7v7 and that ugly). BF3=64 players, great physics, released in 2011, awesome graphics. Titanfall=7v7 LOL, hahaha graphics, sub HD, none existent physics and its for 2014!!!!!! 2014!~!!!! I bet graphics were downgraded when they dropped DRM, cloud doesn't tape 4 X1's together anymore :cry:
Zidaneski
And what I'm saying is that more players doesn't equal better. A game that designed around 4v4 can be just as fun as a game designed around 32v32
so #dealwithit :lol:
Don't buy into the crap youtube screengrabs people are posting on here. Download the 1080p 60fps footage from E3 (you can get it at eurogamer) and watch it in all its glory. Its not the best looking game ever, but its certainly not bad looking.
I'm not the one that has to deal with it, you're the one who's gonna deal with it, 7v7 last last LAST gen standards. a 2v2 or 4v4 has its place, yes BUT this game has mechs for ultimate chaos and its 7v7? :lol: its like BF4 being 12v12, so bs. I guess X1 can't handle this very advanced next gen engine such as Source and 7v7 is the limit this game can run on X1, what a shame.[QUOTE="silversix_"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
And what I'm saying is that more players doesn't equal better. A game that designed around 4v4 can be just as fun as a game designed around 32v32
so #dealwithit :lol:
RR360DD
I don't have to deal with anything, I'll be playing BF4 this holiday and love it! Funny how I can enoy games with 64 players, and then enjoy games with as low as 8 players huh?
7v7 is last gen standards yet its winning all these awards. Riiight :lol:
Winning awards at being the ugliest game shown for next gen platforms and i had no idea it won 6 of those :lol:Oh of course. To me a good game is a good game. I think TitanFall looks amazing, but everything comes down to gameplay is what I'm getting at. I enjoyed MAG a lot, was in a clan and everything, it was epic. Even if by launch TitanFall doesn't reach uber levels of graphics it still comes down to gameplay.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]I'm not the one that has to deal with it, you're the one who's gonna deal with it, 7v7 last last LAST gen standards. a 2v2 or 4v4 has its place, yes BUT this game has mechs for ultimate chaos and its 7v7? :lol: its like BF4 being 12v12, so bs. I guess X1 can't handle this very advanced next gen engine such as Source and 7v7 is the limit this game can run on X1, what a shame.
silversix_
I don't have to deal with anything, I'll be playing BF4 this holiday and love it! Funny how I can enoy games with 64 players, and then enjoy games with as low as 8 players huh?
7v7 is last gen standards yet its winning all these awards. Riiight :lol:
Winning awards at being the ugliest game shown for next gen platforms and i had no idea it won 6 of those :lol:Annnnd here comes the DC
:lol:
Shhh bro, no more tears
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment